What do you do when you need to change the news cycle? Burn a historic church!
WHAT DO YOU DO TO CHANGE THE NEWS CYCLE SO PEOPLE OVERLOOK WHAT THOSE PHOTOS REALLY MEAN? BURN THE WORLD’S MOST IMPORTANT CHURCH, WHERE THE CROWN OF THORNS WORN BY JESUS WAS.
NOT SO DEAR MACRON: IF THAT CATHEDRAL IS NOT FULLY RESTORED IN TWO YEARS, YOU BURNED IT AND WANT IT GONE, PERIOD. “Decades” for repair is BULL.
This is 2019, not 1019, ONE CRANE can be set up in a day and ensure that job is finished STAT.
HERE WE GO! “Experts” claim it will “take decades” to repair Notre Dame Cathedral
FACT: If you gave that job to Donald Trump, it would be finished in a year flat and stand for another 800 years NO SWEAT.
Modern tech could have that thing better than new in NO TIME if someone wanted to do it quickly and price was no problem. You can bet that price is NO PROBLEM. Anyone claiming it has to take decades to fix it is setting the precedent for it never opening again, just like I said below in the post about Macron vowing to rebuild it when I called B.S. on that. He wants it torn down, no if’s or buts. Every last thing about that cathedral is known, down to the final letter. They know how to replace that roof already. Every last thing in that cathedral is no doubt already in CAD. Any major construction firm could take that data and punch up a perfect repair schedule in a week flat. Decades to fix it? THAT’S BULLSHIT.
I did not know the actual crown of thorns Jesus wore was in Notre Dame Cathedral
Guess what? The fire department Chaplain ran into the cathedral while it was burning, and saved the crown of thorns. Some people were worried it was destroyed. As it turns out, it was not destroyed.
If he had done that in the United States, he’d have been cited for a “work place safety violation” and FIRED. Kudos to the brave man!
RUMOR REALLY IS “CIRCULATING THE KREMLIN” THAT PUTIN HAS FORMALLY AND OFFICIALLY OFFERED TO HELP RESTORE NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL (https://translate.google.com.au/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/60300)
HA HA HA, Let’s see ANYONE attempt to get away with tearing it down now.
I put this request down here, to hopefully be overlooked by whoever is blocking financing for this site.
If you would like to help out, you probably know how. I don’t want to post terms a search function will find. We only need about $280 more to get by this month. Do not send large amounts (over $30) because doing so encourages theft. Thanks!
Notre Dame Cathedral artistically shown as collapsing in I Pet Goat 2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6nE5mF16Dw), and This movie has a reference to the cathedral not being there anymore (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r13wDQ7F8EA).
OUT TAKE: Muslims did not burn that Cathedral if the exact scenario it suffered was in I Pet Goat2, (including the spire collapse) and just like 911, movies referenced it’s destruction beforehand.
Go over the photos. Assange looks like he’s been fruitified (https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=julian+assange&qft=+filterui:age-lt10080&form=IRFLTR&first=1&cw=1134&ch=747).
Assange probably got removed from the embassy for two and a half years, got erased by drugs and shock treatment, and returned for the “arrest” scene while Ecuador played it’s part for 4+ billion. Look at how different Assange’s root existence changed. The body is the same, the mind is not. And it is obvious enough to need him out of the news ASAP. I have drastically changed the for/against “legitimacy” post below, it has now become obvious the entire Assange cover story is a full on sham. Scroll down to that, because the following has to be on top:
What do you do when you need to change the news cycle? Burn a historic church!
Dime to a dollar says that’s what we are looking at with Notre Dame Cathedral, the French government did it (probably with a little help from you know who) NO IFS OR BUTS.
UPDATE: Macron has supposedly “vowed to rebuild” Notre Dame Cathedral
I CALL BULLSHIT. Let’s see THAT happen. The only way it will happen is if the only possible reasons for burning it to begin with were:
1. To distract the news cycle.
2. To cause a religion war and Macron got busted.
Perhaps Macron is backing off because the very FIRST thing to hit the alt media news cycle in a big way was that the Mossad burned the cathedral. If that’s where alt media took it right from the get-go, obviously the best thing to do is apologize and REBUILD IT. MACRON HAS BEEN PEGGED AS THE GUY THAT HAD IT BURNED QUITE NICELY, SEE THE FOLLOWING:
Another Notre Dame Cathedral fire update: Perpetrators pegged with 90+ percent probability
TO THOSE OF YOU IN ALT MEDIA SAYING THE MOSSAD DID THIS, HERE’S A NICE LITTLE TIDBIT THAT BASICALLY CINCHES IT: WHILE THE CATHEDRAL WAS STILL BURNING, MACRON STATED THE CAUSE OF THE FIRE WAS NOT ARSON.
Do you know how long arson investigations sometimes last? Sometimes, a year or more. You can’t say the cause of a fire was not arson when it is still too hot to go in and look at a single thing. This means, with Macron claiming what he did, that the fire was virtually assured to have been a targeted hit, done with Macron’s approval and that it WAS ARSON.
Would the Mossad do it for Macron? YEP.
Go over the reports. A large number of them have arson ruled out as a cause. That’s IMPOSSIBLE, the perpetrators of this event are part of the government if arson is already “ruled out”. Is there a demolition scheduled?, JUST WATCH: There’s little damage to the actual interior, the fire looks bad but it was contained to only the roof and the steeple that collapsed, and whatever the steeple fell on below. Firefighters were gunning water into the bottom so fiercely that even the candles survived. The church is miraculously mostly intact. Let’s wait and see if the cathedral is ordered to be demolished, despite being practically undamaged, except for an easily replaced roof.
UPDATE: Notre Dame Cathedral mostly unscathed by the massive fire (even the candles made it) UNBELIEVABLE, SEE THIS: https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1117922854715236352.
Did a divine hand save this church, or was it simply the way it was made? The lack of damage to the actual interior is astonishing. There is not even extensive smoke damage.
Notre Dame Cathedral rumors:
Thus far it is only rumor, but rumor has it that the Mossad burned it down. I am not kidding, that really is the rumor. Purportedly to frame Muslims. I am not going to get onto this topic much, but will say it makes perfect sense. First of all, Muslims held the keys to many of the churches in Jerusalem for hundreds of years on end when there were not enough Christians to use them, and guarded the churches perfectly, despite them being Christian.
I find it highly plausible that the Mossad burned the cathedral down either to frame Muslims or, if the cathedral is ordered demolished or never gets permits to re-open, to strike out Christian roots. It is, as far as I see it, a good thing the story drifted to “the mossad did it” so quickly. BECAUSE: Silverstein said pull it, and building 7 fell simply because it was grief stricken over the deaths of towers 1 and 2. Five guys danced. Had a cool pain job on the van too. It is a good idea to question the Mossad for Notre Dame, because the basements of the WTC exploded before the planes hit, and when the towers fell, there were demolition sprites at regular intervals during the collapse, plus obviously shape charge cut debris, and well, you know. Not Muslims.
If the Mossad burning down the Notre Dame Cathedral hits alt media mainstream, I’ll be doing the snoopy dance because after all, WHO WANTS CHRISTIANITY DESTROYED? Just ask your nearest luciferian, or your nearest feminist leader, or your nearest communist. Gee, they are backed predominantly by the same people who backed the Mossad, Muslims don’t hate Christians, – in fact, Muslims know Christ is going to return again for the 1000 year reign, that AINT MOHAMMED, who are those claiming Muslims despise Christians trying to fool?
FACT: Muslims did not burn down the Notre Dame Cathedral. Heck, maybe it was burned down because people can obviously see the root existence of Julian Assange has been wiped out. He looks like sentient vegetable Assange, 90 percent brain damaged. I am perfectly game for: Assange was removed the night of October 16/17 2016, vegetablized and homogenized, and then returned for a final showing when the time was right, for a 4+ bil payoff. That would explain everything, including poop on the walls. And the pictures sure look the part, he’s a smiling veggie boy now. No Wikileaks dead man switch either. TIME TO REMOVE ASSANGE FROM THE NEWS CYCLE BEFORE PEOPLE REALLY LOOK INTO THIS, WHAT CAN WE DO . . . . . HMMMMM I GOT IT! Let’s give France a taste of 911!
Jim Stone Investigative Journalist, 16 april 2019
BLOCKBUSTER: PROVEN: Michelle Obama and other global elite burned Notre Dame Cathedral, and celebrated
This is going to be the top posted report for several days, and it will not drift down the page. If you link this, it will be what people see on top.
To get this all started: I had heard of Michelle Obama’s dinner cruise coinciding with the burning of the cathedral, but was not certain it would be possible to pin it down on her. As it turns out, it was possible to. Other people had already posted on this topic, but the work was done in a way that could be questioned as to how legit it was. So I set out to see if there was a way to actually pin it down, and there was a way. There is no doubt the elite New World Order crowd burned Notre Dame and celebrated, I have this sewn up in a body bag. Let’s get started.
First of all, let’s briefly cite the official story on Michelle Obama’s cruise, and then let’s put things in actual order and show what really happened. Here’s the official story:
“Michelle Obama was spotted on an idyllic dinner cruise in Paris on Monday night when she and the other guests learned that the nearby Notre Dame Cathedral had gone up in flames
The mood of passengers changed when news of the fire at Notre Dame filtered through. At one point during the cruise, Mrs Obama stared intently at a fellow passenger’s phone.”
OK, SO NOW I AM GOING TO SHOW YOU WHAT REALLY HAPPENED, AND IT IS ALL RECORDED IN THE WINE GLASSES. THIS IS NOT DEPENDENT ON THE “QUESTIONABLE”(not questionable really) MICHELLE OBAMA WINE GLASS PHOTO YOU MIGHT HAVE ALREADY SEEN, instead, it shows how people on the boat were reacting and socializing when they knew the cathedral was burning.
The cruise departed AFTER the cathedral was already hurling smoke into the sky. This is proven by the reflections in the wine glass in this photo which shows a rather happy Michelle Obama. You can’t see the actual cathedral in this photo yet because the dinner cruise is not close enough yet but they are all happy and they definitely know it is burning.
A little later in the cruise, we still have a very happy Michelle Obama, with the smoke from the burning cathedral still in her wine glass:
In this next photo (below), they are close to the burning cathedral, it is OBVIOUS WHAT THIS IS, and you can see the burning cathedral clearly reflected in Michelle’s wine glass. Other sites that found this only showed Michelle, and did not give the context which put all of this in doubt because after all, that photo could have been pasted onto that wine glass with a little photoshop. PROBLEM: This actually is an original photo that appeared in original form in THIS NEWS REPORT which proves it was not photoshop, that’s an actual photo in original form.
LOOK AT THE PEOPLE ON THIS YACHT. THEY ARE NOT SAD AT ALL THAT THE CATHEDRAL IS BURNING, AND THE LOOK ON MICHELLE’S FACE IS ONE OF VINDICATION. SHE’S NOT SAD, SHE’S VENGEFULLY SATISFIED. THIS CINCHES IT – THE CRUISE WAS DONE TO WATCH THE CATHEDRAL BURN. THE PEOPLE ON THE BOAT SET THIS UP.
And here is what Michelle was looking at, that was reflected in her wine glass:
All the news reports said Michelle did not get close enough to see the cathedral this way. I CALL BULLSHIT, the wine glass DID NOT LIE.
Why would they get close enough to witness it like this? It is called a “victory tour”.
IMPORTANT: The news report I linked does not quote what is shown in the pictures in order or accurately at all, the photo where they are right up to the burning cathedral with it clearly showing in her wine glass is supposed to be from before she knew it was burning according to the reports. Obviously whoever put the MSM report together thought that because the chinese girl is very happy in the background they did not know yet and whoever wrote the report can’t look at a damn wine glass and was too clueless to know they wanted this.
They are playing the “not let the site update” game again
As usual, this site is updated several times daily. If it gets stale, delete your cache or open a new private window, then reload. That still works. But they’ll “fix that” I am sure.
Jim Stone Investigative Journalist, 18 april 2019