Robin Cook – Resignation Statement, March 2003 + The Tap – Will There Ever Be an Investigation Into the Death of Robin Cook?

Resignation Statement, March 2003

Published on 22 feb. 2014

This recording is provided for viewing and research only. Not for broadcast for commercial use under any circumstances.


Will There Ever Be an Investigation Into the Death of Robin Cook?

I happened to notice that a week or so ago was the 10th anniversary of the death of the Labour MP and former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook.
An apparently fit and healthy Mr. Cook died in 2005 while walking on a remote Scottish mountainside, at the age of 59, and – according to the official statements – from a heart attack. Something tells me that the Chilcot Inquiry, whenever it eventually does emerge, will probably make no mention of Mr. Cook’s death.

The local police’s statement after Cook’s death was a little iffy, to say the least; “As this would appear to be a medical matter,” we were told, “there is no further police involvement.” And that was it – case closed, without a real investigation having been conducted.

Just as curious was the fact that the newspapers and news media didn’t seem particularly interested in investigating Cook’s death either and the matter seemed to be pushed to one side very quickly; which is odd when it concerns the death of a highly significant political figure and the man who had only very recently been the nation’s Foreign Secretary.

Robin Cook had died very suddenly, supposedly from a heart attack while on a countryside walk with his wife. But despite the media’s remarkably limited and unquestioning coverage of the matter, there were irregularities around the circumstances of Cook’s death. Cook was rushed to hospital by helicopter without his wife, who was not permitted to accompany him, even though he was still alive at that point. The helicopter, according to newspaper reports, had taken 30 minutes to arrive at the scene. As her husband was flown off, Mrs. Cook was left to walk all the way back down the Scottish mountainside on her own.

By the time she got to Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, her husband had already been pronounced dead. Gaynor Cook, his wife, has never spoken about the matter to this day, despite requests from various media organisations. The post mortem took two days to decide whether Mr. Cook “had died from an illness or injuries sustained in the fall”. The cause of death eventually settled on was ‘hypertensive heart disease’.

We were told that neither Mr. Cook or his wife were carrying mobile phones with them; which, though possible, seems odd, as this was only 2005 – not the early nineties.

There is also the matter of the unidentified group of ‘walkers’ who, according to official reporting, came to Gaynor Cook’s aid when her husband had collapsed in the highlands. It is, however, noted by some that it would’ve been unusual for such people to be around the area of Ben Stack where Mr. Cook had collapsed. The landlady of Scourie Lodge, where Robin Cook and his wife had spent their final night together, had said at the time, “She was lucky another walker was in the area to be with her at such a time. You could be on Ben Stack ninety times and not see a soul, so for someone to be within shouting distance and with a mobile phone was very fortunate.”
Which leads us to wonder whether these unidentified people may have been there at that time for a more specific reason and whether they may have been something more than friendly passers by.

Tony Blair, who was at that time still Prime Minister (and who had, some years earlier, demoted Cook to a lesser post for fear of Cook being a problem in regard to foreign policy), declined to attend Mr Cook’s funeral; the excuse given being that he was apparently busy with other matters at the time. It was Gordon Brown who gave the eulogy at Cook’s funeral service.

Cook (pictured on the right above), of course, had been one of the most ardent objectors to British involvement in the Iraq War. In fact he famously resigned from the Labour Party in protest over the decision to invade Iraq. “I have heard it said that Iraq has had not months but 12 years in which to complete disarmament and that our patience is exhausted,” Mr. Cook had said at the time, “yet it is more than 30 years since Resolution 242 called on Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories. We do not express the same impatience with the persistent refusal of Israel to comply.

He also later was open about his scepticism concerning the Al Qaeda narrative. “There were no international terrorists in Iraq until we went in. It was we who created the conditions for Al Qaeda to thrive,” he had said, refuting the idea that the US led invasion had been aimed at ‘fighting terrorism’. He was correct, of course; there had been no terrorism coming from Iraq prior to 2003, no extremist groups active in Iraq prior to 2003, and Iraq had had absolutely no connection to 9/11. Iraq, like Libya soon to follow, had been a stable, secular country until Western operations callously turned it into an Al Qaeda terrorist stronghold.
It was Robin Cook’s sense of ethics more than anything that had guided his protest against the Blair government’s war; that same sense of ethics had been present in much of Mr. Cook’s political career.

He was an early supporter of constitutional and electoral reform, and a supporter of unilateral nuclear disarmament. Among other things, Cook was responsible for the agreement between Britain and Iran that ended the Iranian death threat against the author Salman Rushdie, helping Britain and Iran to improve diplomatic relations. He is also the man most credited with having helped convince Gaddafi era Libya, after over eight years of resistance, to hand over the suspected Lockerbie bombers for a trial in the Netherlands (but crucially according to Scottish law). This Libyan extradition of the Lockerbie suspects (who it turns out were probably innocent anyway) was a major reason that Libya and the West were able to ‘reconcile’ for those brief few years, with the Gaddafi government becoming a key ally in the so-called ‘War on Terror’.

His openly stated desire to add “an ethical dimension” to British foreign policy didn’t only see him falling out with the Blair government over the Iraq War; in March 1998, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu angrily cancelled a dinner with Cook when the British Foreign Secretary did that rare thing (for a Western politician) and openly criticised illegal Israeli settlement building in Palestinian territory.

His opposition to the Iraq War was one of the key themes in his widely acclaimed book, The Point of Departure, which, among other things, discussed in diary form his efforts to persuade his colleagues, including Tony Blair, to distance the Labour Government from the Geo political agendas of the Neo Con and Bush administration (obviously to no avail). Cook’s resignation speech in the House of Commons (video shown above – and notice Jeremy Corbyn on Cook’s right) received a standing ovation by fellow MPs, and it was described by the BBC’s Andrew Marr as “without doubt one of the most effective, brilliant resignation speeches in modern British politics.
According to Cook’s obituary in The Economist‍, this had in fact been the first speech ever to receive a standing ovation in the history of the House, and it was a substantial embarrassment to the Blair government.

Summing up the character of the Iraq invasion, Mr. Cook had said: “Ironically, it is only because Iraq’s military forces are so weak that we can even contemplate its invasion. Iraq probably has no weapons of mass destruction in the commonly understood sense of the term – namely a credible device capable of being delivered against a strategic city target. It probably still has biological toxins and battlefield chemical munitions, but it has had them since the 1980’s when US companies sold Saddam anthrax agents and the then British Government approved chemical and munitions factories. Why is it now so urgent that we should take military action to disarm a military capacity that has been there for 20 years and which we helped to create?

It was also Robin Cook who was willing to openly state, in 2005, that Al Qaeda was little more than a long held ‘database of mujahideen and fighters’, stating that the myth of a real terrorist network called ‘Al Qaeda’ and led by Osama bin Laden was simply a fiction concocted and maintained by the CIA.

In a column for The Guardian just weeks before his death, he expressed that view; a view that has since been borne out absolutely by facts. Al Qaeda of course does exist now, but only due to a kind of self-fulfilled prophecy; but at that time, and the time of 9/11, it is very doubtful that the organisation existed as anything like the highly-organised ‘bogeyman’ it was being portrayed as. Robin Cook, and many other British politicians – in the Foreign Office at the very least – would’ve been well aware of that, and well aware of the fact that British intelligence had been working with Al Qaeda affiliates for many years, for example in the ongoing operation in Libya to assassinate Gaddafi.

Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker was among those who believe that Cook did not die of natural causes, but was the victim of an intelligence agency assassination. If true, Mr. Cook, like the weapons expert Dr. David Kelly, might be seen as yet another domestic victim of the Iraq War conspiracy; a war that was carried out against the wishes of the British people, against the rules of international law, a war based on proven lies, a war that was entirely unnecessary, and a war that we are still all living with the consequences of.

The absolute lack of interest by virtually all of the mainstream media in looking into the death of Robin Cook remains very suspect, just like the lack of police interest at the time. Then again, even should an investigation be carried out, it probably wouldn’t be a reliable one anyway – as anyone who studies the Diana inquest will find out for themselves. That, in all likelihood, will also apply to the Chilcot Inquiry, which for all the interminable delays that have prevented its publication, is unlikely to accomplish very much.


The Tap. Sat 5:46 am UTC, 22 Aug 2015


22 Aug 2015 8:16 am
ian says:
I have always believed Robin Cook was killed as was David Kelly, both were a threat to the criminal drive to war in Iraq. Though looking back now at the way things were, a stable and peaceful Iraq, a stable and peaceful Libya, a stable and peaceful Syria. How much better things are now, God bless Tony Blair.
NOT…Criminals all of them. If there ever was justice internationally, none of these devious criminal conniving creeps would have been anything to do with it.

22 Aug 2015 8:19 am
ian says:
Robin Cook was the last and only honest politician I ever saw. I admired him, they killed him. Lets you see how different we are from them.

22 Aug 2015 9:41 am
ferryt says:
I agree with you Ian. It seems he was honest and decent. Great orator too.
The thing that puzzles me. Cook was part of the cesspit that is Westminster. How did he get so far? As far as I can see you must be compromised in order to rise the ranks. So how did a seemingly good man get through?
I suspect Cook wasn’t a naive man. Would he have suspected he might be offed when say outing that Al Qaeda was absolutely not what the scum corporate western media were telling us?
Can’t quite piece it together…

22 Aug 2015 9:54 am
Lynn says:
Pretty obvious now as then. Speak out and they will have you dissapeared. The Chilcot enquiry is purley more theatre. The delay proves they cant get the lies to add up yet. We have a maffia in control,with all the assasins on hand. This is why they have got this far. Its rigged against us. We know it, they know we know, the media have been bought, threatened, or blackmailed. This is a planet under occupation now. The Mob have taken over.

22 Aug 2015 11:11 am
Nike says:
“State of the art“ assassinations?
Jürgen Möllemann, an inconvenient politician telling the truth.

23 Aug 2015 9:28 am
Dee says:
@Nike Hi, is it possible to get the Mollermann video with English subtitles please? Sorry, I don’t know how to do umlauts.

22 Aug 2015 12:10 pm
Tom says:
It was always very strange how the details of Cook’s affair that led to the break up of his marriage leaked to the papers – as though as a warning to do what he was told or else.

22 Aug 2015 7:01 pm
Eric says:
I think by mentioning Isra-hell and annoying Satanyahoo he basically signed his own death warrant.He then went on to debunk “alqueda”

22 Aug 2015 7:09 pm
Adam Spiritualwarrior Exposing the Secret Space Programme says:
An interesting question of if he got as high as he did, surely he was compromised and or blackmailed?
-Maybe he was, but felt terrible regret over his predicament, and repented. I sensed a good man, never got that sense from blair , straw and cronies
-Maybe, he was acting not alone. But with the backing of some sort of good faction within governmentt and the SS. Maybe spy games and macchiavellianism, the real story is what’s going on in our own country, not spying on foreign powers. Cat and mouse between factions.
– Maybe a bad faction got to Robin Cook and liquidated him.
-Maybe, some kind of non evil, but positive good secret societies going back centuries, have their own infiltrators. Maybe Cook was one of them or made contact with them if he repented.

22 Aug 2015 8:33 pm
RabbiT says:
I don’t know whether it is masonry or just establishment or both but in Scotland if the police, the judiciary or any public body for that matter, is told to cover up an issue – covered up it will be. They call it expediency.

24 Aug 2015 10:56 pm
Gordon Logan says:
This was the room where Robin Cook was served his last breakfast by Gerald Clyne:
The following may be interesting:

28 Nov 2015 2:06 pm
Rollo56 says:
John Smith, Dr. Kelly and Robin Cook: all thorns in the ‘Establishments’ arse!
That statement by Cook [above] was just 4 weeks before he was killed.
Similar questions should be asked of Dr. Kelly, who allegedly suffered an heart attack: – Top 10 conspiracy theories that were true. One of them a ‘Heart Attack gun’??

The Tap, august 2015

1 Comment

  1. Oh you have to laugh at these conspiracy theories, all of which require a level of intelligence, cunning and organisation, totally lacking in all modern politicians, who can hardly get through a day without saying something stupid. The presumption that any of them could organise a piss up at a brewery is laughable.

Reacties zijn afgesloten bij dit onderwerp.