Here will be yet another current example to demonstrate that all US Main Stream ’news’ media hide from their respective publics that the U.S. Government is lying, when the US Government lies – i.e., that all of the Main Stream ’news’ media in America hide the truth, when the Government itself is lying. In other words: the US Main Stream ’news’ Media are propaganda organs for the US Government.
While some American news Media are Democratic Party propagandists, and others are Republican Party propagandists, and therefore all of them eagerly expose lies that are of only a partisan nature, none of them will expose lies that both Parties share – such as, in 2002 and 2003, the central fact at that time. They hid that George W Bush and his Administration were outright lying to the public in each and every instance in which they said they possessed conclusive evidence that, as Bush himself put it on 7 September 2002 (http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/23883, and no mainstream and only one alt-news medium exposed as being a lie): “a report came out of the Atomic – the IAEA that they [Iraq] were six months away from developing a [nuclear] weapon. I don’t know what more evidence we need [before invading].” That was his answer when he was asked at a press conference on 7 September 2002, “Mr. President, can you tell us what conclusive evidence of any nuclear – new evidence you have of nuclear weapons capabilities of Saddam Hussein?” Immediately, the IAEA said then (http://web.archive.org/web/20021031194304/http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Press/P_release/2002/prn0211.shtml) that there was no such “new report,” and that the last they were able to find, there was nothing at all left of WMD, nor of an ability to make any, in Iraq. The American news Media simply ignored the IAEA’s denial that they had issued any new report at all such as Bush had alleged they had issued. Republican ’news’-media hid that Bush’s allegation was a lie, and Democratic ’news’ Media likewise hid it. And, so, the American people trusted Bush, and destroyed Iraq (https://washingtonsblog.com/2015/09/gallup-iraqis-are-the-saddest-one-of-the-angriest-populations-in-the-world.html, anyone who says that America’s invasion didn’t vastly harm the Iraqi people, https://www.democracynow.org/2013/3/20/dahr_jamail_returns_to_iraq_to, is either a liar or else ignorant of the realities, such as the last two links document).
The example this time will be taken from The Week magazine, which is a compendium of summaries of the week’s ’news’ from America’s major ‘news’-media. The 1 March 2019 issue had this, on its page 8:
“Aid for Venezuela: U.S. military planes delivered more than 180 tons of humanitarian aid for Venezuela to the Colombian border city of Cucuta this week, setting up a showdown with Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who has vowed to block the supplies. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) made a surprise visit to Cucuta and told Venezuelan troops stationed at the border that it was their patriotic duty to let aid through. ‘Will you prevent the food and medicine from reaching your own people?’”
The presumption there is that readers are simply too stupid to wonder, “Why should I trust that this military plane doesn’t also carry weapons for supporters of a coup to overthrow Venezuela’s President and to replace him with Trump’s choice, Juan Guaido – trust that weapons aren’t included in the cargo of ‘food and medicine’? Is Trump really so kind a person as to care about the Venezuelan people? Or is this instead yet another U.S. set-up for a brutal coup, such as the US did in 1953 to Iran, and in 1954 to Guatemala, and in 1973 to Chile, and, more recently, in 2014, to Ukraine (https://off-guardian.org/2017/03/24/what-americas-coup-in-ukraine-did/)?”
That ‘news’-report, since it’s from The Week, is about what other US propaganda agencies are saying, and it’s true about that (they actually are saying this), but it’s summarizing from two very untrustworthy ‘news’ Media, one being a tweet from Senator Rubio on 18 February 2019 that was immediately posted at sites such as ABC News (https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/1097570310495367169), and the other being a ‘news’ report from the Miami Herald (https://web.archive.org/web/20190301145136/https://www.heraldmailmedia.com/news/nation/military-planes-from-miami-filled-with-humanitarian-aid-for-venezuelans/article_83e3aa4e-236c-5806-b30a-172963f26978.html), which added that this shipment came from USAID – and yet they ignored that USAID is a major part of almost every US coup.
Here’s more context about this incident of ‘aid’ shipments: On 6 February 2019, Britain’s Daily Mail, which is less dishonest about the US Government than US ‘news’-media are, headlined “Venezuelan officials accuse the US of sending a cache of high powered rifles on a commercial cargo flight from Miami so they would get into the hands of ‘extreme right fascist‘ groups looking to undermine Maduro’s regime” (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6674105/Venezuelan-officials-large-cache-weapons-hidden-airport-delivered-Miami.html), and reported that,
Officials in Venezuela have accused the US of sending a cache of high powered rifles and ammunition on a commercial cargo flight from Miami so they would get into the hands of President Nicolás Maduro’s opponents.
Members with the Venezuelan National Guard [GNB] and the National Integrated Service of Customs and Tax Administration [SENIAT] made the shocking discovery just two days after the plane arrived at Arturo Michelena International Airport in Valencia.
Inspectors found 19 rifles, 118 magazines and 90 wireless radios while investigating the flight which they said arrived Sunday afternoon.
Monday’s bust also netted four rifle stands, three rifle scopes and six iPhones.
And here’s yet more context: the independent American journalist Aaron Mate, tweeted on 18 February 2019:
Page 136 [near end of Ch. 4, https://books.google.nl/books?id=F7tuDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT87&lpg=PT87&dq=%22the+president+talked+about+Venezuela.+That%E2%80%99s+the+country+we+should+be+going+to+war+with%22&source=bl&ots=DzJcmFyEN9&sig=ACfU3U3uiRaA7k-MPIdOCYI1GnquWGZYyw&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22the%20president%20talked%20about%20Venezuela.%20That%E2%80%99s%20the%20country%20we%20should%20be%20going%20to%20war%20with%22&f=false] of [Andrew G.] McCabe’s new [and only] book [THE THREAT, which was published on 19 February 2019], recounting a [July] 2017 Oval Office meeting: “Then the president talked about Venezuela. That’s the country we should be going to war with, he said. They have all that oil and they’re right on our back door.” [Stated there by the authoritarian McCabe, in order to prove how crude Trump is, and McCabe was not condemnatory of such international thefts of Venezuela’s natural resources, but only of Trump’s crudity.]
12:59 PM – 18 Feb 2019
Furthermore, yet another independent journalist, Ben Norton, at “The GrayZone Project,” headlined on 29 January 2019, “Corporate Interests – Militarist John Bolton Spills the Beans” (https://thegrayzone.com/2019/01/29/us-coup-venezuela-oil-corporate-john-bolton/), and he provided a complete transcript of a brief interview that John Bolton had done with Fox Business Channel five days before, on January 24th. That interview wasn’t publicized by Fox, and its headline was as dull as possible, “Venezuela regime change big business opportunity: John Bolton” (https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/venezuela-regime-change-big-business-opportunity), and the ‘news’-report posted below it was empty of anything important, but Ben Norton captured the entire interview, and on January 29th he posted it to youtube and to The GrayZone Project as a news report, with the full intervie -segment also being transcribed there by Norton. In it, Bolton had said, on January 24th:
We’re looking at the oil assets. That’s the single most important income stream to the government of Venezuela. We’re looking at what to do to that. (…) We’re in conversation with major American companies now that are either in Venezuela, or in the case of Citgo here in the United States. (…) It will make a big difference to the United States economically if we could have American oil companies really invest in and produce the oil capabilities in Venezuela.
Of course, that’s an attempt at theft of the property of another sovereign nation — theft of natural resources assets of Venezuela, from the people who live in Venezuela – it’s a huge theft-attempt, which is being bragged about by the US regime. Though they’ve done this type of heist in many instances during the past few decades (including in Iraq, where US oil companies now extract, http://archive.is/0Wx6H), Bolton’s outright bragging about it is certainly extraordinary, and thus is major news. This was major news that however hasn’t been focused upon except in the few honest sites, all of which are non-mainstream (most non Main Stream sites are just as dishonest as America’s Main Stream ones are – they’re fake ‘alt-news’ instead of authentically against false ‘news’, but all Main Stream national news-sites routinely report lies stenographically, as if what the Government says is always true, and so they’re propaganda). The GrayZone Project is one of the few honest sites, and Norton luckily discovered this huge news-break from the blunder by Fox Business Channel to have aired it – that revelation having been a freak event by America’s major media, a rare slip-up.
And, finally, the great investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, at the Strategic Culture Foundation, headlined sarcastically but truthfully on 1 March 2019, “Military Intervention and Mercenaries, Inc. (MIAMI, https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/03/01/military-intervention-and-mercenaries-inc-miami.html)”, and he (a journalist whose trustworthiness I have checked and verified for many years – he’s really one of the best) opened with:
The city of Miami, Florida may have started out as a retirement mecca for winter worn pensioners from northern climes. However, after the beginning of the Cold War and US military and Central Intelligence Agency intervention in Guatemala, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Chile, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Guyana, the Bahamas, and other Western Hemisphere nations, Miami became a refuge for exiled wealthy businessmen escaping populist revolutions and elections in South and Central America and spies. The retirement and vacation capital of the United States quickly became the “Tropical Casablanca.”
Now home to thousands of limited liability corporations linked to the CIA, as well as private military contractors, sketchy airlines flying from remote Florida airports, the interventionist US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM), and exiled oligarchs running destabilization operations in their native countries, Miami – or MIAMI, “Military Intervention and Mercenaries, Inc.” – serves as the nexus for current Trump administration “regime change” efforts. (…)
Earlier, on February 18th, President Trump had delivered a lengthy speech in Miami, titled “Remarks by President Trump to the Venezuelan American Community” (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-venezuelan-american-community/), and this was obviously aimed at passionate enemies of Venezuela’s Government. Here is a typical passage, with accompanying documentations of the actual truth regarding his lies as stated there. Trump’s allegations are in boldface italics, and my commentaries are in regular type within brackets, and linked there to my sources:
Not long ago, Venezuela was the wealthiest nation, by far, in South America [the allegation that Venezuela’s economy has done less well since Hugo Chavez became President on 2 February 1999 is disconfirmed by World Bank data showing that Venezuela reached its all-time-high economic-growth rate in 2004, 5 years after Hugo Chavez became democratically elected and took office as the country’s President (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=VE). The economy rapidly declined as soon as the U.S. started its coup-attempts. Furthermore, a scientific study of the data showed in 2017 that (https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3375&context=gc_etds): “Mexico’s and Venezuela’s numbers on this question [[of ‘Where would you place our country ten years ago?’”]] with a 1 to 10 scale, from absolutely democratic, to not democratic, throughout the period of 2013 – 2017, compared to those of other countries in the region, clearly show Venezuela as the country where the highest percentage of people believed that democracy had increased during the 2003 – 2013 decade. Mexico ranked in twelfth place, out of eighteen surveyed countries. “This comparison helps to dimension the solid sense that Venezuelans had about the strength of their democracy during the Chávez administration, and the weak one that Mexicans had.”] But years of socialist rule have brought this once-thriving nation to the brink of ruin. [That too is false – socialism wasn’t the cause of Venezuela’s economic come down. Venezuela’s boom-time (https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/diegor/research/MFHLA_paper.pdf) was the period of massive public-debt buildup prior to the exceptionally high oil prices in 1973 – 1985 (https://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/Historical_Oil_Prices_Table.asp), as shown in “Figure 4: Venezuela Real GDP per Capita” (https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/diegor/research/MFHLA_paper.pdf). Moreover, as the CIA edited (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia/cia-fbi-computers-used-for-wikipedia-edits-idUSN1642896020070816) and written (https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/) Wikipedia says about Venezuela (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuela#20th_century): ”The election in 1973 of Carlos Andrés Pérez coincided with an oil crisis [[the OPEC oil embargo]], in which Venezuela’s income exploded as oil prices soared; oil industries were nationalized in 1976. This [oil nationalization and oil-production investment all at the worst possible time] led to massive increases in public spending, but also increases in external debts, which continued into the 1980s when the collapse of oil prices during the 1980’s crippled the Venezuelan economy.“ That “oil crisis” was actually the period of exceptionally high oil prices resulting from Israel’s 1973 invasions and OPEC embargoes, but it was actually hell for Venezuela because Venezuela was losing money on each barrel (https://washingtonsblog.com/2019/02/why-venezuelas-people-are-suffering.html) of oil sold because only the Arabic countries and Iran were able to sell profitably their oil after the period of OPEC’s oil embargo. Venezuela, seller of the world’ dirtiest oil, after 1976 was losing money on each barrel, when they had to repay all those foreign loans amassed during the boom-period]. That’s where it is today.
The tyrannical socialist government nationalized private industries and took over private businesses. They engaged in massive wealth confiscation, shut down free markets, suppressed free speech, and set up a relentless propaganda machine, rigged elections, used the government to persecute their political opponents, and destroyed the impartial rule of law.
In other words, the socialists have done in Venezuela all of the same things that socialists, communists, totalitarians have done everywhere that they’ve had a chance to rule. The results have been catastrophic.
In conclusion, then, no country in the world has a press that’s more dishonest than the United States of America does. “More dishonest” than this press would even be a ludicrous concept. Though the particular lies that are being promoted elsewhere might happen to be different, they can’t be worse. America’s having destroyed Iran and Libya, etc., is proof of this.
Consequently: Only people who possess a thoroughly scientific orientation toward confirming and disconfirming allegations, are capable of extracting from such ‘news’ a realistic understanding of what’s actually happening. The vast majority of people can be fooled, and they can be fooled constantly and even for (as in the instance of America, since at least 2003) decades, and yet still trust the institutions that have deceived them so mercilessly through all of those decades. This is the major reason why the United States is a dictatorship, not a democracy (https://washingtonsblog.com/2018/11/america-is-one-dollar-one-vote-not-really-one-person-one-vote.html) – and why any ‘news’ site which calls the US a ‘democracy’ is thereby clearly demonstrating its untrustworthiness. But, of course, only honest news reporting organizations are publishing this report. And there will probably be very few that will do that, though all are receiving it for publication.
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010 (https://www.amazon.com/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic/dp/1880026090/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1339027537&sr=8-9), and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007Q1H4EG).