MainStream Media Hide Skripal’s Connections to Russiagate Trump Case
First of all, everyone should read this:
“The 10 Worst, Most Embarrassing U.S. Media Failures on the Trump-Russia Story” (https://theintercept.com/2019/01/20/beyond-buzzfeed-the-10-worst-most-embarrassing-u-s-media-failures-on-the-trumprussia-story/).
It is important background for understanding what follows, because the following helps to explain what is displayed in that brilliant prior article:
News has slowly been getting out that the British Government’s account of the poisoning of the Skripals is a fabrication which had been done in order to escalate hostilities against Russia, and that when information from Democratic Party and Clinton campaign computers subsequently became either leaked or hacked to Wikileaks, the Democratic National Committee hired, in order to investigate that, British contractors who were also involved in the Skripal fraud, and Skripal himself might have been a crucial part of the Russiagate-Trump operation. Russiagate – the alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government – resulted from this DNC-UK team. There was collusion, but it was between the U.S. Government (then under Obama) and the UK Government (under Cameron and then May), directed against Trump, and not actually between candidate Trump and the Russian Government, directed against Clinton. The present report summarizes the gradual making-public of this actual history.
Developing that case about the real collusion has been and is a remarkably slow process, because the evidence in the real case requires extensive expertise in order to understand and interpret correctly the relationships between the people who were involved in it. So: the following summary encapsulates those relationships; and, at all points, it will link directly to the reports by the courageous investigative journalists who have participated in making public parts of what is, effectively, a key component of the history of the U.S. Obama Administration’s collusion with the UK Government in order to cripple – and having the aim to overthrow – Trump’s U.S. Government, in the event that Trump would win the 2016 U.S. Presidential contest, as he did. (Perhaps the main reason for this manufactured case against Trump was that Trump had publicly criticised NATO, and that doing this, by any U.S. Presidential candidate who has a real chance of winning his or her Party’s nomination, is prohibited by the Deep State – the rulers of both Parties, and of both U.S. and UK.)
Throughout this peeling-off (thus far) of the layers of this onion that’s behind both the Skripal fraud and the Russiagate fraud, the case became progressively stronger that the U.S. and UK Governments were actually colluding together, in order to prevent any possibility that the Cold War would end on the U.S.-and-allied side, as it had decades earlier ended only on Russia’s side in 1991. All of this has been done so to keep in place the myth that when Russia ended the Cold War on its side in 1991 (https://washingtonsblog.com/2015/09/how-america-double-crossed-russia-and-shamed-the-west.html), the U.S. and its allies likewise ended it on their side, instead of secretly proceeded forward on their side of the Cold War (as they have done, https://washingtonsblog.com/2015/09/how-america-double-crossed-russia-and-shamed-the-west.html), their ultimate aim being to gradually isolate and then take control of Russia’s Government, and thereby emerge with incontestable control over the entire planet, the first and only globally all-encompassing empire, a dictatorial government of the entire world — any imperialistic regime’s dream – an unchallengeable rule over everyone. Both the Skripal set-up and the Russiagate-Trump scam (and the cover-ups of both) were parts of that broader international operation.
PEELING THE ONION
On 8 May 2018, David Allan Miller of the University of Bath in England headlined at Spinwatch, “Revealed: rebranded D-Notice committee issued two notices over Skripal affair” (http://spinwatch.org/index.php/issues/propaganda/item/5998-two-d-notices-for-skripal-affair), and he posted, and then commented upon, a leaked email that the UK’s Defence and Security Media Advisory (DSMA) office had distributed to all of UK’s major news-media, which started:
Private and Confidential: Not for Publication, Broadcast or for use on Social Media
TO ALL EDITORS
The issue surrounding the identity of a former MI6 informer, Sergei Skripal (…)
You can see the full notice here (http://powerbase.info/index.php/DSMA_notice_7_March_2018). It instructs all of the major news-media to hide “the identifies [identities] of intelligence agency personnel associated with Sergei Skripal.” This, of course, would include the name of his MI6 handler, Skripal’s MI6 boss.
David Miller then went on to summarize the evidence:
On the evening of 6 March  a Russian opposition news outlet Meduza, styling itself ‘Russia’s free press in exile’, published a long piece on Skripal in English. [Dr. Miller didn’t link to it, but it is dated “March 6, 2018” and opens “On March 4, a 66-year-old former colonel in Russia’s Military Intelligence Directorate was hospitalized in critical condition in Salisbury, England,” and that Meduza article can be seen here (https://meduza.io/en/feature/2018/03/06/a-hundred-grand-and-hundreds-of-betrayed-agents).] Citing a variety of online sources including in Russian, some from over a decade old, identifying Pablo Miller as the MI6 agent inside the Estonian embassy who had recruited Sergei Skripal. By the next afternoon, the notice [on 7 March] was issued to the mainstream media. The Telegraph was the first mainstream outlet to discuss – in discreet and decorous terminology – the connection between Skripal and a ‘security consultant’ who is ‘understood to have known him for some time’ and ‘is also based in Salisbury’. (…) The Telegraph reported that the ‘consultant’ worked at the same company (Orbis Business Intelligence, https://orbisbi.com/) that compiled the controversial dossier on Donald Trump and Russia – paid for by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Convention (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/03/12/christopher-steele-the-man-behind-the-trump-dossier). The consultant was, as we now know, Pablo Miller, who had ‘known’ Skripal in the specific sense that he was his MI6 handler. Some, such as Guardian journalist Luke Harding (https://twitter.com/lukeharding1968/status/971721269208080384?lang=en), have suggested that Miller never worked for Orbis, but this seems to be false. (…)
The notice helps to encourage the climate of anti-Russian hysteria implying that investigative reporting on this matter that might discuss British intelligence is in effect Russian propaganda. This is a nice illustration of David Leigh’s phrase from nearly 40 years ago: ‘the obverse of the secrecy coin is always propaganda’ (https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=CgdIAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA79&lpg=PA79&dq=%22the+obverse+of+the+secrecy+coin+is+always+propaganda%22&source=bl&ots=DHhcPO6nZI&sig=7lDLGnzNtSaAmfADSLrJpVJdc_Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiBuJTw8_XaAhUqJMAKHRrPA4gQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=%22the%20obverse%20of%20the%20secrecy%20coin%20is%20always%20propaganda%22&f=false).
It is a standing rebuke to the notion that journalism should question power, that 15 senior media people should agree to sit on this censorship committee. As well as the BBC, ITV, ITN and Murdoch’s Sky News, representing broadcasters, there are a variety of representatives from the broadsheet and tabloid press, regional and Scottish newspapers and magazines and publishing – including two News UK and Harper Collins, (both owned by Murdoch) as well as Trinity Mirror (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reach_plc), the Daily Mail and the Guardian. On the government side of the committee are the chair from the MoD and four intelligence connected representatives from the MoD (Dominic Wilson, Director General Security Policy), Foreign Office (Lewis Neal, Director for National Security), Home Office (Graeme Biggar, unspecified post in the OSCT) and Cabinet Office (Paddy McGuinness, Deputy National Security Adviser for Security, Intelligence, and Resilience).
The DSMA [Defence and Security Media Advisory] committee likes to cultivate the impression that it is a rather uninteresting committee that is, as a former vice chair of the committee (a journalist, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/aug/02/d-notice-national-security-blackout) put it, ‘is emphatically not censorship… but voluntary, responsible media restraint’. Then working at Sky News (https://web.archive.org/web/20150919194435/http://www.dsma.uk/committee/index.htm), that vice chair, Simon Bucks, is now CEO at the Services Sound and Vision Corporation (https://twitter.com/simonbucks?lang=en), the broadcasting service which says it is ‘championing the Armed Forces’. Bucks also wrote [in the Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/aug/02/d-notice-national-security-blackout] that the DSMA committee is ‘the most mythologised and misunderstood institution in British media. (…) ‘Slapping a D-notice’ on something the establishment wanted suppressed has been the stuff of thrillers, spy stories and conspiracy theories for more than a century.”
This is a typical deception used regularly by defenders of the British system of censorship.
This comes from Ludwig De Braeckeleer:
“Salisbury Incident — UK Media silenced by D-Notices Over Skripal Affair” (https://gosint.wordpress.com/2018/05/10/salisbury-incident-uk-media-silenced-by-d-notices-over-skripal-affair/)
Posted on May 10, 2018 [two days after David Miller’s article, and adding context to it]
In the aftermath of the Skripal incident, the UK government moved quickly to ‘protect’ the identity of Sergei Skripal as well as the identity of his former MI6 handler Pablo Miller who happens to live near Salisbury.
On March 7, the first D-Notice was issued, but their names had already been revealed.
At the same time, a few journalists planted false information regarding Pablo Miller and Orbis, the private Intel company that became famous because of the infamous dossier Chris Steele compiled on Trump’s Russiagate.
On March 8, Gordon Corera tweeted that his sources were certain that no link exists between Skripal and Orbis or Chris Steele.
On the same day, Luke Harding suggested that Miller never worked for Orbis, which is obviously untrue. Pablo Miller had listed his employment by Orbis Business Intelligence on his LinkedIn profile.
So, this much is certain. The UK government has quickly moved to black out the identity of Pablo Miller and his connections to both Sergei Skripal and Orbis.
In 2017, a D-Notice was already issued against British journalists revealing the identity of the Trump’s Dossier author (Chris Steele).
Multiple British outlets ignored this advice and revealed his name anyway, including BBC News, The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian.
The use of a D-Notice is not a rare event. But it is not used very frequently either.
I believe that a couple of such notices have been issued annually on average in the UK over the last ten years. And we KNOW that at least three of these notices were issued in connection with the Skripal and Orbis Affair(s?). Stay tuned!
Revealed: rebranded D-Notice committee issued two notices over Skripal affair (http://spinwatch.org/index.php/issues/propaganda/item/5998-two-d-notices-for-skripal-affair) – SpinWatch
The DSMA notices can be found here:
DSMA notice 7 March 2018 (http://powerbase.info/index.php/DSMA_notice_7_March_2018)
DSMA notice 14 March 2018 (http://powerbase.info/index.php/DSMA_notice_14_March_2018)
On 19 March 2018, the anonymous “Moon of Alabama” blogger headlined “No Patients Have Experienced Symptoms Of Nerve Agent Poisoning In Salisbury” (https://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/03/no-patients-have-experienced-symptoms-of-nerve-agent-poisoning-in-salisbury.html) and was perhaps the first person to put it all together:
Is this third person the MI6 agent Pablo Miller (https://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/03/spy-posions-spy-and-the-anti-trump-campaign.html) who in 1995 (https://meduza.io/en/feature/2018/03/06/a-hundred-grand-and-hundreds-of-betrayed-agents) recruited Skripal as British double agent. Miller who was also involved in handling (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/skripal-russian-web-or-rusi-web) the MI6 assets Boris Berezovski and Alexander Litvinenko. Pablo Miller who lives close (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/07/poisoned-russian-spy-sergei-skripal-close-consultant-linked/) to Sergej Skripal in Salisbury and is considered to be his friend? The same Pablo Miller who worked (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/07/poisoned-russian-spy-sergei-skripal-close-consultant-linked/) with former MI6 agent Christopher Steele’s Orbis Business Intelligence which created the ‘dirty dossier’ about Donald Trump? How deep were the Skripals involved in making up the fake stories in the anti-Trump dossier for which the Clinton campaign paid more than $168,000. Did the Skripals threaten to talk about the issue? Is that why the incident [the poisoning] happened?
On 5 July 2019, Aaron Maté issued his enormous study, “CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims” (https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/07/05/crowdstrikeout_muellers_own_report_undercuts_its_core_russia-meddling_claims.html), which points out that:
There is also reason to question CrowdStrike’s impartiality. Its co-founder, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, the preeminent Washington think tank [NATO’s PR agency, actually] that aggressively promotes a hawkish posture towards Russia. CrowdStrike executive Shawn Henry, who led the forensics team that ultimately blamed Russia for the DNC breach, previously served as assistant director at the FBI under Mueller.
And CrowdStrike was hired to perform the analysis of the DNC servers by Perkins Coie – the law firm that also was responsible for contracting Fusion GPS, the Washington, D.C.-based opposition research firm that produced the now discredited Steele dossier alleging salacious misconduct by Trump in Russia and his susceptibility to blackmail.
On 31 August 2017, Scott Ritter issued his “DUMBSTRUCK: a HomeFront Intelligence Report on how America was conned about the DNC hack” (https://medium.com/homefront-rising/dumbstruck-how-crowdstrike-conned-america-on-the-hack-of-the-dnc-ecfa522ff44f), which described how
the DNC prohibited the U.S. Government from having access to the evidence, and instead went directly to the major ‘news’-media in order to (mis)inform the public what had happened:
At first the DNC tried to get the FBI to make the attribution call, figuring that it would garner more attention coming from the US government. But when the FBI wanted full access to the DNC server so that it could conduct a full forensic investigation, the DNC balked. Instead, after meeting with Alperovitch and Henry, the DNC and CrowdStrike devised a strategy to take the case to the public themselves. Alperovitch prepared a formal technical report that singled out the Russians for attribution. When it was ready, the DNC invited in a reporter from the Washington Post named Ellen Nakashima, who was given exclusive access to senior DNC and CrowdStrike personnel for an above-the-fold, front-page article. … The Post article, published on the morning of June 14, 2016, went viral, with nearly every major media outlet.
On 11 June 2019, Matt Kennard posted a long string of tweets:
Matt Kennard [abbreviated here]
Guardian’s deputy editor @paul__johnson joined state censorship D-Notice committee (run by MOD) after Snowden revelations in sop to British spooks. In board minutes, they thank him for being “instrumental in re-establishing links” between UK mil/intel and Guardian. Explains a lot
10:09 AM – 11 Jun 2019
Who was @carolecadwalla’s “highly placed contact with links to US intelligence” who fed her clear disinformation? (Mueller report makes clear Podesta/DNC leaks transmitted digitally). Since Snowden, intel agencies have used Guardian/Obs to launder their disinformation operations.
Guardian dep ed @paul__johnson joins D-Notice comm for 1st meeting at MOD in 2014. Air Vice-Marshal Vallance reports relationship w/ Guardian has “continued to strengthen”. Alongside Air Commodore Adams and Brigadier Dodds he’s now in “regular dialogues” w/ “Guardian journalists”
12 Jun 2019 (…)
So: not only was it “Pablo Miller as the MI6 agent inside the Estonian embassy who had recruited Sergei Skripal,” but “In the aftermath of the Skripal incident, the UK government moved quickly to ‘protect’ the identity of Sergei Skripal as well as the identity of his former MI6 handler Pablo Miller who happens to live near Salisbury.” MI6 was covering its tracks. And, “At the same time, a few journalists planted false information regarding Pablo Miller and Orbis, the private Intel company that became famous because of the infamous dossier Chris Steele compiled on Trump’s Russiagate.” And, “Pablo Miller had listed his employment by Orbis Business Intelligence.” And, “Orbis Business Intelligence (…) compiled the controversial [MI6 Christopher Steele, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Steele] dossier on Donald Trump and Russia – paid for by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Convention [Democratic National Committee]. The consultant was, as we now know, Pablo Miller, who had ‘known’ Skripal in the specific sense that he was his MI6 handler.” And, “CrowdStrike was hired to perform the analysis of the DNC servers by Perkins Coie – the law firm that also was responsible for contracting Fusion GPS, the Washington, D.C.-based opposition research firm that produced the now discredited Steele dossier alleging salacious misconduct by Trump in Russia and his susceptibility to blackmail.” And, “At first the DNC tried to get the FBI to make the attribution call, figuring that it would garner more attention coming from the US government. But when the FBI wanted full access to the DNC server so that it could conduct a full forensic investigation, the DNC balked. Instead, after meeting with Alperovitch and Henry, the DNC and CrowdStrike devised a strategy to take the case to the public themselves.” And, “Since Snowden, intel agencies have used Guardian/Obs to launder their disinformation operations.”
Masterful. The Obama-Clinton DNC and MI6, and their hired private contractors, worked together to frame Russia for both the Skripal poisonings and the Trump victory.
And yet, key questions remain unanswered: “How deep were the Skripals involved in making up the fake stories in the anti-Trump dossier for which the Clinton campaign paid more than $168,000. Did the Skripals threaten to talk about the issue? Is that why the incident [their poisoning] happened?” There is the possibility that the Skripals’ poisoning was an inside job, by a contractor, for the UK and/or U.S. Governments.
Not to mention other questions: Why are the Skripals still prohibited from speaking to the press and from answering questions in a court? After all, Boris Johnson, who is likely soon to be UK’s Prime Minister, lied (http://archive.is/ZgMRg), and repeatedly (https://gosint.wordpress.com/2018/04/05/sergei-yulia-skripal-boris-johnson-lied-about-the-nerve-agent-origin/), in order to allege that UK’s Porton Down intelligence lab had identified Russia as the source of the poison: “Asked how the British government could be so sure Russia was behind the attack, Johnson deferred to ‘the people from Porton Down,’ who he said were ‘absolutely categorical.’” And here’s how corrupt he is (https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2019/07/bought-politicians/).
But the historical background of this entire matter – both Skripal and Trump-Russiagate (https://off-guardian.org/2019/06/19/the-case-that-obama-was-a-traitor-just-got-powerful-new-evidence-from-the-dnc/)- is obvious: MI6 is Britain’s equivalent to America’s CIA. That was Obama’s CIA. This was entirely a MI6-CIA disinformation campaign, which was an extension from Obama’s (and the UK Government’s) participation in U.S. President G.H.W. Bush’s decision, on 24 February 1990, to continue the Cold War until Russia becomes swept up in, controlled by, the U.S. (https://washingtonsblog.com/2015/09/how-america-double-crossed-russia-and-shamed-the-west.html). And Britain’s Guardian served the Deep State as the core conduit for disinformation to the public on this particular operation (Russiagate-Trump – Obama’s operation to make irreversible Obama’s public restoration (most obvious in Ukraine, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWkfpGCAAuw) of the Russia-is-America’s-top-enemy (https://washingtonsblog.com/2017/11/u-s-aristocracys-smear-russia-campaign-big-brother-work.html) meme), for and on behalf of the Deep State, so as to continue G.H.W. Bush’s Cold War, inside the U.S. – never to reverse it, until ‘victory’ (https://off-guardian.org/2017/01/02/americas-secret-planned-conquest-of-russia/) is achieved.
The “special relationship” (https://washingtonsblog.com/2018/07/vladimir-putins-basic-disagreement-with-the-west.html) between the U.S. and UK (CIA and MI6) is obviously to assist each other in deceiving the other’s public. (Not only did MI6 participate in deceiving UK’s public to fear and despise Putin, but it was crucial in deceiving the U.S. public that Trump was Putin’s stooge.)
On 21 March 2016, the Washington Post had headlined “Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy” (http://archive.is/wzrvb) and reported:
“I do think it’s a different world today, and I don’t think we should be nation-building anymore,” Trump said. “I think it’s proven not to work, and we have a different country than we did then. We have $19 trillion in debt. We’re sitting, probably, on a bubble. And it’s a bubble that if it breaks, it’s going to be very nasty. I just think we have to rebuild our country.”
He added: “I watched as we built schools in Iraq and they’re blown up. We build another one, we get blown up. We rebuild it three times and yet we can’t build a school in Brooklyn. We have no money for education because we can’t build in our own country. At what point do you say, ‘Hey, we have to take care of ourselves?’ So, I know the outer world exists and I’ll be very cognizant of that. But at the same time, our country is disintegrating, large sections of it, especially the inner cities.”
Five days later, the New York Times bannered “Transcript: Donald Trump Expounds on His Foreign Policy Views” (https://off-guardian.org/2019/06/19/the-case-that-obama-was-a-traitor-just-got-powerful-new-evidence-from-the-dnc/) and reported his saying, “NATO is obsolete” because it “was set up to talk about the Soviet Union. Now of course the Soviet Union doesn’t exist now.” How would the controlling owners of corporations such as Lockheed Martin – and extractive international U.S. corporations such as ExxonMobil – feel about that? NATO has produced a significant portion of Lockheed’s sales, and of Exxon’s access to other nations’ natural resources. That sort of thing – enforcement and extension of empire – is NATO’s real purpose. And it didn’t end when the U.S.S.R.’s communism, and Warsaw Pact, did in 1991.
The Skripal poisonings had occurred earlier that same month, March 2016. And the DNC went to the very same UK operators that UK did in order to frame Russia for Skripal’s poisoning — but now to place that Russian frame around Trump’s face. All of this was part of the U.S. empire’s decision, which had been made on 24 February 1990 (https://washingtonsblog.com/2015/09/how-america-double-crossed-russia-and-shamed-the-west.html), to conquer Russia.
In the timeline of events leading up to the DNC’s hiring of its investigators, we also have this (https://libertyunyielding.com/2017/10/30/extraordinary-timeline-dnc-fusion-hillary-trump-dossier-crowdstrike-hirings-payments-2016-primaries/), in 2016,
29 April: The DNC discovers the penetration of its servers by unknown hackers. An emergency meeting is called (https://medium.com/homefront-rising/dumbstruck-how-crowdstrike-conned-america-on-the-hack-of-the-dnc-ecfa522ff44f) between Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (DNC Chief Executive), Amy Dacey (DNC Technology Director), Andrew Brown, and Michael Sussmann, a lawyer for Perkins Coie. Sussmann is a former federal prosecutor for the DOJ whose expertise is computer crime. (…)
4 May: Five days after first discovering the server penetration at the DNC, Michael Sussmann – of Perkins Coie – finally calls CrowdStrike to arrange for analysis of the problem.
In other words: Sussman wanted to privatize the ‘investigation’ instead of to hand to the FBI control over it, which would have given the FBI subpoena-power to require the DNC to provide to the FBI access to their computers – the actual evidence which was in their posession on their end of the case. Even the Special Counsel, Robert Miller, had no access to that crucial evidence.
Furthermore, Aaron Maté’s painstakingly thorough analysis of the entire Mueller Report, on July 5th, showed “CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims” (https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/07/05/crowdstrikeout_muellers_own_report_undercuts_its_core_russia-meddling_claims.html); and, so, even regarding the allegations that Mueller makes against Russia (not merely regarding whether Trump was colluding with Russia), Mueller’s Report was trash – extremely unreliable and untrustworthy. Mueller has a long history as being a Deep State agent (http://web.archive.org/web/20190107130553/https://off-guardian.org/2017/11/12/why-robert-mueller-was-selected-to-be-the-special-prosecutor/).
And through all of this has been the U.S. and UK Governments’ imprisoning-without-trial Julian Assange – for many years including the part that was spent at the Ecuadorean Embassy – and never even negotiating with Assange for him to answer questions under oath such as “Did that information come to you physically via a thumb-drive or instead purely by electronic transmission?” “Did Craig Murray (https://washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/strong-evidence-obama-lying.html) bring it to You?” They’d rather kill Assange or keep him incommunicado in prison for life, than to do that. Why? And Trump, himself, is part of this, no less than Obama was. Obviously, both Presidents serve the same Deep State (even though they serve different billionaires in it).
This, at least, is a credible scenario. There is no evidence for the PR’d one, regarding either Skripal or Russiagate-Trump. There are accusations, but no case, for those.
In the current hyper-partisan American political climate, when a vast majority of the supporters of each of the two Parties hates the opposite Party so much as to be closed-minded – blinded to the reality of their own Party’s evilness, and to its incessant lying and cover-ups – I should make clear that there is nothing in this article that is, at all, supportive toward either Party. My personal view is that, ever since at least 1981, only Deep State controlled people have lived in the U.S. White House and controlled Congress. As a group, they have perpetrated incalculable harm (such as this: https://washingtonsblog.com/2019/07/hypocrisies-about-refugees.html) to the entire world. Their only masters have been America’s billionaires. America certainly is a dictatorship, no democracy — it represents only its hundreds of billionaires and their millions of agents, no public at all (https://represent.us/action/theproblem-3/). The two Parties represent the two factions into which America’s aristocracy have divided themselves. Neither (https://thesaker.is/the-civil-war-now-in-america/) represents the public. Each represents only a faction of America’s billionaires. A democracy cannot consist merely of contending factions of the aristocracy. That’s not a democracy. It’s like almost all other dictatorships throughout history. But the vast majority of Americans refuse even to consider this scientifically proven fact (https://washingtonsblog.com/2018/11/america-is-one-dollar-one-vote-not-really-one-person-one-vote.html), that America is a dictatorship, not a democracy. For example: recently, a Democratic Party propaganda site, the Daily Beast, headlined “Mueller Missed the Crime: Trump’s Campaign Coordinated With Russia” (http://archive.is/MscR3), and the law-professor who wrote it ignored the much deeper criticisms that Maté’s article leveled against the Mueller Report. A prominent Democratic Party propaganda site continues, even now, “The Moscow Project” (https://themoscowproject.org/about/) about “Trump’s collusion with Russia.” Closed-minded people are simply closed-minded – and that’s the vast majority. They’re open only to ‘information’ that confirms their prejudices. This widespread closed-mindedness is the Deep State’s biggest protector. The manufacture of consent (https://off-guardian.org/2019/01/10/chomskys-unearned-prestige/) is based upon it. Being open-minded doesn’t mean being gullible – a fool, manipulable. Being closed-minded does. Most people aren’t even aware of that basic epistemological-psychological fact. It’s the reason why both among Democrats and among Republicans, the vast majority still trust their Party, even after all of the blatant and consistent lying of the U.S. Government at least since 9/11. Any Government with a track-record like this, warrants zero trust, and gets that from any intelligent citizen.
Originally posted at strategic-culture.org (https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/07/15/mainstream-media-hide-skripals-connections-to-russiagate-trump-case/).
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010 (https://www.amazon.com/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic/dp/1880026090/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1339027537&sr=8-9), and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007Q1H4EG).