RUssian President Vladimir Putin released around 500 lions to make people stay indoors during the Corona Virus crisis (foto Twitter)
On Tuesday, March 24th, the following happened:
USA had the World’s largest number of new Corona Virus cases: 10,168 (http://archive.is/HjryO). The prior day, there were 33,546 (http://archive.is/lGneo) cases; so, this 10,168 new cases were a 30% increase from the day before.
Reuters bannered “US has potential of becoming Corona Virus epicenter, says WHO” (https://www.reuters.com/article/US-health-Corona–Virus-who-USA/US-has-potential-of-becoming-Corona–Virus-epicenter-says-who-idUSKBN21B1FT) and reported that,
The World Health Organization said on Tuesday it was seeing a “very large acceleration” in Corona Virus infections in the United States which had the potential of becoming the new epicenter.
Over the past 24 hours, 85 percent of new cases were from EUrope and the United States, WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris told reporters. Of those, 40 percent were from the United States.
Asked whether the United States could become the new epicentre, Harris said: “We are now seeing a very large acceleration in cases in the US. So it does have that potential.”
Right now, on Wednesday the 25th, the US again has the World’s largest number of new cases reported, 11,074 (http://archive.is/tbka7). That’s a 25% increase added to the 43,734 (http://archive.is/HjryO) cases total on March 24th. And, within just three more days, America will have the World’s largest total number of cases, if Italy won’t. And after yet another day, the US will almost certainly have the World’s largest total number of cases, because Italy has been adding only around half as many new cases per day as the US, though Italy’s total right now is higher than America’s, and is actually the second largest total after only China’s. China will have the World’s third largest total number of cases by this weekend, the 28th or 29th, and America will be #1 then, not only on the number of new cases, but on the total number of cases, of this infection. That quickly, then, China will become no longer the #1 Corona Virus nation, but, instead, #3, behind the #1 US, and the #2 Italy.
America has been in political chaos because each of its two houses of Congress, and both Parties, and the President, have been blocked from agreeing on what to do – all of them were ignoring that this is an existential emergency and thus dealt with it as if it were instead just another way for each to increase its chances of re election at the expense of the others. Both political Parties, Republicans and Democrats, and Congress and the President, agreed on a “$ 500 billion fund for corporations” (https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2020/03/24/how-one-Trump-tweet-put-a-deal-in-doubt-488695)to reduce the negative impact on billionaires’ wealth, but Democrats demanded that limits be placed on executives’ pay (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/23/senate-Corona–Virus-rescue-package-143799), and “included reducing student debt and boosting food stability programs. Some of the ideas would be major sticking points with Republicans: The bill, for example, would invest money ‘to eliminate high polluting aircraft’ and ‘research into sustainable aviation fuels.’” Democrats also wanted, but Republicans refused, some costly measures to continue workers’ incomes during their plague induced period of unemployment. Agreement had been reached only on the billionaire bailouts – protections especially of stock values. This is the way America’s ‘democracy’ (https://act.represent.US/sign/the-problem/) works. Rule by the billionaires (http://archive.is/7jGRY) is considered to be ‘democracy’. Luxuries are treated as being more important than necessities are (billionaires are thought to be superior people, who must be served before anyone else). Dollars rule, people don’t. And this chaos is the result of that.
On March 23rd, the prominent progressive economist James K Galbraith headlined “What the Government Needs to Do Next” (https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/what-the-Government-needs-to-do-next) and described in detail what a governmental policy response would be that would subsidize the public to deal with this crisis, but not subsidize the billionaires (who already have way too much and can well afford to become merely millionaires while not actually suffering at all), and that would be of maximum benefit to the total economy by protecting the assets of the most vulnerable (who could then continue to shop and work), but his common sense proposal wasn’t even being considered by the legislators, nor by the President.
Only a few countries had a faster rate of increase in cases than the US did on March 24th, but all of them had far fewer cases: Portugal, South Africa, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Rwanda and Uganda. For example, Rwanda had the world’s highest percentage increase from the day before, almost a doubling, but that was 17 new cases, up from a total of 19 on the day before. So, America’s 30% increase was clearly the World’s worst performance, on that single day.
RUssia’s performance is perhaps the World’s best.
On March 22nd, CNN headlined “Why does RUssia, population 146 million, have fewer Corona Virus cases than Luxembourg?” (that’s a country of 628,000 people, https://edition.CNN.com/2020/03/21/EUrope/Putin–Corona–Virus–RUssia-intl) and reported that
RUssia’s early response measures – such as shutting down its 2,600 mile border with China as early as January 30, and setting up quarantine zones — may have contributed to the delay of a full blown outbreak, some experts say.
RUssian President Vladimir Putin responded to criticism over the number of recorded cases.
A strong record on testing
“The director-general of WHO said ‘test, test, test,’” Dr. Melita Vujnovic, the World Health Organization’s representative in RUssia, told CNN Thursday. “Well, RUssia started that literally at the end of January.”
Vujnovic said RUssia also took a broader set of measures in addition to testing.
“Testing and identification of cases, tracing contacts, isolation, these are all measures that WHO proposes and recommends, and they were in place all the time,” she said. “And the social distancing is the second component that really also started relatively early.”
Rospotrebnadzor, RUssia’s state consumer watchdog, said Saturday that it had run more than 156,000 Corona Virus tests in total. By comparison, according to CDC figures, the United States only picked up the pace in testing at the beginning of March.
On March 20th, the permanently anti RUssian US organization, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (whose “Orwellian” name was perhaps one of the inspirations for George Orwell’s permanent Warfare novel, 1984) headlined “Confronting the Challenges of Corona Virus, RUssia Sees Its Worldview Vindicated” (https://carnegie.RU/commentary/81335) , and tried to put as bad a face on RUssia’s Corona Virus performance as they could, such as by alleging that (alleged) dictatorships were performing no worse than ‘democracies’ at controlling the Corona Virus threat:
The state has reasserted itself as the prime actor on the global scene. International institutions like the World Health Organization have become mere statisticians, and even the EU has taken a back seat to the governments of member states.
The World’s democracies are not faring better in the crisis than non democracies.
However, back on 27 July 2015, that organization had bannered “How Authentic is Putin’s Approval Rating?” (https://carnegie.RU/commentary/60849) and reviewed more than 15 years of Putin’s approval ratings from the RUssian public, and reluctantly concluded that it was and had always been “Authentic,” and almost always high.
Internationally, too, Putin’s leadership of RUssia is more highly regarded than is the current US President’s leadership of America.
Back in 2017, the British firm of WIN | Gallup International issued “Gallup International’s 41st Annual Global End of Year Survey Opinion Poll in 55 Countries Across the Globe” (https://www.gallup-international.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2017_Global-Leaders.pdf), which sampled 1,000 persons in each country in order to determine in each one the percentage of the public who rated “Favorable” and who rated “Unfavorable” each of the following 12 national heads of state (listed here in descending order of their net favorability, or “favorable” minus “unfavorable”): Merkel, Macron, Modi, May, Xi, Putin, Saud, Netanyahu, Rouhani, Erdogan, and Trump (Merkel globally scored highest, Trump lowest).
Amongst RUssians, the score for Putin was 79% Favorable, 11% Unfavorable, for a net score of +68%.
Though Germany’s Merkel had the highest score worldwide, her score in Germany was only 54% Favorable and 44% Unfavorable, for a net of +10.
Macron’s net score in France was -1%.
May’s net in UK was -18%
Rouhani’s in Iran was +37%
Erdogan’s in Turkey was +22%
Modi’s in India was +72% (that’s 84% – 12%)
Trump’s in US was -23% (35% – 58%) – the worst of all.
The following leaders weren’t surveyed in their own countries: Xi, Netanyahu, and Saud.
So: Putin’s net +68% score amongst his own country’s population was second ony to Modi’s – and, whereas Modi had been in office for only three years and had not yet begun his controversial actively anti Muslim campaign, Putin had led RUssia for 17 years, and was a very firmly established high performer in these figures. Here (http://archive.is/0MJ3W) are some of the reasons for this.
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910 – 2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.