Pressibus – From Jean Michel to Brigitte Trogneux, Lies at the Elysée

• The present page started from the remarks I made about Brigitte Macron last month, in December 2021,on the

neighboring page

• devoted to the Covid crisis. After having read the whole file at that date, it seemed relevant to me to treat the subject under its main angles by privileging the genealogical approach because it allows more effectively to understand what happened, because I have experience in the matter and because, incidentally, I am a distant cousin by marriage of the Trogneux family.

• How did this matter come to me? It had been a while since I had heard some astonishing comments about Brigitte Macron née Trogneux, wife of the President of the French Republic Emmanuel Macron. As for many people, it was difficult for me to really understand the allusions… In hindsight, I realize that many people knew, as, for Mitterrand, many knew before the revelation of the existence of a hidden daughter.

• On December 18, 2021, I first heard in a

article

• by Eric Verhaeghe about the fact that : “

the rumor is running with strange vivacity, claiming that Brigitte Macron is actually a man, or transgender. This assertion originally appeared in Faits & Documents in October 2021 had hardly aroused any passion. One wonders why, all of a sudden, it has become a scoop on social networks. Again, it smells like a campaign stink bomb” and “In this chapter, we’ll pour the perfidious words uttered by Gérald Darmanin, evoking Emmanuel Macron’s husband and explaining that, given the violence of the personal attacks, the President was not yet sure to run

• ” (

>>>video>>>

• of 18 seconds). I didn’t really click, since it was billed as a “

rumor

• .” Just another rumor…

• That same December 18, shortly thereafter, I found an

argumentative article

• by Lionel Labosse that was based on the dossier in issue # 501 of the journal “

Facts & Documents

• ” (

here

• in pdf), published in early October 2021. The thesis was daring, was it supported?

• As of this date and without waiting, I was thus able to read and directly analyze the essence of the file at the origin of this “

rumor

• ” advancing the hypothesis that Brigitte Macron would be according to the current vocabulary a “

transgender man

• “, a male individual who would have taken the social appearance of a woman. This is a long investigation by Xavier Poussard, an investigative journalist, as there are too few nowadays. I found it well structured, asking pertinent questions and putting forward common sense hypotheses. As a genealogy enthusiast, I am used to conducting such investigations to find the parents of an ancestor, weighing each hypothesis… The search for archival, administrative, or biographical documents is well conducted by the author. He notes their absence in great number, which appears to him very quickly suspicious. And the same is true of certain inconsistencies that seem to be deliberate, probably to confuse the issue.

• After this first study of the file and before undertaking a more in-depth analysis of its contents, I wanted to know the counter-arguments. What was my surprise! While this revelation had been making the headlines on social networks (in which I do not participate) for five days, I could not find anything serious in the official press to stop the rumor. It was however very easy, it was enough for example that Brigitte and Jean-Michel appear together in front of a media. Why didn’t they do it already?

Right, anti-sanitation pass protest on August 21, 2021, in Paris [photo Stephane Lagoutte, Myop].

• In the current context, this void is a sign of great embarrassment, because, as we know, the “

fake news

• ” are very quickly denied. The newspaper Libération mobilized in the front line to save the respectability of the presidential couple, did present a “

checknews

• “, which was taken up, for lack of a better word, in some other newspapers. I read it carefully, it was completely vacuous on the facts and only made one ad personam attack after another to discredit the investigator Natacha Rey, the one who uncovered the hardest points to find in this affair, despite the fact that the Elysee’s services sprinkled her with false leads.

• Despite the enormity of the attack, the contrast between the seriousness of the prosecution’s case and the factual vacuity of Libération’s journalistic pleadings gave me the intimate conviction that Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey are telling the truth: Emmanuel Macron, born in 1977, married Jean-Michel Trogneux in 2007, born in 1945, who then became his fictitious sister Brigitte born in 1953. The transformation would have been made in the late 1970s. Before Brigitte did not exist or was “

fabricated

• ” a posteriori, after Jean-Michel disappeared [P.-S. of September 15, 2022: I leave this vision of the affair that I had in January  we know, since then, that it is not rigorously accurate]. From being the father of his three children, he would have become their mother. On this basis, I proceeded as I do in genealogy: I adopted the hypothesis, and then looked for the facts that would allow me to clarify it. Should I give a large place to this (state) affair on my page dedicated to Covid? I quickly answered yes for reasons that will be presented later and I was one of the first to blog about it. The threat of a complaint waved by the Elysée and reported by Libération seemed to me very fake in front of the reality of the facts.

• This page is started on January 14, 2022, almost a month after my discovery of this Brigitte affair that I call “

the brigittegate

• “. I realize it because, obviously the media and politicians (including my deputy, we will see) have decided, for lack of anything better, to marginalize the affair and treat it with contempt as a rumor and a tissue of lies. It is therefore necessary to try to convince the Internet users of the validity of the questions and of the hypothesis retained. I will try to do this by means of a division into chapters which, I hope, will allow the reader to orient himself towards his points of interest.

• As Xavier Poussard writes “

The difficulty of this investigation is to disentangle the true from the false

• “. It is not easy, I am trying but it is possible that on a few points, which I think are secondary, this recognition of the true or false is questionable. Knowing this, I will make corrections. I add that, by myself, I do not bring anything new except my link of cousinhood and a dating of photo in 1953/1954, I only take again information already existing elsewhere.

• I invite each reader to make up his or her own mind by confronting the hypothesis presented here with the legend told by the mainstream media, based on the verisimilitude and consistency of the facts.

Alain Beyrand (alain [at] pressibus.org)
with the help of Lionel Labosse (site), Hortense Fuschia, Jean Doux and about fifteen anonymous contributors.
File started January 13, 2022, made public January 17 with the first 15 chapters,
first finalized (version 1.0) on January 24 with 22 chapters.
Photo top and bottom Stephane Lemouton, Closer.
Clicking on the thick-bordered illustrations will enlarge them.

Postscript of April 13 and 30, 2022: as time went by, contacts with correspondents bringing their clues and remarks multiplied, a real citizen’s investigation was set up, which I coordinated. The initial hypotheses have evolved. Some of them, and not the least, have been put forward here for the first time. So, contrary to what I wrote on January 13, this page brings something new. It reports on the progress of the investigation, including its rejected hypotheses, which are kept, but discarded in boxes on a red-striped background. There have been some adjustments (such as this Postscript) but virtually nothing has been deleted. This file is both a diary of the investigation and a status report on its progress.

I don’t like this word “conspiracy”, I prefer “resistance”, but since those who I could call “collabos” designate us thus : I am thinking – I am informed I am interested – I research I analyze – I distrust the media I doubt – I learn – I think I compare – I am independent I step back – I am rational I discern – I examine – I check I question – I trie to be impartial I am uncontrollable – I sort I am self-taught – I dig deep I am not manipulableI am a COMPLOTIST! History is full of conspiracies. There are still some and there always will be. They hide behind lies erected as truths. I have known two huge lies of this kind, both originating from the United States : the “weapons of mass destruction in Iraq“, in 2003, and “the only solution to COVID is vaxxination for all” with its French slogan “Tous vaccinés, tous protégés“. In the first case, France had been dignified in denouncing the lie. In the second case, Macronian France has been fully complicit in a crime against humanity. And the French provaxx have their share of responsibility: those who wanted everyone to be vaxxed, and those who used the QR Code in places they could have boycotted, to denounce the discriminations. Also those who forced others, even children, to wear a mask…

• Several reasons led me to carry out this study and to present it on my site. To denounce heavy lies at the highest level of the State, joining the lies held on Covid-19, as if it were usual to present false realities to the French. To denounce and help to pierce the omerta of the Elysian presidency and the media, whose denial is based on wind.

• But the original impetus is more anecdotal, it is genealogical. I had already studied the Trogneux family and positioned them in my genealogy. Indeed, my wife and our children are cousins with the Trogneux, as this family tree shows.

Clicking on this image takes you to my tree on geneanet with all its links. On the left, due to the usual 100 year confidentiality, the branch stops at Jean Trogneux, Jean-Michel’s grandfather. The common ancestor Jeanne des Essarts, sister of a mayor of Rouen, had as her brother-in-law the famous Etienne Marcel (1315-1358) (page Wikipedia and his equestrian statue in the vicinity of the Paris City Hall).

Christian Settipani

• is a renowned genealogist-historian. I am inspired by his method described in this

page

•  : “

Research is an intimate conviction! I read critics who say “it’s not safe because we don’t have enough clues”. In reality, when you do nothing else for decades, when you are confronted with academic research, you manage to obtain an intimate conviction, even if it will never replace a proof. An intimate conviction is not synonymous with precision either, it more often concerns a kinship rather than a precise filiation.

• ” I use the same notion of intimate conviction in my genealogy, especially for ancestors named XXX (there are some in the tree above).

• I have been expanding my genealogy (my

associated site

• ) for several decades now and conducting real investigations to try to get out of certain dead ends, when no written document validates a parentage, or when a biological parent must be found. Comparing photos, trying to find similarities, trying to distinguish between what is legendary and what is real, finding kinship links hidden behind strong cooperation, etc. So I treated this Trogneux file with this experience. After amassing the clues and trying to find coherences or inconsistencies, when I finally arrive at the intimate conviction of having found the solution, it is rare that I am wrong. This is what gives me the confidence to publish this page.

• Sometimes, however, a new element has challenged my conclusions. I then correct them and usually it is not too far from my first conclusion. Here, it’s the same, I am in good faith and I only ask to see documents. If there are documents that contradict the hypothesis, for example, Brigitte’s first marriage certificate or the birth certificates of her children or photos of her with her young children, let them be shown to me, I will change my mind, while trying to understand why documents that are so easy to show have been hidden for so long. [P.-S. of September 10: on these examples, I changed my mind about Brigitte Macron’s first marriage that I considered false because it was invented; now I consider that it existed but that Brigitte Macron was not the bride. I was wrong but not that wrong…]

• I tried to have one or more complementary elements allowing to strengthen or shake my conviction about Jean-Michel and Brigitte. I did so through the official channel, by sending the following email on December 26 to my MP, Philippe Chalumeau, of the presidential majority (LREM) :

Congressman, I have studied the file of my distant cousin by marriage Brigitte Macron as I study other genealogical files. I have come to an intimate conviction which I expressed on a page of my blog at http://pressibus.org/covid/index.html#brigitte1 Obviously, I am interested in any new factual evidence, even if it might change my mind. Perhaps you can pass some on to me? A bit earlier on this page (http://pressibus.org/covid/index.html#inter2), I give an update on the current Covid situation. I end with this: “Everyone has a choice: be an accomplice or a whistleblower to the conspirators.” Hoping that you will now be in the second category, I wish you, Congressman, the best for 2022.

I didn’t get any response. Is this to be surprised? So far, I have found no evidence that weakens my conviction, while there are many that strengthen it. Late June addition: this member, who voted for apartheid in 2021, was not re-elected in 2022.

• Extract from the

site

• of the Trogneux chocolate factory in Amiens: “

The first Jean-Baptiste Trogneux was a pastry baker. He settled in 1872 in downtown Amiens, in the Gambetta-Delambre-Duméril district (where the current confectionery is located) he made soufflés and entremets. Later, he will also propose the famous “macaroons of Amiens” which made the family famous. The second generation continued the work of the founder and expanded the store. The third generation, that of Jean, the second of the name, knew war and destruction. After the 4th generation, comes the turn of Jean-Alexandre Trogneux. Jean-Baptiste arrives in 2019.

• “

• This article from the Courrier Picard of 1993 shows the place of the family in the society of Amiens:.

Already a family lie… On the left Jean-Michel’s great-grandfather was not named Jean-Baptiste but Marc (tree on the Roglo base, his birth certificate). Marc’s great-grandfather Trogneux was named Jean-Baptiste, so one can assume that the desire to show a lineage of Jean caused the two names to be reversed. This is not insignificant, it is the origin of the store. Jean, born in 1881, Jean-Michel’s grandfather, Jean his father, Jean-Claude his older brother and Jean Alexandre his nephew follow. Stores in Amiens, Arras, Saint Quentin, Lille and Le Touquet (link)

• Officially and mass-mediated, the wife of President of the Republic Emmanuel Macron, elected in 2017, is presented according to a largely fabricated and deceptive narrative that we will call the “legend.” She is presented to us thus in her

Wikipedia page

• (of January 14, 2022) :

Contested are: his gender, date of birth, first marriage and spouse, and divorce. He would not be the mother of his three children but their father (see below). On the right, a teacher or a teacher ? Contested are: her high honors in the baccalaureate, her master’s degree in literature, her dissertation, her role as a press agent in the early 1980s, obtaining the CAPES (Appendix A 32), The Alsatian episode, although subject to dispute (Appendix A 5) appears to be generally accurate (Appendix A 36). November 2017 There, that’s about right. However the paucity of bibliographic evidence regarding Emmanuel’s childhood questions the possibility that they knew each other before 1992 and Emmanuel’s 15th birthday.         February 2022. A 16-year-old student, Emmanuel was 15, according to Wikipedia. Brigitte Macron is untouchable. She says “Love has swept everything in its path” (link), the head of the boarding school says the same thing in her words. Double standards…   She met Emmanuel Macron while she was his high school teacher French teacher with a passion for literature, Brigitte Trogneux was teaching at the high school “La Providence” in Amiens when she had Emmanuel Macron as her Première student. She was then 36 years old and he 17. Fascinated by the intelligence of the young man, she passed on to him her passion for the French language but also for theater since she animated a club within the establishment. “In class, she was always quoting him as an example,” recalls a classmate for “Le Parisien. She was totally transfixed by his writing skills. […] He wrote poems all the time and she read them in front of everyone.” Today “L’Express” reveals that she teaches in “a renowned religious institution in the capital“. In 2015, the “legend” of the Emmanuel-Brigitte meeting was significantly different. Here, the cover of “VSD” of March 5, 2015 and an excerpt from article of “L’Express” of June 25, 2015. Brigitte was then Emmanuel’s French teacher, their age gap was only 19, he was 17, not 15, yet she did not have him as a student (other than in drama club) and the age gap, readjusted to 24, is actually 32. There is no evidence that Emmanuel had any writing talent. From 2015 to 2022, the “legend” of Brigitte has thus been readjusted as various revelations.

• Based on the celebrity press (which Wikipedia takes into account), which relied on Brigitte’s lies, the French were thus led to believe that the romantic love of a hyper-talented 17-year-old high school student would have subjugated his teacher, when in fact it was a 47-year-old teacher who hijacked a 15-year-old teenager from his school (cf.

Appendix A 10

• ). Wikipedia rightly points out that this is a serious offense under French law. Such would be the perverted couple that has been installed since 2017 in the Elysée Palace, at the head of France.

• April 24. In an aside, I stated this at the beginning of this chapter  “

there is also a Wikipedia page on the Trogneux family and another page on the Jean Trogneux company

• .” The first of these two pages has disappeared, without explanation. It is archived

here

• .

• To get out of the lies of this “legend”, it took the persistence of two journalists, Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey, who have long silently conducted the investigation.

• According to the mainstream media. They would be of extreme droute, conspiracy, anti-vaxx, even sexist, transphobic, anti-Semitic… Everything goes through it as in this

article

• from the site numerama. And to repeat that these are only vile “

fake news

• ” conveyed by the vile social networks, the dregs of the Internet etc.

• What to take away from all this? Not much. In any case, when reading the investigations of the two journalists there is nothing that is not sexist, transphobic, anti-Semitic. Saying that someone has changed sex does not automatically imply that he or she is to blame. In this case, in this (state) affair, the blame lies elsewhere, in the fact that he lies on a large scale by claiming the opposite. For the rest, it is better to be reactive to experimental injections than to want to force everybody to be vaxxed, it is better to be a denouncer of conspiracies than an accomplice of these. There are still links with the extreme right, but nothing that is contrary to the law and how would this invalidate the facts revealed?

• Xavier Poussard is editor of the magazine “

Facts & Documents

• “. His

page

• Wikipedia presents it in a dismissive  way: “

relaying many conspiracy theories with a far-right anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist tropism

• “. A little further on, the “

editorial line

• ” is described as “

unconfessed anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic

• “. I have only read the six issues on brigittegate, there is occasional mention of the Rothschild bank (of course, Macron worked there…) and Masonic lodge (of course, some of his supporters are Freemasons), but I did not recognize anything anti-Semitic or anti-Masonic. In my opinion that depends on the reader more than the writer. And even if it were, it wouldn’t mean that one should a priori not read. We also see written “

About the content of the magazine, the press speaks of “fake news” [18,19], of “disinformation [20]”

• ” with in notes 18, 19 and 20 the example of the Brigitte case. On the contrary, should we deduce that before this affair, the magazine had not made any misinformation ?

• And that is indeed the case, because this magazine also has a very good reputation, that of not losing its trials, like Le Canard Enchaîné and Médiapart. It is based on carefully verified information. Its title is in fact characteristic of its content.

Emmanuel Ratier

• was its first editor from 1996 to 2015, Arnaud Be the second, Xavier Poussard is the third, since 2017. More than 500 issues, distributed by subscription, with monthly periodicity, have been published to date.

• From what is written in Wikipedia and elsewhere, it should mostly be understood that this review is very disruptive to the establishment.

The six issues 497 through 501 and 503, 12 pages each, cover the case.
I recommend reading them for those who want to go deeper into what is presented here.
With issue 504 since added, they are available on the journal’s faitsetdocuments.com website for 56 euros.

• In pdf format, you can find

here is an overview of the Poussard file

• with the first pages of each issue and the entire issue 501, the one that in its last two pages reveals the true identity of Brigitte Trogneux, wife Macron.

• On October 3, 2021, in a lengthy

audio interview

• of 1 hour and 41 minutes (reprinted in part in

article

• ), Xavier Poussard shows mechanisms that may underlie the current Covid crisis, with the

Epstein case

• (

article

• on the recent ruling) and its French ramifications, a

Mega group

• , the

Great reset

• . He ends with Macron, the

sale of Alstom

• , a “

corruption pact

• ” that cripples his political opponents and a “

minor corruption

• ” that allows him to be manipulated.

• Natacha Rey gave an essential helping hand to Xavier Poussard at the end of #501 to show that Jean-Michel is surely the father of the children attributed to Brigitte, we’ll come back to that. Apart from this collaboration, Natacha worked in parallel with Xavier. It is a third journalist, Richard Boutry, who brought them to work briefly together.

       
Photo released by Natacha Rey and Emmanuel Ratier, creator of F&D

• Natacha Rey is not at all the same kind of journalist as Xavier Poussard. He is very orderly, methodically linking facts together, quite discreet, building files and publishing them with regularity. She appears scrambling, exuberant, going off in different directions, sometimes clumsy (notably in January 2022 with regard to Xavier Poussard), hardly relying on writings but on video interviews where she shows a wearying logorrhea. And yet, she has essential qualities that allow her to investigate beyond what appears possible: she has solid common sense, she has nerve and above all she has intuition. And she manages to confirm (or deny) her intuitions. It took the combination of the Poussard rock and the Rey spur to succeed in piercing a crucial point of the Brigitte Macron mystery.

• So, if Natacha Rey does not have the official title of journalist (she is only self-proclaimed), she has qualities that are lacking in far too many journalists who nevertheless have their accreditation card. Here are her available videos of interviews :
  • • >>>video 1>>> of 4:35 (link lost) with Amandine Roy, Dec. 10,
    • >>>video 2>>> of 1 hour and 53 minutes (lost link) with Mike Borowski (also on the previous link), on December 14. This video is the most interesting to follow,
    • >>>video 3>>> of 3:47 with Chloe Frammery and Hayssam Hoballah, Jan. 8,
    • >>>video 4>>> of 2:11 with Mike Borowski, January 21.
    • The rest is hard to follow. See this page from April 6.

July 24, 2022: In this page Natacha Rey launches a subscription for support and book publication. August 1. The Elysée is not without reaction to the arguments of Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard. In this country that claims to be very attached to press freedom, Natacha Rey is the subject of two complaints (Appendix D 7 and Appendix D 18), while Xavier Poussard is the subject of a complaint (about a 5-year-old publication, the Dar Olfa affair) and his bank accounts have been closed. He talks about it in the just published issue 507 of F&D, opposite. This “undoubtedly originated in our unassailable investigation of Brigitte Macron.” We look forward to a future issue featuring new revelations about brigittegate…

• Généanet is the most popular genealogy site in France, everyone can post their tree or that of their neighbor. As a result, one can find everything and its opposite there, it is not really a reference site. However, there is generally a consensus. I do not present contemporary individuals on my personal tree, but many genealogists do so for famous people, usually without specifying dates. Here is a classic family tree of Jean (Georges) Trogneux and Simone Pujol, both born in Amiens in 1909 and 1913 respectively, as found in December 2021 (as of January 14, 2022, 14 genealogies show a roughly similar tree on geneanet):

• This is the tree corresponding to the “legend” of Brigitte Trogneux, married Macron. We will see later that there are important corrections to be made on Jean-Michel and Brigitte, with two additional grandchildren for Jean and Simone.

• Let’s provide some generally accepted facts about the children of Jean Trogneux and Simone Pujol, all born in Amiens:
  • 1. Anne-Marie Gisèle Marguerite (Annie), born July 9, 1932, married in 1955 to Gérard Boulogne (1929-2022)  three children Christine born in 1957, married in 1983 to Benoît Haquin, Sylvie and Thierry,
    2. Jean-Claude Marie Joseph, born August 14, 1933, first married to Danièle Courbot in 1960 with three children including the current successor of the chocolate factory, Jean Alexandre Trogneux born in 1961 ; remarried in 1990 with Brigitte Poillon, commonly known as Brigitte Trogneux, which is a source of confusion (example)  he died in 2018,
    3. Maryvonne, born January 17, 1937, died with her husband Paul Farcy of a car accident on February 24, 1960; their daughter Nathalie, born September 23, 1959 and thus 5 months old at the death of her parents, married Richard Bataille (1954-2015) and had two daughters in the Lille area.
    4. Monique, born August 7, 1941, married in 1963 to Jean-Claude Gueudet (born 1940), France’s first automobile distributor (presentation Wikipedia) ; three children,
    5. Jean-Michel Henri, born February 11, 1945, about whom we will return at length,
    6. Brigitte Claude, born April 13, 1953, married to André-Louis Auzière and then Emmanuel Macron.

• Brigitte would thus be the youngest of a large family, born eight years after her brother Jean-Michel, when her mother was 40 years old. According to the “legend”, she would have married in 1974, at 21 years old, with André(-Louis) Auzière, 23 years old, she would have given birth to three children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière, born respectively on September 1st, 1975, April 26th, 1977 and January 30th, 1984 (without knowing the birth certificates), when she was 22, 24 and 31 years old. Everything seems usual, a classic life of a young French woman, not enough to attract attention…

• The following beautiful photo of a large, happy family was broadcast, without caption, on June 13, 2018, on France 3, in the documentary “

Brigitte Macron, a French Novel

• ” recounting the Brigitte legend (

>>video>>

• of 1 hour and 27 minutes) (

>>trailer>>

• of 3 minutes and 20 seconds), “

Their couple intrigued France before fascinating the world. How can a 40-year-old woman, married with three children, leave everything for a 16-year-old student ?

• “. “

An unbelievable but true story

• ,” um…

• This photo is the only one where everyone agrees to accredit the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux : the boy on the left. We can estimate that he would be 8 or 9 years old. It is also the only photo where, according to the “legend”, one sees the whole family, including Brigitte on her mother’s lap. We will see in the next chapter that there are two other photos of Brigitte as a child and that would be it, before she was more than thirty years old. What other person in France who grew up in a close-knit family would have so few photos of her childhood? Or why would she want to hide them?

• The photo appears authentic, there are the two parents, sitting, surrounded by their children. Standing, from left to right, are Jean-Michel, Maryvonne, Jean-Claude, Annie and Monique. But is the “legend” true? Rather than the last child, Brigitte, could the little girl be the first grandchild ?

• In a first time, in early March, we concluded that this little girl could be a niece who died young, mentioned by Brigitte Macron, about which we did not know much. The mystery of this dead niece continued. On May 12, the new light of the

Chapter 28

• allowed us to consider that she was Brigitte Trogneux, sister in the civil status of Jean-Michel, born in 1953, and perhaps biological niece. She would have died in 1961. Jean-Michel would have been very marked by the early death of this niece-sister and will want, later, to make her reincarnate by transforming himself into a woman and by adopting the name and the date of birth of the girl. This will will be understood and partly shared by his parents, brother and sisters who have lived the same drama. This explains their acceptance of the gender change.

• Let’s go back to the photo. Given what has just been said (especially the girl’s birth date of April 13, 1953), and Jean-Michel’s winter shirt, it would be dated fall 1954 or winter 1954/1955. Perhaps Christmas 1954? Or January 1st, 1955? Anne-Marie is then 22 years old, Jean-Claude 21 years old, Maryvonne 17 years and a half, Monique 13 years old, Jean-Michel 9 years and a half, Brigitte one year and a half.

[Getty Images]

• Let’s start with the birth on April 13, 1953. Here it is presented on this extract of page of a base of the genealogical site Généanet :

• Généanet should not be an illusion since, as already said, anyone can create a database (even under a pseudo) and invent a birth certificate n°640 etc. This is not verifiable, only very close family members have access to contemporary civil status (over about a century). The base to which this page belongs is run under the name “

fraternelle.org

• ” with Freemasonic resonances (see

page

• Wikipedia). The

page

• devoted to Brigitte (with the above excerpt) is a very long and impressive

hagiography

• . The “

first lady

• ” (it says 45 times) is even compared to Josephine de Beauharnais, and guess who would be her Napoleon… The subject of this file is, in July 2022, reduced to the minimum : “

These days, a fake news has inflamed Facebook: she would lie about her date of birth…” She is tired of being talked about her age, she is saturated,” says an intimate.

• “

• Let’s linger on the revelation of the date of birth. Xavier Poussard speaks of it in this way, implying that it could have been set after the 2007 wedding [F&D500p10] :

• The “caption” attributes only three photos to Brigitte as a child:

Illustration of a tweet with a sensible question…

• We saw the first of these three photos in the previous chapter. The second would be that of Tiphaine Auzière, the third that of Laurence Auzière, the two daughters of Jean-Michel / Brigitte, which explains a certain resemblance [F&D500p5]. For the last two pictures, a technical analysis shows that the central picture was originally in colors and was much reworked to bring it back to the 1950s, while the right picture, remained in its original juice is dated from the mid-1980s [F&D503p6], while the future first lady of the start-up nation should be in this decade a woman of more than 20 years!

With her two daughters, Tiphaine on the left, Laurence on the right. Then the two sisters with their brother Sebastien. 2017.

• Hungry for images, forced to add illustrations that can create an illusion, the documentary “

Brigitte Macon, a French novel

• ” also shows a short video sequence of a granddaughter dancing, and a photo of the Trogneux parents with a small child very much after the 1950s :

• There are certainly some accounts of Brigitte’s life before 1990, but they remain vague, and in this case the artistic vagueness hardly seems convincing even for a national novel [F&D500p6]. Xavier Poussard points out that several journalists have tried to find friends or friends of Brigitte’s youth, in vain [F&D500p8]…

• However, there was a biographical twist in 2017  we learned that Brigitte had become involved in politics in 1989  Emmanuel was only 12 years old…. Finally, something concrete, a woman in the flesh committed to action… “

It’s a document that was sleeping, tucked away in the drawers of a Truchtersheim family and that is now a collector’s item: the electoral leaflet of the “Truchtersheim Tomorrow” list, and its 15 candidates, among whom a certain Brigitte Auzière. Brigitte Macron, married at the time to the banker André-Louis Auziere, lives in Truchtersheim with her husband and 3 children. She is a teacher of literature at the Protestant college- high school Lucie-Berger in Strasbourg

• ” [

article

• from 2017 from France 3 Grand Est]. It is about the municipal elections of March 12, 1989, here is this document :

See also the end of the Chapter 9 and the Appendix A 36

• At first, the investigation failed to cross-reference information, despite some testimony (

article

• ). Factual elements were missing, in general for the stay in Alsace. The face of this leaflet, worked automatically with a restoration software (above right), did not appear blatantly to be that of Brigitte. Eventually it did, it would be her, as shown in

Appendix A 36

• , in agreement with other Alsatian information discovered.

In conclusion of this chapter and the previous one, the biographical and iconographic record of a young girl from the wealthy middle class is quite thin. In the absence of other more consistent documents (why hide them?), nothing proves that a Brigitte Trogneux, daughter of Jean and Simone Pujol, born in 1953, would have existed before 1984 and her 31st birthday. We will see later that we went back to 1985 approximately, having before only a birth certificate and a family photo from the end of 1954. It is very thin.

• “

Jean-Michel Trogneux was concealed for a very long time and remains very largely a mystery, a “ghost” character. His existence was first confined to a document emanating from a company of the Trogneux family, the minutes of the extraordinary general meeting of the company of Exploitation des Etablissements Arrasse organized on May 25, 2007

• “. He is “

shareholder and scrutineer alongside his brother Jean-Claude and his nephew Jean-Alexandre

• “. But it’s quick, since he is no longer in the bylaws “

on October 17, 2007, that is, three days before the wedding between Brigitte and Emmanuel

• ” [F&D501p2].

• In 2018, at 73 years old, he is present on the death announcement of his brother Jean-Claude [F&D501p3]. It is also in 2018, in the TV movie of FR 3, that appears the family photo with Jean-Michel, without caption. But the boy revealed to the world by this photo will be named only in 2019 with the book of Sylvie Bommel [F&D501p3]. It is thus very recently that Jean-Michel Trogneux entered the official Macronian legend. Until 2019, this character stood in the shadows and one had to search for information on his account with one’s teeth.

• Other elements appeared during the investigation, including his marriage in 1980, but after 1984 it remains a life in dotted line, on paper, without photo or physical public presence. In short before 1984 we have a Jean-Michel present and a Brigitte absent, after 1984 a Brigitte very present and a Jean-Michel almost erased : as if Jean-Michel had become Brigitte…

• At this point and without yet addressing the thorny issue of Brigitte’s first husband and their three children, a first question arises, since their strange life itinerary suggests  is it physically possible that Jean-Michel has become Brigitte ?

• At the end of his investigation, strong also of other elements that will be presented later, Xavier Poussard in “

Facts & Documents

• ” n°501, page 10 comes to ask the question about Brigitte: “

What if it was a man “

• . Could she be Jean-Michel ? He relies on Natacha Rey’s parallel research on her Facebook page (private) and this comparison of photos :

After the broadcast of “Brigitte Macron, a French novel” which incidentally revealed the physical existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux, Natacha Rey posted, on the same platform, this more than disturbing assemblage putting side by side the current “Brigitte” and “Jean-Michel” at the dawn of adolescence.

Right, facial resemblance by Megvii software: normal probability that it is the same person

Resemblance by comparison Betaface: between 71 and 67%.

• Later, Xavier Poussard will use the facial recognition software of the Chinese company Megvii which will establish a good probability that these two faces chronologically very spaced belong to the same individual. Natacha Rey will do the same and everyone can compare photos:

• Other details in Brigitte’s earlier life support this hypothesis. For example, in her third video, Natacha Rey reports that Brigitte recalled living alone in the United States during Neil Armstrong’s moon landing in 1969 (

link

• ). She would have been 16 at the time, what was she doing there alone at that age ? Jean-Michel, on the other hand, was 24 years old and this stay then appears much more likely (‘

Appendix A 26

• ).

• Other questions deserve to be asked. In particular these, raised by associated investigative internet users :
  • 1. Is it possible that a Brigitte Trogneux was born in Amiens in 1953, who would have died shortly after ? Her brother Jean-Michel would then have somehow reincarnated her sister… May 25: this hypothesis, now favored, was issued here as early as the end of January 2022.
    2. Jean-Michel had a niece who died young (Appendix A 11), who could be the girl in this family photo.

It remains that the legend presents Brigitte as having had a first husband, André-Louis Auzière, and three children. How is this compatible with the hypothesis that has just been formulated?

• Following the caption listed in the fraternelle.org Geneanet file, the life of Brigitte Macron’s first husband, later remarried Macron, appears thus :

• On close inspection, the blurring is widespread  :
  • • Depending on the documents, his first name varies, André, André Louis, André-Louis, Jean-Louis. In fact it would be André for the first name, Louis for the second and André-Louis would be a passing mistake of Sylvie Bommel, often repeated later. For Jean-Louis, it is his uncle: we will come back to it several times, and at length. Starting, anecdotally, with the article of Figaro Madame in illustration below.
    • Her birthplace, Eséka in Cameroon, only became a commune in 1954; why would a young European girl have given birth in such a remote place? There is no chance of finding a civil status there…. The presence of the parents at that time in Eséka seems to be proven, however (Appendix A 18). The remaining vagueness will lead to the question of who was really born there (Chapter 27).
    • It would be first a banker at the Crédit du Nord, then “sub-director of the regional delegation of the Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur” in Strasbourg, but there is no record of it in the banking sector [F&D501p7] .
    • Isn’t it strange that he quietly leaves the marital home when his wife falls in love with a teenager, leaving him with custody of the three children aged 17, 15 and 8 ?
    • The date of the divorce, in 2006, appears strangely late, when it’s been about fifteen years since the spouses have been living together and their youngest daughter is 22.
    • The three photos that have been published of him, below, are of someone else who could be identified..
    • “Death Certificate #3888“: is this usually known information? Even the time “6:35 PM” !
    • Why did it take the celebrity press a year to report the death of the first husband (and father of her children) of the “first lady” ?
    • Tiphaine, the youngest daughter, announced, “my father died, I buried him on December 24.” This is contradictory with a death on December 24 and a cremation on the 28th.

The 2018 France 3 TV movie “Brigitte Macron, un roman français” shows this photo featuring Brigitte and her first husband André-Louis. This is actually Claude Hugot, a fellow teacher. Then there was a fake tweet the same year, using this photo, reuniting husband, wife and lover (Emmanuel at 12) (article). And a fake interview with Andre-Louis, actually a hoax (article)… And in 2020, Brigitte mourns her first husband (opposite, link)…

• Since the man could not be found, the focus was on an almost homonymous man, a certain Jean-Louis André Auzière. There is even a confusion between the two on this document, as pointed out by Xavier Poussard [F&D501p9]:

The confusion between Jean-Louis and André-Louis made by Salomé Garganne on planet.fr in May 2017 (extract, link).

• This photo of André-Louis as a young man is the one from his wedding, below. The idea then comes to compare it with a recent photo of Jean-Louis. There is a resemblance, confirmed by the Betaface comparison software (71%,

Appendix B 6

• ). It was believed that the bride and groom would come from a wedding photo of the bride and groom Jean-Louis Auzière and Susan Spray, where the bride’s fake parents were embedded on the right, to make it look like a photo from a first wedding of Brigitte Macron. Indeed, the bride, below right automatically retouched by software, does not look like Brigitte.

A thorough analysis of this wedding photo can be found in Appendix A 9. At right, enhanced images of the bride.

• Those close to Brigitte’s first husband describe him as very self-effacing, “

so neutral

• .” Tiphaine says her father “

prefers to remain in complete anonymity

• .” Perhaps, but from there to leave no trace… No information could be obtained from his close family. In 2019, Paris Match lent him some words, but it was “

bidon

• ” (opposite,

link

• ).

• According to Geneanet, including this

tree

• , Jean-Louis Auzière, born in 1943, would be an uncle of André-Louis, born in 1951. Jean-Louis married Susan Spray the first time and they had two children, Pascal, born November 18, 1966, and Marc, born October 26, 1974. Then he remarried to Catherine Audoy born in 1944, the couple had no children. Recall that the Geneanet data may not be reliable, these appear accurate. Complements on the Auzières in Appendices

A 18

• ,

A 30

• ,

A 31

• ,

A 42

• , in the following chapter and elsewhere again…

The France 3 documentary shows a fake André Louis Auzière [and fake Jean-Louis] mowing his lawn.
In fact, this would be Jean-Paul Debes, present on the Truchtersheim municipal election leaflet seen in Chapter 7.
One day, André [the real Jean-Louis] caught his fingers in the lawnmower. He had to be taken to the emergency room for
stitches. And Sylvie Bommel comments, “This is probably one of the few times he was noticed.” (article)

“This is a man who does not want to be found after what happened. It was a terrible shock to him to have his wife leave him for someone so young,” a source said. He then reportedly cut ties with everyone except his children. He reportedly hasn’t given any more life signs (link)

• This chapter deals with the biological parents of the three Auzière children, Sebastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, born in 1975, 1977 and 1984. We now know that Jean-Michel / Brigitte Macron is not their mother but their biological father. The hypothesis on the identity of the biological mother has changed during the present investigation. We will stay, in this chapter, only on the first of these hypotheses, revealed in mid-October 2021, popularized in mid-December. In retrospect, it was a necessary step to know, on April 12, 2022 (probably, becoming, on May 25, an intimate conviction) the mother we retain in this case, which will be presented in

Chapter 27

• .

• It was while analyzing the information about André Louis and Jean-Louis Auzière that Natacha Rey had the intuition that this Jean-Louis, so close to André, could be the one who passed on his Auzière surname to Brigitte’s three children. She then had the idea to contact his second wife, Catherine Audoy. Xavier Poussard tells the rest in “

Faits & Documents

• ” n°501, it is an anthology moment, the key to the enigma was about to be revealed :

• Obviously the police, with their unfriendly methods, had a message to send to the journalist. If until now the investigation on the biographical track of Brigitte advanced by the research and the laborious study of documents difficult to find, the surprise irruption of the pandores in the residence of Natacha signaled that this last was on the good track. In any case, one can say that such a disproportionate reaction of the police to a banal contact is indicative of something that should not happen in the public place. The hypothesis below, known as “

Catherine Audoy mother

• “, formulated in mid-October 2021, was going to impose itself on brigittologists for six months before another one rejected it and took its place in this file, where the rejection of this starting hypothesis is now acted :

All this leads to believe that Catherine Audoy could really be the mother of Brigitte’s three children, that’s what Natacha Rey, Xavier Poussard and their readers, including myself, have deduced. It was only later that another explanation was given (Chapter 27). Catherine Audoy is a painter and designer. “In particular, she paints children’s faces whose resemblance to “Brigitte’s” grandchildren is unsettling, to say the least, as if they were the models…” [F&D501p10]. To the left, illustrations (from Catherine Audoy’s old facebook account) and comments found on the internet It is then possible to build a scenario where Jean-Michel would be the biological father of his three children Sebastien, Laurence, Tiphaine Auzière, the biological mother being Catherine Audoy married Auzière. On his side, Jean-Louis Auzière can then be considered as an adoptive father, even official from the administrative point of view. A striking resemblance of features between Catherine and Laurence goes in this direction. Xavier Poussard goes further by estimating that the resemblance is strong with the three children [F&D501p10]. However, the Betaface comparison is more mixed, 63% to 60%, between the three Auzière children and Catherine Audoy

• This explained the custody of Natacha Rey, an extraordinary custody for which no other explanation could be found at the time. Another oddity, just after this episode, Natacha Rey tells of having been contacted by other people (

link

• ). After the revealing act of the gendarmes, tongues were loosened to come spontaneously to help the investigation and thus try to guide it :

• How were the parents of the three Auzière children declared at their births in 1975, 1977, 1984? We don’t know. Everything seems to have been carefully looped, as with the life of André-Louis Auzière. Similarly, we do not know under what conditions Jean-Michel became Brigitte and how he managed to be recognized as the mother of his children.

From left to right, Tiphaine, Laurence and Sebastien Auzière with Emmanuel and Brigitte (photo Gala).
Emmanuel Macron at his wedding: “I wanted to thank Brigitte’s children.
If there are any for whom it might not have been very easy, it was for them.
And it had, thanks to them, the force of evidence.” (link).

• The hypothesis thus constructed seemed to be the only one able to assemble in a coherent way the pieces emerging from the Brigitte puzzle. It corresponded to positive answers to the following questions asked by Xavier Poussard [F&D501p10] (adding links to Wikipedia):

• This scenario is now replaced by another, presented in

Chapter 27

, which also positively answers Xavier Poussard’s questions.

• Now that we are approaching reality, we can admire the way the Brigitte legend was built. The manufacture of her first husband André-Louis Auzière is particularly clever, allowing to keep the patronymic Auzière leaving in the shade the one who can sometimes be considered the adoptive father, Jean-Louis Auzière. Transforming, later, Jean-Michel from the father of his children to the mother was clever and was masterfully interpreted by the family. Having practiced acting classes proves effective….

• However, the reality is even more complex, since it appears that, according to the diagram below, Jean-Michel is the father of two other children, Jean-Jacques and Valerie. This tree has lost its relevance since we know that the three Auzière children are not the children of Catherine Audoy. The reader’s attention will be drawn to the right-hand side of the tree, which is correct, showing another relationship of Jean-Michel Trogneux, this one official with another woman, Véronique Dreux, from whom two other children, Jean-Jacques and Valérie, were born.

Tree made up from two trees found on the Web (1 2), keeping only what fits the hypothesis presented here. This tree has since been rejected.

This tree, false as far as Catherine Audoy is concerned, has been replaced by the version 2, which will also be rejected and replaced.

• Xavier Poussard explains how he discovered the couple’s first child [F&D503p4] :

• On the right, the wedding was celebrated, very discreetly, on a Monday…

• Similarly was born then a sister of Jean-Jacques, Valerie Anne-Catherine Trogneux on February 20, 1984 in Amiens. She married Frank Limpens on June 21, 2008 in Amiens [F&D503p5]. Jean-Jacques Trogneux was present at the Elysée Palace during the inauguration of Emmanuel Macron in 2017. His sister was not there. Their mother, Véronique Dreux, born in 1952 in Amiens, remarried on January 30, 1998 in Toulon to Alain de la Simone (L’Eleu de la Simone), born in 1935 in Paris (having for nephew the singer

Albin de la Simone

• ) [F&D503p5].

Jean-Jacques Trogneux sporting, apparently portrayed by Catherine Audoy, and in front of the Elysee Palace in 2017.

• Thus, contrary to the family tree of the legend, presented in the first chapters, Jean-Michel Trogneux would not have remained single without children, he would have had five children with two wives and, after change of sex, he would have become Brigitte, would have married Emmanuel Macron, reaching the unofficial title of “

first lady of France

• “. Extraordinary journey skillfully camouflaged … to the point that it is difficult to imagine … It is so much more comfortable to believe in an idyllic legend carefully romanticized by communicators, diligently spread by magazines and media. Once again, we have the illustration that the bigger the lie, the better it goes… until we realize that, behind the actors of the play, reality exceeds fiction.

• As Njama points out in a

comment

• from Agoravox :

• Indeed these retirement amounts are further proof of the vast web of lies on which the Brigitte Macron “legend” is based. This could be a new line of inquiry for an investigating judge who would give himself the means to conduct a serious investigation.

Astoning remarks of all kinds from 2020 and July 2022: “After McKinsey, Rothschild and Alstom, among many other deals sensitive, here come the “UberFiles.” A new political-economic scandal whose facts date back to 2015” (link).

• Does the hypothesis of Jean-Michel becoming Brigitte lead to inconsistencies? The one that seemed strongest to me is relative to the age of the character. With this biographical merger, Brigitte gets eight extra pigs. This old age gives her 77 years in 2022. Does this correspond to the canon of beauty that magazines show us? Xavier Poussard gives the following answer [F&D503p6] :

Amanda Lear at 71 (2010), 80 (2019), 81 (2020) (link). Even at 5 years younger, this is still amazing…
Marie-France in her youth (link), at 67 (in 2013) (Fabien MacRa, same link) and at 73 (link).

• So in this world of appearance there are illustrious antecedents in show business and Brigitte is not an exception.

• However all the photos are not to his advantage. On some pictures the outrage of time and the hours of flight in the jet set are visible and betray his true biological age, to bring it in line with that of Jean-Michel…

Center photo: original version (1 2) from 2019, photoshopped version from France Dimanche July 3, 2022, tweets (1 2).

• Comparing the photos, we see that, like any senior citizen, her height as a teacher at La Providence has diminished, she is shrinking. And videos show that at 72 years old on 12 cm heels, it is difficult to gambol, her unassertive gait is problematic when she walks on stilts…

Similar wigs, some might think the singer Iggy Pop, shown here, born in 1947, 75 in 2022, would be his younger brother (or sister ?). “It all started with Natacha Rey who, as soon as she saw her appear, had the evidence that Brizitte was a transsexual and investigated for three years… Some only obsessed about her wig and blue-plastic contact lenses… already bizarre. To deny the wearing of a wig, the Élysée used a procedure that will go down in history. The palace had a job offer published looking for a hairdresser capable of applying extensions [article of January 11, 2018]. Unheard of! Never does the Presidency post a job for such a position. It’s a bit technical, though, extensions [page Wikipedia] only lengthen a head of hair… and countless close-ups of Brizitte’s head corroborate that she only wears wigs. Which are all the more noticeable because they are too large…unless she has a male-like cranial volume…“. Article from January 18, 2022 also featuring short videos showing that in the way she moves and is, Brigitte is not very feminine…

“Thanks to the wind! Here you can clearly see the little bit of hair attached to the front on the tiny shaved hair and another floor with the hairpiece, I used to be a hairdresser and I know how it’s messed up !” [tweet]

“Hands say a lot about a person’s age” [tweet]

The arms too…

• So Brigitte would be 77 years old on Friday, February 11, 2022. Will we remember to wish her a happy birthday ? Yes, see the

Appendix A 6

• .

• And from a March 11 tweet, four photos betraying age  :

1234

.

• A woman can have a look (bone structure) close to a man, she can have a short neck, long feet, flat buttocks. It is probably very rare for her to have all of these characteristics together. Also, as indicated on this

photo

• of tweet, it is usual for men to have the knee out, women the knee in, again Brigitte is in the first category. And also for her overdeveloped lower face (

photo

• ), for the relative length of the fingers (

Manning’s index

• ,

photo

• ), even the hairiness (

photo

• ). These elements are repeated and expanded upon in the

Appendix B 12

• . Yes, it is very rare for a woman to have so many generally masculine characteristics…

Variants of the photo on the left : 1 2 3 [Bestimage Agency], avenue Montaigne, Paris, June 21, 2018.

“The neck of a nymph, graceful, light, delicate, sleek, supposed to be that of a Lady of the High.
Reproduced without trickery by Natacha Rey.”

These illustrations and comments were collected from the web.

• In her manner, Brigitte can also have masculine ways. Such is the case for the way she sits with her legs spread (

manspreading

• ) in a video from the France 3 documentary “

La Stratégie du Méteore

• ,” available on Youtube under the title “

Macron’s diabolical strategy to win the presidential elections

• ” (

>>>video>>>

• 1:21).

Here’s this >>>video>>> 29-second clip showing a very masculine way of sitting.
// copy and paste pdf : https://pressibus.org/gen/trogneux/compar/assise.mp4 //

• Nevertheless, often dressed by renowned couturiers, Brigitte was able to create an illusion (excerpts from this

page

• of Gala magazine):

• Three times, in this month of January 2022, the Brigitte Macron affair has brought us back to the year 1977, which appears to be the year when Jean-Michel Trogneux begins to become a woman.

• 1. 1977, the interview of the transsexual Veronique.While her reaction should have been immediate, to quell the rumor as soon as possible, Brigitte Macron opposed a long silence to the revelations about her transsexuality. These had however inflamed the social networks, from mid-December 2021. Apart from the censorship and the outraged and unargued denials of the complacent media, the Elysée avoided the subject and was even very discreet. It is only in mid-January that Mrs. Macron brings the first answers, in two media interventions. That of January 12 is brief  “Of course it’s a lie, but hey… Once I said that, I did not say anything …“, also vaguely speaking of complaint.The second time, on RTL radio, on January 14, she spoke at greater length on the subject. She spouts her nonsense with aplomb, in a natural way (she has so much experience…), of course without the slightest proof, birth certificate, marriage certificate, photos or other documents, in short the classic tools of the genealogist… She enters as if she were at home in any big media and she talks in front of journalists who do not know how to study a file and who swallow any bluff (“rumor”, “transphobic”…). The one who assaulted a teenager, the one who, through her husband, assaulted all French citizens, even dares to present herself as a defender of teenage harassment (see also the Appendices A 17 and D 25). How long will this grotesque play  last? When will we get back to reality and the documents and facts (not to say Facts & Documents…) that testify to it ? Since its formation, this couple has set up the lie as a way of life. Its way of governing is likewise based on lies, seasoning it with demagogy, bluffing, accusatory inversions, as we will see later, and other artifices. Here is the transcript of this >>>video RTL>>> of 1 mn 21, Brigitte Macron (BM) answering questions from journalist Alba Ventura (AV)  :
     

     AV – Have you been a victim of social networking too? Recently, you were called a man on social media. First it hurt you, that? BM – At first I looked at it from a little bit far, I heard about it and then well… And then at a certain point, I realized that they were upsetting my genealogy. AV – How’s that? BM – That is, they had changed my family tree. That is to say, three quarters of the family was fine and then all of a sudden we get to my brother. I am my brother. And there, we touch the genealogy of my parents and there it is impossible. AV – When you say “they,” who are these people? AV – Exactly. But you, you have, dare I say, the means to defend yourself. BM – Totally. AV – Finally, a 13-year-old or a 13-year-old who continues to suffer in silence…. I think it took you five-six days to get some information out… BM – I took five and a half days… AV – Five-six days, you?. BM – Yeah, five and a half days, I think, yeah. So you can imagine… With a lawyer who is experienced in the practice…

      

     She doesn’t say “I would be my brother…” or “They claim that…”
     Brigitte Macron admits, “I am my brother“
     She proves us right even in her denial!
     This interview from 2022 is going to be valuable to us for the comparison it allows with another interview, from 1977 :

     The first proof (here the second, in Chapter 30) January 23, 2022: while in the process of first finalizing this page, I learn of the discovery of a >>>INA video>>> of 1 min 47, dated September 27, 1977 (it has disappeared from the page INA around February 10, I replaced it with a saved version, 15 MB). It features an interview with “Véronique and Martine, transsexuals in the 70s“, Martine with her face uncovered and Véronique with her contours in the dark. On the television channel “Antenne 2″, they answer the journalist François Desplats with the comment (typing errors included) :”Veronique and Martine, who became women after an operation, bring a testimony on their transsexuality. With her face hidden, Veronique talks about her operation. For her, it is not a transformation because she has always felt like a woman. Martine evokes her difficulties in the working world. Since her operation, she had to change jobs because the environment in which she worked would not have accepted her gender change“. This video is incomplete. The rest of the dialogue between Veronique and François Desplat is transcribed in Appendix A 19, but the essence is already here. This Veronique’s voice and Brigitte Macron’s voice are practically the same. Also, Veronique has the same “That is” speech tic as in the above RTL video from January 14, 2022, from 1:21. Listen the comparison is striking : >>>video>>> of 1 min 27 // copy and paste pdf: https://pressibus.org/gen/trogneux/compar/voix.avi // The silhouette in the INA video looks very similar to Brigitte’s. And the same body language…         This comparison of voices allows us to affirm that Brigitte and the transsexual Veronique are the same person, therefore that Brigitte Macron was born male. Certainly the expert is self-proclaimed, but his statement appears accurate, no contradictory analysis was presented and especially everyone can see with the video above that the voices are the same…

     From there we can affirm that Brigitte Macron born Brigitte Trogneux is a fictitious character, invented, well not completely invented, we will see it later. The proof that Brigitte would have been born and would have grown up under the name of Jean-Michel Trogneux is not, however, established. However, the number of clues accumulated in this sense leaves little doubt.

     Jean-Michel Trogneux would have become a woman around September 1977, if we are to believe the qualification of “transsexual“, implying operated, given to the two interviewees. A change of sex does not take place in three months (Xavier Poussard indicates 3 years), it is possible that the interview was conducted at the beginning of the process. However, this is prior to the birth of three of Jean-Michel’s five children (out of his two “families“) : Tiphaine (1984), Jean-Jacques (1982) and Valerie (1984), which could create an impossibility. We notice then that to the question of the journalist seeking to know if she was operated, Véronique shuts up… It is thus later that she was operated, supposing that she was really operated. Or she was only operated on her face, her voice and her neck, possibly her breasts… There are still questions, but the darkness begins to be d

     
  2. 1977, the meeting with Pastor Joseph DoucéOn January 8, 2022, at the end of her 3rd video, Natacha Rey opened a new lead. She presented the first photo below pointing, in the foreground, to a young man, looking pensive, leaning on his knees, cigarette in his mouth (on the right he is compared with an image from the video of the previous chapter) :
     In the photo on the left, from left, probably Pastor Doucé and Jean-Michel Trogneux
     On the right montage, Jean-Michel in 1977 and Brigitte in 2017 : same way of sitting, also on this photo of tweet in 2021
     Natacha Rey insists that it would be Jean-Michel Trogneux. There would be formal evidence that would be presented in a few weeks, in February 2022. Why wait? However, no proof was brought in the following months, there is only a physical resemblance and a certain logic that is explained in what follows. It is therefore appropriate to be cautious about the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux on this document. The photo is taken from the television program “Faites entrer l’accusé“, broadcast in 2005, devoted to the assassination of Pastor Doucé (>>>video>>> of 1 hr. 09 min.)Joseph Doucé was a Belgian Baptist pastor, excommunicated, graduated in psychology-sexology from the Protestant University of Amsterdam, naturalized French in 1982. He disappeared at the age of 45 on July 19, 1990, his body reportedly found in the forest of Rambouillet on October 24, 1990. He had founded the Center of Christ the Liberator (CCL) in Paris in 1976. According to the profession of faith of this group, it was to provide a space of welcome and speech for believers belonging to sexual and gender minorities: homosexuals, transgender, sado-masochists and also for other sexual perverts including pedophiles, a criminal group in terms of the law. Declaring himself “homosexual practicing [his sexuality]” as much as a pastor (believer practicing his faith), he welcomed in various meetings or in his bookstore, under the good auspices of Christ, young people in suffering encountering difficulties in affirming and living socially their specific sexuality considered as marginal, deviant or psychopathological.
     Pastor Doucé, his store, his meetings, two of his books and a headline about his passing.
     For young people, changing sex at the time almost obliged them to go through prostitution. For the older people, who had become parents and integrated into society, and who were ill at ease with their own skin, listening to the pastor, his meetings and his networks, which made it possible to be operated on discreetly, constituted a relatively accessible step. It is therefore probable that Jean-Michel Trogneux followed this path. Xavier Poussard brings details (we find the Fraternelle already mentioned on a Généanet site) [F&D503p6] :

      

     Mid-1980s. Jean-Michel Trogneux (40 years), although a family man, becomes aware of the “gender dysphoria” that he has buried for so long and is about to perform his “reassignment“. It must be said that the times strongly encourage such steps. […] The law is beginning to evolve. if it is still legally and medically forbidden to change one’s sex by surgery in France, a public care pathway was defined in 1979 based on a two-year psychiatric follow-up before being able to access hormonal treatment and then surgeries (it takes three years) that are quite costly and generally performed abroad, mainly in the Netherlands and Great Britain. Under the influence of Pastor Joseph Doucé’s Center of Christ the Liberator, which welcomes, connects and files (on whose behalf ?) members of “sexual minorities” (homosexuals, lesbians, sadomasochists, transvestites, transsexuals, pedophiles, etc.), from Dr. Léon Pérel, who operates openly at the Saint François clinic in Paris, and from Henri Caillavet (Masonic dignitary of the Parliamentary Fraternity), the media are giving ever greater prominence to the subject.

     On Pastor Doucé, there is a page on Tom Reucher’s Transidentity site and, on the BoyWiki site, another page of introduction and, in full, his book “Pedophilia in Question“. In it, we learn that Joseph Doucé was a member of the Senate Committee on Freedoms. On September 12, 1989, he had the European Parliament vote on a “Resolution on discrimination against transsexuals” and on September 29 of the same year on a “Recommendation on the condition of transsexuals“. The pastor also speaks in this >>>INA video>>> of 3:39.

     Because of his militancy and his very wide eclecticism in the sexual sphere, but especially because of his unrestricted tolerance of pedophilia associated with his relations, sometimes high placed, Joseph Doucé has quickly acquired a sulfurous reputation, including in institutional homosexual circles, to the point of becoming unfriendly. Is it for all that, as some say or imply, that there would be suspicions of pedophilia (in the usual sense, with an immature child) in the support that Jean-Michel Trogneux found with the pastor? Nothing really goes in this direction at this stage of our knowledge.

     The evidence that Natacha Rey did not bring could call into question the link uniting Jean-Michel Trogneux and Joseph Doucé. This meeting however leaves little doubt. Because of the pivotal role of the pastor to change sex at the time. Moreover, the interview of Véronique the transsexual in 1977 is a confirmation. A TV producer wanting to capture such testimonies could only turn to the pastor. Let us recall that the CCL of the pastor was founded in 1976, one year before the interview. Moreover, the photo opposite, of unknown origin, appears to bring together the pastor and Véronique, thus Jean-Michel.

  3. 1977, the false trail of mock gay prideAs of January 22, this chapter has been augmented by the addition of a photo where Jean-Michel Trogneux had been thought to be recognized, according to the box below. On February 15, we learned from a reliable source that it is another person [in confirmation of F&D504p12], which leads us to consider this photo as a false lead abandoned. Moreover, it is actually dated March 5, 1977, and not June 25, on the sidelines of a demonstration by MLF lesbians.
     

     As an introduction to this chapter, after it was written and before it was finalized, I add, on January 22, 2022, a discovery of this day, from twitter : a new photo of Jean-Michel Trogneux ! The context in which it is taken, under a banner of the Groupe de Libération Homosexuelle, and the blatant resemblance with other photos (see below), even more than the one with Pastor Doucé, leaves little doubt. Here is this photo present here on the website of the magazine “Têtu“, in a slideshow of “12 archival photos of the first Parisian prides“. It is dated June 25, 1977, Jean-Michel was 32 years old : (P.-S. of February 3: another photo with the banner and the two people on the right) Hypothesis rejected (the figure in the top hat not being Jean-Michel Trogneux after all)

     In the center photos, you can see the same incisors spread out…

     The militancy of the transsexual cause that Jean-Michel / Veronique conveyed in the 1977 interview made us believe in other public expressions of this cause, or the homosexual one often associated. We revived this type of hypothesis for the first gay pride in New York (Appendix A 26) or for an Alsatian Music Hall (Appendix A 27), but it seems that Jean-Michel remained discreet after 1977…

• Jean-Michel’s first appearance as Brigitte in Amiens corresponds to the start of the 1991-1992 school year at the private high school “

La Providence

• ” as a French teacher. For Xavier Poussard : “

Jean-Michel Trogneux begins a new life at La Providence high school in Amiens. Under the name Brigitte, he joined the teaching profession like many “reassigned” men, the famous transgender showgirl Bambi (born Jean-Pierre Pruvot) being the most famous example

• ” [F&D503p7].

• It was at the beginning of the following school year 1992-1993 that Brigitte and Emmanuel are said to have met (

Appendix A 10

• ). After several variations, over the course of articles and books, it appears that we can settle on this version written by Sylvie Bommel in her book “

He had just turned seventeen

• ” in 2019 :

Books from 2017, 2018, 1018, 2019, 2020 and 2021. The narrative of the Brigid legend is then stabilized.
The authors of these books tried to pierce the opacity of the past life of the first lady, in vain.

• A real legend of prince and princess was embroidered by the communicators of the Elysee and disseminated on a large scale in the national press. In such a factory of lies one does not skimp on the exceptional, providential or emotional biographical details of the kind “

She is 39 years old, he goes on his 15 years. She, a teacher admired by her students, spontaneous, direct, solar. He, gifted who knows everything about everything, looks like a poet. A few months of dating at the theater workshop, and the complicity turns into an idyll

• ” [

article

• from L’Obs, 23 May 2017].

• But the chronological and biological reality borders on the sordid. No Sleeping Beauty… In September 1992, the date of the declared beginning of their meeting, Emmanuel, born on December 21, 1977, was 14 years old, Jean-Michel, born on February 11, 1945, was 47 years old (they are 32 years and 10 months apart). Thus the princess of the Elysian farce approaches the half-century, with the outrages of time, contrary to the Sleeping Beauty that Prince Charming woke up from her sleep in her frail youth. For the sad Elysian idyll, it is clear that with such an advanced age of the princess, it will no longer be possible to ensure a numerous progeny in the service of the start-up nation.

• In 2017, Caroline Derrien and Candice Nedelec imagine: “

Emmanuel is perfectly serious when he dares to undress his heart to his teacher

• “. Can we believe that the teenager would have seduced the adult and would have declared his love for her?

The private Jesuit high school La Providence in Amiens. In 1993, Emmanuel Macron played the scarecrow in the play “La comédie du langage” by Jean Tardieu (a premonitory title for a manipulator of lies and a premonitory role to which was added that of a puppet…). Brigitte Auzière, future Macron, French teacher, in class with another student and in front of her pupils. At this time in Amiens, there is no photo, nor video, where Emmanuel and Brigitte are on the same picture. There are quite a few photos on the Internet of Brigitte at the high school “La Providence“, with other teachers or with students, often from the France 3 documentary “Brigitte Macron, un roman français“. It is difficult to date them, as Brigitte practiced in this high school from 1991 to 2007. Xavier Poussard [F&D499p5] and Natacha Rey believe that during a certain period, Brigitte systematically wore a scarf around her neck, as if she were hiding the traces of an operation (Adam’s apple…). See also this photo of tweet (or over-interpretation of restoration software ?). On the left 1st L class in 2000/2001. The photo on the right is obtained from the previous one by clearing the hair around the ears. In the photos from that time, Brigitte had a much smaller chest than in her post-2015 photos.

• Gaël Tchakaloff, author of the 2021 book “

Tant qui’on est tous les deux

• ” gives us a glimpse of Brigitte’s character when we try to approach her secrets in a

revealing article

• titled “

Brigitte Macron very upset : she loses control in front of a journalist

• “. Presentation of the author by a correspondent then extracts :

[photo Gwendoline Le Goff – BestImage]

• In May 2016, in the pages of Pop Story, according to the confidences of a close [F&D497p6] (what is the part of legend ?, the episode of the pool is also told when Emmanuel is studying in Paris) :

At the Trogneux household, one is a thousand leagues away from imagining the vaudeville that was being played out in the family home where the couple met. Emmanuel took advantage of Jean-Claude Trogneux’s [his older brother] absences to sneak up on Brigitte, who was basking by the family pool. And would run off into the bushes with his towel, as soon as he reappeared. […] The confrontation will come, however, when the oldest sibling stumbles upon the couple in the garden. It is the starting point of many quarrels. […] She will not manage to convince them of a necessity : the first lady can well ensure to have always perceived Emmanuel Macron as a contemporary, his relatives, them, measure at the time each of the twenty-four years that separate them

• In April 2017, Closer magazine gave Emmanuel Macron’s mother a voice with this feature (

link

• ):

Brigitte is the woman of his life, the one Emmanuel Macron met on the benches of high school. He was a student, she was his drama teacher. A transgressive love that will lead many years later to a marriage. But before reaching that point, the lovers had to face the wrath of Emmanuel Macron’s parents, who did not look kindly on his romance with an older woman. Worried about the future of their beloved son, Mr. and Mrs. Macron even decided to abruptly remove him from his school in Amiens to “exile” in Paris. If since then, water has flowed under the bridge, Françoise Noguès, the mother of the former Minister of the Economy, has not forgotten the wounds of the past. She even decided to tell them to the journalist Anne Fulda in the book Emmanuel Macron, “Un jeune homme si parfait“. In it, the mother of the family talks about the one who overshadowed her in the heart of her own son: the omnipresent Brigitte. In its new issue, on newsstands Friday, April 6, Closer explains why the relationship between the two women has not always been in the pink, far from it!

• In 2019, Sylvie Bommel, in her already quoted book “

He had just turned seventeen

• “, writes:

On Rue Saint Simon, a neighbor of the Auzières, hiding behind her curtain, counts Emmanuel’s comings and goings and decides that it is her duty to inform the management of La Providence. At least they sign the letter with his name. […] During the presidential campaign, when it was indeed necessary to deliver some details on the circumstances of their meeting, the Macron couple did everything to ensure that the three fatal words “détournement de mineur” were never uttered.

• Renaud Dely and Marie Huret in their book “

Les Macron du Touquet-Élysée-plage

• “, published in 2020, talk about the reaction of the great-brother Jean-Claude Trogneux  “

He especially dreads that Brigitte’s affair with his student will splash the reputation of the Trogneux and will reflect on their business. He blames his sister, makes her feel guilty. He thinks he is her father

• “. And that of the bishop of Amiens, Jacques Noyer, a close confidant of the family, remembering the hullabaloo that this relationship had caused in the city  “

The petty bourgeoisie has said so much bad about Brigitte ! The Trogneux took a lot of it !

• ” [

article

• ]. In January 2021, Hervé Algalarrondo published with Grasset (

link

• ) the book “

Deux jeunesses françaises

• “, of which here is, in part, the presentation and an extract :

In the heart of Picardy, between Amiens and Vimeu, grow up two young boys that everything opposes. A few years apart, they do not attend the same schools, not the same streets, not the same parties. One has a neurologist father, and a wonderful French teacher, his grandmother known as “Manette“. The other lives in a damaged house, far from everything, and dreams in words. Both will flee to the capital to fulfill their personal destiny, and make a name for themselves. Eddy Bellegueule becomes Edouard Louis, a famous novelist, translated all over the world, gay, very committed to the left, close to the sociologist Didier Eribon. Emmanuel Macron, Manu for his friends in Amiens, will be President of the Republic. “His French teacher Jeanne Verdier admitted to finding out that Emmanuel had exfiltrated to Paris in September and that his parents were close to filing a complaint.”

• Once again, Xavier Poussard provides details [F&D497p9] :

On April 26, 2017, an investigation by the “Daily Mail” [link] recounts the episode  “Jean-Michel Macron personally contacted the management of Henri IV to ask if they would accept his son with the guarantee that he would be separated from Madame Trogneux. The principal kept the family secret.” In the same article, Patrice Benoît Delespierre, a journalist at the “Courrier Picard” recounts that “it was a huge scandal. In all honesty, they don’t really like to talk about it. The whole thing embarrassed them enormously. His father Jean [Trogneux] was furious.” And Christian Monjou, Emmanuel Macron’s English teacher at Henri IV, explains that “his father had put him there to keep him away from this woman.”

• Thus, when he reached his 17th birthday, Emmanuel was “

exfiltrated

• ” from Amiens where his relationship was deemed scandalous, to become a student at the prestigious Lycée Henri IV in Paris. These facts took time to be recognized. Thus, the newspaper Le Monde, self-proclaimed fighter of “

fake news

• ” or “

infox

• ” (including December 20, 2021 for the brigittegate,

link

• ), declared on October 28, 2012  “

He married in 2007 a woman 20 years older than him, a French teacher and mother. He had met her in Amiens when he was in first grade, during a theater course

• “. And also, a different version, on August 27, 2014  “

Emmanuel Macron married Brigitte Trogneux, twenty years his senior, met when she was his French teacher in first grade at the Lycée Henri IV

• ” [F&D497p4]. At the time, the legend minimized the age gap, 20 years instead of 24 (without being able to suspect yet 32) and aged Emmanuel’s age at their first meeting, 17 years instead of 14, here in the class of première when it was in class of seconde. And Brigitte did not teach at Henri IV and was never Emmanuel’s French teacher.

Emmanuel high school student at Henri IV then student in an amphitheater. On the right Brigitte, perhaps at the Franklin high school
(it is difficult to find a photo of her in this high school…)

• What happens next, him being in Paris, her in Amiens? In 2017, in a

article

• in Gala dedicated to him, Tiphaine Auzière, explains :

First known photo of Brigitte and Emmanuel together, in 2006, at the wedding of a couple of friends [Paris Match 3547].

• The wedding on October 20, 2007 was preceded by Brigitte’s divorce from André-Louis Auzière on January 26, 2006 and Brigitte’s move to Paris for the 2007/2008 school year. She left La Providence in Amiens to become a French teacher at the very prestigious Lycée Saint Louis de Gonzague, also called Franklin. She would remain there until 2014/2015, teaching “

de la haute

• ” students, including children of

Bernard Arnault

• ,

Renaud Dutreuil

• ,

Jacques Attali

• , who would later become strong supporters of Emmanuel Macron. As for the wedding, in

Touquet-Paris-Plage

• , this is how Xavier Poussard tells it [F&D497p8] :

Image excerpted from a >>>video>>> 2 min 13 min marriage broadcast on FR3 (the one just above is from that too).

• In 2007 gay marriage was banned and sex change was highly restricted. These issues are taken up later, in

Chapter 30 part 3

• . However, it is not only Jean-Michel’s sex change that should invalidate this union. For him, it is a remarriage. His first marriage, with Veronique Dreux, dates from 1980 (divorce in 1987). But, if a first marriage is evoked at the ceremony, it is another, that of 1974 (divorce in 2006), where he was the witness of the bride. Unlike 1974, there are no photos with the parents, who seem to be absent, as in 1980). Are they only mentioned on the announcement (they were in 1980)? Did they refuse to participate in an illegal act? Diabolical, even ?

Baphomet is a “transgender creature, transformed into a liberator of women,” link.
On the Internet, Jean-Michel/Brigitte is sometimes referred to as “Baphomet” (by Webcraft at the end of Appendix A 18).

• Emmanuel Macron is the son of Jean-Michel Macron, born in 1951 in Vouël, Aisne, a doctor and professor of neurology at the CHU in Amiens, and Françoise Noguès, born in 1950 in Poix-de-Picardie, a doctor of medicine, a medical adviser to the Social Security. They were married around 1976 and divorced around 2010.

Genealogical record of Emmanuel’s father, according to Généanet (l’arbre fraternelle.org and another tree whose information
are more complete on the descendants), with the addition of an overlay of the photo of Emmanuel’s parents in 2017 at the investiture
at the Elysee Palace. Below is the fiche of Françoise Noguès on the fraternelle.org  Geneanet database:

• Not counting a possible stillborn older sister (see

Appendix A 21

• ), Emmanuel thus has a brother Laurent and a sister Estelle apparently born in 1979 and 1984. As he became famous, Laurent didn’t want to hear about him, saying he was a “

vague cousin

• ,” before making some contact (

link

• ). Estelle could be even more distant, because of this anecdote told by Xavier Poussard [F&D500p2] :

• According to the official biography, it was at his grandmother’s house, Germaine Noguès born Arribet in 1916 in Tarbes, then living in Amiens a few blocks from his parents’ house, that Emmanuel Macron would have spent most of his childhood. Here, on Généanet fraternelle.org, the

fiche

• of Manette in the state of January 2022, except for the photo added since then, with important new comments to the glory of Emmanuel Macron (example : the paragraph titled “

At Bagnères, all praise indeed his simplicity, his naturalness, but also his values

• )  :

• The

birth certificate

• of Marie Louise Germaine Arribet, usually called Germaine or Manette, on October 5, 1916, confirms her death in Amiens on April 13, 2013, and reports her marriage on January 10, 1939, in Amiens to Jean Gabriel Noguès. The latter was born on March 15, 1914 in Florensac in the Hérault (

act

• ). He died on December 14, 2002 in Amiens (

fiche

• ). Complements on Manette in

Appendix A 14

• .

• But, as with Brigitte’s legendary biography, digging deeper, the reality looks different. Xavier Poussard [F&D500p2] :

The “Manette” character has several uses. First, it essentially helps explain the absence of photos and memories of Emmanuel Macron  “So I spent my childhood in books, a little out of the world. It was a still life” (Revolution). Although he never officially lived in her house, Emmanuel Macron sows doubt […]. This account of a “grandmother whose background is like a perfect Epinal image in order to illustrate the republican rise of a daughter of the people” (“A young man so perfect”, Anne Fulda, Plon 2017) served, at first, to reassure François Hollande and the Socialists that “Emmanuel is of the left”. Did the “Maman Ninie” of the Mitterrandian gesture inspire communicators to the role assigned to “Manette” ? […]Anne Fulda briefly touched on the possibility that Emmanuel Macron “nearly got adopted by his grandmother,” “goddess of his enchanted world,” “Queen of his childhood and even of his adult life.

• Emmanuel’s father “

assures us that contact between him and his son is kept to a very strict minimum. Barely three or four phone calls a year. And then that’s it. Jean-Michel Macron assures that these minimum links, as well as those very limited with his mother, brother and sister sadden them

• ” (

link

• ). Xavier Poussard [F&D500p4]:

The first photos of Emmanuel Macron’s “legend” (link). On the left, in 1990, the baptism (noted “confirmation of communion“).
Center, excerpt from a trombinoscope of the fifth grade class in 1990. At right, in the same class.

• The obscurity of the childhood of the very luminous President of the Republic alerted Xavier Poussard and led him to wonder about his family. Some of his early questions have since lost their value. In January 2022, I quoted him [F&D500p5] and commented thus :

If he exaggerates, in my opinion, to consider that Jean-Michel Macron, the father, is a ghost (even if he has opacities), Xavier Poussard puts his finger on a new character who could be fictional : Jean-Michel Noguès. However, he exists, above, on the genealogical file of Manette. He is the brother of Françoise Noguès, Emmanuel’s mother, and married to “Lucette N“. He is especially supposed to be very close to the twelve-year-old baptized, since he is his godfather (the godmother is Manette’s grandmother). Before questioning his existence, Xavier Poussard found some other available information : “Born in 1940 and died in 2006, Jean-Michel Noguès would have become “only” a general practitioner “because of a troubled youth” (Deux jeunesses françaises). A little light for an uncle to whom Emmanuel would have given enough importance to make him his late godfather…” [F&D500p5]. Whether Emmanuel got his middle name from his father or his godfather is incidental, the question is about the existence of the godfather so presented. And this induces another question  “Could this godfather Jean-Michel be Jean-Michel Trogneux ?“. At this stage of our knowledge, nothing confirms it, nothing invalidates it. Doubts invalidated

• In early March, the existence of Jean-Michel Noguès was confirmed, as explained in

Appendix A 13

. Born in 1940, he was, as mentioned above, a doctor, died in 2006, he had married Lucette Duponchel, with whom he had two children, Isabel and Florence, in 1969 and 1971.

The buzz during the election campaign, February 2017, Closer (link) and France-Dimanche.
After the election, in September 2017, a photo montage on the cover of Garçon Magazine (link).
In hindsight, this provoked rumor had a numbing effect on the media, which considered it a true rumor based on a false reality. When, five years later, they are told that a new rumor turns Brigitte into a man, the effect of repetition prevails and does not invite to consider that it is a solid case…

Let’s return to Xavier Poussard’s chapter. He emphasizes that, for his entourage, Emmanuel has “a sexual side“. Jean-Baptiste de Froment, his fellow student at the Lycée Henri IV, assures us that he “didn’t give the feeling of being interested in girls“. And, for a socialist elected official, “he doesn’t look more at men“. Only the love of Brigitte seems to count. It also reveals that “Alexis du Réau de la Gaignonnière told in several videos posted on Youtube openly, how in 2013, during one of these private swingers parties prized by the “zealots” (politicians, lawyers, businessmen, show business, etc.) to which he was invited as an actor of pornographic films, he would have “sodomized” Emmanuel Macron.”

A >>>video>>> reuniting three sequences in 4:30 minutes was released in early January 2021. It turns out to be amazing. Even supposing that Alexis is affabulating for the sake of gallivanting, the fact remains that he has a formidable talent for guessing in 2017, to make Nostradamus jealous. He had discovered (alone or with others…) the true nature of Emmanuel. Here is the full transcript (so in spoken language) of this video:

Above, Alexis du Réau in each of the three sequences from 2017. Defense Council at the Elysee [drawing diverted from “The Duck Year 2021“].		He also directed a >>>video>> of 27 min 19 “Brigitte Macron live” with a yellow wig (opposite), where he states (at 21 min 55) : “Did you know that Brigitte is a trans?“.

Under the copyright “Réau Alexis/SIPA“, we find Alexis photographer in a report of “L’Obs” (link) on the party organized by Brigitte at La Rotonde, a famous Parisian brewery, on the evening of the 1st round, Sunday, April 23, 2017. He makes photos 3, 4, 5, 8 of a 14 photo slideshow. Here three extracts. After their wedding cake in the shape of a giant phallus with devil horns, the Elysian couple has repeatedly had amazing attitudes, including hosting DJ Kiddy Smile’s tranny and trans group at the Elysée (link). Aunt Yvonne must have been turning in her grave… Less surprising is the long friendship between the Amiens-based Brigitte and Michou, born Michel Catty in 1931 in Amiens, openly homosexual, died in 2020, famous director of a theater in Paris (link).

• Below is a transcript from microtaxe.ch (

link

• ) of a

>>>video>>>

• 9 min. talk by Professor Adriano Segatori, an Italian psychiatrist and psychotherapist, dated May 3, 2017. Like Alexis du Réau, he shows there beautiful qualities of diviner… I also had indirect knowledge of a French psychologist who has similar conclusions. Here is how Emmanuel Macron is a “

particularly dangerous psychopath

• ” :

“Jupiter‘s” sense of omnipotence upon taking office, in front of the Louvre pyramid on May 7, 2017 (link). In hindsight, the slogan “Ensemble la France” is revealing of a character with an asserted psychopathological profile, who has not hesitated, in a crisis situation, to impose segregationist measures hitting millions of French people in their daily lives, even assuming that he wants to fuck them up to the end !

• Nothing surprising that, throughout the Macronian quinquennium, this pathological character is noted and denounced forcefully by many people. Thus, in August 2018, Guy Millière, on a

page

• of Dreuz.info : “

There are in Emmanuel Macron the dimensions of a being ready to do anything to achieve his ends

• […]

Living in full view of everyone with his drama teacher and knowing that he will have no children and no future (no future, the punks used to say) can make him a modern-day Nero. Where will France be in four years? I leave the question open. I prefer not to give him an answer

• “. September 19, 2019, comedian Christophe Alévêque  “

Macron inspires me enormously. I summarize this man in one sentence : “what’s the point of being so brilliant if it’s to light up your ass ?” For me, this guy is unbalanced. I say it on stage. [He’s a psychopath. We are led by a big sick man

• ” (

link

• ). And Eudoxe de France, on the site “

Le libre penseur

• “, on January 5, 2022 (

link

• ), draws up a very partial, but so revealing assessment of the mental state of the President of the Republic, with the title “

A psychopath at the Elysée

• ” and with for illustration the one taken up below, to close the quinquennium in the opposite way of its opening :

• April 29. Professor Adriano Segatori recorded a second

>>video>>>

• of 11:27 minutes in 2022. France-Soir published an

article

• on April 28, with excerpts, which ends  below:

In his second video, Adriano Segatori repeats that “Macron has no morals“, that he is a “predator” who must successfully immobilize a prey. Symbolically, this can be France, or the French… which he is rightly warning. According to him, a being endowed with reason should be afraid when a president declares, “We will limit access to social life for the non-vaccinated.” Those who do not go in “the direction of good“, in other words the Yellow Vests, the non-vaccinated or even the anti-sanitary passes, seem to be his adversaries, his prey. Emmanuel Macron pursues a goal without bothering with moral and ethical considerations and crushes those who do not adhere to his policy.

A France 3 news report picked up this sign with the word “degree” erased (photos, link).

• July 4. In a speech delivered in Saintes on June 23, Jean-Dominique Michel elaborates on Emmanuel Macron’s psychopathy and

sociopathy

• . “

A successful lie is worth the truth

• ,” “

If it allows the other person to believe it and if it allows me to crush him, it will have served its purpose

• .”

>>>Video>>>

• of 14:39.

• September 5. Covid is forgotten in the population. Who remembers that a year ago, we were in the middle of apartheid, the masks on the nose, the media, then as much psychopaths as Macron, preparing us to face the next terrible wave ? Yet there were fewer hospitalized Covid than now (

graph

• ).

Photographs by Liewig Christian (Abaca), Christophe Archambault (AFP), Cyril Dodergny and Ludovic Marin (AFP).

• When he begins the first of his six issues of the Brigitte Macron dossier (the first five will come out in a flurry in October 2021), Xavier Poussard knows that he is setting out into the unknown, “

in a breathless thriller

• .” He knows that “

the Macronian gesture slips away, events cancel each other out, and in doing so, leave unknown areas populated by enigmas and ghostly characters

• “. We saw that in the fifth of his six issues, with the help of Natacha Rey, he finds the key that allows the transformation of the father of the family Jean-Michel into the mother of the family Brigitte thanks to the discovery of the biological mother of the three children, then probable, since questioned (

Chapter 10

• ). The puzzle then takes shape and the continuation of the investigation will strengthen the overall vision, even if there are still many missing pieces.

The date of birth of “Brigitte” Remember that before being given precisely in May 2016, the date of birth of “Brigitte“, was commonly located at “the late 1950s“. We reported the birth of a Brigitte Trogneux in the civil status of the “Courrier Picard” of April 14, 1953 (not April 13, 1953, the generally accepted date), a civil status published in the April 15, 1953 edition of this local daily newspaper in which there was also a birth announcement for Brigitte Trogneux (reproduced in F&D #500). It had escaped us that a first announcement had been published in the previous day’s edition (April 14, 1953), but that this birth was not mentioned in the civil status of April 13, 1953. Strangely, this first announcement omits one of Brigitte’s sisters, Monique Trogneux. If it is surprising to say the least that a birth can give rise to two different announcements, let us stress that these documents are subject to caution. Indeed, if on an extremely reduced set of documents (in this case the one attesting the existence of a Brigitte Trogneux born on April 13, 1953), we already find a significant number of forgeries (false testimonies, false wedding announcements, false pictures of “Brigitte” child, etc.. ), doubting the authenticity of the rest of the documents in the file becomes a methodological imperative, which is indeed the difficulty of this investigation where it is a matter of disentangling the true from the false and not of “believing” or “not believing“.

Facts & Documents No. 503 of January 2022. On this birth and the other announcement, see also Chapter 28.

• Before 1992, there are no photos of each of them, no factual elements to support the legendary story we are told, this correspondence is troubling. If the darkness is so strong before, isn’t it to hide what happened there?

• Before 2017, the lies and concealments were rather cobbled together, oral in scope, like the CAPES in French that Brigitte would not have had or the master’s degree on Machiavelli that Emmanuel did not obtain. Parallel lies. Parallel coups de piston too, like Brigitte being propelled as a teacher at the prestigious Franklin high school even though she doesn’t have the required diplomas and like Emmanuel being exempted from the mandatory procedure of being placed on leave from the civil service when he joins the Rothschild bank, “

unprecedented

• .” Who is behind them ? Who supported this couple in their conquest of the Elysée ? We know some French names like Bernard Arnault, but there are others, also abroad. Those who knew what makes both the strength and the fragility of this couple, they were more or less aware of their hidden history, they had a very strong means of pressure to transform the duo into puppets.

The Macron puppet as seen by Lutte Ouvrière (link), the site “Les moutons rebelles” (link) and JERC (link).

• This impression of a puppet Macron, executing decisions made outside of France, harming France, was felt on several occasions. Notably for the sale of Alstom (

link

• ), the sale of Alcatel (

link

• ), the submission to Big Pharma in the Covid crisis (we come back to this in the next chapter) and the appalling digging of the debt (“

unprecedented

• “,

link

• ). And, in retrospect, certain behaviors can find an explanation, such as

Alexandre Benalla’s

• confidence in believing in his impunity. And of course the McKinsey affair (

Appendix C 13

• ).

• After 2017, the couple benefited from the resources of the French state. False documents may have been outright fabricated, some contradictory to cover their tracks. And we don’t know everything that was erased… We do not know the extent, it is possible that it is not important, only “

surgical

• “…

• Everyone imagines the puppet showers, there are suspicions (above center,

Patrick Drahi

• ,

Jacob Rothschild

• ,

Jacques Attali

• )… Isn’t the first manipulator Brigitte? So, according to a phenomenon of transitivity, who manipulates Jean-Brigitte? First of all, those who know his heavy past and helped him to climb the ladder…

• The media ensure the staging and support the official version of the Elysian characters, but, of course, they are not the string-pullers, the ones who decide, as described in the image opposite [from microtaxe.ch, with regard to the words of psychologist Adriano Segatori presented in the previous chapter,

link

• ]. The media have owners, here presented, and, as a result, journalists also flail around with a status of television puppets. The press bosses are the real machinists behind the scenes. However the image is correct, the Invisible Hand is indeed that of capital, the French billionaires with their media empire. Thus in the hierarchy Macron is effectively the Pinocchio of the political farce through the distorting mirror of the press. No one is fooled, in other words, the major French media are in the hands of very few large groups, which facilitates manipulation and silencing. A few details: SFR for Patrick Drahi, LVMH for Bernard Arnault, whose son-in-law is

Xavier Niel

• , co-owner of the newspaper “

Le Monde

• “, who declared in 2011 “

When journalists piss me off, I take a stake in their duck and afterwards they leave me alone

• ” (

link

• ).

• For the title of this chapter, I hesitated in the qualifier to attribute to the media  diligent, indigent, servile, complicit… There are all of these. Serge Halimi spoke of “

reverent journalism

• “.

• Brigittegate illustrates their herd behavior. First complete silence from mid-October to mid-December 2021. Then a few denials, including one from Liberation on December 15 (

link

• ). And then, on December 20 it’s an avalanche of articles,

Le Monde

• (“

The episode reveals the media world’s dread that the presidential election could be parasitized by infamous conspiracy theories

• “), there wasn’t so much precaution in 2017 for the case, however less serious, of François Fillon),

Le Figaro

• , all start denouncing the odious rumor, which results in clogging up the search engines, which, at the top of the references, present plenty of articles that say the same thing. Since then, we have returned to the omerta. As for the Canard Enchaîné and Médiapart, they stick their heads in the sand, see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing… They don’t even ask a few questions, like “

Where is Jean-Michel ?, Let’s get it over with…

• “) They too now seem manipulated (Médiapart even publishes AFP dispatches…). Will it be necessary for the information to break through abroad first ?

On the left, a case of the lie factory, and its denunciation. Macron has increased the pressure on the hospital and weakened it with the non-renewal of strategic stocks of masks, with budget cuts and bed cuts, even during the health crisis of 2020, with the exclusion of staff in July 2021 (vaccine obligation). He is therefore the first responsible for the hospital crisis of late 2021 and he blamed the non-vaccinated ! Right, a case of covering up the lie, and exposing it. The lies follow one another, but, discreetly, Macron tries to erase some of them to better persevere in his flight forward.

• What lies, what cover-ups, what propaganda in this international crisis of the Covid-19  coronavirus! It is a context in which the Macron couple could only move with ease… France was indeed one of the most active elements with the United States, Great Britain, Italy, Austria, Australia and some other so-called rich countries. Beginning in early 2019, what is considered a pandemic has disrupted the lives of some countries, including those just mentioned. However, others have hardly been affected, they are even numerous in Africa and Asia, in so-called poor countries that are supposed to have less health protection. What a paradox… Let’s stick to the official figures and consider the graph below (from the site

ourworldindata.org

• ) presenting the cumulative number of deaths from Covid reduced to one million inhabitants so that it is independent of the total population of each country :

The situation in mid-January 2022 is confirmed, as an inset graph, by the situation in late April 2022
(article), with an additional graph showing the ineffectiveness of sanitary passes (article).

• At close examination, this graph, a record of two years of Covid, reveals things that are essential to understanding what has happened. In contrast to the political/media statements, it shows :
  • • the success of early treatment, whether for countries that have used it since the beginning, Madagascar with artemisia, Senegal with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin advocated by Prof Didier Raoult or with ivermectin starting in September 2021 for India (except for a few states), Japan, Bangladesh and Indonesia. Which major media in France announced this essential information? None. Almost two billion people in these last four countries have been rid of Covid in one or two months because they have adopted the ivermectin treatment and almost nobody knows about it in France. Since the beginning of the Covid crisis, few parliamentarians have denounced the senseless accumulation of lies and unspoken words (Martine Wonner, Alain Houppert…). For each of the countries just mentioned (except the few states in India that have not adopted ivermectin), there are currently zero Covid deaths.
    • the failure of vaxxins (I don’t write vaccines, since their definition has changed to include messenger RNA and adenovirus injections, one can be anti-vaxxin and pro-vaccine, by the way, last July I had my tetanus vaccine booster etc.). Indeed, now look at the other countries, not only did they all have many more deaths, but, see on the far right the profile of each curve, it is rising, they still have, in January 2022 deaths every day.
    • the failure of containments, masks, curfews, sanitary passes and other constraints. The example of Sweden shows this on this graph and it could be observed on other countries. We can estimate that constraints or not, the virus acts, so we might as well do like Sweden rather than piss off the citizens as Macron likes to do.

• Since the lethality of the virus depends on the territories and the application, or not, of early treatments, it can be estimated that this pandemic is not one. It was largely manufactured by the banning of these treatments, the evidence is beginning to mount (

link

• ). There has similarly been a global manipulation of PCR testing causing “

epidemics of positive cases

• ” with a large proportion of people not sick at all or with some mild cold symptoms. This has cost, as of the end of 2021, nearly 16 billion euros to French social security (

article

• ). The paranoia of rich countries across the planet has brought us into a kind of third world war of a new,

orwellian

• type. I describe it on this

Covid page

• nearby, I also show the danger of vaxxins passed over in silence by the media but the seriousness of which is clear from pharmacovilance and the increase in some deaths in young people, especially by heart attack.

• I come to the apartheid declared by the Macron couple on July 12, 2021 and introduced in a progressive manner. In this month of January 2022, the “

health pass

• ” becomes “

vaccine pass

• “. It’s a bit technical : before a non-vaxxed, hated as antivax, could go to a restaurant or movie or travel far away showing a negative Covid test, now he can’t. And I’m not talking about the other constraints, wearing a mask that serves almost no purpose inside (except for the caregivers) and no purpose at all outside (

link

• ), having to wait in line outside to enter a store etc. The worst was for the nursing staff forced as early as July to be vaxxed while it was in this profession that there was the best awareness of the danger of piquouzes. The Larousse defines apartheid, a word of French origin (“

apartheid

• ” for the Huguenots,

link

• ), thus : “

Discrimination, or even exclusion, of a part of the population, which does not have the same rights, places of residence or jobs as the rest of the community

• ” (

link

• ). This hadn’t happened in France since 1942 for the Jews (

enforcement measures

• ) under Philippe Pétain and since 1685, the

revocation of the Edict of Nantes

• for Huguenot Protestants under Louis XIV. I never thought I would live through this…

• Faced with this kind of historic event, everyone reacts in their own way. From March 2020 to July 2021, I had experienced the Covid crisis passively, like everyone else, a bit lost for the first four weeks of confinement, then well aware of what was happening after that. Also, in late April 2020, someone very close to me had caught Covid (in its most severe variant) and had done very well being treated with the early treatment of ivermectin combined with azithromycin. Luckily, her doctor had caught Covid a little earlier, studied it and found a solution. As Dr Raoult had found another one which could have been applied in France in the same way as it was in Senegal, and for a low cost, without fattening Big Pharma. In that month of July, I also knew the dangers of vaxxin. Two people around me had had serious side effects, whereas I only knew of two Covid patients with serious effects (in all cases without hospitalization). Anyway, on July 26 I answered the call of the

July 22

• collective

Reinfocovid

• and Doctor

Louis Fouché

• . I did what I know how to do, I opened on my site the

neighboring page

• titled “

Covid-19 Paranoia Diary

• ” which I feed every day or so. And one thing led to another and here I am.

(table expanded on this next page) The figures of the Resistance, as seen from France with a few people outside the hexagon. I gather them here after browsing my page Covid nearby where they are quoted in link with articles or videos or tweets. Here they are in alphabetical order with a link to an article dedicated to them, it’s a way to travel in this endless Covid crisis that we could have lived, in another time (or another country), like the Hong Kong flu (1968/1970), but we are now ruled by psychopaths wanting to control the population… Line 1: Idriss Aberkane essayist Denis Agret physician Dr. Alwest humorist Christine Anderson Member of the European Parliament Surya Arbi researcher Xavier Azalbert journalist Nicolas Bedos humorist and actor-writer Frédéric Beltra father of Maxime, who died of vaxxin by heart attack André Bercoff journalist Ariane Bilheran psychologist and philosopher Richard Boutry journalist Carlo Brusa lawyer Valérie Bugault doctor of law Pierre Chaillot (or Lécot) (from Decoding the Eco) statistician René Chiche philosopher Line 2: Ryan Cole Dr. Charlie Couture singer Virginie de Araujo lawyer Fabrice Di Vizio lawyer Novak Djokovic tennis player Marc Doyer whose wife, after vaxxin died of mad cow disease Anny Duperey actress Marie-Estelle Dupont psychologist Damani Bryant Felder tiktoker Louis Fouché physician Reiner Fuellmich lawyer Patrice Gibertie historian Carol Hayes patient saved by ivermectin Alexandra Henrion-Caude geneticist HK singer Line 3: Thomas Jendges caregiver committed suicide from the roof of his clinic (+) Robert Kennedy Jr attorney Salim Laïbi blogger Francis Lalanne singer Karine Levalleux suspended caregiver Robert Malone one of the inventors of messenger RNA technology Fabrice Marchand mayor Gérard Maudrux physician Bertrand Mertz lawyer Jean-Dominique Michel medical anthropologist Luc Montagnier Nobel Prize in Medicine Laurent Mucchielli sociologist Gerhadt Ludwig Muller cardinal Jean-Philippe Nilor deputy of Martinique John O’Looney mortician Line 4: Pierre Perret singer Christian Perronne professor Doug Peterson attorney general Florian Philippot politics Julie Ponesse suspended ethics professor Pascal Praud journalist Diane Protat lawyer Denis Rancourt physics professor, researcher Paulo Rangel judge Andry Rajoelina President of Madagascar Didier Raoult professor microbiologist Sébastien Recchia humorist Marie Reno singer Ivan Rioufol journalist Véronique Rogez suspended caregiver Line 5: Anne-Claire Rossignol suspended teacher Jean-Marc Sabatier researcher Hervé Séligmann statistical biologist Véra Sharav association president John Stokes student Pierrick Tillet blogger Laurent Toubiana epidemiologist Jean Umber chemist Amine Umlil pharmacist Christian Velot geneticist Eric Verhaeghe writer blogger Carlo Maria Vigano archbishop of Milan Rémy Watremez blogger Martine Wonner member of Parliament I could have listed Pierre Barnérias, but I haven’t seen his films “Hold-up and “Hold-on” (of which I have seen the trailer)… As for the opposing plotters, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and others, they are not forgotten on my Covid page, here I don’t want to go off topic, but I wanted to pay tribute to these fighters, thank you to these brave ones, regretting of course to have missed many others… (including Lionel Labosse who had it all figured out on July 24, 2021 with his “10 point cheat sheet to inform the conspiracy skeptics about the ” health crisis ““, article, pdf)

• We are millions to have a parallel path, to be excluded, sometimes harassed, and to find ourselves, more or less often, in the Saturday afternoon demonstrations across France, started on July 24, 2021. They have become “

the last living room where we talk

• “, to the sound of slogans “

Freedom ! Resistance !

• “. And from all sides, from the far left, the far right, the center, the right, the left, Gaullists, ecologists (I am one of them, but not those who refuse GMOs by accepting the unknown risks of mRNA), never-voters, we found ourselves exchanging our ideas and building a common front, hoping for better days, the end of Macron, the end of this Republic without checks and balances, etc. A situation that reminds me of 1942 with an amorphous people, media under control, radio London news castigated, collabos more and more ferocious, a Resistance that was taking shape…

Saturday afternoon demonstrations, here on 4 September and on the right on 31 July 2021 (in Rennes, photo Ouest-France). 1: Eyes in the eyes “The health pass will never be a right of access that differentiates the French. It cannot be mandatory to access everyday places, such as restaurants, theaters and cinemas, or to go to friends Emmanuel Macron, source Le Parisien of 29/04/2021. The word of this government is worth nothing !” 2: Billions for the hospital. Not for the multinationals. Let us eradicate the macronavirus. 3: I am a trader, not a health policeman

• As shown in the last photo above, the Macronian perversity (brigittienne ?) has gone so far as to force some citizens, here merchants, to become collaborators of the regime to impose its constraints. And, with a few exceptions like this one with his sign, the shopkeepers, but also the librarians, the sports and cultural managers and others, submitted themselves to the vaxxinal doxa of the government of Castex, Véran, Bachelot and other ministers. Certainly, they were under respiratory assistance of the subsidies of the State (to compensate the loss of earnings, the partial unemployment etc.), but they submitted, as the trade unions which preferred the sanitary overbidding, even when the variants had become kinds of cold. How could the mask be submitted to young (and older) children who were in no danger? And the whole teaching staff complied! And it was the same (but less vicious) in many rich countries, including Israel, which had already experienced the horrors of discrimination, and worse, in the 20th century. Camp survivor Velma Sharav recalled that “

the Holocaust happened because people looked away

• ” (

>>>video>>>

• of 36 min. and

transcript

• +

speech

• from August 20, 2022), other survivors joined her in writing that “

This is a medical experiment to which the Nuremberg Code

• must be applied” (

link

). How could the lessons of history  have been forgotten to such an extent?

1: With Macron everything is wrong! This is not a Brigitte, it is a Jean-Michel  This is not a vaccine, it is an experimental injection !
2: Macron, this great sick man and his lies. The ass of a woman. The ass of his “wife”. We have a subject of mockery, of sauciness…

• Let’s get back to Macron and his Brigitte. In this planetary-synchronized bidding contest (through various intermediaries such as the WHO or the McKinsey firm,

link

• ,

Appendix C 13

• ), our “

first in line

• ” has stood out as a good student of Big Pharma. In particular, he was one of the first to institute the health pass turned vaccine, and mandatory vaxxin for health care workers, firefighters and other professions. On December 26, 2021, on the nearby Covid page, with the illustrations above, I explained in the text below (here shortened) how it was appropriate to link the Covid release and the unveiling of Brigitte’s past (I add the end of

Appendix C 20

• ) :

Summing up the parallelism and intertwining of the two cases, this formula:
MACRON-COVID:
the bigger the lies, the better they come across
A simple, mundane reality, with rough edges to make it a legend, is more believable than a complex, twisted reality.

Posters: 1 “I’ll get a shot when Jean-Michel T. is found” 2 “Who do we say thank you to? THANK YOU Manu & Jean-Michel”
To the left the outrageous state lie that has been preached for months and months by the government, while the lack of
protection of this vaxxin to be renewed every five months was patent. Center and right, demonstration in Paris on December 18, 2021
of those whom Emmanuel Macron would declare having “enviable to piss them off[…]to the end” on January 4, 2022.

• The formula posted above “

All vaccinated, all protected

• ” is characteristic of the inversion of values operated by the psychopathic couple of the Elysée. This vaxxin does not protect against Covid, but it is dangerous, by its short-term adverse effects (38,000 suspected deaths and 3.4 million injuries reported in Europe according to pharmacovigilance as of January 15, 2021,

link

• , update in

Appendix C 16

• ) and by its unknown effects in the medium and long term. The benefit-risk ratio is very poor in those under 65 years of age (

link

• ). Therefore, to protect oneself as best as possible, it was necessary to use early treatment (like any disease, it is better to be treated as early as possible) and not to be vaxxed.

[tweet from July 22] I was talking to a young intern this morning and I asked him the question “Why did young people accept these mRNA  injections?“. He replied that young people don’t believe in anything. It made me think of this haunting and terrifying quote from Hannah Arendt [opposite] : “When everyone lies to you all the time, the result is not that you believe those lies but that no one believes anything anymore. A people who can no longer believe anything cannot form an opinion. They are deprived not only of their capacity to act but also of their capacity to think and to judge. And with such a people, you can do whatever you want.” Ariane Bilheran has studied the Covid crisis from this angle : pdf file of three articles “Psychopathology of Totalitarianism“. Jean-Marc Sérékian, on a adjacent page, followed up with an article titled “Totalitarianism in the Digital Age.”

A hell of a lot of propaganda against young people. They suffered more from the injections than the Covid…
“All vaccinated, all contaminated” has become less of a false slogan, according to studies on the 3rd dose (articles : 1 2).

• This artifice, wielded by communicators expert in manipulating the masses, is called accusatory inversion. It is thus presented by the essayist Michel Geoffroy in an article of which here are excerpts (

link

• ) (see also an

interview

• with François Belliot, from July 8, 2022) :

• Emmanuel Macron has used this process to the extreme. He thus claimed to be a defender of freedom, democracy and other values that he flouts. So when he says, on January 4, 2022, that “

the immense moral fault of the antivaxers” is to “undermine what is the solidity of a nation

• “, it is all wrong. Those who have plunged the country into totalitarianism and apartheid claim to be responsible, concerned about our health, supportive, defenders of freedoms, etc. They have such a power of persuasion that many vaxxed people, after having received their third dose, thought they were free (to go to restaurants, to the theater, etc.) when in fact they were only chaining themselves and putting their health at risk.

“The manufacturer is not responsible, the government is not responsible, the vaccinator is not responsible,
but if you are not vaccinated, you are irresponsible“.

• Another process has been used to manipulate crowds : the “

nudge

• “. This “

nudge

• “, in French, aims to provoke targeted behavior from citizens. This technique, imported from the United States, has gradually conquered the sphere of power in France, which used it extensively during the Covid crisis. To learn more, check out this

article

• by Benoît Collombat titled “

How nudge has conquered the Macronie

• “.

• I end this chapter with a staggering accusatory inversion, seen at the beginning of

Chapter 14

• : Jean-Michel Trogneux, the one who completely fiddled with his family tree to the point of splitting an individual and transforming a father into a mother, dared to accuse his detractors of having changed his tree ! We can see that Brigitte can be superior to Emmanuel Macron when it comes to handling accusatory inversions and that she must have suggested their massive use to him.

• To conclude this chapter on accusatory reversals, let’s quote these two excerpts from Brigitte Macron’s

Wikipedia page

:
• • “The age difference (of more than twenty-four years) between the two lovers is causing a scandal in the Trogneux family, especially since their relationship could fall under Article 227-27 of the Penal Code, which enshrines the crime of sexual assault on a minor, and which now provides that a teacher who has sexual relations with a minor student over the age of 15 years may face up to three years in prison.“
  • “In October 2017, when, in the wake of the Weinstein affair thousands of harassed women began to publish on Twitter, with the hashtag #balancetonporc, the account of sexual assaults of which they claim to have been victims, Brigitte Macron gave her support to the alleged victims in question.“

• If the publication of this file has left the journalists blind, deaf and dumb, citizens have on the other hand mobilized across France. And valuable information has reached me, by people wishing to remain anonymous, some even turning into investigators. This is not always easy, so much the error is human. The reliability of the information is not always established and I wish to present only hypotheses which seem to me to have a good probability of veracity. However, this is not fixed, the knowledge of new elements can lead to modify or even reject certain hypotheses.

• The first big revelation was that Brigitte Trogneux, wife of Emmanuel Macron, would be born male, Jean-Michel Trogneux. Since Monday, January 17, the beginning of the constitution of this file (which was then supposed to be only a synthesis of the investigations of Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey), the starting elements have become much stronger, especially with, at the beginning of

Chapter 14

• , the video

INA

• (Institut National de l’Audiovisuel) of the transsexual Véronique and the excellent technical match of Véronique’s and Brigitte’s voices. In the manner of the scientific police, this now appears to be indubitable. In the opposite direction, on the part of the presidential couple and of the mass media, there were, in front of these data, only denials without any concrete element. The hypothesis appears therefore sure for the attentive readers of this file: Brigitte Macron was born and grew up male, certainly under the name of Jean-Michel Trogneux.

• This chapter was added on Saturday, January 29, 2022, five days after the first finalization on Monday the 24th. Its title then was “

was Emmanuel’s mother a man?

• “. What a question! With an immediate, obvious and certain answer: no, Emmanuel’s mother was not a man, there is no need to explain why. But, right after, this question was asked a little differently  “

did Emmanuel’s mother look like a man ?

• “. And, there, the answer might not be the same. This was based on an interpretation of the 1977 mock gay pride photo shown at the end of

Chapter 14

• . Since, afterwards, the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux in this photo appeared impossible, the comparison could no longer be valid. It still exposed in

Appendix B 15

• .

• The very expression of this quickly rejected hypothesis had nevertheless brought us a revelation : Emmanuel could have been raised by a woman who lived under the guise of a man, which would explain the opacity of his life as a child.

• If he was raised largely by a man, it can only be a close friend of his mother. Friend or lover? And could this friend or lover be Jean-Michel Trogneux? To the point of even being Emmanuel’s father? Internet users, since December have raised this hypothesis, particularly in the

tree n°1

• cited in the caption at the beginning of

Chapter 11

• (and further in the NBI file in

Appendix A 37

• ). Tweets have thus suggested a resemblance between Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux, who, in this hypothesis, could be his half-brother :

On the right, the Betaface comparison assigns 68% similarity.

• It is not the same person, so it cannot be very convincing, but would there be a family resemblance ? In our team, Hortense Fuschia, as Lionel Labosse calls her, then made this comparison, reinforcing the resemblance of the potential half-brothers :

• Can this resemblance really lead one to believe that Jean-Jacques and Emmanuel, both born in Amiens, are half-brothers? As they don’t have the same mother, they would have the same father, who would be Jean-Michel Trogneux, now Brigitte Trogneux ! Hard to imagine: the father would have slept with the son, when the son was fourteen years old (

Appendix A 10

• ). Nothing seems to invalidate this hypothesis, however, which does not mean that it is the only one, nor that it has a significant probability.

• Here are the hypotheses that appear to me possible :
  • 1. the one where Jean-Michel Macron would be Emmanuel’s biological father, where the latter would have been raised mainly by his mother and grandmother, and where Jean-Michel Trogneux would have gotten closer to Emmanuel only at the theater workshop, for a mostly geographical reason : their presence in the same high school in Amiens. This is the hypothesis that conforms to the “legend”…
    2. that, which has just been mentioned and considered very unlikely, without being impossible, where Jean-Michel Trogneux would be the biological father of Emmanuel. This is in keeping with what Françoise Noguès, the mother, said about her “old friendship and complicity” with Brigitte Macron (see the next chapter). The adoptive father, Jean-Michel Macron, may or may not know. The child would only have really known the biological father when he returned to Amiens in 1991. This being said, an old friendship and complicity can obviously exist without a love affair. This clue remains weak, as does the questionable physical resemblance of Jean-Jacques and Emmanuel.
    3. that where another person would be the biological father. He could then have taken care of the young child’s education until he entered college. He would have done it discreetly, in parallel with the grandmother Manette, which would explain the lack of photos …

• These assumptions, can be visualized thus, by taking up the tree from

Chapter 11

• . This provisional tree is now rejected as much as the first one because it considers Catherine Audoy as the mother of the three Auzière children, but the part on the right will be kept later.

(the existence and date of the Jean-Michel Trogneux – Véronique Dreux marriage is explained in the next chapter) Rejected Tree

Warning: this tree is now rejected as far as Catherine Audoy  is concerned: it is replaced
by the tree in version 3 of Chapter 27 Part 2. The assumptions for Emmanuel Macron remain valid.

• Personally, I have a slight preference for the “Other” hypothesis, on the one hand because it could explain the opacity maintained, on the other hand because Emmanuel’s official parents and grandmother would probably not have allowed a father-son incest.

• More than the “According to legend” hypothesis, the other two hypotheses are consistent with the following findings of Xavier Poussard, repeated in the

Chapter 17

•  :
  • • Laurent, Emmanuel’s declared brother, and Estelle, his declared sister, apparently born in 1979 and 1984, hardly know Emmanuel. They would be more of a half-brother and half-sister never raised with him.
    • there is a strong distancing between Emmanuel and his official father Jean-Michel Macron.

• The lies about the sexual nature of the wife of the President of the Republic are damaging France. The

role

• of representing Brigitte Macron is becoming untenable and cannot justify the provision of two advisors and a secretariat. Worse, the French and foreigners now know what has been too hidden and downplayed, namely that this individual, whether transgender or not, has committed a crime of sexual assault on a minor, as Wikipedia says. Such a reality should not have allowed Emmanuel Macron to run for president. Some, for similar offenses, such as

Olivier Duhamel

, were dismissed ruthlessly and very quickly. What is the Justice  doing? In the absence of journalists, could lawyers mobilize ? Can an investigation as quick as the one against François Fillon in 2017, for less serious reproaches, be initiated quickly ? A simple blood test, or even DNA, would put an end to these suspicions. They have been spreading since mid-December, and the presidential couple is unable to deny them, although it should be very easy…

• I will not go back over the story of Pastor Joseph Doucé, who disappeared in 1990, it was exposed in

chapter 14

• . We saw that around 1977, he probably knew Jean-Michel Trogneux and helped him, between 1977 and 1990 to become Brigitte Trogneux. Let’s start with the physical similarities :

Emmanuel Macron and Joseph Doucé, comparisons made on Betaface: 69 to 65 percent.

• We have already seen with the now rejected 1977 gay pride mock photo that a good facial match can be misleading. It cannot be enough. The fact that Jean-Michel / Brigitte knew the pastor between 1977 and 1990 is a complementary element. But the one I find most convincing is of a different nature.

• At the age of about 12, so in 1989 / 1990, Emmanuel Macron was baptized and it is only then that photos of his childhood have reached us. Before that, it is opaque. Only an important event could have caused such an upheaval. And 1990 was the year of Pastor Doucé’s death. Losing a religious father can provoke a religious impulse, even if one is Protestant, the other Catholic (the college being Catholic…).

• Let’s add that in the 1980s, being the son of Joseph Doucé, a well-known character, could not have been easy. In addition to a mother who was not very present, busy with her official home, Emmanuel really did not have a traditional family, hence the obscurity that envelops his childhood. Besides, was his childhood spent in Amiens ?

• It is also notable that Emmanuel was born in 1977, just one year after the creation of CCL when the pastor settled in Paris. Furthermore, Emmanuel is a first name that means “

God is among us

• “, a messianic name that a religious person might give. With this first name and such a childhood, it would not be surprising if he wanted to force fate…

• There are other clues that point in this direction. We have already seen the very distant ties between Emmanuel and his official father and the almost non-existent ones with his brother and sister. We have also seen the links between Joseph Doucé and Jean-Michel Trogneux. Even if they are not certain, they constitute a cluster of concordant clues. I put opposite a photo I found (also seen at

Chapter 22

• ), which seems to reunite Véronique / Brigitte and the pastor Doucé, some Internet users having even believed to see Brigitte and Emmanuel there, which reinforces the resemblance.

• I am adding items recently discovered in the NBI file (

Appendix A 37

• ) and in the latest issue of “

Facts & Documents

• ” :
  • 1. Sylvaine Télesfort, president of the Association Maison Intersexualité et Hermaphrodisme Europe (AMIHE) sent a declaration “As a hermaphrodite” to MPs on October 24, 2018, where she said “I met with geneticists who recommended that I get surgery, that I get ” fixed “. I asked my congressman to help me, which he did. A chief medical officer of the health insurance fund (CPAM), Dr. Françoise Macron, helped me to build the case.“. Thus Françoise Noguès married Macron would have helped Sylvain to become Sylvaine in 2007 [F&D504p09]. One wonders if she was trained by Pastor Doucé, at the CCL who helped to accomplish such transformations… And from there to imagine a much stronger link that led to the birth of Emmanuel…
    2. Joseph Doucé is known to be gay. This was mostly in the 1980s. In 1976 / 1977, he may have had a female affair…
    3. Françoise Noguès was born in 1950 in Poix-de-Picardie, about 30 km from Amiens, Jean-Michel was born in 1945 in Amiens. Françoise studied medicine in Amiens. She got married between 1974 and 1976 (we are not sure…) in Amiens with Jean-Michel Macron who specialized in psychiatry, then neurosurgery, at the CHU of Amiens and made his career there. Françoise has a “first child, a girl, who dies shortly after her birth in 1976. Manu was born on December 21, 1977, followed by Laurent in 1979, then by Estelle in 1982 or 1984 (always according to the same ” approximatologues “)…“[NBIp38]
    4. “The Macrons bought a house in 1982 at the top of Gaulthier-de-Rumilly Street in the Henriville neighborhood of Amiens, and Françoise made a career at the CPAM of the same city as a medical adviser. To complete the picture, Manette, at the end of the 1970s, ends her career as director of the Sagebien college in Henriville and moves to rue Delpech, very close to Françoise’s home, and not much further from Brigitte’s…” [NBIp38]. “There is not, as the crow flies, a kilometer (a quarter of an hour on foot) between rue Gaulthier-de-Rumilly and 91 rue Saint-Fuscien, the family residence of the Trogneux where Brigitte and Manu enjoyed the pool…” [NBIp27]
    5. In a article of Télé-Loisirs of August 20, 2021, Chloé Berry takes up words of Gaël Tchakaloff, author of the legend “Tant qu’on est tous les deux” to the editions Flammarion, published this same month. In it is a long interview with Françoise Noguès about her relationship with Brigitte. “The two women have known each other forever. They were neighbors in Amiens“. It is on this occasion that Françoise Noguès introduces Brigitte as “the friend like I have no other, we have the same affinities, the same priorities, we tell each other everything” [NBIp27]
    6. About this article by Chloe Berry, “Why Françoise Noguès, who has known Brigitte “forever” does not […]provide a simple and irrefutable testimony accrediting the real existence of Brigitte Trogneux ? If we rule out the hypothesis of a “lie in command”, it is because she has known Brigitte “since always” … but under another name and another appearance …” [NBIp37]. And isn’t it unusual to talk about an old friendship in this way without illustrating it, in a magazine with a large circulation, with an old photo?
    7. “If Françoise claims to have known Brigitte all her life and to be her neighbor, the same must be true of Germaine! The three women living at the time of the hijacking in the same neighborhood of Henriville, a few hundred meters from each other, and – for very different reasons – were closely interested in Manu…” [NBIp37] Germaine / Manette, very close to her daughter Françoise and therefore knowing quite well the friend of her daughter Jean-Michel Trogneux, was able to see in the latter a father / mother surrogate for her grandson in 1990. From there to this Brigitte becomes a wife, there is obviously a big step to cross… It could be crossed gradually. Manette was caught in a spiral and the happiness of her grandson was her priority… She could also have lacked the courage to oppose this chain of events and resolve to do “against all odds“… As Françoise and Jean-Michel Macron will do much later to be present in 2017 at the investiture of the Elysee…
    8. This agreement of Manette was essential: “” If Manette had not given his assent, nothing would have been possible ” between Emmanuel and Brigitte, we learn Anne Fulda. This will be confirmed by the station novelist Gaël Tchakaloff: “If Germaine had not accepted me, I would not have lasted long, Brigitte told me one day. “” [NBIp45] At this point, it should be realized that Manette’s acceptance still had limits (and later those of Françoise and Jean-Michel Macron) : she would not have accepted a father-son affair, as suggested by the NBI file …
    9. The blurring and then amputation of the archive of the program on Pastor Doucé is an indication that there is something to hide. To alter an INA Archive, there must be good reasons and the order must come from on high.

• A trio of the same generation appears there, who may have known each other in 1976-1977 : Joseph Doucé (JD), Françoise Noguès (FN) and Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT), or rather a JD-FN duo that may have helped JMT in his gender transition. This duo, which probably worked on other transitions, was able to go further, to the point of engendering Emmanuel Macron in 1977? Back in Amiens, in September 1991, did JMT get closer to the son of his protector… Even before a theater workshop, in September 1992, served as a pretext for this meeting?

• Does a facial comparison allow to lean more in favor of one of the two potential biological fathers? Carried out by Betaface, it does not allow to decide: 63 to 64 % for Jean-Michel Macron, 65 to 69 % for Joseph Doucé.

Jean-Michel Macron and Emmanuel Macron, comparisons: 64 to 63 percent. More Betaface comparisons in Appendix B 8

• On March 10, when apart from the dimple, no even slight contraindication to the hypothesis here presented appeared, a reader, Maria, testified about points #1 and #6 above :

• On March 29, at the microphone of Amandine Roy, the writer geopolitologist Morad El Hattab told us that in 1963 Jean-Michel Trogneux was a student in Algiers in 1963. This is explained in the

Appendix A 22

• . The citizen’s survey was then seizing on this new element. I took it into account by two additions of April 2 and 4, which I now transfer here :

April 2. A correspondent sends me the photo below, of a Première class in Algiers in 1960/1961 at the Collège-lycée Notre Dame d’Afrique, whose day school was located at 24 Boulevard Saint Saëns (extract from 1961 directory, photo), while Jean-Michel Trogneux lived in 1963 at No. 87 of this artery (Appendix A 22). He wonders about the unidentified student in the second position from the left of the top row. With a photo reworked to firm up the features, the comparison Betaface increases from 70% to 72%. The eyeball-to-eyeball and Betaface comparison is not very compelling (but not prohibitive). But with someone else from another class? It is possible that Jean-Michel spent several years in Algiers, including in a high school. Hypothesis rejected, having become chronologically unlikely, according to the Chapter 28.

April 4. Here are new photos from the Saint Joseph El-Biar boarding school in Algiers in 1961, with a student who could be Jean-Michel Trogneux (links : 1 2). At this point, not much can be inferred… André Salette, the only one named in these two photos, was probably born in 1945 in Marseille, the son of an unknown father and an Algerian-born mother (link Geneanet). 1945 is also the year of birth of Jean-Michel Trogneux

• It is April 8 and last night a “

profiler

• ” correspondent pointed out to me that the five students in the last group photo are also in the first :

The six buddies being dressed alike, the photos were taken on the same day. in 1961.
Compare, above, with the presumed Jean-Michel in the 1960/1961 class photo.

• Above all, he pointed to the great friend of the supposed Jean-Michel Trogneux, believing to recognize him, here on the left, Jean-Louis Auzière :

Perhaps Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière. On the right betaface comparison for Jean-Louis Auzière.

• These photographic resemblances alone prove nothing, except that there is no dissimilarity. But there is more to it than that… Jean-Louis Auzière was born on 28 February 1943 in Meudon, Jean-Michel Trogneux was born on 11 February 1945 in Amiens. There is thus two years of difference, they are together in a boarding school, perhaps not in the same class. It’s consistent.

• We also know that the family of Louis Auzière, Jean-Louis’ older brother and eventual father of André-Louis (see

Appendix A 18

• ), lived in Algeria from 1943 to 1945, with Hélène Auzière’s birth there on November 19, 1945 in Port Gueydon (now

Azeffoun

• ).

• In the photo of Brigitte’s alleged first wedding, the groom is Jean-Louis Auzière (

Chapter 9

• ). In Jean-Louis Auzière’s complaint against Natacha Rey (

Appendix D 18

• ), Brigitte Macron has diligently sent a bailiff. This means that there is a collusion between Brigitte / Jean-Michel and Jean-Louis Auzière. She has an explanation, they knew each other somewhere, they have a common history. It is possible that it goes back to this Algerian friendship.

• April 10. As explained below, Maria doesn’t think the Algerian boyfriend is Jean-Louis Auzière.

The implantation of the nose, a constant skeletal landmark, roughly marked on the bony skeleton (above right) is significantly longer for the young man on the left than for JLA, who has more of a short implantation nose ( I am obviously talking about the bony openings of the nose called choanae). This being skeletal does not change on a subject of this age. This also gives the eye very different physiognomies. The middle stage of the face is thus shorter in JLA.

• Effectively, on the double enlarged photo, for the same nose height of 3 cm on the screen, the head height is 12 cm on the left and 14 cm on the right. But on closer inspection, the difference in face height is mainly due to the difference in hair height. For the wedding, JLA went to the hairdresser and had his hair inflated, while in Algiers the boyfriend just got out of the shower and has very flat hair. Taking the top of the eyebrow as a reference, the difference is much less clear: 7 cm and 7.5 cm perhaps slightly more … And the remaining 0.5 cm would be due to JLA’s smile at her wedding. More generally, in our team, we are not really convinced that it is the same two people, so I consider the probability to be medium. Whereas it is stronger for Jean-Michel Trogneux.

• May 11. A new photo has reached us, of the Saint Joseph El Biar boarding school in Algiers, circa 1961 (

link

• ). Jean-Michel Trogneux seems to be present there in the second row on the left, in a dark sweater :

Betaface comparison: 76%.

The student in the upper left appears to be the one numbered 6 in two photos from the beginning of this chapter.

• As you can see from the screenshot at the top of

page

• above on April 9, Jean-Marc Uhrweiller has been a Twitter enthusiast since his retirement in 2010. Previously, he was a commercial director at the Autonomous Port of Strasbourg. He lives in… Truchtersheim, where Brigitte Macron lived when she was Madame Auzière with her three children. And the reader understands why he is here. I would have preferred not to direct the spotlight on him, but his role in this Brigittegate is too important. Also, see his tweet just before the April 10 election, he doesn’t like Macron, so he must be sympathetic… Although he has not responded to our attempts to contact him, I don’t see how not to quote him and still be credible. I therefore rely on the public data he himself provided.

• Jean-Marc Uhrweiller is mentioned three times in Sylvie Bommel’s book “

He had just turned seventeen

• “, by his first name and then his surname :

• This was the narrative of the “legend” Brigitte in 2019. We have seen that false information has been disseminated about this passage in Alsace of Jean-Michel / Brigitte (

Chapter 7

• ,

Chapter 9

• ,

Appendix A 5

• ). There is nonetheless a strong undercurrent of truth (

Appendix A 36

• ). For several years, Brigitte did indeed stay in Truch and she did teach at the “

Lucie Berger

• ” high school in Strasbourg.

• So, Jean-Marc Uhrweiller knew Brigitte before she moved to Alsace, and, born in 1944, he was a year older than Jean-Michel. On his Twitter page, he acknowledges having lived in Algeria until about 1961. And if, like Jean-Louis Auzière, another long-time friend of the same age, they had met in Algiers? In the same boarding school? Would they be together on photos seen in the previous chapter ? And, there, it “

matches

• ” :

That’s how the three buddies from Algiers around 1962 found themselves in Strasbourg 25 years later, one of them having turned into a woman and the other two helping him so that this transformation would go unnoticed and to help him start his new life.

Didn’t the “And at the same time” policy, usually attributed to Emmanuel Macron, come from Brigitte Macron, who first applied it to her personal life ? She is at the same time Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux. She had two families, two children born a month apart, she was both father and mother, at the same time teacher in Strasbourg and administrator in Amiens… We will understand in this chapter and the next one that he knew how to make two Brigitte Auzière live, two André Auzière… Seen from afar, the illusion is convincing, except for a few surprises. Wanting to remove them leads to finding the mechanisms underlying a life that has long been fabricated and concealed. Now consolidated, however, our investigation has been laborious.

 

 

 

 

• This chapter had three successive headlines, the last one dated May 2. As of April 30 the second title was “

Are Brigitte Auzière and Jean-Michel Trogneux the parents of the Auzière children ?

• “. It could seem absurd. We know that Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Macron, previously named Brigitte Auzière, are one and the same person. How could she be both biological father and mother ? Because it is indeed biological parents that this title was talking about. There is a magical illusion, the same one that makes people believe that Brigitte Macron is the biological mother of the children. This chapter proposes to explain the mechanism of this sleight of hand, which was revealed to us in two episodes…

• 1. Part 1: Is a niece of Jean-Louis the mother of the three Auzière children ? She starts from a very simple observation : since the children are named Auzière, since their father is named Trogneux, it is their mother who must have passed on her patronymic to them and therefore be called Auzière. Indeed, when a child is born of unknown father, he takes the name of the mother. We will see later, in the box at the end of Appendix A 44, that this explanation no longer holds (very low probability) and that we now have a better explanation, based on the 1974 marriage and the involvement of the Auzière family.
     As developed in the Appendix A 18, Jean-Louis Auzière is the last child, very late in life, of a family of four children. He has two sisters and a brother, Louis, 26 years older than him, a brother who would have had, on his side, six children, including the famous André-Louis, Brigitte’s first phantom husband (Chapter 9“), as claimed in this tree of the Auzière’s on Généanet :
     

     Jean-Louis is of the same generation as his brother Louis’ children. His nephews and nieces are, for him, like brothers and sisters… (Sipa photo)

     Given the involvement of Jean-Louis Auzière, the great friend of Jean-Michel Trogneux, this Auzière woman should be in his close family, of a close age, preferably a little younger. So we searched among his nieces, named Renée, Hélène and Laure. We explored on the Web what we could find out about the family of each of them, but, except for leading a double life with a husband and a lover, none of them seemed to be suitable. One of them, however, particularly caught our attention, Laure.

     Laure Auzière, known as Laurette, born in 1955, married Yves Gheerbrant with whom she had three children. Her school career thus appears on her fiche of the site “Les copains d’Avant” :

     The presence of Laure Auzière in a high school in Amiens in 1972-1973 calls into question. It leads us to formulate two hypotheses, the first being much more likely than the second, based on what we saw in Chapter 25 :

     • Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT) and Jean-Louis Auzière (JLA) are two great friends who met in Algiers around 1961 (or even around 1969 in the USA). When they came back to France, they met again in Amiens, or in Paris, or elsewhere. JLA, very close to her nieces, invites them to meet JMT, which will bring Laure to Amiens during at least the school year 1972-1973.
     • JMT and JLA do not know each other before this Amiens episode. Laure is brought to study there, Jean-Louis comes to see her and becomes a friend of JMT.

     Since two Auzière probably found themselves in Amiens, a third, the one we are looking for, could have gone there too. But who can she be if she is not one of the nieces Renée, Hélène or Laure ? There is no really close cousin… At this point, we remember that the genealogy that we are presented with may be distorted. …. Could there be another niece that we are not aware of?

     With these questions in mind, the search was on for a new niece. Looking at the dates of birth of her siblings, it was not obvious… Except to put her in the place of the ghost André-Louis… And there, tilt, but yes, it is that  as Jean-Michel Trogneux, the biological father of the three Auzière children became their mother, their biological mother became their fictive father André-Louis ! A solution finally rather simple… but realized in two times, 1974 and 1984.

     Let’s call, for now, Proba (as in probable…) this hypothetical niece, who would thus have been born in 1951, perhaps in Eséka in Cameroon since her parents were there (Appendix A 18). Proba would have come to Amiens to join her sister Laure, or her young uncle Jean-Louis, and she would have met Jean-Michel Trogneux there…

      

     About her portraits of the Auzière grandchildren on her Facebook account, Catherine Audoy reportedly spoke the truth when she said they are family, but not on her side, implying : her husband’s. They are the children of a niece of her husband and also the grandsons of his great friend. As for Jean-Jacques Trogneux, he is the son of the same boyfriend. It is understandable that she painted them, especially since she herself had no descendants. These paintings were the clue that stimulated the sagacity of Natacha Rey …

     In the Hypothesis Table that follows, these Proba scenarios (BD, BE) now appear much more likely than the now-rejected original scenario (AF) in which Catherine Audoy was the mother. This first scenario, presented in Chapter 10, was largely the result of Natacha Rey’s custody, probably triggered by JLA and JMT, after she contacted Catherine Audoy. The goal was not to protect her, as was believed following the police custody, but rather her husband Jean-Louis Auzière and also her niece Proba.

     April 28. In their complaint against Natacha Rey (Appendix D 18), Jean-Louis Auzière and Catherine Audoy consider themselves defamed by the fact that Catherine would be alleged to be the “surrogate mother” of the three Auzière children, and that Jean-Louis would be suspected of having operated falsifications, “diddling and make-up” of the three children’s birth certificates. To address the Justice in this way, it is very likely that they can demonstrate that it is false (note that it would have been much simpler and fairer to explain it directly to Natacha Rey…). A DNA analysis between Catherine Audoy and the three children would be unstoppable. Moreover, she herself did not have children with either of her two husbands, so it is likely that she could not have children with another man.

     But the sidelining of Catherine Audoy does not take away anything from the pivotal role of Jean-Louis Auzière, a role that would be of a different nature, however. Let us not forget that his father Marius and his older brother Louis worked for the secret services (Appendix A 31) : this may have indirectly, or even directly, helped him…

  2. Part 2: Is this niece Proba Auzière named Brigitte ? Or: Were there two Brigitte Auzière ?As with Part 1, we started with a base that turned out to be wrong, but allowed us to better approach reality. Here it is :
     

     The 1989 election leaflet in Truchtersheim (end of Chapter 7) shows a young woman who is not Brigitte Macron. To explain it, it was believed that this leaflet was faked after the fact. But what if it appeared like this in 1989? If the Brigitte Auzière of 1989 was not the one of 1990/1991? And it is there that intervenes Proba Auzière, you understand ? This Proba Auzière knows Jean-Michel-Trogneux very well, since they are the parents of the three Auzière children. We even saw that they reversed their roles, the mother Proba Auzière became the father (André-Louis Auzière) and the father became the mother Brigitte Auzière, later Brigitte Macron. Proba is a first name invented because we did not know what to call this niece of Jean-Louis Auzière. The presence of two Brigitte Auzière in Truch shows that her real name is Brigitte! And here is the sleight of hand, the magic illusion: Brigitte Auzière born Auzière is replaced by Brigitte Auzière born Jean-Michel Trogneux ! In addition one would have a photograph of this Brigitte born Auzière, it is on the tract of 1989 (to suppose that it was not doctored…): Hypothesis rejected (the photo on the flyer would be of Brigitte becoming Macron)

      

     
     We subsequently found three denials of this first interpretation of the facts:

     1. In Appendix A 34, a notary document from June 1988 proving the existence of Brigitte Trogneux (future Macron), attesting that the transformation of Jean-Michel into Brigitte had taken place before that date.
     2. The Appendix A 36 shows that Brigitte Trogneux who became Macron, and not Brigitte born Auzière, had indeed been a French teacher at the “Lucie Berger” high school in Strasbourg, from 1985 or 1986 to 1990.
     3. At the end of this Appendix A 36, a new comparison of photos proves that the Brigitte Auzière of the election leaflet was indeed also Brigitte Trogneux who became Macron, contrary to what we had believed at first.

     But, except for this chronological correction (made on May 12), the reasoning used remains true and the continuation, below, of this part 2, written on May 1, remains valid. It is developed there “the sleight of hand” rightly glimpsed, but which goes back to 1984-1985 and not to 1989 : Brigitte Auzière née Auzière is replaced by Brigitte Auzière née Jean-Michel Trogneux : the father of the three Auzière children becomes their mother : it is a question of identity usurpation. However, the usurped identity is only added to the authentic identity, which continues to exist, so that Jean-Michel Trogneux can file a complaint jointly with himself, since he is also named Brigitte Macron.

     Finally it is not so complicated as that. The children have always been called Auzière, their official mother has always been called Brigitte, the substitution (a game, for the children) has been done gently, far from Amiens, neither seen nor known… This scenario is all the more important as we first understood it with the niece Proba, before completing it with the Alsatian lighting, as if the pieces of the puzzle were perfectly assembled. Not yet to the point of understanding everything – some forgeries remain a mystery -, but enough to avoid major inconsistencies. Unless a reader can counter-argue? [August 8: still no counter-argument  on the contrary, this scenario was supported by the analysis of the 1974 marriage, in Appendices A 43 and A 48]

     As for the prestidigitator, the deus ex machina who came up with all this, we can assume that it was Jean-Louis dit André Auzière, the uncle of mother Brigitte-Proba and the great friend of father Jean-Michel. With his contacts in the secret services, thanks to his father and brother (Appendix A 31), he imagined and implemented this scenario with some doctored documents. Did he take advantage of circumstances, such as the accidental death of his niece ? Or did he make sure that she completely disappeared from the radar, as if she had been exfiltrated with a change of identity? It is unlikely that we will know in the immediate future, unless a close witness starts talking or a judicial investigation is finally launched. The pact of silence has been sealed and is holding for now, despite all the revelations already known… We have here an identity usurpation skilfully achieved in a geographically remote phase, with the social distance required by the secret transition, known only to the family circle, which is always closely united.

     Succeeding the version 2, tree version 3, of the two Brigitte Auzière,
     the biological mother (born Brigitte Auzière) and the surrogate mother (born Jean-Michel Trogneux)
     
     A version 4, better translating the word “falsely”, is presented in the Conclusion Chapter.
     The revelation of the existence of two Brigitte Auzières gives us a better understanding of a marriage record that we had initially rejected, because it seemed false. Its source was dubious, since it was shown, at the beginning of January, by Moadab (Appendix A 7), and it seemed absurd that Brigitte Auzière, who was believed to be Brigitte Trogneux, was present at the wedding of Jean-Michel Trogneux with Véronique Dreux in 1980. We understand now that it was the first Brigitte, niece of Jean-Louis. Moreover, it is actually marked that she lives in Croix in the department of Nord where she resides then (Appendix A 30). Thus, in 1980, Brigitte Auzière, Jean-Michel Trogneux’s lover (with whom he had two children and would have a third) is present at his wedding with Véronique (future mother of two more children). It looks like a ménage à trois… And this document provides us with the signatures of the trio, here it is in a version of February 25, a little more complete than the first one:
     
     Right, from top to bottom, the signatures of Véronique Dreux, Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Auzière.
     The Moadab version from early January states that Brigitte Auzière is “not a professional” : 1 2.
     This signature “B. Auzière” appears as a confirmation of the hypothesis first named “Proba Auzière”. We have understood the mechanism of the magic trick, the interrogative form can disappear from the title of this chapter. It is still a hypothesis but, in my opinion, it now reaches the intimate conviction…
     

This act can only be falsified. The non-indication of the 1st marriage, which we know to be fictitious, does not constitute proof, but other elements point in that direction. First of all the Amiens City Hall has already communicated forgeries. I spoke of the non-birth in Amiens of Jean-Michel Trogneux on an act of April 15, 2021, there are two other similar acts, dated March 24 and April 12, 2021. It is therefore from December 2021 (when the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair breaks out) that the Amiens City Hall begins to disseminate the birth certificates of Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux, the first appearing right and the second false, we find there a way to confuse the tracks. Xavier Poussard adds : “How to explain the fact that on these two birth certificates, provided by the same administration, relating to two individuals born at the same time, that of Véronique Dreux lists three marriages in the marginal mentions, while that of Brigitte Macron omits her first marriage to André (-Louis) Auzière” [F&D504p04]. Hypothesis rejected (the birth certificate now appearing valid)

Progressively, with hindsight, this document appeared to be a true extract of the civil status record. Certainly, with regard to the “legend” of Brigitte, we note the absence of the first marriage with André-Louis Auzière in 1974 (which is not the first marriage of Jean-Michel, in 1980), but only the last act Should necessarily be cited in an extract. One wonders then why the “extract of birth certificate, obtained under the same conditions by the same town hall a month later, mentions two marriages. This leaves doubts about the 1974 marriage  this will be dealt with in the next Chapter.
Logically, recognizing the birth required us to know what happened to this little sister of Jean-Michel. This was the subject of an Appendix A 37 in late May 2022, incorporated here in mid-September.

In Appendix A 11, we raised the “mystery of the niece who died young.” Let us associate it, now, with two other mysteries  that of the little girl present in the 1953/1954 photo (treated in Chapter 6 and in Appendix A 11) and that of Brigitte Trogneux’s birth certificate on April 13, 1953 in Amiens. We will compare these three data. Let us begin with the birth of Brigitte Marie Claude Trogneux. Here, opposite, is her announcement published in “Le Courrier Picard” of April 15, 1953.

Up to now we have considered these two documents to be forgeries. They are, however, very different in nature from each other. We have also learned that Brigitte Trogneux’s Social Security number appears, prima facie, to be correct and not forged (Appendix A 35 Part 2). There is still the voter registration card that appears correct (Appendix A 35 Part 1). Let’s assume that this birth is true. And let’s return to the niece who died young. Could she be, in reality, this sister Brigitte ? Here is how Sylvie Bommel talks about it, twice, explicitly and then implicitly, relying on Brigitte Macron’s words and wishes :

Thus, in 2019, Sylvie Bommel did not return to the death of the little “niece“. Probably at the request of Brigitte Macron, who felt she had said too much in 2017 … This niece who died at the age of 8 (one year after the accident when Brigitte was 7), we looked for her (Appendix A 11 in the reject inserts) and we did not find her  it is neither Christine Boulogne born in 1957, nor Nathalie Farcy born in 1959 and there is no other one before (officially). There is also Sylvie Boulogne born in 1959 and deceased in 1966, but that’s much later… So, yes, only Brigitte, Jean-Michel’s own sister, may have died in 1961 at age 8. More exactly at the beginning of 1961

Lastly, let us note that in this 2021 book, Syvie Bommel, just before the accident, writes that “Brigitte, at six years old, is old enough to be a little maid of honor” at the wedding of her older brother Jean-Claude, on June 14, 1960. Ah… Why then were we not shown a photo of this wedding with Brigitte and the bride and groom? This presence is to be compared with the mention of Brigitte on the faire-part of Maryvonne’s death in February 1960, in “Le Courrier Picard“. This mention of granddaughter of honor in June 1960 is the last evidence of life, indirectly, that we have of Brigitte Trogneux.

A detail singularly supports the reality of Brigitte Trogneux’s birth in 1953. There were two announcements, published on April 14 and 15, 1953 : the first is presented at the beginning of Chapter 20, the second at the beginning of this chapter. Why two in a row ? Simply because, in the announcement of the 14th, big sister Monique had been forgotten. She probably protested and, as a result, Dad had a new notice published in the next day’s paper, to restore internal family justice. Why is this little detail interesting? Because it validates Brigitte’s birth. A forger would never have made life difficult by falsifying two newspaper numbers instead of one, under such an improbable pretext. Even the idea would never have occurred to him. These two ads authenticate the birth certificate!

The death of this younger sister in 1961 has deeply marked the teenager Jean-Michel, to the point that he will want, later, to reincarnate her… Why, then, does the birth certificate of 2021 indicate that this sister married Emmanuel Macron in 2007? If it seems very difficult to have falsified both the 1953 double announcement, the social security number and the 2021 birth certificate, it is easier to imagine that these documents are administratively valid, as those relating to the 1974 and 2007 marriages. The falsification can only be on another level: the best explanation is that the death of little Brigitte in 1961 was never declared to the civil registry. Is this possible? The Wikipedia page on the “National Directory of Identification of Natural Persons” shows that this is relatively common :

Without ruling out that the death could also have been erased, it is therefore conceivable that it was not reported. Especially if the fatal illness of the girl, although apparently quite short, was trying and hidden, becoming a family secret. All the tricks will then be good to keep her alive, and in the most sophisticated way possible so that it is undetectable. Thus, more than the creation ex nihilo of the identity of Brigitte Trogneux, it is a usurpation of this identity by Jean-Michel Trogneux which gains our intimate conviction.

In addition, because of this word “niece” used in the “legend”, there is another possibility. When Brigitte was born in 1953, Simone was 40 years old and her eldest daughter Annie (Anne Marie) was 21 years old. This one could be the biological mother, the father being unknown (except maybe in the secret of the family). The state of being an unmarried mother was frowned upon at the time, so it was Annie’s parents who would have assumed the birth. This was quite common. Brigitte would then be a biological niece of Jean-Michel, which goes in the direction of a sister-niece confusion.

This is the moment to return to the famous family photo: as we had already assumed, we have, there, a confirmation that it can only group the six children, from the eldest Anne-Marie to the youngest Brigitte. And to return to the Chapter 27, relating the passage of Jean-Michel in Algiers, we can guess the continuation : very disturbed, the teenager was sent to Algiers at the beginning of the school year 1961/1962, entrusted to a correspondent, probably confectioner, also training him in this trade (hence the designation “confectioner” on his military booklet). And one can assume that the Trogneux parents made it look like Brigitte was accompanying her brother. Jean-Michel then began to become Jean-Bri-Bri, especially when he wrote a letter from his sister… which the parents were proud to show… These are only suppositions without any tangible proof, but they are in the logic of what happened before and what will happen after the death of 1961. In the logic also of a Brigitte Macron who, claiming to be Brigitte Trogneux, remembers in 2017 her passage in Algiers.

• We wondered, in the previous Chapter, about the disappearance of Brigitte born Auzière, until considering her death, after the birth of her third child in 1984. An exfiltration was also envisaged.

• Two clues guide us to the following hypothesis  : Brigitte born Auzière would have returned to live in Croix, under another name, next to the place where she had already lived in 1979-1984. In

Appendix A 16

• , we have already quoted this statement by Tiphaine : “

My dad worked in Lille, he came back on weekends. During the week, I was with my mother and on weekends with my dad and mom went to see Emmanuel

• “. Given the father-mother inversion, it would not be the father who would live in Lille, but the mother, Brigitte born Auzière. The second clue is called Antoine Choteau, he is the father of Tiphaine’s two children and he was born in Croix !

To the left, excerpts from the fiche Généanet La Fraternelle. In the center, Antoine and Tiphaine at the Elysee inauguration in May 2017.
On the right Eric Choteau, Antoine’s father (link). Did the Choteau family know Brigitte born Auzière?

• To thus found a family with a native of Croix, Tiphaine knows this township very well. As her father André Louis, is fictitious, it is therefore her mother that she would meet, especially between 1992 (date of the meeting with Emmanuel Macron, Tiphaine was 8 years old), and 2010 (date of PACS with Antoine).

• Eric Choteau, Antoine’s father, was a gastroenterologist and hepatologist who practiced in Cucq in the Pas-de-Calais. He died on October 9, 2013 (

faire-part

• ,

link

• ). In Le Touquet, he was a well-known figure, president-creator of the field field hockey club (

link

• ). Is he the one who, as a doctor or neighbor, would have allowed his son to know Brigitte born Auzière and her daughter Tiphaine ?

• August 24, 2022. We take note of large extracts of a notary document, of donation-sharing, of bare property, of the Trogneux parents, Jean and Simone Pujol, to their six children, Jean-Michel

and

• Brigitte included, Maryvonne deceased being replaced by her daughter Nathalie Farcy, married Bataille. The date of this document is revealing: March 27, 1985. The transitional period 1974-1984 is over, Jean-Michel took the identity of his deceased sister Brigitte. This family state of affairs will not change thereafter, it is still operational now, thirty-seven years later: Jean-Michel continues to exist in a vaporous way, by short intermittences, especially in writing, when Brigitte lives, ostensibly. Their presentation on the notarial act is the following:

The important and revealing word is colored red. On the right, it appears likely that the photo
of the 1974 bride is that of Brigitte born Auzière, as explained in Appendix A 48.

• The simultaneous presence of Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux, in the form of two distinct persons, is a challenge: we know that it is impossible, so? So, perhaps for the last time, the Trogneux family called upon Brigitte born Auzière. As for the 1974 wedding, she plays again the role of Brigitte born Trogneux. One notices, on this occasion, the importance that takes the marriage of 1974: it is well him which, administratively, resuscitated Brigitte born Trogneux.

Photo 2022 Stephane Lemouton – BestImage

Photo 2019 Dominique Jacovides – BestImage

• The notary, Maître Hervé Laudren, who realizes this act, is the same one who had acted the marriage contract in 1974. He recognizes the bride of then and does not ask himself any question. For him, he has well there, in his study, the youngest daughter of the Trogneux family of Amiens, who was there ten years earlier on the occasion of her marriage contract. It is for Jean-Michel that he wonders, in view of his appearance: unlike his brother Jean-Claude, he does not consider him “présent” but “présente”! No doubt Jean-Michel came in his feminine form, his definitive form… Who had noticed this spelling at the time ? Probably nobody… And even if someone had seen it, wouldn’t it be better to ignore it ? Wasn’t it better to ignore it? To see it as a simple typing error? We had to wait until 2022 for it to be highlighted…

• The place of residence declared by Jean-Michel, at La Neuville-sur-Oudeuil, near Beauvais, is another source of questioning, the subject of the

Appendix A 47

• . He certainly could not say that he lived in Truch, like his sister !

• As for the one who, for the last time, pretends to be the daughter Brigitte of the Trogneux parents, she declares that she lives at n°4 rue des coquelicots in Truchtersheim, where Jean-Michel, now Brigitte, lives. This notarized act is like a handover: we leave the 1974 marriage configuration to enter the new one, scripted in 1984. As in the first act, the complicity of the Trogneux family remains very active in this second act. However, the role of Brigitte, the reincarnated born Trogneux in 1953, will be held by another actor, and this one is not a woman! The bet is very risky. But the game is worth the candle: Jean-Michel will be much more involved in his character, he will have more confidence from his parents, brother and sisters, and the details have been carefully treated, in the continuation of the previous years, on the basis of the same marriage. Brigitte born Auzière was worryingly fragile. She was relieved after this last performance, which she meekly accepted, one last time, as a release. The heavy burden she had assumed since 1974 is finally over.

• Given the date of this document, in March 1985, the installation of Jean-Michel / Brigitte in Truch probably occurred at the beginning of the 1984-1985 school year, so that the two eldest children, 10 and 8 years old, could integrate their new school at the beginning of the school year. It is then that Jean-Michel Trogneux would have left La Neuville-sur-Oudeuil, his official wife Véronique Dreux and their two children Jean-Jacques and Valérie, to settle in this commune of Alsace, under the appearance of a woman, with his three other children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, and the ghost of a husband named André Louis Auzière.

• Jean-Michel is the only donee whose children, however official, Jean-Jacques and Valerie, are not named, as if the Trogneux family was drawing a line under the Veronique Dreux episode. The erasure of this marriage and these two children lasted until their revelation in 2021 in “

Facts & Documents

• ” (

Chapter 11

• ).

• Although we do not know the final page of signatures, we do have an

appendix page

• with signatures and the two excerpts below on the left :

The second proof (here the first, in Chapter 14) Originals:document blue, document green, document yellow. The image on the left shows the two signatures of Brigitte born Auzière that appear on this page of the act. They are identical to that of the 1974 bride when she was a witness at Jean-Michel Trogneux’s 1980 wedding, recalled in the green box (taken from Chapter 27). Blatantly (e.g., the shape of the p’s), the handwriting of Brigitte born Auzière, who calls herself “nee Trogneux” here, is not the same handwriting as that of Brigitte Macron, reproduced on the right and analyzed in Appendix A 39. These are not the same people. So here we have evidence that : Brigitte Macron was not the bride of 1974! And here, above, is another, similar proof, with the writing of the word “Trogneux”, twice in the blue document already seen, supposedly in Brigitte Macron’s hand, and the same word written by Brigitte Macron, signing in 2007 a document orange, just before her marriage to Emmanuel Macron (Appendix A 39). Once again, these are not the same handwritings, Brigitte Macron is not the 1974 bride, who signed the blue document. Two different people claimed to be Brigitte born Trogneux. And neither of them was… Addition of 23/10/2023: it appears likely that the text in the yellow document is not in Brigitte Macron’s hand. This one certainly is, and the conclusion is the same.

• This appendix page with signatures also shows that the Trogneux parents were involved in the “

Tentations

• ” store that Jean-Michel and his wife Véronique Dreux ran in Beauvais (

Appendix A 38

• ). They were probably also involved in supplying the confectionery department.

• The meeting of Tiphaine with the Choteau family in Croix and the presence, on March 27, 1985, of a clone of Brigitte born Trogneux, other than her brother Jean-Michel, lead us to consider that Brigitte born Auzière still lived after the birth of Tiphaine and that she lived, after 1984, in Croix or next door, in the suburbs of Lille, under an identity that we do not know.

• This leads to other questions. Wouldn’t the announced death of André Louis in 2019 rather be that of Brigitte born Auzière ? When, in 2022 (

Appendix D 10

• ), Brigitte Macron made it known that André Louis Auzière “

had become depressed, reclined in a psychiatric clinic

,” which Tiphaine denied, were they both talking about Brigitte born Auzière ? Wouldn’t a mental health problem be the cause of her being put aside from 1984 ? Participating in the fake wedding of 1974, witnessing the wedding, in 1980, of the father of her children with another woman, being pregnant at the same time as this official wife, participating, under the pressure of her in-laws, in the reincarnation of a person who died more than twenty years ago, seeing the father of her children transforming himself into a woman: can’t all this bring about a profound loss of bearings, to the point of provoking serious psychological problems ?

1. 1980, the marriage of Jean-Michel Trogneux.In the Chapter 11, we have already presented this first marriage of Jean-Michel Trogneux with Véronique Dreux, on November 24, 1980 in Blangy-Tronville, near Amiens. It was discovered by Xavier Poussard and revealed in “Faits & Documents” n°503 in October 2021. Previously, it was not even known that the “first lady” had a brother named Jean-Michel. Her siblings of five children increased to six. We now know what this implausible concealment was hiding.In January 2022, Moadab and Blanrue revealed several civil status documents, including a birth certificate extract of Jean-Michel Trogneux, dated January 9, with an indication in the margin of his marriage, the only marriage, that of 1980. The divorce of June 17, 1987 is also stipulated. His death, however, is not : he is therefore still alive. A copy of the complete birth certificate of Jean-Michel Trogneux was then provided, dated January 25 (link) :
   The birth certificate of Jean-Michel Trogneux is incorrect: it does not mention his 2007 remarriage.
   The NBI file adds that, ten months earlier, on April 15, 2021, the same Amiens town hall had issued Natacha Rey a document stating that Jean-Michel Trogneux had not been born in that commune. By what artifice had the birth certificate then been lost and by what miracle did it reappear ?At the end of April 2022, we understood why the wedding had taken place in Blangy-Tronville: it had been about ten years since Jean-Michel Trogneux had been living there and was managing Picardie Métal (Appendix A 33). At the end of May (Appendix A 38), we learned that the couple, after their marriage, had moved to Beauvais, where Véronique Dreux was the manager of a confectionery-merchandise store “Tentations“, in connection with her confectioner-chocolate maker parents-in-law. The couple’s first child, Jean-Jacques, spent his first months there. He was born on November 15, 1982 in Amiens.

   He will have a little sister, Valerie, also born in Amiens, on February 20, 1984. The little family lives in a beautiful villa, 20 km away, in the commune of Neuville-sur-Oudeuil (Appendix A 47 from the end of August). But the storm is rumbling, Jean-Michel is going to move to Truchtersheim with his three other children. The divorce is taking shape and will be pronounced three years later, on June 17, 1987.

   It appears that Jean-Jacques and Valerie were the only two grandchildren forgotten by Jean and Simone Trogneux when they made a large gift to their descendants on March 27, 1985 (Chapter 30 from late August). Yet they are present in the 1991 family photo (Appendix A 2) (apparently without their mother). Jean-Jacques can be found at the Elysee Palace in May 2017, during the first inauguration of Emmanuel Macron (a December 2021 find). Apart from these presences the two children and the mother appear very distant from Jean-Bri-Bri. We do not know of any photos of this family, which remained complete for only a short time.

   As indicated in Chapter 11 Véronique Dreux later remarried and seems to have lost all contact with the Trogneuxes. We do not know when and under what circumstances she had met Jean-Michel, and in particular whether he used her first name in the 1977 television program in which he called himself Véronique la transsexuelle (Chapter 14). We also don’t know what his relationship was with Brigitte born Auzière, the mother of Jean-Michel’s other three children, born in 1975, 1977, 1984. Surprisingly, she was Jean-Michel’s best man at the 1980 wedding, when she already had two children by him (the signatures of the trio are at the end of Chapter 29) .

2. A key witness to the real 1980 wedding sheds light on the rigged 1974 wedding and the 1984 crisis.Although discreetly performed on a weekday Monday, the 1980 wedding appears to be entirely valid, with no identity manipulations or the like, unlike the 1974 and 2007 marriages. We do not know the full record, but we do know of several excerpts, already shown at the end of Chapter 28. One of them (noted [1]) proves particularly interesting. It is the presentation of the witness named “Brigitte Auzière.” It is below, with, embedded in a green frame, the reminder of her signature on this 1980 act, and her photo at the 1974 wedding :
   The Article 34 of the Civil Code specifies that “The civil status records shall state […] the first names, surnames, occupations and domiciles of all those named therein“. And these are indeed the names of birth, even if one can, sometimes, optionally, add the name of married woman (link). Thus, the one referred to as “Brigitte Auzière” cannot be “Brigitte married Auzière“, as a first, too quick, reading would have us believe. She can only be a “Brigitte born Auzière“. Consequently : We have, there, a first proof of the existence of Brigitte born Auzière!
   Remember, last May, in the Chapter 28, we had initially estimated that the mother of the three Auzière children was an Auzière woman, close to Jean-Louis, to whom we had given the first name of Proba. Then, at the end of this chapter, we had acquired the conviction that her first name was Brigitte. We had then of her only one signature, as witness in this marriage of 1980. Then we had shown, in the Chapter 29 of late August, excerpts from an act of March 1985, two other signatures, one of which noted “nee Trogneux” (a deliberate and characteristic lie), and we had considered that the 1974 bride’s photo was hers. Other clues, presented in a frame in Appendix A44 pointed in this direction. We wrote elsewhere in the record that we had these clues without having formal proof of his identity. Well, on September 15, here is the first proof! This is a new step forward, even if, admittedly, there is still a long way to go: to have proof that Brigitte is indeed the mother of the three Auzière children, that she is a niece of Jean-Louis, that she was born in Eséka…Moreover, the mayor of Blangy-Tronville, and also his deputy who celebrates the event, are not friends of the family knowing the malpractices carried out, as the mayor of Le Touquet in 1974 and 2007. They treat this marriage “in the regular way”, according to their habits of respecting the editorial instructions. They have verified the validity of the identities of the witnesses. It is solid.

   This shows that Brigitte born Auzière presented herself at the wedding with her true identity as a young girl, whereas she could have, as first at the 1974 wedding and as, one last time, in March 1985, presented herself as the deceased Brigitte born Trogneux. Thus, from 1974 to 1984, the integration of Brigitte born Auzière into the identity of Brigitte born Trogneux is not systematic. According to the circumstances, she presents herself under one name or another. After 1984, the integration of Jean-Michel Trogneux in his deceased sister will be physically more complete and permanent, the identity Jean-Michel existing only in a written and sporadic way.

   The extracts we know of from the 1980 marriage record show only one of the four witnesses. However, we have the signatures of three of them, which allows us to identify a second witness:

    

   Opposite, on the left, the signatures of the bride and groom and witnesses. Above the bride, below the groom, with his initials JM that look like a B. And the signatures of three witnesses, including that of Brigitte Auzière, shown in the green box above. The one on the bottom left is not yet identified.For the one on the right in the middle, we thought, at first, to recognize the “paw” of André Louis Auzière, as shown by the comparisons, opposite on the right, with two other specimens from 1992 and 2001. But, on reflection, it could also be AM (Anne Marie) Annie (without the T of Trogneux), the sister of Jean-Michel.

   It is then appropriate to ask the question: why did Brigitte Auzière come under her own identity ? Because guests at the wedding knew her only under her original name ?… Including the bride ?

3. 2007, the rigged wedding of Emmanuel and Brigitte.At the end of Chapter 16, we already mentioned the October 20, 2007 marriage uniting Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Trogneux, aka Jean-Bri-Bri. We knew, of course, that this marriage could only be illegal, since, at the time, only a man born a man and a woman born a woman could get married. But we did not know at what level the illegality should be situated.In the end, this marriage is as rigged as that of 1974  the bride, administratively registered, is deceased but reincarnated in both cases. In 1974, we had a fictitious husband, there, in 2007, the bride is a man disguised as a woman, who moreover was already married in 1980, divorced in 1987, without this being stated.
   

   The few photos that came out of this ” ceremony ” are strange, if not disturbing. Brigitte wears a very short and sleeveless dress, it is not a wedding dress. Macron, on the other hand, wears a pink tie and a black suit […] On the “most important day of his life”, all the details count, so why break the codes? Especially with their cultural and financial level, there is no chance, but in a pinch. The most… bizarre is their centerpiece. It clearly represents the horns of a Baphomet under flames. […] So how is it then that their wedding does not appear in the records of the city hall in which the ceremony took place? There is too much occult symbolism, which does not bode well for anything holy. [Franck Pengam, reprinting information from “Facts & Documents,” “Les moutons enragés,” November 14, 2021, link with illustration at right]

    

   July 14, 2022, what fireworks… (link)

   
   To achieve this deception, which appears incredible at first glance, Jean-Bri-Bri had two essential supports. That of his great friend Jean-Louis Auzière, knowing the workings of the secret services, who had already engineered the 1974 wedding, where Jean-Michel (not yet Jean-Bri-Bri) was best man of the bridegroom (already his deceased sister, but under another reincarnation). And that of Léonce Deprez, mayor of Le Touquet, great friend of the father Trogneux, who had already celebrated and also arranged the 1974 wedding. As in 1974, the parents, brother and sisters Trogneux were accomplices, but it does not seem that they were present, thus marking a certain distance (they are nevertheless on the invitation). Only Manette, Emmanuel’s grandmother, was there, surely knowingly (Appendix A 14). Emmanuel Macron’s mother, Françoise Noguès, apparently absent, as was her husband, also knew, surely, because of her professional support for transsexuals, her probable acquaintance with Pastor Doucé, and her old friendship with Jean-Michel Trogneux (Chapter 25). The others may have been deceived. Including Jean-Michel Macron, official father of the groom, who will divorce with his mother in 2010 ?

   Unlike 1974, there was no religious wedding. Instead, the 2007 wedding seemed to be patronized by the Devil Baphomet himself, crowning the cake that ended the meal with his horns. It is true that in the meantime, in 1992, a 47 year old devilish man had hijacked a 15 year old minor…

• Considering only the data and hypotheses that appear most likely to us, relying on the known facts gathered and adding a requirement of coherence,

here is the scenario of Jean-Michel Trogneux’s journey that appears to us to be the most realistic

• . First constructed in mid-May 2021, then updated, it is the counterpoint to the FR3 documentary film “

Brigitte Macron, a French novel

• “, it is its hidden side, much more romantic…

• To understand the springs of this implausible story of Brigitte “

first lady

• ” born into male Jean-Michel, we had to dive far into the past, all the way back to the 1950s, and point out some critical steps compounding the unspoken. As for the transformation of Jean-Michel into Brigitte, we believe that everything was carefully orchestrated and planned so that no one could suspect, let alone prove, this change of identity. The mastermind of the sleight of hand would be Jean-Louis Auzière. His father Marius Auzière was an intelligence officer, his older brother Louis too (

Appendix A 31

• ). Jean-Louis benefits from some of their contacts and is fascinated by secret lives. He himself goes by André, his middle name. He is a great friend of Jean-Michel Trogneux, whom he probably knew in Algeria (

Chapter 25

• ). But before we get to this meeting, around 1961, we need to go back in time even further.

• • 1. 1945, birth of Jean-Michel Trogneux in AmiensAs we saw in the Chapter 6, Jean-Michel Henri Trogneux was born on February 11, 1945 in Amiens, into a well-to-do family of chocolate makers, well established in the local bourgeoisie. He has an older brother and three older sisters.
    2. 1953, childhood in Amiens, the birth of Brigitte Trogneux, Jean-Michel’s little sisterOn April 13, 1953, Jean-Michel, 8 years old, has a new sister: Brigitte.The Chapter 28 explains why we now believe in this birth, which we rejected at the beginning of this investigation. Brigitte would be the little girl in the family photo that we now date to the fall of 1954 or Christmas 1954 or January 1, 1955. The whole family, the two parents and the six children, would thus be gathered here.
       In late 1954, the famous family photo would finally be true, although it has received some retouching
       accessories. On the right is a photomontage of Jean-Michel with his sister Brigitte, a merger in the making.
    3. 1961, the death of the little sister Brigitte, not accepted by her parents.the Chapter 28 also explains that Brigitte probably died around the age of 8, but that this death was hidden and not reported to the civil registry. We do not know the cause. It is not excluded that it was later. It could be linked to an accident or a long illness, which would explain the scarcity of photos of Brigitte (only one has reached us, the photo above of the whole family). At the time of her death, Jean-Michel, a 14 year old teenager, was very touched. This family drama becomes a terrible family secret when the parents decide to hide the death and not to declare it, after having hidden the illness. No doubt they tell their relatives that she went on long trips with her brother Jean-Michel, showing them some postcards.
       
       
    4. 1961, in Algiers, the meeting of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis AuzièreIn Chapter 25 and in Appendix A 22, we set forth a certainty  Jean-Michel Trogneux was a student in Algiers. He lived in a hotel-pension at 87, boulevard Saint-Saëns. It was in 1963, he was there before too. We can estimate that, shortly after the death of his sister Brigitte, perhaps to free him from this drama, his parents brought him to study there, at the college-lycee Notre-Dame d’Afrique, whose day school was located at 24 of this same boulevard Saint-Saëns. We have several photos that point in this direction, even if we cannot be sure that they represent Jean-Michel. And on two of them, we believe to recognize Jean-Louis Auzière. But it doesn’t matter whether they met there, or a little later in the USA (Appendix A 26), or even in Amiens around 1972 because of Laure Auzière, Jean-Louis’ niece (Chapter 27 Part 1). Still, this strong friendship will be decisive.
       Perhaps Jean-Michel Trogneux, the little one, and Jean-Louis Auzière, the big one, in 1961 in Algiers at the boarding school Le Courrier Picard” [F&D504p5].
    5. 1973-1974, the Blangy-Tronville episode, Jean-Michel meets Brigitte born Auzière, the funny wedding in Le TouquetFrom 1964 to 1973, we know little about Jean-Michel Trogneux, except that he probably lived in the USA in 1969 (Appendix A 26). Jean-Louis Auzière became his great friend (Chapter 27 Part 1), who introduced him to his niece with the endearing first name, Brigitte Auzière. A romantic relationship begins (Chapter 27 Part 2). The Chapter 30 and the End Box of Appendix 44 explain why the future mother of the three Auzière children is indeed this Brigitte born Auzière, Jean-Louis’ niece.In 1972-1973, Jean-Michel is back in Amiens with Brigitte, who meets the Trogneux family. They get engaged in 1973 (or January 1974, see end of Appendix A 49). At the start of the 1972 school year, Laure Auzière, Brigitte’s younger sister, comes to study in Amiens. At the same time, in 1973, Jean-Michel’s parents have a piece of land with a house in the town of Blangy-Tronville, about ten kilometers from Amiens. They installed Jean-Michel there for a hardware store project, Picardie Métal. Jean-Michel will be the manager and will use the services of a representative (Appendix A 33). We do not know if he had other activities at the same time.The Trogneux parents want to show everyone that their daughter Brigitte is alive. Jean-Michel too. Isn’t the new Brigitte worth the old one? To realize this extravagant wish, Jean-Michel calls upon his great friend Jean-Louis Auzière, the young uncle of Brigitte Auzière. This one is fascinated by secret services and double personalities. The crazy idea takes shape: Brigitte born Auzière will play the deceased Brigitte Trogneux and Jean-Louis will play, for appearances, the role of her husband, thus providing an official father to her future children. This fictitious husband will have for name Auzière, for first name André. André is Jean-Louis’s middle name, which he prefers to the first and uses from time to time as a pseudonym (end of Appendix A 30), as if he had prepared for this role.A crazy idea germinates then: Brigitte born Auzière will play the deceased Brigitte Trogneux and Jean-Louis will play, for the sake of appearances, the role of her husband, thus providing an official father to her future children. This fictitious husband will have for name Auzière, for first name André. André is Jean-Louis’s middle name, which he prefers to the first and uses from time to time as a pseudonym (end of Appendix A 30), as if he had prepared for this role.

       Where would this André Louis Auzière come from? Since the future wife, who fraudulently became Brigitte born Trogneux, is no longer officially Brigitte born Auzière, born in Eséka, he would take his place in the genealogy of this Auzière family, thus acquiring an administrative existence: here he is the son of Louis Auzière, Jean-Louis’ brother. It is a simple substitution, a nephew replaces the niece. Marius Auzière, still alive, and Louis Auzière, respectively grandfather and father of Brigitte, who both worked for the secret services (Appendix A 31), took part in this operation, the first for sure, the second probably.

       And, of course, to put all this in place, the fictitious André must marry the deceased Brigitte. And this will have to be done in broad daylight, so that the event will be permanently inscribed in people’s minds, even in the civil registry. At first glance, the challenge seems out of reach, so bold is it. But the imagination and meticulousness of the Auzières, combined with the interpersonal skills of the Trogneux, are serious assets. It is necessary, of course, a complaisant mayor who does not check the identities and a priest for the essential religious ceremony. The Trogneux parents take care of this  the mayor of Le Touquet, Léonce Deprez, is a great friend of the father, from the time when both shone on the tennis courts (Appendix A 28), and Abbé Herreman is a priest of the parish “La Providence” in Amiens, very understanding, for having probably supported the family during the deaths of Maryvonne in 1960 and then of Brigitte in 1961 (mention 1958). And then, Jean and Simone put at the bride’s disposal the administrative documents of their youngest daughter, still valid, since her death was not declared.

       Thus, on June 22, 1974, in Le Touquet, the bells rang and the photographer took shots to make an ideal photo, which will be taken by the local press, showing the two real-false married surrounded by their complicit parents (Appendices A 43 and A 48). The late Brigitte is supposed to come back from far away, from America (Appendix A 26) and even from the Styx, but since she’s here, no one will be able to doubt her existence and identity anymore, which is wedged by the double ceremony. In the skin of the false bride stands the real one (or vice versa). Assuming the heavy burden of embodying the deceased, she obtains, in compensation, satisfaction: she will not be considered as a daughter-mother, since she is married, and with a husband who could not be unfaithful… It will be enough to tell everyone that she has married this André Louis Auzière, but who will go and check it? The only easy check, within everyone’s reach, in addition to the name on the doorbell and the mailbox, is the telephone book. All you have to do is open a phone line in the name of André Auzière (end of the Appendix A 30) where Brigitte lives, in Issy lès Moulineaux. Easy and cheap. The husband will be supposed to work far away and come back from time to time, in the guise of Jean-Michel. But also, from time to time, Jean-louis will be able to play this role, for example in front of a notary. For the neighborhood, it will be a “normal” family, that of Mr. and Mrs. Auzière. As explained in Appendix A 43, this marriage is both false, by the identity of the two bride and groom, and true by the ceremony, the announcement, the announcement and the registration in the civil status. Thus the parents perpetuate the illusion of their living daughter and Brigitte Auzière gently fools her entourage when she claims that the one who comes to see her is her husband.

       How far does the precision of the 1974 mechanism go? Jean-Louis and Jean-Michel have designed the essential characteristics of this false husband, André Louis Auzière. In the Auzière family tree, he replaces Brigitte who, by chance, was born in a remote corner of Africa, without a civil status register. This even makes it possible to change the date of birth of the imaginary husband. It will be the year 1951 instead of 1953, so that André is a little older than Brigitte (as in a “normal” family…) and a little closer to Jean-Louis’ age. And it will be a February 28 to correspond to the birthday of Jean-Louis, born on February 28, 1943.

       The following year, on September 1, 1975, Sebastien Auzière was born in Amiens, the first of three children of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Auzière. The baby bore the name Auzière of his fictitious father, André Louis, the groom of 1974, but he had been fathered by his mother’s lover. The latter, more or less freely, assumes the identity of the sister of the said lover… It is a virtual incest… One can moreover wonder about the relations between the two lovers. Mister is witness to the marriage of Madam in 1974 and Madam will be, in her turn, witness to the marriage of Mister in 1980… Would there be an arrangement behind this symmetrical circumstance?

       Why was Sebastian born in Amiens? To remove the event from the neighborhood of his parents in Issy-les-Moulineaux and to benefit from the help of grandparents Trogneux. They can present the child as the son of their daughter Brigitte, supposedly still alive. To what extent is the double identity of the married couple photographed in 1974 used? To the point of having, for each of them, two identity cards?

    6. 1977, Jean-Michel becomes Veronique the transsexual.The 1974 scenario works well. Brigitte Auzière moved from Issy-les-Moulineaux to Croix, near Lille, in 1976 or 1977. A second child arrived, still born in Amiens : Laurence, in 1977. In addition, Jean-Michel Trogneux is divided between his two personalities of man and woman (gender dysphoria). When did it start ? When his sister Brigitte disappeared and he sometimes had to make her live again abroad, far from her parents? Probably with the accompaniment, in Paris, of the group of help to the transsexuals created by the pastor Joseph Doucé, he begins to transform himself into woman. On September 27, 1977, he is interviewed, in shaded mode, as Véronique the transsexual. His voice, his “That is” speech tic, his gestures are the same as those of Brigitte Macron in January 2022 (first red shaded, in chapter 14).As a man, he knows, moreover, another woman, Véronique Dreux, and decides to cross the step that he had not wanted to cross in 1974  to marry her. It will be on November 24, 1980 in Blangy-Tronville. Brigitte born Auzière is perfectly aware of this and even participates in what becomes a ménage à trois, since she is a witness to this new marriage. We now go far beyond the “normal family” which is still used as a social façade for Brigitte in Croix. Jean-Michel and Véronique settle in 1981 in Beauvais, Véronique runs a confectionery and haberdashery store called “Tentations” (Appendix A 38). They have a first child, Jean-Jacques Trogneux, born in November 1982 in Amiens.1977 is also the date of the arrival in the world in Amiens, eight months after Laurence Auzière’s, in a family of hospital caregivers, of a baby named Emmanuel Macron. Even though this is mentioned in Appendix A 24, there is nothing in what has just been said to link it to the heavy secrets of the Trogneux family. These have been so engrossing, that a parallel history between these two families seems extremely unlikely. Just, according to the Appendix A 10, one could bring forward by one year, from 1992 to 1991, the first meeting of the 2006 bride and groom.
    7. 1984-1985, erasure of Brigitte born Auzière, Jean-Michel becomes in turn Brigitte Trogneux married Auzière, beginning of the Alsatian episodeThe year 1984 arrived. Tiphaine Auzière, Brigitte Auzière and Jean-Michel’s third child, was born on January 30, in the same conditions as her brother Sébastien and sister Laurence, in Amiens. Three weeks later, on February 20, Jean-Michel has another child, Valérie Trogneux, daughter of his wife Véronique Dreux and thus sister of Jean-Jacques. Who was born in the same place, in Amiens.We know little about this Trogneux/Dreux family of two children. Only the marriage record, in part, (end of Chapter 27) and the dates and place of birth of the children, 1982 and 1984 in Amiens, and then the mention of the divorce in 1987. We have photos and paintings of the children and also of Mrs. Dreux. But no family photos (yet), nor of the small children. For the other characters of this play with twists and turns, we have knowledge of big changes :
       • Jean-Michel Trogneux leaves the management of Picardie Métal, which ceases its activity. We will only find traces of this afterwards sparingly, and only in the form of written mentions. Moadab (Appendix A 7) will be the only journalist to have had the privilege of being received at his home and to talk freely with Jean-Michel, curiously omitting to pass on to us any information or images. In 1982, with his wife Véronque Dreux, he moved from Beauvais to the countryside, 16 km away, to La Nouvelle sur Oudeuil (Appendix A 47). We will see that he will stay there for a short time.
       • Jean-Louis Auzière, who became managing director of Grès perfumes in 1981, was appointed in 1983 as a French foreign trade advisor, a role with unclear contours in the line of jobs of his father Marius and his brother Louis, in the more or less secret service of France. In 1983, he moved to Strasbourg, to 26 rue Lorraine, in the Meinau district. On the telephone directory, he designates himself under the first name of André (Appendix A 30). He joins an old friend from Algiers, Jean-Marc Uhrweiller, in Strasbourg as part of his work, commercial director of the autonomous port of that city since 1972 (Chapter 26), who lives in the commune of Truchtersheim.
       • Brigitte, née Auzière, seems to evaporate. She disappears from our radar, after a last intervention, in March 1985, in a notarized deed of gift from the Trogneux parents to their six children. As at the time of the marriage in 1974, she plays the role of the deceased Brigitte born Trogneux. We recognize her signature and, this time, she writes a few words. This allows us to affirm that her handwriting is not that of Brigitte Macron (second red box, in Chapter 30). We then lose track of her. Until now, she had followed, on the phone book, in Issy-les-Moulineaux and then in Croix, the subscriber of the telephone line “André Auzière”. Now, in 1983 and 1984, we find this name twice : in Croix but also in Strasbourg (end of Appendix A 30). Since Tiphaine was born when her mother was located in Croix, there is no evidence that Brigitte born Auzière ever moved to Strasbourg. We assume that she then lived in Croix or Lille, under another name (Chapter 29). It is there, in the 1990s, that the Auzière children will go to see, according to Tiphaine, their pseudo-father André(-Louis). In reality, they would have gone there to find their real mother…
         
         

         Very little is known about Brigitte Auzière née Auzière. We have mainly her signature at the 1980 wedding as a witness (end of Chapter 27), a signature that is found on the 1985 notarial act. It also appears likely that she is the bride in the 1974 photo (Appendix A 48), at left. On the right is the one who will take her place as the mother of her children…

          

          

          

          

       • And it is then, shortly after the disappearance of Jean-Michel Trogneux and just before the last appearance of Brigitte Auzière in March 1985, that appears, at the start of the 1984-1985 school year, a new character : Brigitte Trogneux married Auzière, living in Truchtersheim (“Truch”). Yes, you will say, we know her… She is the one who got married in 1974 in Le Touquet with André Louis Auzière, with whom she had three children. No, no, do what no one did at the time, look very closely : physically, it is not the same mother as the one who gave birth to the three children : Jean-Michel Trogneux, their biological father took on a feminine physical appearance and now passes for her.

       <thus, jean-michel=”” in=”” 1984=”” performs=”” the=”” same=”” operation=”” as=”” brigitte=”” born=”” auzière=”” did=”” at=”” 1974=”” wedding:=”” hiding=”” his=”” identity=”” to=”” take=”” of=”” bride=”” declared=”” administratively=”” marriage=”” certificate,=”” this=”” case=”” deceased=”” sister=”” brigitte.=”” social=”” security=”” number=”” was=”” thus=”” successively=”” attributed=”” three=”” different=”” persons:=”” from=”” 1953=”” 1961,=”” and=”” today.=”” no=”” civil=”” servant,=”” nor=”” magistrate,=”” realized=”” it.=”” perhaps=”” also=”” card,=”” renewed,=”” used=”” by=”” these=”” people.=”” for=”” photo,=”” could=”” have=”” prepared=”” himself=”” erasing=”” biggest=”” dissimilarities…=”” <br=””>
       With great discretion, a new Madame (married) Auzière succeeded the old one, both being supposedly married to the same ghost on April 22, 1974 in Le Touquet, which is administratively true for both. Well, false for their youth identity, but true for the borrowed identity of the deceased, you follow? Who would have the idea to go and check, especially so far, in Alsace? Moreover, like guardian angels, Jean-Michel’s two old friends are there, close by, to secure the operation: Jean-Louis Auzière, who works in Strasbourg, can, from time to time, play the role of the father, and Jean-Marc Uhrweiller has found a place to live in Truch and, with his wife, he helps with a good integration. The new “lady” moved in at the beginning of the 1984-1985 school year with her three children. It is she who will become Brigitte Macron: the official “legend” is right on this point.

       Until then, the life of Jean-Michel Trogneux had been excessively complex. He wanted, at the threshold of his 40 years, in 1984, more stability: it is also for that that he wanted definitively to become woman, as he wished it already in 1977 as Véronique the transsexual. Was he operated a little before? We don’t know… Perhaps of the facial surgery ? Of the Adam’s apple ?

       What is the trigger for these multiple choices : transformation, divorce, moving ? Why after the birth of Tiphaine? His mother had been a witness at the wedding in 1980, she wanted this child and the other woman, Veronique Dreux, the same year, in 1983 also wanted the other child, Valerie. The ménage à trois seemed well established… But everything could quickly go wrong. Something had to break the balance. In particular, Brigitte, née Auzière, may have found it difficult to take on a delicate role that was difficult to manage. Probably she also kept some characteristics of her identity as a young girl, which she did not want to lose. Jean-Michel had more the will to integrate completely in the skin of his own sister.

       But the strongest cause could come from the legitimate wife. As reported in Chapter 30, Véronique Dreux only knew the identity of Brigitte born Auzière (used at the 1980 wedding) and was unaware that she was playing Brigitte born Trogneux. Thus, the ménage à trois was unsteady. Véronique was also unaware that this friend Brigitte, who had become a rival, was the mother of three illegitimate children of Jean-Michel, her inveterate liar husband. The discovery of these huge secrets may have caused a hurricane leading to the divorce…

        

       Brigitte Macron, speaks in 2017 about her change from father to mother of her children [end reminder of Chapter 10]: “I know I hurt my children, and that’s the thing I blame myself for the most. But I couldn’t not do it, there are times in your life when you make vital choices. And for me, it was.“

       Thus, a new pact was concluded in 1984, transforming that of 1974. Everyone in Truch and Strasbourg believed in good faith what they were told, namely that a very ordinary young couple had settled in this quiet commune at 4 rue des coquelicots. The father is very discreet, often absent because he works so much, his name is André Auzière, there is no doubt about it because his name is written on the mailbox and in the Truch directory. And the neighbors see him mowing the lawn. Jean-Louis, the Strasbourgeois, comes from time to time to play his part. He also plays it by being physically present to sign a document in front of notary, at the sides of his wife Brigitte Auzière born Trogneux. On these occasions, he signs AA (in 1992, Appendix A 30). Jean-Louis takes advantage of this proximity and the foreign trade job he holds in Strasbourg to strengthen the curriculum vitae of his double : André Louis would be a banker, deputy director of the Strasbourg branch of the French Bank of Foreign Trade (BFCE).

       After successfully replacing an absent teacher at Truch College, Ms. Auzière was recruited, probably at the start of the 1986 school year, as a French teacher at the private “Lucie Berger” high school in Strasbourg (Appendix A 36). His birth name, Trogneux, appears only in the paperwork of the high school, Brigitte is called everywhere else Brigitte Auzière as the previous one. Jean-Michel thus assumes two identities, in addition, sometimes, to his own: that of his late sister Brigitte and that of the mother of three of his children, Brigitte born Auzière. Fortunately, it seems that they were both born in 1953. As a result, the new Brigitte, a mixture of the two previous ones, must also adopt their age. Thanks to this magical operation, Jean-Michel becomes 8 years younger (Chapter 12). Just as in Blangy we had a seemingly mundane family with a fictional father André Auzière (actually the real father Jean-Michel) and the real mother, we now have in Truch another seemingly mundane family with the same fictional father André Auzière (actually Jean-Louis) and the real father disguised as the mother. This is a step up in the magic trick. Everything seems possible. How far will the process set in motion by the refusal of the death of the sister born in 1953 lead?

        

       The first three appearances of the new Ms. Brigitte Auzière in the “Lucie Berger” faculty photos. On the right, this same Brigitte with her daughter Tiphaine, aged about 7, around 1991. There is no photo of her with her first two children at the same age…

       In Truch, the new Brigitte takes her role as an exemplary mother in a normal family very seriously. She is very busy with her three children and her job as a French teacher in Strasbourg. At the time, she has a very small chest and a boyish look, but who could imagine anything else? She remained discreet, in good company, even accepting in 1989 to be a candidate on an electoral list. For it was indeed her, contrary to what we had believed at the beginning of this investigation (we show it in Appendix A 36).

       For the children and the family, who know the past history, the new pact of 1984 is more delicate to accept. The children (the two oldest, 9 and 7, the youngest Tiphaine is an infant) may have understood it as a kind of game, with the father becoming the mother. Rather than having only a dad, they could prefer to have a mom-dad… As for the Trogneux parents, and probably the brothers and sisters, they agree, since it corresponds to their will to continue to make their missing daughter live. We have proof of this with, in 1988, the closing of a notarial transaction begun earlier, concerning both the father Jean Trogneux and his daughter Brigitte, who accompanied him (Appendix A 34). They lived through the drama of 1961, they refused the death, they know Jean-Michel’s tug-of-war between his masculinity and his femininity, they can only be understanding, they adhere to the 1984 pact, hiding the true identity of the new Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux.

       If, in the previous era (1975-1984), the episode of the transsexual Veronique in 1977 gave consistency to a closeness with Pastor Joseph Doucé, who helped those who wanted to change gender (Chapter 14), the tidy nature of Brigitte Trogneux’s life in Alsace makes it unlikely that she was involved in the life of the Music Hall Adam Meyer close to Truch (Appendix A 27). It is in 1991 that this Alsatian life will cease, which, contrary to what we had believed for a while (Appendix A 5), appears quite consistent with the “legend” of Brigitte Macron. However, we still have reservations about the 1984-1986 period for “Lucie Berger.” She would have arrived there at the beginning of the 1986 school year and not 1984 (end of Appendix A 36)…

       </thus,>

    8. 1991, the return to Amiens, then the meeting with Emmanuel Macron
       Late September 1991, Brigitte, her parents Jean and Simone, her brother Jean-Claude, her sisters Annie and Monique.
       At the end of the 1990-1991 school year at the “Lucie Berger” high school in Strasbourg, Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux obtained her CAER, equivalent to the CAPES (Appendix A 32). Here she is ready to return to Amiens, to teach French in the private school “La Providence”. She needs to better integrate into the extended Trogneux family, convince those who knew her before 1984. Circumstances were favorable. A little after the start of the school year, the Trogneux parents celebrate their diamond wedding anniversary, at the end of September 1991 (Appendix A 2). With the agreement of her children, her successful Alsatian years, and the agreement of her parents, brother and sisters, Brigitte convinces family members who might have doubts of her new identity. The transition is successful, Brigitte Auzière born Auzière has completely disappeared, Jean-Michel Trogneux has faded away, living only in dots, Brigitte Trogneux married Auzière, therefore also named Brigitte Auzière, appears for all as if she had always been there since her birth in 1953.Thus the deceased Brigitte was resurrected three times: a first time, just after her death, by the words of her parents keeping her alive, a second time in 1974 by Brigitte born Auzière and by the three children attributed to her, a third time in 1984 by her brother Jean-Michel. At each stage the reincarnation of the deceased Brigitte becomes more intimate, as if the parents’ tale was coming true. Jean-Michel helped them in their chimera as much as they helped him in his gender dysphoria. But this re-actualized deceptive family pact will then be shaken by Brigitte’s love affair with Emmanuel Macron, who are respectively 46 and 14 when they meet in September 1992 at the workshop-theater (Chapter 15, Appendix A 10). Everything has been allowed to Jean-Michel and, in this period when affairs of morality are not in the news, he can continue his momentum to outdo in other sexual adventures. With his new female gender well established in his large entourage, the forty-year-old can afford a teenager. Even for the time, one has there however a sexual attack on minor. The scandal will be hushed up. The marriage of 2007 will consolidate the acceptance of the family. It is especially the entry to the Elysée Palace in 2017 that will solidly weld the family to the point that nobody dares to move an eyelash since this event, and especially not to start the pact of 1974, updated in 1984.
       
       Before her marriage in 2007, Brigitte divorced with Andre Louis Auzière, except that physically she is not the bride of 1974. She attended the wedding only as a witness for the bride. This one is thus, in 2006, either deceased, or accomplice, or under strong constraint, or unaware of her divorce…Jean-Louis Auzière’s script is then proven. Joel Benenson (Appendix A 23) and Mimi Marchand (Appendix D 10 invent a romance of true love. The underage hit becomes a mutual crush, revealing a radiantly fused couple. But those, especially in the United States, who know the couple’s weakness use the new president as a puppet (Chapter 20) who overreaches in the Covid crisis (Chapter 21) at the expense of the people’s health and their constitutional freedoms.After 1984, Jean-Michel Trogneux lived of course under the features and identity of Brigitte, but also, from time to time, under his own, especially for real estate transactions before notary. The last of his interventions dates from January 2022, when he filed a complaint against Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy for invasion of privacy, alongside … Brigitte Trogneux married Macron (Appendix D 7). The double life is not only alternative : it can also be, but only on paper, simultaneous !…
    9. And on Emmanuel Macron’s side?The Brigitte Trogneux mystery led us to the Emmanuel Macron mystery. Let’s skip over his affair with Brigitte (Chapter 15), his homosexuality (Chapter 18), his psychopathy (Chapter 19, his cynicism (Appendix D 20), and his hairpiece (Appendix D 15), to retain that his childhood involves big questions (Chapter 23). We have few answers, which leaves room for multiple suppositions, especially about her biological father. Unlike Jean-Michel Trogneux, for whom we found enough corroborating elements to expose a scenario, I feel that we have too few to do the same. In moderate belief, I have suggested that Joseph Doucé could be her biological father (Chapter 24), unless it is Jean-Michel Macron, the official father. Others believe that it is Jean-Michel Trogneux, who thus would have married his own son, without my seeing any documented counter-indication to this baroque scenario, apart from the existence of less exceptional hypotheses.With this uncertain childhood, it seems likely that he too had two lives, before and after his baptism around 1990 (1990 again…). It was shortly afterwards, in 1991, at the age of 14 or 15 (Appendix A 10), that he fell under the sway of a 46-year-old man with a tarabiscot life. Forming a close-knit perverted couple, living ceaselessly in the lies of their multiple lives, they took power in France, and served as a conduit for a globalized will to control the people, causing senseless aggression against the population.
       
       Amiens circa 1991. One of the first official real photos of Brigitte future Macron (after the
       Alsatian photos). And Emmanuel Macron at the age when he officially met her.

• • This case is therefore based on four ingredients :
    • • a succession of family secrets (1961, 1974, 1984) in a bourgeois milieu,
      • a cover-up skillfully conducted by a friend using secret service techniques,
      • an effective interpretation by theater actors wallowing in lies,
      • a pact of complicit silence by family and friends.

  This is

Flaubert

• , this is

Mauriac

• , the provincial bourgeoisie in its eternal turpitudes… Goodbye feathers in the ass, MK-Ultra, Baphomet, hello notary transactions, omerta, deportations, the mayor and the priest arranging… Against a background of permanent falsification, first private and family, then public, state and media, this secrecy has progressively taken phenomenal proportions, to the point of becoming a state secret protected by the highest political and media authorities, nationally, and even, partially, beyond.

• The

Appendix A 44

• presents the logic and springs that led to the construction of this conclusion scenario. Beyond that, there are the other contexts, media, health, political, which I discuss in the

Appendix D 36

, in another conclusion.

Photos Sipa, Vida Press, Abaca

• This is the fourth version of our Trigneux-Auzière family tree, which attempts to reflect our new understanding of what happened.

Succeeding the version 3, TREE VERSION 4, of the two Brigitte Trogneux,
the real one, born in 1953, and the fake one, born Jean-Michel Trogneux in 1945.

• The general aspect of this tree is complex. Is it reasonable to want to summarize in a single graphic table a succession of falsifications that takes place over several decades? A diachronic series of charts, each one much simpler and more readable, showing the real situation (excluding the lies) at a few key dates, would be more efficient, with a final chart presenting on the left the real genealogical situation, the result of the previous charts, and on the right the “rose water” situation, to highlight the discrepancy between the two and thus the lies. This would be more striking. Maybe someone will try it. Here, we remain in the continuation of the three previous trees, with inaccuracies and errancy gradually corrected.

• In mid-September 2022, we add a chart explaining the role of each of the players in this family psychodrama over the years. Here it is :

• The reader may find this too complicated and even smoky. He should however realize that if Jean-Michel Trogneux succeeded in becoming the “first lady” of France, he had to be extremely sure of his foundations and convinced that the deception was so well hidden that it was undetectable. The complexity of this mystification is a cause of this quasi-impossibility to perceive the underlying reality. Its construction in two major stages, 1974 and 1984, accentuated the obscurity, further reinforced by various falsifications (the deceased little sister transformed into a niece, Jean-Bri-Bri recounting her first childbirth…). Beside the well-constructed “legend” peddled by Mimi Marchand, biographers of good faith, such as Sylvie Bommel, have nevertheless perceived and transmitted the lack of transparency, which Xavier Poussard has been able to highlight in order to arrive, with the help of Natacha Rey, at first conclusions on a truly enormous deception.

• This revelation of mid-October 2021, eleven months ago, gained momentum in December, thanks to Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy. The Elysee then opted for a strategy, winning in the short term, since Emmanuel Macron, helped by media unable to grasp this #brigittegate, was re-elected in April. It consisted, on the one hand, in considering Natacha and Amandine, expressing themselves only by videos for a rather large public, as legally condemnable hysterics and, on the other hand, in ignoring those who, in writing, treated the problem more thoroughly, but for a more restricted public. This strategy, however, can only work for a time. Because the citizens’ investigation is progressing, the evidence is accumulating, the details of the cover-ups are becoming better known, and also because external events, such as the file found in Donald Trump’s safe, are feeding the buzz.

• We are reaching a point where, unlike December 2021, the servile media, also sensing the end is coming, are no longer saying that it is a rumor and, when they dare to speak out, are timidly beginning to make a few remarks of astonishment at the prolonged Elysian silence. So the truth will end up being recognized, but we don’t know when: it depends first of all on the journalists, on their fear or their courage, on their complicity or their revolt.

• Jean-Louis Auzière conceived this scenario progressively, stubbornly, like a timepiece. Almost fifty years later, it is still running smoothly, despite the grains of sand of suspicion that are growing and threatening the whole mechanism, which is maintained by the complicity of the major media. And also by its complexity, because it is not easy to expose, nor to understand, nor to believe. But it is impossible to hide everything, to clean all the archives. Here is the television interview of Veronique the transsexual in 1977, there a photo of class or boarding school, words that escape the self-control of Brigitte, so many traces of the hidden life… And holders of specific information, documents, which manifest themselves, especially through social networks, enriching the historical data. It is by associating them, by giving them a sense, that we understand better the workings of this deception having taken frightening dimensions.

• Let us now try to gather what we can guess about this niece Brigitte born Auzière, whose person is obvious, while the conditional is appropriate. ALA means that the information is taken from the official biography of André(-Louis) Auzière, his fictitious double. BT means that the information comes from the “legend” Brigitte Trogneux, the one who succeeded him as mother of the three children. C27 means that the explanation is in the

Chapter 27

• , A25 that it is in the

Appendix A 25

• , A32 in the

Appendix A 32

• .

• Throughout this large file, in Chapters and Appendices, hypotheses have been formulated, with a status that may have evolved. The reader is likely to get lost in them. The following table summarizes them and ranks them in order of probability. This is my opinion, given the contacts I have had with various brigittologists.

• Evolution of this table:
  • • April 12. AF moves from level 4 to level 1. BA, BB, BC, BD, BE are added, cause: Ch. 27.
    • April 14. BE moves from level 2 to level 1. Cause: App. A 25.
    • April 30. BD changes wording, Proba becomes Brigitte.
    • May 14. AS goes from level 1 to 6, AV goes from 1 to 4. AO moves from level 2 to 1. AK moves from level 3 to 4, AU moves from level 1 to 4 with AK+AU meeting and new wording.
    • May 25. BD moves from level 4 to level 5, AF moves from level 1 to level 0.
    • July 6. AK+AU moves from level 4 to 5. AN moves from level 2 to 3.
    • July 30. BF assumption added. AI moves from level 4 to 5.
    • August 26. BG and BH assumptions added. AT goes from level 1 to 0.

1. (A) Emmanuel Macron at college in 1990.
   

   Emmanuel Macron as a child. On the left photo of trombinoscope in 4th grade, 1990/1991 (coll. Gérard Banc). Then two images from the documentary “Macron, la stratégie du météore” (page “Macron president : 10 places in the Hauts-de-France that matter to him“). Apparently around age 12 (1990) and in a school setting, like the other three photos shown in chapter 17. September 1990, on a school field trip, photo of teacher Gerard Banc (link). Emmanuel then begins his fourth grade class, Brigitte’s theater workshop will begin a year later.

    

2. (A) The Trogneux family in 1991.
   

   This photo found on a tweet is from the German magazine Der Spiegel. It was taken on September 26, 1991 for the diamond wedding anniversary (60 years of marriage) of the couple Jean Trogneux – Simone Pujol. The added captions appear good. “Brigitte Trogneux” is present, but her husband “André-Louis Auzière” and her brother “Jean-Michel Trogneux” are missing. Why is the photo released not the one where everyone is facing the lens ? Perhaps to hide the presence of Veronique Dreux, the mother of Jean-Jacques and Valerie Trogneux ?

    

3. (A) The Elysee in Macron fashion.
   

   Mrs. Macron thought the tapestries smelled of tobacco, so the state spent a million euros to change them (article). Here are the new Pompadour (before, after, official photo, article) and Cleopatra (official photo) salons. Tastes and colors, we don’t judge, but it’s hard to resist a good word : “With such a taste of shit, no wonder he wants to fuck !“

    

4. (A) Freedom, equality, fraternity…
   

   The institutor of apartheid, the great separator, the one who trampled on freedom, equality, fraternity. Lies, always lies… (from the Elysée website )

   

5. (A) Brigittology: the fake news from Alsace…In chapter 7, we mentioned the passage in Alsace of Brigitte Trogneux, future Macron, from 1986 to 1989 according to legend. We expressed doubts about the election leaflet and various testimonies (article). At the beginning of February 2022 [without suspecting future more important posterior discoveries], some new information reached me thanks to new Twitter brigittologist experts. Yes, despite the official censorship – or because of it – Xavier Poussard and Natacha Rey have made emulators (I am one of them) and a new field of study has appeared: brigittology. This is the science (let’s not be afraid of the word…) that consists of flushing out the untruths in the official legend of Brigitte and trying to shed light on the opacities of her and Emmanuel’s life. These investigators, “fact-checkers” of the official infox, compete in efforts and exchanges to cross-check, additional research, make assumptions … And restore the real facts of the biography of “Brigitte“. More widely, it is to make them known, often through social networks.I have, of course, already used these sources of information in this file, and also for illustrations. Brigitte Macron’s alleged stay in Alsace is one of the topics covered, even challenging the media legend. Here it is, for example, told in this excerpt from article relating the happy days of the Auzière couple and their three children near the Rhine :
   

   Brigitte Macron lived for several years in Alsace, in Truchtersheim, with her first husband André-Louis Auzière and their three children. […] Alsace holds a special place in the heart of the first lady, and for good reason. She lived for several years in the town of Truchtersheim with her first husband André-Louis Auzière and their three children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, born respectively in 1975, 1977 and 1984. They rented a house in Truchtersheim from 1987 to 1991 and she was a literature teacher at the town’s secondary school and then at the Lucie-Berger Protestant secondary school in Strasbourg, a past recounted in the documentary Brigitte Macron, un roman français broadcast on France 3 last June. It is thus with great nostalgia that she returned there in the afternoon of November 5, 2018. […] Happy to return to Truchtersheim, Brigitte Macron asked to see a circle of close friends again , a request honored by Justin Vogel, the mayor of the town. If the interview took place away from the cameras, one of the people authorized to discuss with the first lady confided, and not just anyone, the former nanny of her daughters. “I am very, very moved to find her“…

   Who says middle school says class photos and thus the site “Friends from before” which compiles many of them. Here are two from the “Lucie Berger” high school in Strasbourg, with French teacher Brigitte Auzière. The analysis of the pictures calls for some comments. A first overall impression is that “Brigitte” appears somewhat undersized, like Lilliputian, compared to the students, boys and girls, who surround her. Then the questioning focuses on two suspicious elements. In the first photo (left), the figure standing on the right in a beige jacket has the stature of a teacher, yet he seems to have the head of a student. On the second photo, we can distinguish the presence of an adult woman, a second potential teacher: she is located on the left, in a more classical position than the student Brigitte, who could then have been added.

   
   On the left, the teacher could be saddled with a student’s head, on the right there is indeed an adult on the left.
   Could Brigitte Auzière just be a trainee teacher?
   Of course, one can always argue about the presence of such retouching on the available plates, it is on the other hand more difficult to deny the conclusion of this other case of brigittology :

    

   [format initial] In other words, the brigittologist (or brigittologist) Fiko first noticed that this photo had been deposited there in 2017, the year of Macron’s election, by someone named Sarah K, with a blurred face. This one had deposited on the site two photos in all, this one and one other with Brigitte). Among the students in the class, the identity of 13 of them was presented and listed in the database. Fiko had the idea to go and look for the information attached to them and discovered with surprise that these former students of the same class had very different ages today, between 33 and 67 years old… Sarah K. should have been in less of a hurry and more cleanly executed her trickery…

   The presence of only one falsified document casts doubt on the others… We can therefore imagine the following scenario. Brigitte had some contacts in Truchtersheim, including Simone Uhl, the main witness (article), and she knew the town and Strasbourg. On this basis, perhaps a little broader, falsified documents were circulated and the legend was formulated, probably by the playwright Brigitte Macronella herself, perhaps with the help of the sultry Mimi Marchand, close to the presidential couple. But these biographical clues remain too few with, for some, the presence of some anomalies or oddities. Thus the Alsatian “legend” appears for what it is: a more or less credible storytelling.

   April 25: this “legend” regains some credibility with the information delivered in the Appendix A 32 and, in a parallel story in Appendix A 27.
   April 30. This credibility remains relative. Only the year as a professor in Strasbourg in 1990/1991 has any consistency. The rest, including a possible presence at the Adam Meyer Music Hall and a professorship that would have started in 1984, appears doubtful. A correspondent writes to me:

    

   [As noted in this chapter,] there are strong inconsistencies in the official Alsatian narrative. JMT/BM’s presence in Truch is disputed on social networks. There is a cluster of elements that seem to say that it was not him who was there but an unidentified woman. In the TV movie “A French Novel“, a lot of things seem fake: illustrative images, hesitant testimonies of Thiphaine and the mayor, there is also a visit of BM to Truch and there too the mayor says yes yes yes but doesn’t seem to believe in what BM says (video). The meeting sounds artificial with the women they meet. Uhrweiller met Auzière in Algiers and probably JMT, I’m not sure what his testimony is worth if out of friendship he covers for his former friends. However, it is his testimony that Bommel reports and which gives a little consistency to the Alsatian story and to the Auzière man who is perhaps non-existent. All the photos from the period are from the BestImage agency so possibly doctored.

   May 12. “An unidentified woman” for two Brigitte Auzière? This idea is indirectly developed in the second part of Chapter 27. But finally, in Appendix A 36, there would be, from 1984 to 1990, real news from Alsace, erasing most of the doubts expressed here, at the beginning of the investigation…

6. (A) February 11, off his calendar, it’s his birthday!On the page of the Elysee website dedicated to her, Brigitte Macron has no more appointments since December. But what happened during December ? Is she afraid that someone will ask her about her brother Jean-Michel? It’s time to bring him some… [since then, the agenda has been maintained again].
   Clicking on each of the months reveals that Ms. Macron has built up a great photo album…
   On this page, her professional background indicates that she holds a master’s degree in literature
   and a CAPES in modern literature, that she began her teaching career
   “in Paris and then in Strasbourg at the Lucie-Berger College,” which does not appear to be proven (supplement in Appendix A 32).

   The “transparency charter on the status of the spouse of the head of state” is a little masterpiece of camouflage. The spouse is entitled to a director of cabinet, a chief of staff, police protection, operating costs… But, promise, swear, he or she receives no remuneration, he or she has no presentation expenses and he or she has no budget of his or her own ! In August 2018, on a page of his blog, Paul Cassiat had drawn up a one-year assessment of this “management of opacity” entering into an “Orwellian way of managing public affairs“. By 2022, transparency, which was based on this agenda, has become very obscure…

   In this month of February, an important event should have been reported on the agenda of the first lady : his birthday, that of Jean-Michel, his 77 years, today February 11 ! I’m not even the first to wish him, at 7:30 am, Mitrophane Crapoussin preceded me in a article titled “Beautiful birthday to the most famous Jean-Michel !“, ending with “Beautiful retirement !“. Although her illustrated chart (above) of “Brigitte Macron’s travels and appointments” would indicate that the retirement was anticipated and started in December, it remains to be officially announced. Apparently, it is difficult, the famous candidacy claimed by all the major media and hated by the lowly people and their convoys of Freedom was scheduled for early February. Come on Brigitte, guts, finished this life of lies and glitter, the time has come to get out of this play, which has lasted too long, to find the genealogy of his birth and his childhood … And to write his biography, “A Life of Lies“, what a success…

   On the occasion of this anniversary, the hashtags #JeanMichel77ans and #HappyBirthdayJeanMichel were created. Here are some of the tweets attached to them : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12.
   
   

7. (A) Moadab and Blanrue’s “counter-inquiry”.February 14. In Appendix A 37, I presented the “NBI File,” produced by two people who, after investigating on a Telegram thread, published their findings in a distributable pdf file. The process appears simple and natural. I learn, this February 14, that two other people, Paul-Eric Blanrue and Jonathan Moadab, also conducted an investigation for about a month, and that it ended in a bizarre, fishtail fashion on January 23 with a video document, unrelated to the elements of the investigation (link).I was aware of a few things in this research anyway. I had found them unserious and dismissed them.
   These photos were taken during the transfer of power between François Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
   Thus, photos have been known to exist, such as those above, allegedly showing Jean-Michel Trogneux, supposedly a “little fatty” (explanations at the end of Appendix A 20). They would be attested by “two independent sources“, but not cited and therefore not credible (also by the lack of resemblance with the photo of Jean-Michel 1953, especially the ears)… Then, extracts of administrative acts that respondents considered, rightly or wrongly, falsified, such as these documents and tweets : 1 2 3. Or the page 54 of the NBI file.This mistrust increases when we see that the two “investigators” managed, last December-January, to obtain from the Amiens town hall, while not being close family, documents that, until then, were not accessible (see the “Appendix A 30). And finally, if some of these documents appear to be not very credible, two of them will prove to be authentic and will have great importance in this case : the birth certificate of Brigitte Trogneux in 1953 and partial copies of the marriage certificate of 1974 in Le Touquet. The true and the false are mixed, to confuse the issue….

   Without dismissing the clumsiness of the two authors, this looks, on this February 14, like a trial balloon to set up a counter-offensive. The fact that the Macron couple has apparently still not filed a complaint after having promised to do so almost two months ago, shows at the very least a great embarrassment and a strong indecision on the retort to be led. So far, it would only consist of covering up the case by cutting it off from the mainstream media… There is a certain success, but it will be very hard to maintain in the long run.

   April 2. It appears that a few media outlets continue to rely on investigative material from Moadab and Blanrue, in particular, to estimate that the figure shown above would be Jean-Michel Trogneux. You can see below (link) that, although the Betaface comparison is quite good, his ears are different, notably not as large, from Jean-Michel’s in 1953, which are similar to Brigitte’s :

   
   May 2. In light of the Chapter 27 differentiating the two Brigitte Auzière, Moadab and Blanrue’s “counter-investigation” must be viewed differently. It is a relatively skilful mixture of the true and the false. It is necessary to go back into the context of the time to understand it. Natacha Rey, Xavier Poussard and all the brigittologists were then convinced that Catherine Audoy was the biological mother of the three Auzière children, which now appears to be false. Moadab and Blanrue, remotely controlled by the Elysée, have thus pressed this weak point and shown the right arguments and documents to dismantle it. But this did not remove the doubts. As long as another hypothesis did not emerge, it was very difficult for us to give up on Catherine Audoy’s hypothesis. Moadab and Blanrue failed because they were unable to propose a credible alternative. Simply because the only credible alternative was reality and it had to be hidden… This “counter-investigation” was only an attempt at diversion, presenting some authentic elements aiming at provoking trouble to consolidate the invented “legend”.

   On April 3, a article from Blast claimed that a (anonymous) journalist had met the “little fatty” (now “ventripotent“) at his home (shown in the following Appendix) and that it would be Jean-Michel Trogneux since he “undoubtedly shares the Trogneux family resemblance“, the only evidence provided, with his name on a mailbox…
   
   May 7. It is the inauguration ceremony of the second quinquennium of Macron, and the duettists Moadab and Blanrue are entitled to all the entrances to present us again tweets with their famous “little fatty” Jean-Michel Trogneux and try once again to put him in the same picture as Brigitte, and they succeeded… This is an opportunity to see his ears better and to see, once again, that they are not those of Jean-Michel. As for the true identity of this “little fatty“, it would be a very close relative of the Trogneux family, whose name is circulating, but any photo of which has been scrubbed from the Internet so that we can not be affirmative. See also in Appendix A 20.

   
   Left and center, Brigitte and her faux-brother, “the little fatty,” with his ears. At right, at the May 7, 2022 inauguration,
   scene of jubilation at the Elysee: joy and optimism radiated on all faces.
8. (A) The Amiens “home” of Jean-Michel Trogneux.February 18. Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard have, on several occasions, referred to this home, reported in the complaint against Natacha Rey (in Appendix A 41). Xavier Poussard gives details [F&D504p08] :
   

   Regarding Jean-Michel Trogneux’s address at 14- 16, rue des Vergeaux in Amiens (lot VC 26), we were able to establish that this address corresponds to an apartment located on the second floor of a three-story building. […] Jean-Michel Trogneux bought this property on March 28, 1996. […] The research that we have carried out comes up against several anomalies. For example, the mention “nothing” is displayed in the Fichier informatisé des données juridiques immobilières (FIDJI) concerning Jean-Michel Trogneux for the urban property section VC plan number 26 (co-ownership rue des Vergeaux 14-16 and 9-11 rue des Lombards lots 2, 21 and 251) while his identity is taken into account by Télé@ctes. […] Our team in Amiens has interviewed shopkeepers and inhabitants of the area. All of them are categorical  “never seen or heard of a Jean-Michel Trogneux“. In the building of 14, rue des Vergeaux, the name J-Michel Trogneux, written by hand, is stuck “à l’arrache” on one of the mailboxes placed on two makeshift trestles. The building, its layout and maintenance do not seem to correspond at all to the economic and social level of the Trogneux described during our investigation. In the apartment (1st floor, left), inhabited, the television turns at full speed (one hears it since the street) but nobody answers, neither with the intercom, nor when one knocks at the door. The inhabitant seen through the window is an individual whose physical appearance is totally different from the “little fatty” presented earlier. We contacted one by one the inhabitants of 14, rue des Vergeaux. One person answered us, Mrs. Regond, who, surprised, specified us formally not to know Jean-Michel Trogneux.

   So all indications are that only the mailbox has the name “Trogneux J. Michel“.

   
   The front door is recognized. The proximity of the Jean Trogneux workshop
   makes it easy to survey the mail [Google Street].

9. (A) The retouched 1974 wedding photo.Back to the 1974 wedding of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux. Xavier Poussard had the famous photo (chapter 9) analyzed by a professional graphic artist. Differences in grain, screen, definition attest that it has been heavily retouched. “In conclusion, the analysis suggests that there has been an assemblage between several photographs with essentially the addition of a block featuring Simone and Jean Trogneux,” which are on the right side of the photo [F&D504p09].
   Betaface comparison confirming that the bride does not bear a strong resemblance to Brigitte
   For her part, Natacha Rey had also consulted specialists, who also concluded the rigging. She talks about it in a long video from the end of March and in another from April 12, reported at the end of Chapter 26 with these screenshots : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. Also, on April 20, a correspondent sent me this explainer :

   This photo has two light sources. Orange colored arrows indicate where the light is coming from, blue ones show the presence of shadow. The characters on the left are lit from above but from the right, the characters on the right from above too but from the left. Now, the sun illuminates everyone in the same way, its light is diffused over the whole Earth and casts the same shadows, unlike a spotlight, which is omnidirectional. This would indicate that the characters on the left do not come from the same photo as the characters on the right. Another surprising fact is that they do not all look in the same direction. Or not at all. Normally, one stares at the photographer.

   So there is no doubt that this photo is retouched. The wedding took place on June 22, 1974, the photo appeared in “Les Echos du Touquet” of June 28 and the announcement in its issue of July 12. A correspondent took photos of the two copies at the BNF. Here they are as thumbnails, to be enlarged with a click (the last two images show full pages of a non-NFB copy) :

   
   
   In the title of the photo, we are surprised by the absence of the first names of the bride and groom, while the caption, including the involvement of the father of the bride in the life of Le Touquet, appears skillfully done. The announcement is common. How is this local magazine presented at the BNF? In each issue, the 3 or 4 sheets are folded to form double pages, not bound together. The successive issues of about two months are simply stacked, separated, in a large common envelope. The only instruction seems to be to provide only one envelope each time to the reader, to avoid mixing these sheets. It was therefore relatively easy to take these two issues and substitute them with modified facsimiles. This is what we believed at first, by estimating that this substitution would have been made in 1984/1985 when Jean-Michel became Brigitte Trogneux:

    

   It is in the form opposite that appeared in the BNF (Bibibliothèque Nationale de France) copy of “Echos du Touquet” of June 28, 1974, the retouched photo. How could it have appeared in this newspaper ? As this diary is probably not digitized or microfilmed, the most likely hypothesis is that the BNF copy was stolen to be replaced by a modified facsimile. This is technically difficult to do: find the same paper, the same ageing, the same font. The State has these means (it is a question of protecting a State secret) and it is within the reach of specialists. Some of them are capable of creating false documents that deceive historians, who are by nature very suspicious… With such technical means, even if the substitution appears more delicate when it comes to large bindings, the trickery being easier to discover, one can also modify a civil status record… The film Les compagnons de la marguerite by Jean-Pierre Mocky (1967) deals with this subject, in a very light-hearted way. Hypothesis rejected

   In his book “He had just turned seventeen“, Sylvie Bommel tells, in a double page, the “legend” of the wedding. It was, in May 2019, the first time it was said that Brigitte Macron had a brother Jean-Michel, then witness of the bride. We will see elsewhere, especially in Chapter 27 and in the conclusion, that this marriage that was supposed to engender the three Auzière children is a mirror game with gender inversion. It reflects what would have been a Jean-Michel Trogneux – Brigitte Auzière marriage, the real biological parents of the three Auzière children. We will return to this photo in Appendix A 18, with Jean-Louis Auzière, and in Appendix A 43 to explain that it did appear (with photographer’s retouching) in 1974, corresponding to a wedding that would have actually taken place… And also at the end of Appendix A 48, to realize that these retouchings are anecdotal and that we have given them too much importance.

10. (A) When did Brigitte and Emmanuel meet?According to the official “legend”, as written at the beginning of the Chapter 15, the love encounter of the student Emmanuel Macron with the teacher Brigitte Trogneux – Auzière became Macron dates from the school year 1992-1993, during a workshop-theater when Emmanuel was in the class of Seconde with Laurence Auzière the daughter of Brigitte.Natacha Rey took a close look at the class photo from the previous year, when Emmanuel was in Troisième, and was surprised to find Laurence  there:
    

    1991/1992 class of Troisième. Laurence Auzière is wearing her hair the same way as in the photo in Appendix A 2 (#14, Sept. 1991)
    
    
    Laurence Auzière, Betaface comparison: 69%.
    In all logic, Natacha Rey then considered that, since Laurence and Emmanuel were in the same class one year earlier, the workshop-theater had also taken place one year earlier. She therefore published the attached statement on February 23, 2022, which was taken up here and by all the brigittologists, to the point that one of them, in a tweet, retitled Sylvie Bommel’s book “He had just turned fourteen” instead of “fifteen” (and another made a song out of it, cf. Appendix D 11)

     

    After searching long and hard for a photo that would show Laurence Auzière and Emmanuel Macron, who according to the official version were together in class at the “lycee“, that is to say from the second grade. I finally found it again, although it could not be found on Copains d’Avant or Trombi and the press curiously never revealed it to us. I now understand why! In truth, they were college buddies and together only in 3rd grade. At the beginning of this school year, the year when his affair with his teacher Brigitte Trogneux known as “Auzière” began, the young Emmanuel born at the end of December was only… 13 years ! […] Macron’s parents themselves testified that they believed at the time that their son was dating Laurence, his young classmate, before discovering with horror, that he had in truth started an affair with her “mother” ! In public education, the latter would have been fired on the spot, prosecuted in Justice (prison sentence) and struck off the National Education. The press and the media have been lying to you since the beginning […]. By reducing the age gap and making the “romance” start later, they were trying to make the general public accept the unacceptable. Mass manipulation and lying, as always ! Hypothesis rejected

    There were, of course, still doubts, especially about Laurence’s recognition among the students, but it was so consistent with this “legend” that, on multiple occasions, distorted a reality that needed to be hidden… However, on March 16, I was led to reject this hypothesis when I discovered the photo below, taken from Paris Match #3547, from 2017 (see Appendix A 15) :

    
    Left: Emmanuel in the role of scarecrow; right: Brigitte, amidst the other teachers, in 1992/1993.
    On this program, fortunately preserved by Professor Philippe Robert, the date of the performance is indicated: Tuesday, June 15. However, June 15, 1992 is a Monday, June 15, 1993 is a Tuesday. We had thus made a mistake.

    Exactly, Emmanuel was born on December 21, 1977. He was thus 14 years old at the beginning of September 1992 until the Christmas vacations, then 15 years old in 1993. That is 14 / 15 years old. We can assume that their love relationship was publicly known in 1993 when he was 15. Before, we don’t know… Thus, on this point, the “legend” is confirmed. It is also confirmed on another point: we have verified, by analyzing the school photos, that Laurence and Emmanuel were in the same class for only one year. Other class photos of Emmanuel, in 5th and 6th grade, are presented in Chapter 17 and in Appendices A 1, A 10 and A 29.

    Nice carnival. A large head of Brigitte was burned in 2019, much to the chagrin of the mayor of Nice (articles: 1 2 3)

11. (A) The family photo and the mystery of the niece who died young.
    With an automatic colorization process, the famous photo from Chapter 3.
    This photo has long questioned brigittologists on two themes  who is the girl and is the photo faked ? Before concluding that the photo is not faked, but only retouched, and that the little girl is Brigitte, Jean-Michel’s little sister who died young, we tried to position ourselves in the present case. Here are the remains of this research.

    At first, we thought that this little girl would be Christine Boulogne, the first grandchild, daughter of Anne-Marie and her husband Gerard Boulogne. Strangely enough her existence “has never been incorporated into an official caption“, she would be born on March 26, 1957 [F&D501p2]. But then the photo would be dated 1958 or 1959 which would make Jean-Michel 13 or 14 years old, that’s not possible. Unless she was born before or it was another niece… This made me doubt Christine’s birth date, is she sure ? I did a search on the web. I found a Christine Haquin (her husband’s name, first name Benoît) born in 1951 living Brégy in Oise (link). This is indeed the one married to Benoît Haquin (link on dirigeant.societe.com), living in the same town of Brégy and this 1951 date, appearing on an official company declaration document, is more reliable than a date given by Généanet. Assuming that Christine is 2 years old, we are in 1953, or even 1954, and Jean-Michel, born on February 11, 1945, is 8 years old, which seems the most likely. Correction of January 30, 2022. As I indicated at the beginning of Chapter 23, the publication of this page provoked a citizen emulation, a small technical team was formed, gathering elements found on the Internet and analyzing them. First, yesterday, a message was received indicating, with supporting documents, that there were two sisters-in-law in Brégy named Christine and married Haquin, one born in 1951, the other in 1957. And the one whose maiden name is Boulogne was born in 1957, as Xavier Poussard thought! The above explanation did not hold anymore and the one of Xavier Poussard, dating the photo from 1959, or even 1958, still did not hold, as explained above. So we were in a dead end to date this photo. Happily, we had accumulated observations on this photo. First, very curiously, it also existed without the lampshade above Jean-Michel, as on this photo. This cleverly done retouching had whetted the curiosity of some Internet users who tried to solve “The mysteries of the lampshade“. Thus the two tweets below were issued : The explanation for the first tweet does not appear to be conclusive, but the explanation for the second would be when you consider that the mother’s right arm is facing backwards. The little girl would therefore have been added. At the same time the comparison opposite of the young child with another granddaughter, Nathalie Farcy, born in 1959, so another niece of Jean-Michel, was disturbing. Comparison Betaface: 70%. So it seems likely that this photo is a careful photomontage between the group photo from 1953, or even 1954 (with Jean-Michel and Monique’s ages indicated in the two unbarred parts above), and another photo from 1961, or even 1962 where Nathalie Farcy is 2 years old. Or also Christine Boulogne, the second photo dating from 1959, or even 1960. Or even a little girl unrelated to the Trogneux family… We can also add the hypothesis (expressed at the end of Chapter 8) of a Brigitte little sister of Jean-Michel who died very young, in which case there would be no photomontage, assuming that she was born around 1951 to justify the age gap with Jean-Michel. Or an older sister of Christine Boulogne who died young. Our specialist Hortense Fuschia (who nevertheless first made the comparison girl – Nathalie Farcy), is not convinced by this explanation (and the others, see this triple diagram). She explains it to us with the diagram opposite and this explanation  “No overhang, the mother’s leg and hand are simply hidden behind the granddaughter’s body” The upper arm seems to be very much behind though…. The hypothesis of an older sister of Christine Boulogne who died young for an unadulterated photo from 1953-1954 has rather my preference, Brigitte having spoken of the death of a niece, aged 7, of acute appendicitis (link). Everyone will be able to make up their own minds with the evidence here (and why the lampshade ?). Rejected Hypotheses

    Kots has studied the Trogneux family at length, including captioning the 1991 photo of the Trogneux family (Appendix A 2). On March 1, in five tweets, he proposed a new hypothesis :

     

    Here is the Trogneux family photo as it was originally taken before retouching before adding Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT). We notice that neither JMT nor Brigitte appear on this photo. JMT is between 13/14 years old at this time… Were they excluded ? The framing of the official photo is incorrect. JMT is completely glued to the border. A photographer always leaves margin on either side of a photo, as is the case with Monique on the right. So the photo has been stretched to add room. 1. Part added to the lamp 2. Lack of shadow at JMT (JMT is surely from a class photo, upper body only) 4. Black band and back of chair invisible. (no illustration) The little girl cannot be Brigitte born in ’53 (Anne-Marie is over 22 in this photo, married in ’55 and we see her wedding ring) and even less so Nathalie Farcy born in ’59 and whose mother, Maryvonne, died when Nathalie was only 6 months old. (illustration opposite) So there is only Christine Boulogne born on 26/03/1957, daughter of Anne-Marie, and who is between 1 and 2 years old on this photo. Here she is during the inauguration of Macron in 2017. Hypothesis rejected (because of the dating, see below).

    We now have three major hypotheses  1) the photo is not retouched, 2) the girl is added, 3) Jean-Michel is added.

    I believe the photo can be dated with the apparent ages of the three youngest children (only the last two in case 3) : Jean-Michel, born in 1945, is an 8/9 year old boy, Monique, born in 1941, is a 12/13 year old girl (small in stature and without breasts) and Maryvonne, born in January 1937, is a 17 year old girl. This brings us to 1953/1954, at the most 1955, not more. This is why I do not subscribe to this 1958/1959 hypothesis of Kots. In particular, Monique cannot be 17 years old, she is at the beginning of puberty. And the age differences between Jean-Michel, Monique and Maryvonne being respected, it seems very likely that they are all three on the original photo. This hypothesis of Kots is therefore rejected because of the dating.

    I incidentally add that the technical explanations, although plausible, do not convince me. While I found the little girl resembling Nathalie Farcy, this is not the case for the half-face of Christine Boulogne. I discover precise dates of birth, some of them, those of Maryvonne and Monique, previously unknown. Without dwelling on the wedding ring on Anne-Marie’s finger, which I cannot distinguish, I am surprised by her wedding date, 1955, more exactly January 21, 1955 (act cited in marginal mention).
    Let us consider the hypothesis that the girl is a niece. Christine Boulogne, born in 1957 is to be ruled out, as well as Nathalie Farcy, born in 1959. The dating of Anne-Marie’s marriage, in 1955, excludes an older sister of Christien Boulogne, unless Anne-Marie had a child before her marriage. This seems unlikely, but possible.

    Remind that the existence of a niece who died young is based on statements by Brigitte Macron. In 1961 (“one year after” the death of her sister Maryvonne in February 1960), she says she lost “one of her nieces, only 6 years old. This one died as a result of acute appendicitis” (link). Given that Jean-Michel/Brigitte made herself 8 years younger, she probably made her niece that much younger. Assuming she was born in 1952/53, she may be the girl in the photo. She would be the first grandchild of Jean and Simone, who would thus be photographed with all their children and their first grandchild. A banal family photo, in short…

    May 7. A solution emerges for this dead niece, who would be more than a niece : she would be Brigitte Trogneux herself, sixth and last child of Jean and Simone. The date of birth in 1953 corresponds. And the photo could date from Christmas 1954, or thereabouts. See the end of Chapter 6. August 29 : we now believe that the possible existence of retouching is anecdotal, it was a usual practice of photographers of the time, as shown at the end of Appendix A 48.

12. (A) The three Auzière children with Emmanuel in June 1993In the documentary “Brigitte Macron, un roman français” by Virginie Linhart published on France 3, already cited, we find (at 23 mn 09) the photo below on the left, which can also be found on this page where it is attributed to Gérard Banc, a teacher at the Lycée La Providence, and dated June 1993, with the only other indication being the presence of Emmanuel Macron :
    The June 1993 photo. At right zoom in on three excerpts from the 1991 family photo in Appendix A 2
    All indications are that Emmanuel Macron and Laurence Auzière are in the foreground here, as they are in the 1991/1992 class photo. Behind Laurence (#14 on the 1991 family group), the little girl could be Tiphaine. She is n°7 on the 1991 photo, she has here the same abundant hair, and is recognizable by her rictus and her big mouth. She is 8 years old. And between the supposed Tiphaine and Emmanuel, the boy could be Sébastien Auzière. Comparing with the family photo of 1991 (n°16), it seems that it is him, at 16 years old, especially because we find the same thin glasses on both pictures. So there would be Laurence, Tiphaine and Sébastien Auzière on the left and Emmanuel in the center.The boy on the right of the photo, with the striped sweater, is probably the one sitting behind Emmanuel (holding the slate) with his sweater over his shoulder in the 1992/1993  10th grade class photo: 

    Sophomore Class, 1992/1993 In the trombinoscope

    
    Betaface comparisons with black and white 1991/1992 class photo excerpts in Appendix – A – 10
    Two questions. What is Emmanuel doing in the middle of the Auzière children? Is it not Brigitte who takes the photo? The answers are not easy. For the second question, the photographer could be Gérard Banc, the teacher who kept the photo, but also Brigitte who gave him a duplicate photo. For the first one, here is the answer of a correspondent, which I agree with:

     

    Apparently, it was customary at La Providence to have a nature trip every year. So the bucolic photo is a school photo (like all the others of Macron). I have no objection to accepting the June 1993 date, even though I had originally dated it to the summer of 1992. Apparently several classes were participating in the outing since Sebastian is present despite being 2 years older (if 1993, he is a senior). If several classes are participating, no oddity to see Laurence on the picture with Emmanuel. Prior to this outing, it is perfectly plausible that Brigitte would have requested and obtained that her youngest daughter participate in this field trip, especially if she was an accompanying teacher.

    
    1993/1994, Première class, Emmanuel Macron’s last year (sitting, center)
    au lycée la Providence d’Amiens. Laurence Auzière est dans une autre classe.

13. (A) Uncle and godfather Jean-Michel Noguès and aunt Lucette
    1. Uncle Jean-Michel Noguès in 1980. A correspondent consulted, at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France, the medical thesis of Françoise Noguès-Macron (under the reference 4-THM-26382), defended in Amiens on June 23, 1980, and communicated to me some pages. Here are the most interesting ones for our study.
       Recall that doubts have been raised about the very existence of this Jean-Michel, brother of Françoise Noguès married Macron, mother of Emmanuel (end of Chapter 17). Xavier Poussard had nevertheless found some other information available: “Born in 1940 and died in 2006, Jean-Michel Noguès would have become “only” a general practitioner “because of a troubled youth” (Deux jeunesses françaises)” [F&D500p5]. Finally, these words appear to be accurate. Jean-Michel Noguès received his medical degree in Amiens in 1971 (link). He is featured on the notice of his mother Germaine / Manette’s death in 2013. And he is present on a page Geneanet with the indication of his wife Lucette Duponchel, born in 1939, and their children Isabel and Florence, born in 1969 and 1971 (these children are also on Manette’s announcement).Brigittologist Maria tried to find out more:

       The medical thesis by Jean-Michel Noguès shows no dedication, only the names of the thesis director (Pierre Galibert, neurosurgeon at the C.H.U. of Amiens) and the members of the jury. Its technical content seems clear, methodical, with balanced conclusions that are addressed to neurosurgeons. In the Rosenwald Guide (directory of the French medical profession), for 1977-1978 and 1996 (last available at the BnF) : Noguès (Jean-Michel), general medicine, 27 rue Léo Lagrange, Amiens (today still a medical practice in a building). In 1977 as in 1996, Professor Pierre Galibert was the neurosurgeon of the Amiens Hospital. Jean Michel Macron, for his part, defended a scientific postgraduate thesis. In 1996 he was appointed professor of physiology (option “biological” and not “clinical”) in the laboratory of functional explorations of the nervous system. So Françoise Noguès had a career as an office doctor, and her husband, Jean-Michel Macron, as a physiology laboratory doctor (link). So doctors who do not directly treat the sick. This may explain why Emmanuel Macron lacked confidence in the healthcare personnel during the Covid epidemic, preferring to defer to Big Pharma.

       
       She provides an explanation for Manette’s remark regretting that her son became “only a general practitioner” :

        

       There is a kind of generalist-specialist segregation, still tenacious today, because some consider that a doctor is only a generalist because he or she could not access a University Professor specialty. Manette would have liked her son Jean-Michel Noguès to have had such a university career. Her daughter Françoise started a specialty in pediatrics, but did not finish it. She compensated by marrying Jean-Michel Macron, a PU-PH (University Professor – hospital practitioner). Her other daughter Marie-Christine is an ophthalmologist (she is married Bové, apparently Philippe Bové veterinarian in Amiens). Of the three children of Manette, it is indeed Jean-Michel “the least graded“, at least in the eyes of an ambitious mother, for whom the eldest son necessarily carries all the family hopes, almost the family honor. Ten years apart from her sister, Manette has indeed had time to hope… Personally, I consider that the profession of generalist is the most beautiful, but prejudices are hard to overcome.

       chapter 23 that the godfather would be Jean-Michel Trogneux has therefore been abandoned.

       Reading the acknowledgments in Françoise’s thesis suggests a banal family, with husband Jean-Michel Macron, the two children aged three and one, Emmanuel and Laurent, and the parents of the attentive spouses. Nothing seems to foreshadow that Emmanuel will be far from his father, his brother and his future sister…

    2. Aunt Lucette Noguès née Duponchel. A page on the site “Les copains d’avant” traces the career of Lucette Duponchel, born in 1939. From the age of 5 to 9, she attended school in the town of Brombos, in the Oise region 41 km from Amiens. According to a page of the 1936 census, she may be the daughter of Yvonne Deras (death notice in Grandvilliers in 2012) and Lucien Duponchel, son of Eugène Duponchel and Odile Desachy (daughter of Julien Albert Brasseur and Marie Estelle Brasseur, married in Sommereux in 1884) . From age 9 to 10, she is at the Warabiot school in the nearby commune of Grandvilliers. From 11 to 17, she is at the college in Poix-de-Picardie, where Manette teaches. From 24 to 57 years old, 1973 to 1996, she teaches at the Delpech elementary school in Amiens, in the street where Manette lives. She has known Manette since she was very young, so it is not surprising that she married her son.
       Lucette and her students circa 1979. Photos taken from a tweet by brigittologist Isabelle who states.
       “Lucette was a teacher in the school where Macron was in elementary school” but, on “The Buddies of Before,
       Emmanuel is “not found among kids of his age group.”
    3. Uncles and aunts in the shadows. Manette and Jean Noguès were of modest origin. Their son Jean-Michel became a doctor and founded a family, with a wife, Lucette, well inserted in society. He had a good career. So why blame him for having been “only” a doctor… And this “disturbed youth“, what does it mean ? Is there an inversion there? It is the life of her sister Françoise Noguès that is troubled, to say the least, with a marriage whose date is unknown, a child raised separately from the other two, a divorce, questions about her help to transsexuals… Ordinary also must be the course of the third child of Jean Noguès and Manette, Marie-Christine Noguès, married to Jean-François Leprêtre, who does not seem to be mentioned by Françoise or Emmanuel, as if she had not existed… So the life of Jean Noguès and Germaine/Manette Arribet and that of their three children, Jean-Michel born in 1940, Françoise born in 1950 and Marie-Christine born in 1952, appears to be troubled only for Françoise. So much so that Manette felt obliged to intervene strongly (apparently after 1980) to take care of Emmanuel’s education… And she is also out of the ordinary, when you consider her relationship with her favorite grandson.Before, let’s finish with the uncles and aunts, to point out that Emmanuel has a paternal aunt, Françoise Macron, born around 1955, a pharmacist in Coudun in Oise, married to Jean-Marie Bacciochini. The paternal grandparents are André Macron (1920-2010) (page Geneanet) and Jacqueline Robertson, of English father and French mother, but it appears that Emmanuel had very little contact with this paternal side although settled in Amiens and, not far from it, in Coudun.
14. (A) Manette, a strange and dark grandmother…No photo of grandparents Jean and Germaine Noguès with their three children was released, nor even a photo of Emmanuel with his maternal grandparents or with one of them. Usually, however, one is proud to show oneself as a child with the grandparents with whom one has spent a lot of time. While we don’t know of any illustrations of Grandpa John, two photos, below, of Grandma Manette have been published, in addition to the one shown in Chapter 17. And nothing on the side of the paternal grandparents, admittedly less close to their grandson.
    In her youth, Germaine Arribet, known as Manette, wife of Jean Noguès. In 2007, 88 years, at the wedding of his grandson [Paris Match 3547].
    While his grandmother Manette’s role was essential in Emmanuel’s upbringing, his grandfather, the Pyrenean Jean Noguès, was also present, as was his great-aunt Nicole. On May 14, 2017, a article from “La Dépêche” spoke of it thus :

    Germaine Arribet, daughter of an illiterate valet, born in Tarbes in 1915 and became a schoolteacher [then a geography teacher] then a college principal. Before the Second World War, she married Jean Noguès, whose parents were merchants in Bagnères-de-Bigorre. The couple moved to the Nièvre region and then to Amiens. […] Every school vacation, Manette and Jean Noguès, whom the future president affectionately nicknamed Coulou, returned to Bagnères-de-Bigorre, to the family home, with little “Manu” in their luggage. […] Also his grandmother as well as his great-aunt Nicole are thus hardly surprised when one summer, barely of age, Manu comes to Bagnères to introduce them to Brigitte, his companion, 24 years his senior. “We took her kayaking, hiking,” recalls Nicole. She immediately loved Bagnères and the Pyrenees. Brigitte adopted Bigorre and the whole family at the same time. Besides they also came back every winter to ski in La Mongie.“

    
    Manu on vacation in the Pyrenees, late 1990s. Photo from a article in “Paris Match” No. 3547, May 13, 2017,
    during the election campaign, similar to the one in “La Dépèche” published the next day. Probably a photo of Brigitte.
    In Chapter 17, it is stated that the grandfather died in 2002 at age 88, the grandmother in 2013 at age 96, both in Amiens. Manette’s influence in Emmanuel’s childhood was highlighted. In a article of “Télé-Loisirs “of May 3, 2017, Cédric Rémia confirms it :

     

    In his book Revolution, Emmanuel Macron recalls his sweet childhood memories. “My grandmother taught me to work. From the age of 5, once school was over, it was with her that I spent long hours learning grammar, history, geography. And to read.” More generally, she raises him at the expense of parents overwhelmed by their professional activities. So much so that at the age of 5, the boy asks his parents if he can go and live with her. “As he spends most of his time in the house of his beloved grandmother, why not settle there permanently ?“, write journalists Bernard Pascuito and Olivier Biscaye, authors of the book Politicians also have a mother. The parents refuse. “He was built a childhood with Epinal images that sell well. With his grandmother a teacher and his great-grandmother illiterate,” said Jean-Michel, Emmanuel Macron’s father, in the book by journalist Anne Fulda, “A young man so perfect.” To the great despair of his parents, “Manette” considers Emmanuel his “son.” And he returns the favor. He literally has an unwavering admiration and love for the one who is his preceptress, his compass, in short, his emotional pillar. And for good reason, when Emmanuel Macron, then a teenager, struck up a romance with his teacher Brigitte, a married woman 24 years his senior, his grandmother was the only one to support him.

    One senses some dark sides in what appears to be a kind of monopolization of the grandson. And that’s not all: Xavier Poussard implies that Emmanuel might not have gone to elementary school, having been educated at home by his grandmother (which would explain why we don’t find him in the class photos of Aunt Lucette’s school, see previous Appendix). And Poussard makes other observations [F&D500p2+p4] :

     

    Although he never lived in her house, Emmanuel Macron sows doubt [in his book “Revolution“] : “So I spent my childhood in books, a little out of the world. It was a still life“. “I remember those early mornings when I would go to join her in her room where she would tell her war anecdotes, her friendships. As a child, I would pick up the thread of the interrupted discussion each day and travel through her life like picking up a novel. And the smell of the café au lait that she would sometimes prepare in the middle of the night. And the door of her room open as early as seven in the morning when I had not yet come to join her, exclaiming with feigned concern  “Are you still sleeping ?”” “According to several witnesses, Manette lived her retirement cloistered at home, among books. She almost never went out, the rooms were plunged into darkness. […]At Bagnères de Bigorre too, the shutters often remained closed, she was never seen outside” [Deux jeunesses françaises]. Anne Fulda briefly touched on the possibility that Emmanuel Macron had “nearly been adopted by his grandmother“, “goddess of his enchanted world“, “Queen of his childhood and even of his adult life” [Such a perfect young man] […] In a relationship that resembles family instruction (now violently opposed by the government), one may be surprised at the literature that Manette would have recommended to his grandson. According to Candice Nedelec and Caroline Derrien, “as a teenager, the young Macron escaped by reading. […] André Gide or even “Le roi des aulnes” by Michel Tournier are on his bedside table. Authors that his beloved paternal grandmother […] gave him in sharing“. […] Let’s skip André Gide [“The concerns of a private life marked by assumed homosexuality and the desire to shake up taboos are at the origin of” some of his texts, according to the introduction to his page Wikipedia] to focus on Le roi des Aulnes, Prix Goncourt 1970, a chemically pure synthesis of the obsessions of the intelligentsia at the time of its publication, in which Michel Tournier pompously manipulates signs and symbols (the concept of “phoria“…), plays on the ambiguity between Hitler Youth and death camps (“malignant inversion“) to rewrite the myth of the ogre and, ultimately, deliver a radically pedophilic work. […] Could the strange mention of this work in Emmanuel Macron’s official biography be one of those signs he is so fond of? A key to reading ? Would his official legend be made up of “malignant invertions” ?

    Or would it be made up of “accusatory reversals“, as seen in Chapter 22 and several other times ?

     

     

    [excerpt from a article in Paris Match on January 5, 2018] [Reuters photo / Philippe Wojazer : Paris Book Fair, March 2017, in the middle of the presidential campaign]

    Emmanuel Macron’s book, “Revolution,” will be released on Monday in China on the first day of the state visit of the French president and his wife. […] Emmanuel Macron will be in China starting January 8, 2018. His book too. “Revolution“, his book , in which he tells his personal story , his inspirations, his vision of France and its future […] The French edition, released in November 2016 at the time of his presidential candidacy announcement, has sold more than 200,000 copies. The book is also already available in about 20 countries and translated into a dozen languages. […] The French president is well known to the Chinese… for his love affair and marriage to his wife Brigitte. The age difference between the couple has caused a sensation in a country where men tend to marry women who are much younger than them.

    March 2022: learning that Brigitte is a transsexual who grew up as Jean-Michel Trogneux
    is causing a sensation in China and elsewhere (see Appendix D 13).
    Recently, in 2021, a testimony came to shed new light on Manette [article] :

     

    It was in the 1960s, Marie-Claire Stubbe had then been received by Germaine Noguès who occupied the position of principal of the elementary school [in Poix-de-Picardie]. At the origin of this interview, a terrible fact that Marie-Claire Stubbe would have done well without. “Until she was 6 years old, one of her four children attended school near Poix-de-Picardie. But her teacher was violent towards her. He beat her because she had visible marks on her face. And even, we could see bloodstains in a book.” So this unbearable and unbearable situation pushed him to find a new school for his daughter. That’s when Germaine Noguès stepped in. “I will always remember that meeting. As soon as we told her about the problem, she didn’t hesitate to welcome my daughter into the facility. She was very warm. It warmed my heart. I will always be grateful for what she did.“

    Again, another reading reveals a dark side. Here’s what NBI says in early March 2022 :

     

    At first glance, the story could only further enhance the luster of the saintly laywoman and “avant-gardiste” halo. On closer inspection, this one may well be tarnished by some awkward shadows. The journalistic narrative is designed to exalt the pious grandson through the uplifting life of his grandmother, and so it focuses on what Manette did…but not on what she didn’t do. Faced with the drama of the little martyr, the caring and warm principal took her in without hesitation or delay. And that was it. A teacher unabashedly indulges in unspeakable violence against one of his young students. She may not be the only victim, nor the first or the last. And the beating she received could also be a cover for something even worse. Taking in the child in this way can also be interpreted as the easiest way to discreetly cover up the tragedy… and ensure impunity for the perpetrator, allowing him to continue. Nothing in the story indicates that Manette did anything else. Like advising the mother to file a complaint, urgently alerting the school management about the teacher’s behavior, reporting it to the rectorate, the prosecutor… In short, what one would expect from such an open, attentive and forward-thinking teacher in the face of “a terrible fact“, “an unbearable and unbearable situation“.

     

    Official portrait of Brigitte Macron, by Soazig de la Moissonnière (Elysée website, link)

15. (A) Family photos of Emmanuel MacronIf Xavier Poussard was surprised at the lack of photos of Emmanuel Macron as a child, he also specified [F&D500p3], next to small reproductions, in black and white, here taken in their original appearance, the following :
    

    Looking hard, we found three other photographs of Emmanuel Macron in the 1980s (still in his family). Diffused only once in the n°3547 of Paris Match, these photos were not diffused on Internet as it is now the custom. Inexplicably they were not incorporated into the authorized biographies produced later.

    
    The May 10, 2017 issue of Paris Match 3547 is devoted to the new President of the Republic, just after his election.
    The spotlight is on the family and love life of the newly elected.
    There are also these two photographs, including the only one we know of that brings together Emmanuel, his parents Jean-Michel and Françoise, his sister Estelle and his brother Laurent:

    
    With his family, no date, and on a training course in Nigeria in 2004.
    2017, after the election, Emmanuel Macron between his father and mother. On the right is his brother Laurent.

    
    Betaface comparison of Jean-Michel Macron with his two children Laurent and Emmanuel

16. (A) Brigitte and her absurd Auzière family In math, I’ve always enjoyed reasoning by the absurd. They have a sense of adventure. Throughout the thought process, one moves forward in an improbable space until the final fall where, like Little Nemo, one falls out of bed and returns to reality by relentlessly rejecting the original hypothesis. In everyday life, I also use these demonstrations by the absurd. For example for the initial hypothesis of this file. Assuming that Brigitte was born a woman, what would she do? She would deflate the rumor as quickly as possible by showing up with her brother Jean-Michel or by means of a blood test under the supervision of a bailiff; or by another method as easy and basic. She didn’t do it, it’s absurd, so she was born a man. But there are, in everyday life, logics that are not mathematical. For example Brigitte could be a perverted woman who would love to be mistaken for a man… The Wikipedia page on apagogy (the scholarly name for reasoning by the absurd) explains this well by differentiating its uses “in logic and mathematics” and “in philosophy“.In the Appendix A 37, I presented the NBI (No Brain Inside) file dated February 11. I have already said that I do not favor the hypothesis supported in this file, which makes Jean-Michel Trogneux Emmanuel’s father. There is a stronger divergence with the adoption of the Kots hypothesis to date in 1958 a photo that cannot be so late: incomprehensible. Nevertheless, the analysis carried out is, on many points, relevant. Here is an excerpt which is a cleverly conducted reasoning by the absurd:
    

    According to the official version “Brigitte Auzière” has three children: Sebastien born in 1975, Laurence of 1977 and the same age as Manu since they were in the same third grade class at La Providence, and Tiphaine the youngest born in 1984. The Ministry of Truth asks us to piously swallow the absurd fable that the three Auzière children sided – without delay and without any problem of conscience – with Brigitte and her lover… who was also their schoolmate. Because he was “a madman who knows everything about everything” according to Laurence ? Or because the trio was transfixed by his masterful interpretation of the role of the scarecrow in the legendary theatrical performance that serves as the keystone to the whole shaky propagandist scaffolding? Unless their father – “charming” by the way – did not make their mother happy according to hagiographer Anne Fulda, in her book “Emmanuel Macron, un jeune homme si parfait” and that this brave little Manu was fortunately there to fill her ? Except that the simple chronology already puts the fable to shame. Brigitte has known Manu since at least the beginning of the 1991 school year (her daughter Laurence is in the same class as him) [and she may have known his mother earlier, Chapter 24]. Let’s even admit that, suffering from visual disorders and a failing memory, Brigitte only became aware of the existence of the child, er… of the man of her life in the late spring of 1993. Manu was then 15 and a half, Laurence no more, Sébastien two years older, and Tiphaine at 9 years old was still in elementary school… Let’s always admit that Sébastien, a 17-year-old teenager, finds it perfectly normal that a 15-year-old boy sleeps with his mother  that Laurence, out of generational solidarity, finds it very “cool” that Mom’s lover is a classmate; and that Tiphaine finds it convenient that between two cuddling sessions with Brigitte on the living room couch Manu kindly helps her with her homework… Except that, even assuming the most favorable timeline, the most basic common sense throws even more of a wrench into this beautiful story. It is, moreover, Tiphaine, Brigitte’s official spokesperson for all things related to the Auzière family, who involuntarily blasts it in a hagiography whose title is already in itself an admission: “Brigitte Macron, a French novel“. In it, she ingenuously admits that, “My daddy worked in Lille, he came back on weekends. During the week, I was with my mother and on weekends with my dad and mom went to see Emmanuel“. This irrefutable first-hand testimony completely undermines the official legend that André-Louis Auzière – transferred to Amiens but working all week in Lille – learned of his misfortune through public rumor, which left no tangible trace: “And what was supposed to happen… happened. The rumors whistled in André-Louis Auzière’s ears. A crushing blow for the husband, a banker by profession! Disgraced – what shall I say – scorned, he slammed the door! He immediately left the marital home. He also lost the connections, reputation, and money that his marriage to Brigitte offered him’, reveals the Daily Mail.” Not content to be able to cuckold her banker husband all week with the complicity of her children, on weekends Brigitte ostensibly goes out to find her lover … and leaves the little one in the care of the scorned husband … and very complaisant. Who therefore takes all his time to slam the door and divorce only in 2006. The bank is a demanding mistress, and Manu, an ex-Rothschild employee, will not deny it. [NBI quotes there from a article from May 3, 2017 from Télé-Loisirs, reprinting passages from the Daily Mail. Here is another excerpt ] “Emmanuel could be seen walking down his street almost every day, taking the first right and ringing the bell at the Auzière’s. His incessant comings and goings gave rise to rumors in the neighborhood,” the couple’s former neighborhood told France Dimanche. Gossip and other persiflages rustle throughout Amiens. It is the scandal: the respectable teacher of the Jesuit high school of Providence of Amiens, married who is more, is the lover of one of his minor students, 24 years his junior. After the “death” of her “father,” Tiphaine paints a moving portrait of André-Louis Auzière: “I adored him, he was a being apart, a nonconformist who held on to his anonymity more than anything. We must respect him.” [article from Paris Match of October 7, 2020, cover opposite]. Which – at the same time – had not prevented her from shamelessly betraying the anonymous nonconformist she adored to her sister’s classmate! As Laurence and Sebastien always show – like their “mother” – a modesty bordering on muteness about their relationship with their ghostly father we don’t know if they shared their younger sister’s curiously contradictory feelings… Let’s summarize. The being apart and dignified banker forty years old regularly finds his wife in bed with a teenager, spends his weekends alone with his youngest daughter while his wife cheats on him… takes the first train to Lille and disappears until his death on December 24, 2019, abandoning wife, children, relations, reputation and money… Once again we are confronted with the absurdity of the official story that tries – very clumsily – to hide a frightening reality. As it has already been demonstrated before that the marriage Brigitte Trogneux – André-Louis Auzière is fictitious for lack of the existence of the husband, it is necessarily the same for the Auzière family ! But if there is no tangible trace of the real existence of the Phantom of the Bank, it is not the same for the “Auzière” children. They are real and were at once witnesses, accomplices and victims of the actions of their “mother“. Before asking the question of their true identity, we must already question what they have suffered. Despite the lack of formal evidence, everything points to Brigitte/Jean-Michel Trogneux as the real father of Emmanuel Macron. But also as the author of a sexual attack on a minor of 13 years doubling as an incest according to the unambiguous statements – for once! – of the father/wife and the son/husband. If “Brigitte” was capable of such a crime on her son how could she imagine that she could not also have committed it on her other children, the Auzière  children? Tiphaine admits it moreover : the three “Auzière” children were witnesses to the sexual assault on Manu, found it perfectly normal… and probably participated in it if we judge with what amoral candor a lawyer and politician tells about the sexual life of her “mother” and her very young lover !

    I have reservations about the conclusions in the last paragraph, which I think are plausible but currently quite unlikely hypotheses. I also have a small reservation about the whole demonstration because it is reasoning by the absurd outside of mathematics. But, if not implacable, it certainly helps to understand how the Auzière family as presented to us is a very unlikely thing.

17. (A) The Gabrielle Russier alibi and the accusatory reversal of harassmentThe Gabrielle Russier case in 1968/1969 had upset many people. Here it is summarized by the introduction to her page Wikipedia :
    

    Gabrielle Russier, born April 29, 1937 in Paris and died September 1, 1969 in Marseille, was a professor agrégée of literature. Following a love affair with one of her sixteen-year-old students, she was sentenced to a one-year suspended prison term for kidnapping and abduction of a minor. She committed suicide in her apartment in Marseille. Her story has inspired many artistic works such as André Cayatte’s film, Mourir d’aimer (1971), Serge Reggiani’s Gabrielle (1970) [paroles], Anne Sylvestre’s Des fleurs pour Gabrielle [1971] [paroles] and Mourir d’aimer by Charles Aznavour (1971) [paroles), or Josée Dayan’s TV movie, Mourir d’aimer (2009), which will be criticized by the protagonists of the case.

    Three other vintage items: 1 2 3.

    From a distance, it may seem like there is a parallel to the Brigitte case: a romantic relationship between a teacher and a high school student. On closer inspection, the differences are very significant. At the beginning of the affair, the young man, Christian, was at least two years older than Emmanuel (at that age, it counts, he was over the criminal majority for minors of 16) and Gabrielle was 16 years younger than Brigitte/Jean-Michel. Brigitte concealed her sexual state and did not experience rejection, stigma, or incarceration.

    Nevertheless, the “legend” Brigitte brings the situation in Amiens closer to the Russier case. The age of the high school student was raised (“He had just turned seventeen“), the teacher’s age was lowered (Brigitte is 8 years younger than Jean-Michel), the transsexuality was hidden. The spotlight was on the age gap (20 years, then 24 years) and the romance of a great love (as in “dying to love“) was activated. In 2017, and even now for the majority of French people who are unaware of Jean-Michel’s reality, this resonance in the subconscious worked.

     

    [article from AmoMama of November 6, 2018] “During an interview, Frédéric Mitterrand made a rather unwelcome comparison between the Macron couple and another infamous couple.” The former Minister of Culture, said “His marriage to a woman who is not of the same generation. It is a bit of revenge for the Russier affair“.

    This March 17, NBI (The Ze Qe Fan hermit) also mentioned it on his Telegram channel:

     

    Indeed, the plot of the Gabrielle Russier affair was knowingly used to set up the narrative of the mythical love at first sight of unusual lovers. One played on the similarity of the situations (however completely fictitious), the tragic character of the Russier affair, its impact in the memory and the collective unconsciousness to impose a gilded legend which has strictly no relationship with the affair of the end of the 1960s. The Manu-Brigitte affair was created from scratch to justify the unjustifiable and to focus attention on a very complacent version of which all the elements and testimonies were concocted by the protagonists themselves and intended to conceal a sordid affair of pedocriminality hiding even worse. There has never been a public affair, a complaint, an investigation, a trial, a media debacle… except the one deliberately provoked for political purposes by the Macron couple. Never has young Emmanuel undergone a three-week sleep cure in a psychiatric clinic, nor has he been subsequently committed to a psychiatric asylum, placed in a boarding school hundreds of kilometers away from his family and his lover… And never has Brigitte been the subject of a complaint filing, nor has she spent a minute in police custody, not to mention a detention or any conviction for sexual assault on a minor of 13 years of age by a person with authority! If the Russier affair was over-mediatized it is, in part, because of the socio-political context of the time: the events of May 68, the liberation of morals, the resignation of General De Gaulle, the Markovic affair and the election of Pompidou… And when the press has a bone to pick, it only lets go of it when there is nothing left. The media hype has also contributed to the intellectual and cultural hype… involuntarily fanned by the rigid behavior of the self-proclaimed representatives of order and morality. By today’s standards, the France of the 1960s is another planet…

    “Brigitte Auzière” French teacher at Lycée La Providence in Amiens circa 1993, class photo with her students.

    This parallel between the two cases is also discussed on this article from pasidupes.wordpress.com, also touching on the Olivier Duhamel case and the MeToo movement. The title is characteristic of the accusatory inversions of the Macron couple : “Macron wants to ” criminalize sexual relations between an adult and a minor of 15 years ““. Similarly, Brigitte fights against harassment at school :

     

    Gabrielle Russier had been expelled from the National Education. Brigitte Macron is presented as a teacher by Minister Blanquer, November 18, 2021. In the background, students and teachers are muzzled, victims of government harassment.

    Already in September 2020, the pedocriminal dared to pose on the cover of a magazine against child abuse.

    Below: header of a article from Marie Claire from May 2018.

    

18. (A) Brothers Jean-Louis and Louis Auzière, their nephew André Louis
    Above, we find the photo, this time colorized, supposedly of Brigitte Macron’s wedding to her first husband André-Louis Auzière, in 1974. The two people on the left, given their approximate age, are indeed the supposed parents of the fictitious André : Louis Auzière (the older brother of Jean-Louis) and Renee Costes, aged at the time of the snapshot 49 and 46 years.To better understand, let’s study the genealogy of Jean-Louis Auzière. He was born in Paris, 9th arrondissement, on February 28, 1943 (act), the son of Marius Auzière and Germaine Bary, who were just mentioned. A extract from the 1936 census of Meudon shows the Auzière family before Jean-Louis was born. In addition to the parents, aged 43 (he is “chief accountant“) and 40 (no profession), it then consists of three children, Louis 19, Suzanne 17, Marcelle 13, grandmother Anna Bary, 75, and a cousin Reine Bary, 57.
    Marius Auzière (young left) and Germaine Bary, probably in 1965 for their 50th wedding anniversary.
    Photos of the fiche of Marius Auzière on the kensi13 Geneanet website.
    From this family, it is worth remembering that Jean-Louis arrived very late, in 1943, when his parents were 50 and 46 years old, his brother Louis already 26 years old, his sisters Suzanne and Marcelle 24 and 20 years old. This means that the famous André-Louis Auzière could hardly be a new child of Marius and Germaine. He is rather a grandson and it is indeed what the “legend” of Brigitte claims; he would be a child of Louis, thus a nephew of Jean-Louis.So we are led to look at the life of Louis, Jean-Louis’ older brother. Louis Alexandre Michel Auzière (1917-1985), a company administrator, married Renée Costes (1920-2014) in Montpellier in 1939. They are the ones seen next to the groom in the wedding photo. Here is the fiche of Louis on the site Généanet kensi13 (sisters and daughters are indicated with their husband’s name) :
    
    The positioning of André-Louis (actually André Louis) in the list of his five siblings appears quite natural here. In her already cited 2019 book “He had just turned seventeen,” Sylvie Bommel describes in one page the itinerary across Africa of her father Louis, a French civil servant during the decolonization era. The UPC (Union des Populations du Cameroun) considers that he rigged an election in 1954 (documents  1, 2). On this route, see also the end of the Appendix A 31.

    We have seen that André-Louis is supposed to be born on February 28, 1951 in Eséka, a small commune in Cameroon created in 1954, and doubts have arisen as to the validity of this place of birth. However, the following document (from the local annals of Eséka), dated January 1, 1952, shows, on the contrary, that it appears likely :

    
    On the right, the main avenue of Eséka [Wikipedia].
    In 1984, according to “legend”, André-Louis Auzière became deputy director of the Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur (page Wikipedia) in Strasbourg and moved to Truchtersheim, in the affluent district le Hoeft. This bank closed in 1996 and no trace of activity of this sub-manager seems to remain.
    
    It was in December 2020 that Closer announced the death of André Louis Auzière, which had occurred a year earlier (article)
    (photography Stéphane Lemouton). It is the first name André-Louis that is used.
    As of mid-March 2022, at this stage of the investigation, we still had no proof of the existence of André Louis Auzière, but it still appeared plausible, as told in the Brigitte “legend”. This André-Louis could have been born in Eséka in 1951. If so, had he lived long? Had he met the Trogneux family? There was some truth to it, but we didn’t know, then, how far he would go…

    April 4. I discover an explanation that consists in considering that Jean-Louis and André-Louis Auzière are the same person. The fact that Jean-Louis’ middle name is André and that he sometimes signs André (and not Jean-Louis) is particularly troubling. One can imagine an intermittent identity or a posteriori… Here’s how Webcraft talked about it on February 14 (link) :

    When Jean-Louis Auzière goes by the name André

    Another extraordinary character is her husband ALA [André-Louis Auzière]. […] JLA has always been called by his middle name André. It is him who under the identity ALA married Baphomet [Jean-Michel / Brigitte] in 1974. ALA, born abroad, never asked for a SS [Social Security] number, contrary to JLA who obtained it automatically, being born in France. It is thus under JLA’s SS number that ALA’s career was made at the BFCE and Natexis. However, he signed AA [André Auzière] as many documents attest. The JLA identity was used to take shares in companies. These company documents show that the AA signature is assured and consistent over several years, whereas JLA’s signature over the same period is very inconsistent and therefore changing. Indeed JLA has always called himself André. It is possible that JLA served as a cover for Baphomet during his stay in Alsace. On the other hand, ALA inherited from his parents at their death and therefore had a tax number. In 2003, ALA sold a property in joint ownership on rue du Faubourg Saint Honoré in Paris. JLA certainly transferred funds from ALA’s bank account to access the proceeds of the sale. JMT [Jean-Michel Trogneux] also inherited from his parents and owns a property in joint ownership with Baphomet in Le Touquet. […] The statute of limitations has expired and most of the accomplices are dead. The crime was almost perfect.

    April 14. This intermittent and after-the-fact dual identity is confirmed with the new Proba / Brigitte Auzière hypothesis, niece of JLA and mother of the three Auzière children (Chapter 27, Appendix A 25). It appears that Jean-Louis was going by the name André in documents that did not require an ID, such as phone books. So in hindsight, it could be believed that it was André-Louis. And if Proba was not (officially, seemingly, and probably) his uncle’s spouse, she lived in his reported apartment (at least in the phone book), briefly in Issy-les-Moulineaux and longer in Croix (see end of Appendix A 30 for phone books). This suggested that the father was André(-Louis) when in fact it was Jean-Michel Trogneux, Jean-Louis’s great friend.

19. (A) Brigitte when she was Veronique the transsexualAs noted in the disclaimer at the beginning of the file, the comparison of audio voice curves between Brigitte Macron and Veronique the transsexual interviewed in 1977 proves scientifically that the two bearers of these first names are one person (see red box in Chapter 14). Added to this is a common speech tic, a common gesture. It’s been more than two months since this comparison has been online, more than ten thousand Internet users, on this site alone, have listened to it and no one, neither here nor elsewhere, has brought the slightest element of doubt about this common identity. And since December, the Macron couple has taken refuge in denial without showing the slightest new element, and so have the major media. Only Le Canard Enchaîné, Médiapart and a few others have not dared to deny, while remaining silent. Such is the situation on this March 27.Véronique / Brigitte Macron was therefore born a man. And, very probably, under the name of Jean-Michel Trogneux, so much is solid the collected bundle of indices. We are now numerous to have the intimate conviction of it. Since this similarity is acquired, it is interesting to exploit at best the information delivered on Véronique. However, the video interview of the INA is truncated. By consulting the Inathèque, which is only accessible in research libraries, Xavier Poussard obtained the entire interview and communicated it in writing [F&D504p11]. First, here is the transcript of the first part, the video interview available:
    

    François Desplats (FD) – I can just assure you of the authenticity of Veronique’s testimony. Veronique, I would like to know if, at the time you had this operation, which is the one you had, it was a difficult moment for you or it was just a culmination of something that had happened before ? Veronique (V) – I believe that in fact there is not transformation because the psyche is already feminine and the individual, in this case me, is already prepared for this kind of mutation by necessity in the sense that one feels woman and one regularizes a situation without more. There is no mutation, there is regularization FD – You are completely female so you were operated on how long ago ? V – I don’t really like the word become completely female. That is, we become a kind of woman who can copulate but cannot procreate. Hence the legal problems that we will talk about later. That is to say that the integration is done without problem on the individual level. They only exist on a social level;

    
    Let us recall that, for not having answered the last question, Veronique does not say explicitly that she is transsexual, with operation. We have reason to believe that this operation, if it took place, was done in 1984-1985. And it could be that it did not exist. We do not know therefore if Jean-Michel / Brigitte is a transsexual become woman or a transvestite making pass for a woman. We can say that he is a transsexual in the broad sense, to simplify. Here is now the unpublished part, absent from the video made public on the site INA :

     

    FD – You have a profession that we’re not going to reveal here, let’s just say it’s a public facing profession V – That’s right, I’m a craftsman. I have regular contact with the public. I’m around customers. I don’t have any problems. I used to have some, because I had a phenotypic gender, meaning an ambiguous appearance. I was taken for what I was not, that is to say for a homosexual, which was not the case, neither in my behavior, nor in my way of thinking. But unfortunately, this image resulted in a non-integration. And I regularized a situation for my integration. And I live very legally and very honorably. For the civil status, it is possible to change your first name for an ambiguous one. This is very important because it allows insertion, or pseudo social insertion. In the sense that there are always problems but that the problems are soluble at the administrative level, that is to say, by mutual agreement. But legally, there is no solution unlike all foreign legislation except for Belgian legislation which is modelled on ours. FD – Do you feel that you are now completely yourself? Do you no longer have any problem identifying yourself since you were operated on? of yourself since you had the operation? V – To tell the truth I only had identification problems with third parties, I didn’t have any with myself. I considered myself as what I was as what I was, that is to say as a woman having a body which did not belong to her. It is very difficult to conceive for someone who is well in her skin. I use the term “comfortable in her skin” because it’s the typical image because I didn’t have any problems but people created them for me. Now I don’t have a problem. To tell you the truth, this surgery, that is, this removal of an organ that is useless in our case because it is both unusable and unused… FD – Do you live alone? V – I am not with someone but I lived with a woman. And conceived this union in the style of George Sand and Chopin. Chopin was most likely a transsexual [Note by Xavier Poussard: we had not heard of this transphobic conspiracy theory…]. His melody, his way of playing, indicates it quite clearly. […] I think the image that has been given of the Rimbaud/Verlaine union is a distorted, caricatured image that does not correspond in any way…[FD stops the conversation]

    Based on these remarks, Xavier Poussard lists new similar elements between Brigitte and Veronique :

    1. Veronique likes Chopin a lot. Yet, in the “legend”, Emmanuel only plays Chopin on the piano one-on-one with Brigitte.
    2. Véronique has a certain fascination for the Rimbaud/Verlaine couple, who were cited to enter the Pantheon, on presidential will, probably on Brigitte’s impulse. The latter says, in a article of January 27, 2022  “In poetry, my favorites are Baudelaire and Rimbaud, an overwhelming, absolute genius“.
    3. Veronique appears admiring of the platonic love George Sand / Frédéric Chopin, Brigitte would have devoted a university thesis to courtly love article).

    For this too, although it is less certain than the voice comparison, Veronique and Brigitte are the same person. Some of Veronique’s other words could be exploited. Assuming she is telling the truth, she worked in a craft trade and had both a male and female first name from 1977 to 1989. We know almost nothing about these years, except her marriage in 1980, as a man, and the birth of her five children from 1975 to 1984, there is still much to discover, especially for the married couple Jean-Michel Trogneux – Véronique Dreux.

    So it could be that Jean-Michel, in 1977, took on a dual identity for his three lives. With the first name Jean-Michel as a man for his two family lives. With a mixed first name (like Dominique, Camille…) as a woman for his third life, his job, we don’t know where. Then, from about 1989, he was systematically called Brigitte, except for some written acts. The first name Véronique was probably only used for this television interview. We do not know if he is in place with Véronique Dreux, whom he married three years later, in 1980.

    April 26. I am advised that the full video is available at this link.

    2016, 2017 and 2018, when Brigitte Macron tells what she thinks of the Yellow Vests, though not very mean to her: “I know this violence and vulgarity” (link). She ignored the police violence…

20. (A) Gallice Jewelry and Elysian DisinformationThis Annex, created on March 28, was first titled “Jean-Michel Trogneux and the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon“. We were then sure of the following information.
    

    Let’s go back to a question that has just been asked: what craft may have been practiced by Jean-Michel Trogneux, aka Véronique, in 1977 and in the 1980s ? Chocolatier ? Perhaps, but rather jeweler, since it is established that he held a jewelry store in Toulon. Here is what Xavier Poussard says [F&D501p3] :   There is no trace of marriage, nor address of Jean-Michel Trogneux in the “Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales” of June 12, 1973, where a “Jean-Michel Henri Trogneux” acquires the jewelry store “Gallice” located at 25, rue des Boucheries in Toulon (Var), an address that takes the place of his domicile. [opposite 25 rue des Boucheries in Toulon, currently a nail bar] [until 2019, there was a Gallice jewelry store in Lavandou, in the Var, created on 1/1/1973, with a new agent in 2004, link] Rejected information

    How could we have been so wrong and how, on April 26, did we realize the mistake? This is what is told here:

     

    Even though Xavier Poussard was specifically stating his source of information, we wanted to verify it. Here is that source : Document A So, through books.google, one had to query the “bulletin des annonces civiles et commerciales” from 1973. But this search engine no longer worked the same way. Depending on whether one queried by “Gallice” (link) or “Trogneux” (link), one got, each time on the same page 13.133, the following excerpts : Document B Document C By concatenating a morcau from “Document B” with another piece of “Document C”, an “extended Document A” similar to “Document A” with additional information  was obtained: We could have stopped there and confirmed the Gallice information. Fortunately, there were several of us and one of us asked the right questions. Extended Document A Do these two ad fragments, automatically assembled a few months ago, manually assembled with the new version of Google Books, reconstruct the ad ? Or do they belong to different ads? The wider knowledge of the ads and a careful reading of the “extended document A” gave the answer. Is Jean-Michel Trogneux the buyer or the manager? Can a jewelry store transform “materials, including iron” ? Is it not rather the neighboring company, Picardie-Métal, which processes iron ? And it is based in Blangy-Tronville, where Jean-Michel Trogneux was married in 1980 to Véronique Dreux… Arrived at this point, we could not but notice that there had been confusion : the first part of “A” and “A extended” corresponds to the jeweler Gallice of Toulon, while the second part, that which concerns Jean-Michel Trogneux, corresponds to Picardie-Métal. The final proof was brought by a second assembly, of a “document D”, which reconstitutes the integral announcement of Picardie-Métal : Document D (larger)

    Yet, the Gallice jewelry store was firmly rooted in the history of Jean-Michel Trogneux. It seemed connected to the remarriage of Veronique Dreux in Toulon, while this second marriage of Mrs. Dreux took place in this city only by pure coincidence.. It was especially confirmed by contacts between Natacha and Xavier Poussard. This one explains himself as follows [F&D503p5] :

     

    It so happens that, by chance of common relations, we were able to get in touch with a friend of Jean-Jacques Trogneux [son of Jean-Michel, see three chapters before]. A relatively close friend since he was even his roommate for several years, in the early 2000s. By contacting this individual, we thought we could finally validate or invalidate our working hypothesis as simply as definitively. However, during the first telephone exchange (December 13 at 11 am), our correspondent certified to us that he had never physically seen Jean-Jacques Trogneux’s father, had never seen photographs of him, and that Jean-Jacques Trogneux had never spoken to him about his father. When we submitted our working hypothesis to him, the individual remained pensive before remembering that at the time, Jean-Jacques Trogneux often spoke of a young politician who was going to break the mold and that it was probably Emmanuel Macron. Three hours later, we were contacted again by the same individual who, in a completely different tone, affirmed that the current existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux was proven, that he had been a jeweler in Toulon, that he lived at 14, rue des Vergeaux, that Jean-Jacques Trogneux organized parties at the home of this father who simply did not wish to appear because of a failed curriculum and an unattractive physique (“a little fatty“). Furthermore, we needed to contact a third person who would tell us more. This third party did not respond to our solicitations.

    This briefed witness conjures up a Jean-Michel Trogneux with a “physical ingratitude” of the “little fatty” type, which will be taken up by the Elysian agents Moadab and Blanrue (Appendix A 7) to the point of giving him substance. Similarly, the geneanet file of Jean-Michel Trogneux on the famous fraternal.org base, which one suspects of being remotely controlled by the Elysée, insists on the Gallice  jewelry store:

    
    Two false leads validated by the Elysée: the Gallice jewelry store and the so-called Jean-Michel Trogneux “little fatty“,
    embraced by Emmanuel Macron on May 7, 2022 (Brigitte had ignored him, tweet…).
    This illustrates the extent to which the entourage of the Trogneux and Macron families tried, discreetly, to stem the tide of revelations, by a sort of infiltration in order to make mistakes official. Thus ends the story of the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon, while that of the Metal-Picardy company in Blangy-Tronville : continued in Appendix A 33.

    So there is evidence here that the Elysée is following very closely the progress of the investigation into Jean-Michel Trogneux and is doing its best to cover its tracks, even supporting, if the opportunity arises, a false track misguidedly started by the researchers. The whole “counter-inquiry by Moadab and Blanrue” goes in this direction (Appendix A 7). And one may wonder about the Elysian appropriateness of unveiling Emmanuel Macron’s preparatory class photo (Appendix A 29). Or to inform that André-Louis Auzière was “reclined in a psychiatric clinic” while having it denied by Tiphaine Auzière (Appendix D 10). May 15. A correspondent thus presents the strategy of the Elysée to maintain the state secret :

     

    We are faced with three levels of disinformation : The first level is the celebrity press, which represents a veritable inundation of mushy lies, designed to drown out the most virtuous of researchers. It even spills over into the political press (Le Monde, Le Figaro…). And it is not expensive: it works by itself thanks to a very developed collaborationism in our country, the one that our friend Lionel Labosse considers under the scatological angle… The second level is the frontal denial, which we suffered this winter following the breakthrough operated by these ladies (Natacha Rey – Amandine Roy), the “conspiracy news“, there too relayed with very good grace by the merdiatic world. The 3rd level is already more professional, and no longer plays on this sounding board effect: it directly addresses the hard core of brigittology. It is Blanrue and Moadab [Appendix A 7], probably also this Kots with his falsely dated photo [Appendix A 11], others surely. Even to the point of exploiting our mistakes as with the Gallice jewelry store. Alongside disinformation (including “trolling” on the Internet), there is, symmetrically, censorship. It can be useful to the researcher in pointing out the right leads… However, none of this is as effective as the very upstream and sophisticated editing done by Jean-Louis Auzière. I believe that he is really strong.

     

    Photos Abaca, Starface, Sipa, Starface (link)

21. (A) Emmanuel Macron’s big sister, stillbornIf you believe the “legend” told in people magazines, Emmanuel Macron would have had a stillborn big sister. This is so told in a article of France-Dimanche of February 25, 2017 :
    

    Emmanuel Macron: The drama that haunted his childhood! The energetic and charismatic presidential candidate, Emmanuel Macron, hides deep inside a family tragedy that occurred shortly before his birth. […] When you read the biography of the Picard, you discover that he is the eldest of a sibling group of three children. This is not entirely accurate. Indeed, ten months before bringing Emmanuel into the world, Jean-Michel and Françoise experienced the cruelest of trials: losing their baby. A stillborn baby girl. Could the couple have avoided this terrible accident? It is possible that being both doctors, he at the city hospital and she at the Social Security, this question haunted them. Even though just two months after the tragedy, Françoise was pregnant again. Is it to implore divine protection on their unborn boy that they named him Emmanuel, which means “God is with us” ? In any case, it was a gift from heaven that fell to them on December 21, 1977, four days before Christmas. But if life takes over, death is still lurking. As Claude Askolovitch writes in Vanity Fair: “Françoise carries the wound. Every February, the pain is throbbing. Retired today, she exhales a suspended suffering that I feel the day I meet her because she wants to talk to me about her son.” How does a child who succeeds a dead baby build himself? […]

    Here is the fiche of this child in the almost official genealogy of the geneanet fraternelle.org database, and what became of his little brother (his official portrait analyzed by a BuzzFeedNewsFR tweet) :

    
    While, yet in the same database, the dates of marriage (circa 1976) and divorce (circa 2010) of the couple Jean-Michel Macron / Françoise Noguès are approximate (Chapter 17), we have for this stillborn child without a first name an unusual luxury of details. He was female, born and died on February 22, 1976 at 6:10 a.m. at the St. Antoine Hospital in Paris 12ème, registered at the civil registry under the act number 530.
    First problem: the baby would not have been born 10 months before Emmanuel but one year and 10 months before. We also wonder why he would have gone to be born in Paris. The maternity hospital St Antoine, closed in 2012, was not particularly renowned for difficult births. But there is still much more embarrassing…
    
    There are files of the deceased in France for public use. A brigittologist with a good grasp of how to access these data searched for the stillborn children Noguès and Macron (even with spelling approximations). He found only two references  “Macron, Philippe Marc Michel born in Croix on 20/09/1970 and died the same day in Lille“, “Noguès, Sophie Joëlle Marie born in Rennes on 01/07/1974 and died the same day in Rennes“. He then extended his search to children who died before their second birthday. Then he had a particular attention on Paris 12th in 1976  he found 4 girls and 14 boys whose names and first names do not allow any connection. Finally, on February 22, 1976, in all of France: there were only two babies (boys) born and dead that day, one in the Meuse, the other in Lyon.

    There is still a record without a first name, although it is rare. There are only 3 stillborn children without a first name who died on the day of their birth in France in the 1970s (which have nothing to do with our case). There would be the even rarer case of a stillborn child not declared or not received and processed by INSEE, which says that there may be missing.

    So this child seems to be fictional, but why say she would have “hated her childhood” ? The testimonies are contradictory. Sylvie Bommel whose investigation is nevertheless thorough, in her book “He had just turned seventeen“, does not say a word about the stillborn big sister, as Emmanuel Macron himself in his book of the election campaign :

     

    In 2017, in his book “Revolution, he devoted five pages to his grandmother Manette. Against barely one to his parents. And two lines to his brother Laurent, and his sister, Estelle, just enough time to mention that they are radiologist and nephrologist and that he was therefore the only one in the family not to participate in medical discussions that lasted hours. No mention either of his half-brother Gabriel, born in 2005 from his father’s second marriage, and even less of his father’s partner, Hélène, a psychiatrist in a hospital in Amiens (and one more doctor!). On the other hand, he takes care to mention the first names of Brigitte’s three children and their spouses and those of her grandchildren […].

    The stillborn child allows to accredit that the couple of Emmanuel’s official parents would have been constituted well before his birth, which is reassuring for the public and avoids indiscreet searches. Emmanuel’s middle name is Jean-Michel, the name of his mother’s older brother Françoise, a doctor, who would have helped his sister during this difficult period. Manette, Françoise’s mother, would also have provided valuable assistance, which explains her attachment to the child. This means that, in infancy, Emmanuel Macron would have been called Emmanuel Noguès… There remain, in my opinion less likely, the other hypotheses where Jean-Michel Macron would have recognized Emmanuel from his birth, whether he was the biological father or not.

    In a very recent article, from March 15, 2022, Jean-Michel Macron states that, about his son’s personal life, “too much nonsense has been told.” There is some in the bundle of hypotheses presented on this page, but it has also been more than five years that nonsense, presented as certainties, has been expressed by the Macron couple, nonsense that his own parents, brothers, sisters, cousins let be said, generating multiple new nonsense. This can only get worse as the lies, the denials, the silences grow and are more and more known, generating and multiplying new nonsense. It will become more and more unbearable for the close family, which the Macron couple has chosen to sacrifice on the altar of its notoriety.

    Let’s go back to the stillborn child. What Françoise Noguès (probably briefed by her great friend Brigitte…) told Vanity Fair, taken up in several newspapers, would therefore be a tale to make the people cry, invented by Mimi Marchand and Brigitte Macron. At that time, February 2017, it was necessary to tenderize the electorate and invite them to vote for a candidate “pudique about his childhood” – as written in the article of France Dimanche – having overcome this terrible ordeal, so trustworthy… Today, we know that around Macron there are lies everywhere, no trust is possible…

22. (A) Alger 1963On March 29, Amandine Roy interviewed during a >>>video>>> of 2 hr 2 min (censored by Youtube) the geopolitical writer Morad El Hattab, whom Richard Boutry had hosted for France-Soir in January 2021 (interview).
    Right, tweet from Facial.Cupping from April 3, 2022
    As with the interviews with Natacha Rey, it’s far too long and hard to follow. Sure, there are (near the middle) some additional revelations about Moadab and Blanrue’s “counter-investigation” (Appendix A 7) that we already knew were bogus. But more importantly, there are two really new revelations (at timings 1:19:45 and 1:44:26), which here are compiled, very briefly, into one:>>>video>>> of 2 min 14.
    Let’s start with the second revelation. In his interview, Morad El Hattab states that, according to the census prior to military service in 1963, Jean-Michel Trogneux was then living in Algiers, at 87, Boulevard Camille Saint-Saëns in Algiers (now Bd Mohamed V), where he was a student. He was then 18 years old.
    Excerpt from the census. The notation “Confectioner” could mean that JMT lived at the confectioner’s at this address,
    maybe a friend of his parents… It may also mean that before being placed in Algiers, he had started, or carried out an apprenticeship as a confectioner, under the paternal tutelage (years 1959-61). 87 Bd Saint-Saëns housed a “hotel boarding house, rental any time” (announcement).
    However, Brigitte said that she studied in Algiers:
    
    Article from December 1, 2017 on algerie360.com (another article).

    Brigitte, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, will visit the Central Faculty of Algiers (Benyoucef Benkhedda University), where she would have memories. Indeed, Emmanuel Macron will make an official visit to Algeria on December 6 as part of his tour in Africa. According to our information, the Algerian authorities have been informed of the desire of the first lady of France to visit the Fac Centrale d’Alger, where she would have studied. At present, we have noticed that the university is being embellished. According to our information, the work targets more particularly a room that Brigitte Macron would like to visit.

    In the end, Brigitte Macron did not make the trip and the presidential visit to the college was cancelled in extremis (article).

    You don’t study at ten, the age Brigitte born in 1953 would have been in 1963. A legend could have her studying in Algiers in the 1970s, but still outside the real world. The staff of the university must have noticed that she did not appear in their registers. It is even possible that Jean-Michel does not appear there either and that this so-called passage at the university is a bluff or an arrangement with reality, like the CAPES. Especially since the date of 1963 is questionable, one year after the difficult peace of Evian!

    However, the sequel presented in Chapter 25, with the boarding school and photos, lends good credibility to a stay of Jean-Michel in Algiers, more in 1961-1962.

23. (A) The Obama precedentThe first of Morad El Hattab’s two revelations (video in the previous Appendix) is in my opinion the more important. It allows us to better understand the Brigitte “legend” and the denial operated by the Macron couple.When I started looking into it last December, I found a 66-page English-language document about Brigitte. And I was surprised to learn in it that Michelle Obama was also born a man. At the time, I did a quick search and as nothing seemed obvious and sure, I had rejected this information.
    

    A preview of the debate. On the left Mickael Robinson, with his friend Barack Obama (disputed photo, comparison with more feminine variant that would be the original, the retoucher is good…). On the right Michelle Obama, née Robinson, with her husband, President of the United States from 2009 to 2017. Is this the same person  ? Yes for this article, no for this one.

    It came back to my mind when it became certain that Emmanuel Macron was going to run for president again. How is it possible to believe that, with such a scandal, the media and the population will continue to consider Brigitte as a woman for another 5 years? The only really convincing answer that came to my mind is this: because there was the Obama precedent. Since the Obama couple succeeded in hiding, with the complicity of the media, that Michelle was born a man, the Macron couple must also succeed. While making people forget that Brigitte is a pedocriminal. This term is used by Morad El Hattab, who cites Article 227-22 paragraph 1 (here), in correspondence with Wikipedia, as we have seen. This is not the case for Michelle Obama, the difference is essential.

    I don’t know if Michelle Obama was born a man and I don’t care, she lives in her corner, with no impact on us. By the quick overview I did (and I don’t want to go beyond that), I find it disturbing that Mrs. Obama was unable to bring a denial (it’s so easy : DNA analysis, blood test…) and it seems to me that there are less factual elements than for Brigitte (it would be less clear also for the physical appearance). On the other hand, I know what it is about Brigitte Macron and we are millions to be concerned by her pedocriminality and the misdeeds of her spouse. We need to get out of a governance based on their lies of all kinds. It has led us to a poorly treated disease, to a generalized piquet with uncontrolled effects, to apartheid and to the despair of too many caregivers. And the public debt, etc. And this perverse couple wants to screw us for five more years, “right to the end” ?

    The precedent is a big plus for Macron. A few articles, like that one, are already finding an argument in it. Those advising him probably relied on it, and specifically one of them, a very special adviser. This is what Morad El Hattab has just revealed to us. He did not think that Mimi Marchand (see Appendix D 10) could have imagined everything so much and he looked elsewhere. Here is what he found (slightly transposed remarks) :

     

    I was looking, in this scenario, who might have prepared this before. I thought, this can’t be right, there’s an American in the loop. But I found a trace in an article in the newspaper Le Monde from 2019 of a man named Joel Benenson. He comes to Bercy [Paris, Ministry of the Economy] in 2015 when Macron is a minister to advise the Macrons on their communication. So who is Joel Benenson? He is the one who handled the construction of the Obama couple.

    Other testimony from the November 2015 Macron – Benenson meeting (lien). Xavier Poussard also talks about this visit [F&D498p6] :

     

    Reputed member of the Grand Orient de France [Challenges, February 23, 2019], it is with a fairly extensive address book that Ismaël Emelien joined Emmanuel Macron at Bercy in 2014. The one for whom he has been working behind the scenes for at least two years will even introduce him as his “closest collaborator” to the influential “spin doctor” Joel Benenson during his visit to Bercy, in November 2015. Introduced by the Sarkozist Julien Vaulpré via the networks of the French American Foundation, Joel Benenson arrives haloed by his success in the 2008 and 2012 American presidential elections, having developed the strategy of selling the Obama couple rather than a program. Let us note here that the more than substantiated suspicions about a transsexuality of Michelle Obama (cf. F&D 487] are today worth to Barack Obama’s wife to be listed in the register of “famous transgenders and transvestites” established by the very informed website on the issue doublegenre.wordpress.com [site in French].

     

    On the left, in February 2014, Emmanuel Macron, accompanying François Hollande to Washington, had dinner with Joel Benenson [article with guest list, photo Mark Wilson, Getty Images]. At right, Joel Benenson, referred to as “Obama’s Guru” in a article in Challenge, was in Paris in July 2019 [photo by AFP].

    “Sell a couple rather than a program“: this is indeed what happened in 2017, we have had the illustration of it multiple times in this file. The Macron strategy was copied from the Obama strategy. Joel Benenson conceived it, Brigitte Macron and Mimi Marchand implemented it, that’s what appears now. “The presidential couple participated very early on, with the help of a vast communication campaign, in its own image-making and peopolization” (article from the Acrimed website of June 5, 2017).
    Joel Benenson was the chief strategy officer in Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign (article). She had lost.

24. (A) Possible link between Emmanuel Macron and J.-J. TrogneuxNumerous are the families with biological fathers who are not the declared fathers, so much so that French legislation prohibits DNA comparisons, except in exceptional cases. In families with an obscure past, such as the Trogneux and Macron families, it is therefore legitimate to ask questions about biological filiation. These filiations are not unknown to the families, at least to the progenitors, and are kept as heavy secrets more or less shared, with estrangement or friendships kept but shaky.Many Internet users have been struck by a strong resemblance between Emmanuel Macron husband of Jean-Michel / Brigitte and Jean-Jacques Trogneux son of Jean-Michel (Chapter 11) to the point that some, many also, consider that they are half-brothers by their father, which means that Emmanuel would be the son of Jean-Michel / Brigitte his wife. This is notably the thesis of the NBI file (Appendix A 37). It seems plausible to me but I have little faith in it, extremely little even, as explained in Conclusion, to the year 1977. The present hypothesis, suggested by a correspondent, Maria, gives another explanation to the physical resemblance : they would be first cousins (or half, one common grandparent and not two). The age of the relationship, 1950, and the ignorance that Jean-Michel Trogneux could have had, make the probability of this nephew-uncle scheme better than that of son-father, but the clues going in this direction are, as we will see, currently few and very fragile. Here is the hypothesis of Maria:
    

    Manette [Germaine Arribet, married Noguès, Emmanuel’s grandmother] was able to have a relationship with Jean Trogneux [Jean-Michel/Brigitte’s father], and thus give birth to Françoise [Noguès, Emmanuel’s mother]. She could be certain of this because of the absence of relations with her husband during this period. Françoise would then have had a special place. Through their biological father Jean Trogneux, with whom her mother Manette would have kept some links, Françoise Noguès and Jean-Michel Trogneux would have met very young. This explains both their long friendship [Chapter 24], the resemblance between Manu and Jean-Jacques and the attitude of Manette during the liaison Brigitte-Manu. Somewhere, the fruits of his great passing love…

    
    Hypothesis of cousinship explaining the resemblance between Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux

    
    Left: 60% is low for a father-son relationship.
    Center and right: could Jean Trogneux be the biological father of Françoise Noguès? Low again.
    As for the half-brothers hypothesis, this hypothesis of first cousins, although possible, seems to me unlikely for two reasons. First the physical resemblance between Jean Trogneux and Françoise is fair (confirmed by Betaface above), secondly we have no clue that Jean Trogneux, living in Amiens, and Germaine / Manette Arribet, living 30 km away, in Poix-de-Picardie (where Françoise was born) knew each other in 1950 (Françoise was born on December 8th 1950). Oh yes: when Manette went to buy macaroons in Amiens! Or an associative relationship, like the Rotary Club… A cousinhood could therefore explain a physical resemblance as much as a sibling relationship. And this notion of resemblance is subjective and easily leads to errors, as for the photo of the 1977 mock gay pride.

    May 15. Did Germaine Arribet, who had obtained her baccalaureate in 1935 (clipping from the press, link) and who had married Jean Gabriel Noguès in 1939 (Chapter 17) leave to teach in Algeria ? Would she be this “Mrs. Noguès” from Algiers appointed in the village of isly as assistant teacher“, mentioned in a press clipping, opposite, from the Alger Républicain of September 15, 1945 (link) ? Thus, a meeting with Louis Auzière is possible, then through him with Jean Trogneux. There is certainly no strong evidence of such a double meeting between Louis and Jean as well as between Louis and Germaine, but if Jean brought his son Jean-Michel to Algiers around 1961, it is probably because he knew people there…

    [Right photo: Abaca]

25. (A) The birthplaces and living quarters of Auzière childrenOn April 12, Chloe Frammery (end of Chapter 26), in addition to her revelation about the Royal Palace, in Alsace, communicated, without formal proof, the following information, delivered by a Social Security retiree :
    • there is no record of an André (or André-Louis) Auzière at Social Security, which confirms that he is a phantom character,
    • there is no movement on Jean-Michel Trogneux’s carte vitale for the past 20 years, which confirms that he has changed his identity,
    • Catherine Audoy worked in New York and Los Angeles in the 1980s, which we already knew about New York.
    • Two of the three Auzière children have an annotation in the margin of their vital records, without knowing more. This means that they were adopted or changed their names, but it is possible that any other, less frequent, cause is possible. Logically, the two children in question would be the eldest Sebastien and Laurence born in 1975 and 1977, in similar family conditions, Tiphaine being born later in 1984.

    At the same time a correspondent sent us the following documents, already reported by Sylvie Bommel:

    • André Auzière is on the Croix directory, from 1977 to 1983.
    • An Auzière (probably André) is on the Issy-les-Moulineaux directory in 1975.
    
    Telephone booths in Issy-les-Moulineaux 1975 and Croix 1977. And extract from the one in Croix 1983.
    The births take place in Amiens, but the advertisements of the “Courrier Picard” also indicate the place of residence of the mother. Let’s take the case of Laurence:
    
    On one side (civil status) she was born in Amiens. On the other side, in the Amiens newspaper, she was born at 1 bis rue Gloriette, which is the address of a maternity hospital in Amiens, for parents living “Croix (Nord), residence Flandre, rue Holden, 91“. So there is no contradiction, the place of birth is indeed Amiens. This is in fact what is marked on the convocation of the complaint against Natacha Rey. And, for the location, it matches what is marked in the directories.

    This raised another question: why, living in the suburbs of Paris (Issy-les-Moulineaux) or, later, that of Lille (Croix), did their mother come to give birth in Amiens ? The answer will be found a few weeks later…

26. (A) Jean-Michel Trogneux in the US in 1969We saw this at the end of Chapter 8 : “In her third video, Natacha Rey reports that Brigitte recalled living alone in the United States during Neil Armstrong’s 1969 moon landing (link). She would have been 16 at the time, what was she doing there alone at that age? Jean-Michel, on the other hand, was 24 years old and this stay then appears much more likely.”
    This April 14, a correspondent brigittologist sends me three photos with this message :

    I think we need to dig into the Stonewall Inn in 1969 and also the first gay pride in 70. Brigitte Macron said she was in the US when Armstrong walked on the moon…. And only one month later…. Anyway here are some pictures of the event in Greenwich village at the Stonewall Inn. It deserves in my opinion further research…

    
    Jean-Michel Trogneux’s face does not appear in these three photos, but a brigittologist might find it in others… The page on the Stonewall riots in New York City gives details of events that created the first militant gay support groups, before the first Priesthood March in 1970.

    
    Two more photos: Stonewall Inn in 1969 (link) and the first gay pride in 1970 in New York (link).
    “Snoopy’s lunar questions…“, Facial.Cupping tweet from April 3, 2022.

    AFP photo by Ludovic Marin and drawing by Ignace

27. (A) Jean-Michel Trogneux and Adam Meyer Music HallIn a >>>video>>> of 1 hour and 35 minutes on April 12 from “Journalists Without Borders,” Chloé Frammery reveals (at 3:40 p.m.) that she learned from a retired Social Security correspondent that from 1984 to 1989, Jean-Michel Trogneux worked in a cabaret, the Royal Palace in the commune of Kirrwiller, 25 km from Truchtersheim (other revelations are discussed in Appendix A 25). There is no physical evidence provided, but it appears, at first glance, likely, chronologically consistent. The History” page of the “Royal Palace” website provides the following :
    

    In 1980, Pierre Meyer decided to create a small performance stage in the room of the family restaurant he had just taken over with his wife Cathy. At first, he presented shows by seven artists, recruited in Paris, once a month, then very quickly every weekend. In 1989, he invested the equivalent of 1.5 million euros in the construction of a 200 m2 stage […] In 1996, the establishment was renovated. A new complex of 800 m2, renamed the Royal Palace comes out […]

    This postcard shows us the “seven artists, recruited in Paris“. None of them bear a resemblance marked with Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux (Betaface comparisons: 1 2 3 4).

    May 13. It turns out that by this time Jean-Michel’s hectic life of the 1970s had been replaced by a wise life in Truchtersheim as a mother of three and a French teacher (Appendix A 36). It therefore appears very unlikely that Jean-Michel played in this Music Hall. Moreover, we have found no new evidence to suggest this. Is this another false lead cleverly suggested or put together?

    Photos Jean-Marc Haedrich / Sipa and EPA (link). 77 and 45 in 2022.

28. (A) The Trogneux family, tennis, Le Touquet and AlgeriaJean (Georges) Trogneux, Jean-Michel’s father, was president of the Amiens Tennis Club, president of the Picardy Tennis League from 1964 to 1976 (link) and, from 1971 to 1978 (he was 62 to 69 years old), founding president of the CROS (Comité Régional Olympique et Sportif) of Picardy, whose headquarters was first located in Amiens (link). Sports journalist Lionel Herbet paints a portrait of him, featured on a page on the picardie.franceolympique.com  website:
    

    In the wake [of the creation of the sports region of Picardy], will be created the Regional Olympic and Sports Committee of Picardy. The first president is a great gentleman, from a very well known family in the regional capital: Jean Trogneux who is also the president of the Picardy Tennis League. We knew this man of a great courtesy, always smiling. He embodied a certain style that has now disappeared. Jean Trogneux was not a man of ground. Rather a person made to evolve at a higher level in rather political spheres [he was notably close to Gilles de Robien, mayor of Amiens, MP, minister]. Jean Trogneux remained in office until December 1978. He had decided to resign two years before his mandate expired, before the Moscow Games. Games that were marked by the forfeiture of some nations like the United States.

    
    Thus, contrary to what says (this day April 18) the page of Wikipedia on the company Jean Trogneux (extract), it is not the son Jean-Claude who held this role, even if he was also president of the club of Amiens, taking up the torch, involving himself in the public life of Amiens, unlike his brother Jean-Michel. This is their father Jean, whose middle name is Georges. His involvement in tennis is very old. He himself was a tennis player. He played doubles tournaments with Léonce Deprez, who was the champion of Flanders tennis cadet before becoming mayor of Le Touquet from 1969 to 1995 and from 2001 to 2008 and who married, in 1974 and in 2007, Brigitte Trogneux (with what verifications of legality ?). The Macron couple, owners of a beautiful villa in Le Touquet, still have the strong support of the former mayor (link).

    
    To the left, Le Figaro of August 31, 1938 (link). On the right, Le Touquet center court before World War II (link).
    Jean Trogneux also became president of the Le Touquet tennis club in March 1974. This passion for tennis spread to the Trogneux family. A daughter Trogneux has indeed participated in competitions in Amiens and Algiers, at least from 1947 to 1950 :
    
    
    “Alger Républicain“, September 7, 1947 (French championship at Roland Garros),
    September 19, 1948, August 20, 1950 (Gallica) and September 17, 1950 (link). Also, for the latter date,
    in “The Moroccan Vigil” for the French championship at Roland Garros (link, extract)
    So who is this Miss Trogneux? The initials “A M” leave little doubt: it is Anne-Marie, Jean’s daughter, born on July 9, 1932. She was 14 years old in 1947 and 17 in 1950, which is compatible with the cadet (14-15) and junior (16-17) categories. Although she was followed in an Algerian newspaper in 1950, she was only assigned to Algiers in the first cut of 1947. And this could be a mistake because the day before, on September 6, 1947, another newspaper wrote “Mlle Trogneux (Amiens) beats Miss Tothe (Parts)” (link).

    While the possibility of Anne-Marie Trogneux’s presence in Algiers in 1947, appears slim, in this case with her father or a close relative, given her young age, it appears certain that Jean-Michel was there at least from 1961 (if he is really in the class photo at the beginning of Chapter 25) to 1963 (if the date of the military census is to be believed). This raises many questions. For example: was there a pastry shop in Algiers associated with Jean Trogneux ’s establishment in Amiens?

    I searched on Geneanet for a brother or cousin of Jean (Georges) Trogneux who went to Algeria. He had a first cousin (same grandfather Marc Trogneux), Ernest Trogneux, born in 1878, who was a pastry cook (link). In 1905, when he married, he worked in the pastry shop of his half-brother Jean (Arthur) Trogneux, the father of Jean (Georges) (announcement). He had a daughter Renée, born in Amiens in 1906, died in Salouël, in the Oise, in 1993, married in Amiens in 1935 to Maurice Philippe (link). Did they live in Algiers?

    

    
    Additional newspaper clippings with tennis competitors named Trogneux (Jean and Anne-Marie) : 1 (1929) 2 (1931) 3 (1933) 4 (1934) 5 (1934, photo at right) 6 (1935) 7 (1936) 8 (1936) 9 (1937) 10 (1938) 11 (1938) 11 (1939) 13 (1939) 14 (1939) 15 (1940) 16 (1942) 17 (1942) 18 (1943) 19 (1943) 20 (1947) 21 (1948) 22 (1950). Jean (Arthur) Trogneux, the father of Jean the tennis champion was a champion of the iron ball game (clippings : 1 (1934) 2 (1934) 3 (1935) 4) (1936). Jean-Claude Trogneux, The tennis player’s eldest son, Jean-Michel’s brother, was into cycling (article).

    All this leads to other questions. Were the Trogneux children sent to Algiers to escape the consequences of the war ? Amiens was destroyed in 1940, at the Liberation in 1944, everything had to be rebuilt in the city center… Did the family have relations in the aristocratic-colonial milieu in Algiers? In particular, did Jean Trogneux know Louis Auzière, who stayed there from 1943 to 1945 (cf. Appendix A 18) ? We know that Jean-Michel had a niece who died young (Appendix A 11). Could she be a daughter of Anne-Marie born in Algiers ?
    April 20. A correspondent brings us details about the years of the Second World War in Amiens :

     

    Was Jean-Michel Trogneux conceived under the American bombing ? If we go back 9 months before his birth, we get May 1944. And it is precisely at this period that the Americans bombed the city, which had already been bombed in 1940. This page tells about the bombing of Amiens on May 27, 1944 by the Americans, 4000 houses had been destroyed. We notice that the Trogneux establishments remained open during the German occupation (ads : 1 (1940) 2 (1943) 3 (1943) 4 (1944) 5 (1944) (18 rue Duméril is currently 12 place notre Dame). And Jean Trogneux was still competing in tennis. However, there had been the battle of Amiens from May 20 to June 8, 1940. From May 20, 1940 to August 31, 1944, Amiens had suffered four years of occupation by the Wehrmacht with its attendant humiliations, shortages, restrictions, despoilment, stigmatization, repression, deportation and extermination. It was liberated by the British and the FFI on August 31, 1944. 25% of the city was destroyed, including 60% of the city center. With the population fleeing the city, only about 5,000 inhabitants remained out of a population of 95,000 in 1939 (page Wikipedia). Had the Trogneux family, in part, fled this hell ? Perhaps to Algiers ?

     

    Renaud Dély and Marie Huret published in 2020 the book “Les Macron du Touquet-Elysée-Plage“. It reads  “I first sympathized with Brigitte’s parents, well-to-do bourgeois shopkeepers; then it was with the boys Jean-Claude and his brother Jean-Michel that I have woven confides Jacques Noyer, 93, the dean of Le Touquet, promoted to bishop of Amiens (1987-2003)” (link).

29. (A) Emmanuel Macron in elementary school and 6th grade
    Jean-Michel Macron opens the door to the house where his son Emmanuel grew up.
    Does the presence of two adults and the large number of students mean that there are two classes together ?
    Emmanuel Macron, bottom right, in cours préparatoire (1983/1984) at the Delpech school in Amiens.
    This April 19, the newspaper “L’Alsace” published a article about Jean-Michel Macron, Emmanuel’s father. This one communicated a class photo of his son in preparatory class. While it was surprising that he did not have a school photo until the fifth grade, this is an element that could go against the hypothesis, expressed in Appendix A 14, that “Emmanuel may not have been in elementary school, having been home-schooled by his grandmother.However, even if this photo appears very likely, the doubt does not appear to be removed. A correspondent points out to me that “At the time Germaine Arribet [his grandmother Manette]was 67 years old and I think that after that year of first grade, he was home schooled and raised by the matriarch. It’s clearer at La Providence Middle and High School in Amiens. Gérard Banc, a former teacher, made the album of the 150 years of the association of former students of La Providence, dated May 26, 2018, from which are extracted the photos of Emmanuel in 5th grade (Chapter 17) and in 6th grade, opposite (repeated in a link TV RTS).The fact remains that the questions raised by Xavier Poussard are therefore still relevant. In addition to what has already been taken up in the Chapter 17 and the appendices A 10 and A 14, let us add : 

    [F&D500p4] This relationship [between Emmanuel and his grandmother] is akin to family instruction, now violently opposed by the government. [F&D499p10] In “Les Macron” [Fayard 2017], it is stated that Emmanuel Macron was educated at the elementary school in his neighborhood, the Delpech school. No class photo from these elementary school years is known [now we know one]. Then, when he entered middle school, the child would have been schooled at La Providence where he would have immediately bonded with Renaud Dartevelle [link], the main witness of these “green years” who however evokes a “quite superficial relationship“, while specifying to Hervé Algalarrondo to have been received “at his parents’ house“. About these years of college, it was reported that Macron did his internship at the end of the third year in Paris, in publishing, at Bordas. And it was during the presentation of his internship report that he would have caught the eye of “Brigitte“…

    But the most surprising, exceptional even, is elsewhere  no photo of Emmanuel with a family member is known before adulthood. Why? Given the photos where he is younger (Appendix A 15), a correspondent wonders if, at his young age, he was not considered a girl. The answer seems to me to be more in his close relationship with his grandmother Manette (Appendix A 14).

30. (A) What role did Jean-Louis André Auzière  play?As this case progressed, the person Jean-Louis Auzière, André for his middle name, became more important. His probable presence in Algiers around 1962 with Jean-Michel Trogneux, his presence as a groom on the photo of the first wedding of Brigitte “Trogneux”, the questions about his nephew André(-Louis), his complaint for defamation against Natacha Rey, with the help of the lawyer of “Brigitte”, make him an active and essential accomplice of the “Brigitte Macron” deceit.
    Jean-Louis André Auzière, possibly in Algeria around 1962, at the 1974 wedding, and recently.
    To the right a complete copy of his birth certificate with marginal mentions of the 1st marriage in 1966 with Susan Spray,
    the divorce in 1996, the 2nd marriage with Catherine Audoy in 2003.
    Jean-Louis André Roger Auzière was born in Meudon on February 28, 1943. His father was Marius Alexandre Auzière born in Paris 9th on February 17, 1893, aged just over 50 years, his mother was Germaine Marie Bary, born in Paris 18th on April 4, 1896, aged almost 47 years. As seen in Appendix A 18, the newborn then has as siblings Louis 26 years, Suzanne 24 years and Marcelle 20 years.The age of the mother, pregnant at 46, questions. At 46, after a year of trying, around 10% of women have a child (source). This opens the possibility of a biological mother who refused the child. Perhaps her daughter Marcelle, who “chose her husband by default, her first choice having died in the war” (link). Marcelle is buried with her parents Marius and Germaine in St Jean de Bournay (photo, link). Because of his late birth, Jean-Louis may have been very sensitive to the family problems of Jean-Michel and his late-born little sister. Still, Jean-Louis was very close to the children, his age, of his brother Louis, who graduated as a major from the Ecole Coloniale in 1935 (cutting out of the press), having followed a career plan across Africa from 1940 to 1963. Among Louis’ six children is the famous André(-Louis), first husband of “Brigitte,” who is supposed to have been born in Eséka, Cameroon, on a different February 28 than Jean Louis, the one in 1951. We suspect that he was substituted for a daughter whom we named Proba and then Brigitte in the Chapter 27. There we considered that Jean-Louis was often referred to by his middle name, André, which explains the confusion. We will come back to this. Before that, let us follow, with Xavier Poussard, the professional career of this André, Brigitte Macron’s fictitious first husband, and then the career of Jean-Louis. 

    André Louis Auzière (or André-Louis) [F&D501p6] He was a bank executive at the Crédit du Nord in Lille, then director of the Banque française du commerce extérieur in Strasbourg. (“As if he had not existed,” see Chapter 9).Jean-Louis André Roger Auzière [F&D501p9] : In contrast to André, there is no shortage of sources for writing the biography of Jean-Louis, André, who was born on February 28, 1943 in Meudon (Hauts-de-Seine), the same day – a February 28 – as André Louis. After studying law and foreign languages, Jean-Louis Auzière made a career in the luxury goods industry, where he successively held positions as sales and marketing director at Fabergé (1972-1978), then Revlon (1978-1981), before joining Parfums Grès as General Manager (1981-1987). Still in the same sector, he launched and chaired Indipar in Jouy-en-Josas (Yvelines), while also joining various professional organizations, having served as General Secretary of the Federation of crystal and mixed glass factories and of the Table Arts Committee. He has been a French Foreign Trade Advisor (1983 and 1996), Knight of the Order of Merit (2012), and was sworn in before the Court of Appeal of Caen in February 2021, thus becoming a judicial conciliator in the jurisdiction of Lisieux (Calvados).

    I have been sent various documents concerning André(-Louis) Auzière, here they are:

    • 1951, a extract of André Louis Auzière’s birth certificate.
    • 1974, a extract of André’s marriage record to Brigitte. Also in extract from decennial tables (in 2 pages, groom and bride).
    • 1984, a extract of Tiphaine Auzière’s birth certificate.
    • 1992, a document of 20 pages with the signature of André, “depositary of the funds paid” in page 20 (link).
    • 2001, a 33-page document with the signature of André, “deputy regional director of Natexis Banques Populaires” in page 6 (link).
    • 2003, a 7-page document on a post-inheritance sale of an apartment, without a signature, listing Andre Louis and his date of birth in page 4.
    • 2004, a document of 17 pages of Information for Health Professionals with André’s signature, representing Natexis Banques Populaires, in page 14 (link).
    • 2012, a 62-page document of articles of incorporation for an SCI with the notation of André and “Brigitte,” without signatures in page 41 (link).

    And also a 14-page document from 1996 with Jean-Louis’ signature, “previous” on page 7 (link), which allows for a comparison of Andre and Jean-Louis’ signatures.

    We are almost certain that André Auzière does not exist, especially because of the wedding photo, the fact that “Brigitte” was born a man, that we have no photo of him, except for the one of someone else with the lawnmower etc. Among the documents presented above, those of the birth and marriage could have been the subject of a recent forgery with the means of the State. This appears to be much more difficult to achieve for the next five documents, from 1992 to 2014.

    We saw in Chapter 27, especially for the phone book, that Jean-Louis went by his middle name André. This could be an illusion for the 1992, 2003, 2014 documents, perhaps with a fake birth certificate. But the documents from 2001 and 2004 still raise questions, showing the existence of a banker André Auzière in the exercise of his work. Like a secret agent with two professional identities, could Jean-Louis have, from time to time, with the support of his hierarchy, worked for a bank? One exceeds there the framework of our case and one has reason to wonder about the purpose poursuvi. This professional career is, however, as ghostly as the role of husband of “Brigitte” and father of the three Auzière children, as Xavier Poussard points out [F&D501p7] (Jol Vil’s May 18 tweet):

     

    In the archives of the banking sector, André Auzière has left even fewer traces than in memories. Not a report, not a symposium, nothing that makes him exist [except, now, these two documents from 2001 and 2004]… Except for the episode of the lawnmower previously recounted, the memories are white. It’s like an episode of Black Mirror where the President’s offices have found a way to penetrate the brains of his former acquaintances to erase everything. More than a “ghost“, would André-Louis or André, Louis Auzière be a fictional character? No, however, concludes Sylvie Bommel, who refers to a document (not reproduced), a marriage certificate that “specifies that André is a stagiaire hors cadre (a status which, in banking jargon, corresponds to junior executive) […]“.Was this document created a posteriori and opportunely placed on Sylvie Bommel’s route?

    Yes, there would have been documents created after the fact, especially for the family setting, but others in the professional setting question a double professional life in slight dots… The character of André Louis Auzière, with his profession as a banker, was probably created around 1988 (cf. Chapter 27), it was necessary to give him a minimum of consistency… And the Trogneux and Auzière families have strong support.

    The above, with the notion of secret agent, has caused a correspondent to react who brings us this light :

     

    I’m leaning towards something related to the secret service for a one-time mission that corresponds to reversing the order of first names. Sometimes they also use deleting a letter in the name or replacing one letter with another. Also keep the birthday. It’s not a “legend” per se, but it avoids cross-referencing and if the cover falls, it allows the mistake or the name of use to be invoked without embarrassment. The fact that Jean-Louis Auzière was a French Foreign Trade Advisor (1983 and 1996) could correspond to functions held in parallel “under cover” and “a minima” at the BFCE i.e. Natixis, under a slightly modified identity.

     

    André Auzière in the telephone directories

    Years	Person – City – Street
    1975 1977	Auzière A – Issy-les-Moulineaux – 1 rue Claude Matrat
    1977-1984 1985	Auzière André – Croix – 5 resid. Flanders
    1982 1983-1985 1986	Auzière André – Strasbourg – 26 rue Lorraine Meinau
    1983 1984-1990 1991	Auzière André – Truchtersheim – 4 rue des coquelicots
    1990 1991-2002	Auzière André and Brigitte- Amiens – 17 rue St Simon
    2003-2004 2005	Auzière André and Brigitte- Amiens – 66 bis rue Boucher de Perthes

    The double presence of André(-Louis) Auzière in Croix and Strasbourg in 1983-1984 and in Truchtersheim and Strasbourg in 1984-1985 (thus triple in 1984) catches the attention. This is the time when he is supposed to work at the BFCE bank (Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur, to be compared with Jean-Louis, foreign trade advisor) in Strasbourg, a job that appears to be real (for Jean-Louis…). There is also a parallel between the career paths of Jean-Louis André Auzière and that of his niece Brigitte Auzière, who, at the time of the birth of her children in Amiens, lived in 1975 in Issy-les-Moulineaux, for Sébastien, in 1977 and 1984 in Croix, for Laurence and Tiphaine. A first-degree reading of the directories thus leads one to believe that André Auzière and his wife Brigitte continuously lived together from 1975 to 2004, except that there are two confusions, that of Jean-Louis with André, that of the niece Brigitte Auzière with the other Brigitte who would become Brigitte Macron, as explained in the Conclusion Chapter 31.

    May 15. Jean-Louis Auzière has a taste for beautiful objects and arts, it appears likely that he made, for the wishes of the year 1969 a small original book his artist name André Auzière :

     

    To the left, a recent book by Odette Ducarre, published by Robert Morel, featuring the book by André Auzière (link). At right, two pages from this book. It was part of the “Collection O” : “Round books, created by Odette Ducarre, 96 pages, 6 cm in diameter, bound by a 3 cm diameter brass ring, patent pending for all countries” (link).

    The multiplicity of countries treated, with above a particularly precise knowledge of Cameroon, point to the son of Marius and grandbrother of Louis, who traveled through Africa. This would show that already in 1969, Jean-Louis was called André Auzière.

31. (A) Father Auzière was an intelligence officer in TunisiaWe are not done with the Auzieres and Algeria. After mentioning in the previous Appendix the possibility that Jean-Louis Auzière, Jean-Michel Trogneux’s great friend, had been a secret agent, we were surprised to discover that his father Marius Auzière, had been a “interpreter and cipher officer“, thus a military intelligence and secret service officer in Bizerte in Tunisia :
    

    On the left, Journal Officiel de la République française of July 2, 1937 (link).
    Center, 1933 and 1939 Navy directories. La présence est continue de 1927 à 1939 (lien).
    Right, Germaine Bary and her husband Marius Auzière (link generatedanet)
    On Geneanet and in the 1936 census, Marius is noted as a certified public accountant, another way to love numbers. Agathe Couderc, in a article entitled “Technical intelligence and military secrecy: the French Cipher during the first months of the Great War,” explains  “The Cipher service is responsible for protecting Allied messages from any enemy reading. It also has the mission to break the enemy codes and make readable the encrypted messages intercepted by the wiretapping services and TSF.“, with the conclusion  “the culture of secrecy, specific to the activities of intelligence in general, has passed into the mores of the Cipher “.

    Marius Alexandre Auzière (1893-1975) had married Germaine Marie Bary (1896-1979), a seamstress, in the midst of World War I, on April 20, 1915 in Paris 11. Germaine Bary’s mother, Willhelmine Anna Steuer, had been born in Germany and married Achille Bary in 1885 in Paris (link). Does this imply that Marius had a knowledge of the German language ? We saw in Appendix 18 that Marius and Germaine’s family lived in Meudon in 1936, where Jean-Louis was born in 1943.

    Bizerte is about 780 km from Algiers by road and Marius had no reason to travel there before the Second World War. This one turned upside down all the organization in place. Marius Auzière’s activity at the “Chiffre” was highly sensitive. He may have been in contact with the American allies and therefore the American secret services. In addition, Algiers was in 1944 the place where the Provisional Government of the French Republic was established (link). Intelligence-related activities and ties to the American allies must have been very intense at this time. Marius, who was 50 years old, was able to settle in Algiers, joined by his son Louis from 1943 to 1945, as seen in his career plan (reprinted below). The latter had settled in Algiers (probably at 12 rue Mulhouse, a small maid search ad, link) as an assistant utility administrator (cut of press, link). Father and son were able to work together, sharing intelligence contacts. With some leftovers for the last-born Jean-Louis…

     

    Louis Auzière, his career plan. His appointment in the Official Journal of French Equatorial Africa of November 15, 1947 (link)

    Louis Auzière, Marius’s eldest son and Jean-Louis’s older brother, was a “special agent” of France known for his colonialist dirty tricks, especially against the UPC in Cameroon when it rigged elections, as seen in the Appendix A 18. Would the Auzieres be secret agents from father to son? From Marius to Louis ? And why not from Marius and Louis to Jean-Louis ?

32. (A) 1991, did Brigitte Macron obtain her CAPES in Strasbourg?On April 25, I was sent documents that shed light on the passage of Brigitte Macron, then named Brigitte Auzière, in Strasbourg at the Lycée Lucie Berger. The subject has already been dealt with in Appendix A 5, with falsified documents that cast doubt on the “legend” that Brigitte Auzière had, for several years, been a literature teacher in this establishment, even though she lived in the commune of Truchtersheim.An extract from a “Bulletin des anciennes élèves et des amis du collège Lucie Berger“, dated March 1992, tells us that at the end of the 1990/1991 school year, Brigitte Auzière obtained her CAPES (“Certificat d’aptitude au professorat de l’enseignement du second degré“) in Modern Letters. The doubt we had on this subject is thus removed.
    This means that Brigitte Auzière had probably passed the written and oral tests of the CAPES in June/July 1990. The following school year 1990/1991, she was a trainee teacher. The photo below shows her with her colleagues, also trainees if we are to believe their age :
    More surprisingly, a list of former teachers tells us that Brigitte Auzière would have taught at “Lucie Berger” from 1984 to 1991. In what capacity ? To do some replacements ? The official “legend” had her starting only in 1986. The doubts expressed in Appendix A 5, do not allow us, at present, to believe that she was a full-time teacher for so many years.
    
    It was then at the beginning of the school year in September 1991 that, with tenure, Brigitte Auzière, born Jean-Michel Trogneux, began teaching in Amiens, at “La Providence” (Chapter 15 and Appendix A 10).

    However, there is still one area of puzzlement about this CAPES: it is in modern letters when it was supposed to be in classical letters, as indicated in a 2018 article written by Olivier Pichon for eurolibertes.com, questioning even more :

     

    After studying classical letters and a master’s degree in these subjects (dissertation on “L’amour courtois“), she brilliantly passed her CAPES in classical letters, which allowed her to teach French at the prestigious Lycée La Providence in Amiens. […] In detail, there are several minor variations. […] One of the media writes: “Brigitte Macron’s qualifications: agrégée de Lettres Classiques“. DISCUSSION – The blurring of dates. No matter how hard we look: Nowhere can we find the date on which Brigitte Macron was recruited to La Providence, nor the precise date on which she ceased her duties there; Nowhere do we find the date on which she would have obtained the CAPES in Classics ; Nowhere do we find the date on which she would have obtained the title of agrégée in Classics. […] By searching exhaustively on the internet, one learns for sure that Brigitte Trogneux is not a holder of the CAPES, but of the CAFEP. […] However, the CAFEP [Certificat d’Aptitude au Professorat de l’Enseignement Privé] exam was only created in 1995.

    In this jumble of information, one comes to wonder if the one in the March 1992 newsletter is really reliable… Certainly, the research evoked by Olivier Pichon concerned the CAPES of classical letters when it was that of modern letters… We saw, moreover, in Appendix A 6 that the Elysée website indicates a CAPES in modern literature (extract). It even says that “she began her career in Paris and then Strasbourg“. Ah, Paris ?
    
    Once admitted to the CAPES (written-oral) exam in July 1990, Brigitte should have joined the public teaching corps and done her internship in a public school. The collège Lucie Berger is private. The photo, however, questions and leads one to believe that these are indeed trainee teachers. In fact, it does appear that Brigitte Auzière obtained a CAFEP, also known as CAFEP-CAPES (link), or rather a pre-1995 equivalent, as it is confirmed that it did not exist before 1995 ( link). The March 1992 newsletter would have used the acronym CAPES because it is better known to the public and because it would be an equivalent. But strictly speaking, Brigitte Macron would not have the CAPES in modern literature. And even for the CAFEP, there are still big doubts according to Sylvie Bommel (link video at 3 min 55), in addition to the date less than 1995.

    April 27. A correspondent probably brings me the solution, Brigitte would have a CAER (Concours d’Accès aux Echelles de Rémunérations) according to this extract from a article by Yves Verneuil entitled “La formation des enseignants du privé depuis la loi Debré – le professionnel et le confessionnel –“. Thus, there is neither CAPES nor CAFEP but a CAER erected, without saying so, as the equivalent CAPES by the March 1992 bulletin. Brigitte Macron’s CV on the Elysée website therefore appears false. As for the Maîtrise de lettres on “L’amour courtois“, no trace of it has been found so far.

33. (A) 1973-1984, Jean-Michel Trogneux manager of Picardie MetalWe saw at the end of Appendix A 20 how we learned that Jean-Michel Trogneux had become manager of the Picardie-Métal company “from June 12, 1973” on this advertisement from the “bulletin des annonces civiles et commerciales” of 1973 :
    Other announcement. 1976 Yearbook. Other yearbook from 1979.
    Blangy-Tronville is a commune in the Somme region located 10 km from Amiens. The dossier of societe.com on the company Picardie Métal is almost empty, the creation date in 1973 is even ignored (and replaced by 1900). The essential being indicated in the extract below :
    Blangy-Tronville, Mail Street (Street View 2017, link)
    Thus, from 1973 to 1984, Jean-Michel Trogneux would have sold hardware. such would be the craft, having “regular contact with the public,” that transsexual Véronique claimed in 1977 (Appendix A 19). It’s less surprising when you consider that Anne-Marie Trogneux, the tennis champion, Jean-Michel’s older sister, married Gérard Boulogne, a merchant in materials and various equipment (link). And also when you know the owner of the Picardie-Metal warehouse land: 

    The Blangy property belonged to Jean (Georges) Trogneux and his wife Simone Pujol, as indicated in A directory from before 1973, “Trogneux J confis av Mail“, the subscriber’s trade being confectioner, they are indeed Jean-Michel’s parents, the pastry cooks of Amiens. They lived there occasionally, in a villa on a vast 3,142 m2 plot of land with a warehouse. In 1973, the couple installed their youngest son Jean-Michel, aged 28, perhaps returning from the USA, who set up, or was offered, a hardware business project, which we can assume corresponded to a previously acquired qualification (Chapter 25). Lodged at goodwill by daddy-mummy in Blangy during the first year, a lease is established in May 1974 for 15 years in favor of Picardie Métal. Picardy Metal lease with Jean Trogneux, extract from the mortgages. The domain, is subdivided into smaller plots in 1983, proof of the stop of the company Picardie Metal at this date (it is dissolved the following year). This subdivision looks like a subdivision company, to sell or rent to several third parties. The warehouse (plots 139 and 142) was sold to SCI Blangy-Tronville in 1983. To the left is the Picardie Metal warehouse. On the right, the land register, at the end of Rue du Mail, with the 1983 division (link) (this is the total of the surfaces of these parcels, which makes 3,142 m2) + view by Google Map (link).

    What if this stewardship was a cover ? During its 10 years of existence, this company seems to have had a concrete activity since the directory of 1976 reports (opposite) a “J. Delarue”, representative of Picardie Métal. Apparently Jean Delarue died in Amiens in 1993 (link).

    The marriage of Jean-Michel Trogneux with Véronique Dreux on November 24, 1980 in Blangy-Tronville is a confirmation of his establishment in this commune. In the same way, the closing of this company in 1984 is very coherent with the birth of the last children of Jean-Michel in January and February 1984, with the beginnings of the professorship of Brigitte Auzière and her moving to Truch. Finally, with the proximity of Amiens, the Picardie Métal episode fits coherently into Jean-Bri-Bri’s biography.

34. (A) In 1988, Jean-Michel had already become Brigitte…
    The above document, which we did not grasp until May 9, 2022, is from page 41 of 62 of the 2012 document in Appendix A 30. It shows that on June 4, 1988, Jean-Michel Trogneux had already become his sister Brigitte Trogneux and that her father Jean Georges knew this.
    Previously, we placed this substitution at the later date of the summer of 1990, between the electoral leaflet of 1989 with photo of Brigitte Auzière, the first Brigitte, and the start of the school year in September 1990 with the second Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux. How to reconcile these contradictory information? Considering that this information, written in a document of 2012, would be false appeared very unlikely, as it would be very cleverly done. This led us to a new understanding: to consider that Brigitte Trogneux would be in the picture on the 1989 leaflet and that she would have started to teach at the “Lucie Berger” high school in Strasbourg before 1990, as the “legend” says. In this case the double transformation of Jean-Michel into Brigitte and of Brigitte Auzière into Brigitte Trogneux would have taken place between 1984 and 1986, between the birth of Tiphaine and the first school year of the new teacher.It is on this new basis that we have analyzed more precisely the 1989 leaflet and the presence of one or both Brigitte Auzière at “Lucie Berger”, in Appendix A 36. As for the involvement of the Trogneux parents, we will see in Appendix A 43 that it is much older than 1988…
35. (A) John Bri: one person, three identities!How does a person live when he has two identities, in this case one male and the other female ? Brigitte has imprisoned Jean-Michel in a corner of her brain and she lives ignoring him. Yet he is there, since he is not dead… And there is his memory, the traces he left behind… and this allows comparisons, the discovery of extraordinary similarities, both physical and biographical. If, on the face of it, a person can have two identities, they can only be extraordinarily close, to the point of breaking the law. Here are some new characteristics.
    1. Voter IDsOn the site online public service, one can find these two voter registration certificates, evidence of fraud :
    2. Social Security numbersJean-Michel has a Social Security (SS) number assigned at birth. But Brigitte? If this SS number exists, it should be compared with the number on her birth certificate to verify the consistency of the two numbers match.The birth certificate for Brigitte Marie Claude Trogneux (beginning of Chapter 28) shows a record number of 640, which means that 640 children were born in this commune between January 1, 1953 and April 13, 1953. So there were about 180 births per month that year in Amiens, and his order number in April 1953 should be around 80. This monthly birth order number is present in the SS number, of the form “2 53 04 80021 xxx“, it is the three digits xxx (80021 corresponding to Amiens, the commune of birth, see page Wikipedia) (the last two digits don’t count, it’s to check, link).Brigitte’s SS number must exist or it would be illegal. Her xxx number must be greater than 80 to not create a duplicate.April 23 supplement. Following the publication of the above, it appears that Brigitte Macron’s SS number meets the two criteria of consistency and non-duplication presented above.

       May 24. The validity of this social security number and birth certificate number (and the copy of the certificate seen in Chapter 28 Part 2) seems to be an actual validity, confirming the new hypothesis that Jean-Michel had a younger sister Brigitte in 1953. The undeclared (or erased…) death would have allowed the reactivation of this identity. The same person, whose role is essential at the highest level of the French state, has two social security records, two voting rights…

       September 7. In commenting on the version 4 of the family tree at the end of Conclusion, we point out that Jean-Bri-Bri has taken on a third identity, that of Brigitte born Auzière, who, from father, has transformed him into the mother of his children. Jean-Bri-Bri is a real identity vacuum cleaner! If the real mother remained alive, which everything leads us to believe, it would imply that it was necessary either to manufacture a new identity for her, or, by a game of musical chairs, to usurp another identity again…

    3. Jean-Michel and Brigitte file a complaint together against Natacha ReyAt the beginning of Chapter 26, we saw the document that informs Natacha Rey that she is being summoned to court by five people, who are only four, since Jean-Michel and Brigitte, one and the other, are named there. Assuming that this summons is processed, will the French Justice system swallow such a deception, or, having established the truth, will it launch a new procedure for misleading justice? And more…

     

36. (A) The real news from Alsace and the 1989 flyerThis Appendix is a counterbalance to the Appendix A 5 where some Alsatian news appeared to be false and cast doubt on what the “legend” says, which, from 1984 to 1990, had the future Brigitte Macron living in Truchtersheim and teaching French at the “Lucie Berger” high school in Strasbourg.Let’s recall below the March 1989 tract and extrapolated photo already shown in Chapter 7. We estimated in Chapter 27 that this person was Brigitte Auzière, the niece of Jean-Louis Auzière. But wouldn’t it be rather the future Brigitte Macron ? The 1988 document shown in the Appendix A 34 was along these lines. The Betaface comparison below, of 75% and 74%, shows that it could also be attributed to the second Brigitte :
    There is another version of this leaflet, which appeared in the FR 3 documentary “Brigitte Macron, a French novel“. The photo there is of better quality and the same Betaface comparison passes, with this shot, from 75 to 86% and from 74 to 79% :s
    It is surprising that in the site FR3 version, tract and list mention occupations while in the FR3 TV movie, tract and list do not. The documents in the TV movie seem triturated, perhaps to anonymize. And let’s not forget that the flyer seems to survive in only one known copy, so with an editable photo….

    In addition, we have tried to reconstruct the years that French teacher Brigitte Auzière was at “Lucie Berger”, using photos of the teaching staff in the years 1984-1990. We have undated images from the FR3 TV movie “Brigitte Macron, a French Novel” and dated photos published in two newsletters of the “Ancients and Friends of Lucie Berger,” the page 8 out of 40 of the 2018 bulletin (link), with the year 1984-1985 and the page 33 of the 2021 bulletin (link), with the years 1983-1984, 1984-85, 1985-86 and 1990-1991. Now the two photos from 1984-1985 are not the same, the first without Brigitte Auzière, the second with. The TV movie brought us another undated photo, which we know to date from 1989-1990 (photo whole with date). Shifting photos 2 and 3 in the 2021 bulletin by one year, to avoid the duplicate photo, we get, with some uncertainty about the dating of the three central photos :

    
    1983-1984, 1984-1985, 1985-1986
    1986-1987, 1987-1988 unknown, 1988-1989 unknown, 1989-1990, 1990-1991
    Brigitte Auzière is absent from the first two photos and present in the following ones. If we can still have doubts about the year 1984-1985, it now appears proven that she taught at Lucie Berger from 1985 to 1990. And it is indeed Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux. As the coexistence of the two Brigitte Auzière appears very unlikely, it would be Brigitte Trogneux, future Macron, who would be on the leaflet of 1989.
    This led us to significantly correct the Chapter 27 Part 2. It was not in 1990 that Jean-Michel became Brigitte, it was between February 1984 (birth of Tiphaine on January 30) and August 1985 (start of the school year in early September 1985). This date of August 1985 can be advanced to August 1984 (according to the dating of the newsletter of 2021) or moved back to August 1987 (because of the two missing photos, 1987-1988 and 1988-1989).

    Such a step backwards would be in line with the “legend” of Brigitte Macron according to which she only started teaching in 1986 (according to Wikipedia, among others). Sylvie Bommel in her book “Il venait d’avoir 17 ans” goes in the same direction, with a gradual entry into the profession :

     

    She learns that the college of Truchtersheim is looking to replace a French teacher who must be absent for a few weeks, neither one, nor two, Brigitte is in. She had never given a private lesson before, but discovered that she loved teaching and, even better, that she was gifted. The students love her. Brigitte has found both an audience and a profession. Without a CAPES, however, it was impossible to land a tenured position in a public school. Luckily, private schools abound in the land of the Concordat and the storks. Brigitte was recruited by the Protestant college Lucie Berger, located in Petite France, a charming district of the Alsatian capital along the Ill River.

    This account, the two photos noted 1984-1985 and the two missing photos therefore cast serious doubt on a start at “Lucie Berger” as early as 1984. Not everything in the Alsatian “legend” is false, but not everything is accurate. Finally, let us recall that the Elysée website presents another version (the third…) : “she began her career in Paris and then Strasbourg” (extract).

37. (A) The NBI file, its strengths and weaknessesThis file was originally positioned, on February 11, at the beginning of the now splintered Chapter 26. At that time, it could have been positioned in Appendix A 8. As of mid-September 2022, four months removed from its April-dated version 2, it retains great interest and is cited in several parts of this folder, including the entire Appendix A 16. It is also aged, for not taking into account the latest documentary input.On February 11, 2022, a new file was published, on the occasion of Jean-Michel’s (now Brigitte Trogneux’s) 77th birthday, on the secure messenger Telegram. This document, which we call “NBI File“, can be downloaded by clicking on this title link :The dark side of the Macrons (in pdf format, 9 MB), now in version 2 of April 8, with 91 pages (instead of 54).
    File produced by NBI (No Brain Inside, “a citizen’s think tank“) and L’Ermite ZeQeFan. No version 3 published.
    
    Above, page 1 illustration and presentation. Below, image signed by NBI.
    While Brigitte’s youthful male identity now seems to be a given for those in the know, the analysis focuses primarily on the Macrons. As the cover image suggests, this NBI file points in the direction of a paternity link between Jean-Michel and Emmanuel, thus one of the hypotheses here developed in Chapter 23, which we hardly believe in. An uncle-nephew hypothesis, developed in Appendix A 24, seems to us somewhat more plausible. The authors make a close analysis of the interviews feeding the legend, especially those of Emmanuel’s parents in order, beyond their astonishing evolution, to bring out characteristic elements that allow us to approach the hidden reality. By a different path than the one developed here, relying in particular on astonishing remarks of Françoise Noguès towards Brigitte (page 27 : “the friend like I have no other, we have the same affinities, the same priorities, we tell each other everything“), they argue that Jean-Michel Trogneux and Françoise Noguès have known each other for a long time, probably before Emmanuel’s birth. So we don’t see this as a tangible new element making us abandon the scenario described in this file, less “indicible“The analysis gives too much importance to a wrong dating (1958/1959) of the family photo and to an element that is certainly new, but fragile : the indication (page 15) in an article that Jean-Michel Macron “is today divorced from Françoise Noguès, the President’s mother, with whom he had two children, Laurent and Estelle“. The absence of the word “others” in “two other children” appears to be an editorial blunder by a journalist who must have only a superficial idea of the situation.

    What is reinforced is the near absence of the official father, Jean-Michel Macron, in Emmanuel’s upbringing, raised probably by his grandmother Manette and, somewhat, by his mother Françoise Noguès, apparently more occupied with her official household, with her husband and two other children, Laurent and Estelle, who are virtually unaware of Emmanuel’s existence.
    As for the story at the beginning of the file, about an Arthur Macron murdering his fiancée in 1938, it is intriguing, but the relationship to Emmanuel can only be a far cry (especially considering the 4 and 52 trees on this page).

    In short, this dossier further undermines the “legend” of Brigitte Macron, describing, with an alert pen, the implausibility of her weaknesses. It also insists on a possible father-son affair between Jean-Michel Trogneux and Emmanuel Macron, but on the basis of a weak argument, almost out of a desire to address “the unspeakable.” In particular, it lacks the construction of a real scenario that would support this hypothesis, which future clues may yet validate. However, the new discoveries, since April, do not go in this direction…

38. (A) Jean-Michel Trogneux in Beauvais“In Le Courrier Picard, on November 15, 1982, is announced the birth of Jean-Jacques Trogneux, son of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Madame, née Véronique Dreux. Two addresses are mentioned: 1, rue Delambre in Amiens (stronghold of the Trogneux family) and 17, rue Saint-Pierre in Beauvais, where Véronique Dreux ran the “Tentations” store between 1981 and 1987” [F&D503p4]. Another announcement (below) will be published in Le Courrier Picard to announce the birth of a sister of Jean-Jacques, Valérie Trogneux, born on February 20, 1984 in Amiens, with the mention of the same two addresses.
    1981, birth of the company “Tentations” [F&D503p8], 1982 phone book, 1984 birth announcement
    In 1982, Jean-Michel Trogneux is present on the Beauvais phone book at the address 4, rue St Pierre, across the street from his wife Véronique Dreux’s “Tentations” confectionery and haberdashery store at number 17. They would later live at this #17 (birth announcement in 1984, above). It is therefore likely that after the wedding of November 24, 1980 in Blangy-Tronville, the couple settled there to manage this store created in May 1981. This will last until 1984 at the latest for Jean-Michel, and until 1987 at the latest (closure of the establishment, link) for Veronique, with the divorce on June 17 and the closure of the store.We will continue in Appendix A 47 the presence Jean-Michel Trogneux, and even more so his wife and children, in Beauvais and its suburbs. 

    Places where Jean-Michel Trogneux lived Beauvais, the prefecture of Oise, is 66 km south of Amiens, halfway to Paris. In March 1984, Jean-Michel lived in Beauvais with his wife Véronique Dreux and their two children Jean-Jacques and Valérie Trogneux. His three other children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière live in Croix, near Lille, with their mother Brigitte Auzière. In 1984, or a little later, Jean-Michel moved to Truchtersheim, near Strasbourg, with his three Auzière children, and from then on he passed himself off as their mother… And the trips to Honfleur (Appendix A 42).

     

39. (A) 2007, Jean-Michel signs Brigitte Trogneux: a blunder?Following is a signature “B Trogneux” dated May 25, 2007. It is made by the same hand as a namuscrit note and a signature of Brigitte Macron in 2017, as evidenced by the handwriting analysis :
    So far, everything appears normal since “Brigitte Trogneux” is supposed to be the maiden name of “Brigitte Macron” and, since May 25, 2007, after her divorce with André-Louis Auzière and before her remarriage with Emmanuel Macron, she is indeed Brigitte Trogneux.The first signature turns out to be exceptional, however, because it appears on a document that Brigitte Trogneux should not be a signatory ! It is the original report (filed with Infogreffe) of the extraordinary general meeting of May 25, 2007 of the “Société d’Exploitation des Etablissements Arasse“, with the signature of the two designated tellers  Jean-Michel Trogneux (2) and Jean-Alexandre Trogneux (1). Below in A, we can see their two signatures (1, 2), but, just before them, appears that of Brigitte Trogneux (0), yet nowhere mentioned in the document and who is not reported present at the meeting. There is a second copy of these minutes, the report duplicate, also submitted to the autograph session. But, on this duplicate, everything is back to normal, with two signatures for the two tellers, below in B.
    On the left, Jean-Michel Trogneux’s signature “2” is shortened. Here it is in full, on the 1980 marriage certificate.
    Notice that the entwined J and M form a B, which looks suspiciously like a revealing confession…
    We have looked for an explanation, and this one seems the most likely:

     

    This general meeting of the Arasse company, a family business, takes place in its headquarters, in a room in the rue des Vergeaux in Amiens. It is May 25, the vacations are approaching, the atmosphere is relaxed. The participants, members of the Trogneux family, know each other very well, nobody is embarrassed by the fact that Jean-Michel is present under the aspect of Brigitte. We are in 2007, it has been about 25 years that the whole family is aware. The meeting goes smoothly, all the good decisions are taken without conflict, and we gradually go into pre-apéro mode, gags and jokes starting to colonize the seriousness of the notary. Signing time comes in the midst of an aperitivo transition. A pen is slipped into Brigitte’s right hand, and she keeps her glass of bubbly in her left hand. She signs, as she is so used to doing as a teacher. It is then that the treasurer, who remained on his first glass, realizes that Jean-Michel made a mistake and that he has inadvertently affixed his female signature. Sapristi! What to do? The decision is quickly made to limit ourselves to asking the clumsy teller to add, while momentarily regaining his momentarily regaining his senses, his old claw Jean-Michel. There is little space left, so much the worse if it overflows in margin. And for the duplicate, no more blunders, we stay on two signatures… Nobody will pay attention to this detail, we think then.

    Those who do not believe that Brigitte and Jean-Michel are the same person should provide a more plausible explanation than this one…

40. (A) Emmanuel Macron’s mother: mostly false leads…The following hypothesis was proposed at the beginning of Chapter 23. It was based on the presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux in the photo of what was initially considered the 1977 gay pride. When this presence turned out to be false, especially since it was not really the first gay pride, this hypothesis could only be rejected. Here it is for the record.
    

    On the left photo, the fly, proudly put forward, appears padded, the Adam’s apple is not very apparent, there is no trace of beard and on the right photo the chest appeared discreet. Above all, the resemblance between the photo on the left and the one in the center is striking enough to raise the question of the confusion of identity of the two people. This set in motion a process of reflection that led to the opening of this new hypothesis.  Hypothesis rejected (after rejection of the 1977 photo)

    This photo comparison sat for 2 or 3 days without really catching on. In particular, I didn’t publish it in the Appendix, it seemed silly to me. And then, Lionel Labosse published it on January 28 on his page titled “#brigittegate : analysis and comparison documents“. Lionel was cautious  “Personally I don’t have too many opinions on these documents, or if I do I wish not to influence the reader by expressing them. Some are convincing until proven otherwise, others probably less so…“. Following the remark of an Internet user, an exchange began exploring the consequences of the same identity of person. The absurd then became plausible… And Lionel added on his page that this comparison could be “a bomb, or a damp squib“. In fact assuming that Emmanuel Macron’s mother, Françoise Noguès, is this gay pride person, implies that : Jean-Michel Trogneux and Françoise Noguès have known each other for a very long time, at least 1977, the date of this photo, disturbing coincidence, Emmanuel was precisely born in 1977, a year when, as a result, his mother was pregnant, the person in the photo does not appear to be pregnant, or would be in the early stages of pregnancy or after it. What is the reality ? The photo is dated June 25, 1977, Emmanuel was born on December 21, 1977. His mother would therefore be three months pregnant. It is possible… a child raised by a mother who thinks she is a man may not have a family photo, no photo with his mother-father, and this is the case of Emmanuel, we saw it in Chapter 17 where it was a strong questioning. I found this last point particularly compelling. Indeed the mystery of Brigitte’s opaque youth had been solved by the question “If it’s a man ?” [F&D501p9] resulting from the meeting of Xavier Poussard and Nathasha Rey. There, in symmetry, the mystery of Emmanuel’s opaque childhood would be solved by the question “If his mother acted like a man ?“. We then asked ourselves the question “what obstacle is there to this hypothesis of a mother with the appearance of a man ?” On the spot, our little citizen team answered none, hence the first title. Two days later, on January 31 (actually the night before), we found this obstacle : Françoise Noguès appears shorter than the 1977 protester. The potential use of heels or a slope of the street does not allow to be sure. Another clue is that Françoise Noguès’ chest is less “discreet” than estimated in the previous comparative photo. It is therefore likely that she is not in the 1977 photo and that the resemblance of the faces is coincidental.

    
    A little further on, in the same Chapter 23, another hypothesis had been stated, without much conviction. It also concerned Emmanuel Macron’s mother and the photo of the 1977 mock gay pride. For the same reason as the previous hypothesis, it was quickly rejected. So here it is, too, for the record.

     

    After the previous addition on January 29, here is the one on February 6, with these photo comparisons : The woman with the tambourine from 1977 and Françoise Noguès, Emmanuel Macron’s mother in 2017. Similarities, including the same pout in the left and right photos, and also potential differences such as the earlobe, smaller waist in 1977. Here we come to compare Emmanuel Macron’s mother with a participant of the 1977 gay pride other than the one at the beginning of this chapter. If the comparison appears better, it remains uncertain. The reader will be able to judge this, as he will be able to judge the complementary elements brought on February 12 in the following chapter. Hypothesis rejected (after rejecting the 1977 photo)

    Two photos ( 122 bis) from the 1977 gay pride event, previously reported in Chapter 14.

    However, it does not seem useless to recall these two rejected hypotheses, because they tried to highlight the role of Françoise Noguès. It could indeed be that Emmanuel Macron’s mother had known Jean-Michel Trogneux for a long time and that she probably knew Pastor Doucé, as was explained in Chapter 24. But, beyond a few clues and another hypothesis developed in the Appendix A 25, we have found nothing really conclusive that would authorize implicating Mrs. Macron-Noguès in the biographical falsifications of Jean-Michel Trogneux. .

41. (A) Interrogations about the three Auzière children
    This Annex, created in mid-February 2022, was first created in Chapter 26, under the title “Were Brigitte’s three Auzière children born in the United States ?“. On April 12, following the creation of Chapter 27 with the “scenarios Proba“, the supposed mother of the three Auzière children, Sebastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, is no longer supposed to be Catherine Audoy but Proba / Brigitte Auzière, which led to a partial rewrite.Then, in mid-February, the #brigittegate experienced new jolts. While Emmanuel Macron was still postponing his declaration of candidacy for the presidential elections, a lawsuit was launched against Natacha Rey and the one who first interviewed her on December 10, Amandine Roy. A complaint, announced two months earlier, finally arrived. It included five plaintiffs, Brigitte Macron née Trogneux, her brother (!) Jean-Michel Trogneux and her three children Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière. We noticed that all of them were presented with their dates of birth in Amiens:Note that the address in Amiens indicated of Jean-Michel Trogneux is a simple mailbox in a building where nobody knows this gentleman (see Appendix A 8). Another subject of astonishment  is the content of the complaint. It relieves Natacha Rey (details in Appendix D 7) and even reinforces her investigation (and now that of all brigittologists…). Indeed, he is in no way accused of lying (defamation etc.), but only of intruding into the private lives of the complainants. While they have spread their lying life to the general public, while Natacha Rey only uses public documents (as we also do on this page), without ever having bribed a burglar to get hold of an old photo album… It is hard to see this complaint succeeding, it seems to be more about scaring the newspapers that would take over. And, indeed, the courageous media seem rare…On February 18, the day after learning of this complaint, Natacha Rey revealed the following questions about the birthplace of the three Auzière children (at the time Catherine Audoy was believed to be the “probable mother“, qualified here as the “true mother“) 

    I have long suspected that the Auzière children were born in the United States, more precisely in New York, where former flight attendant and painter Catherine Audoy (the real mother) resided.For the official version, Tiphaine would have been born in Amiens in 1984, while at the time her parents were supposed to live in Strasbourg. She had to obtain a certificate of French nationality before taking the lawyer’s exam in 2009, a procedure that is only justified when there is a doubt. I’m pretty sure she has dual French-American citizenship, as do her brother and sister. The fact that the nationality of the 3 Auzière children is not mentioned on the court summons, while that of Brigitte Macron and her double Jean-Michel Trogneux is specified, only reinforces my opinion.

    However, the best knowledge we have of the announcements and the context accredits rather that Tiphaine was born in Amiens, in similar conditions to her brother and sister.

    On the side of the geneanet site of fraternelle.org, the most richly informed, already consulted in Chapter 7 and in Chapter 17, the record of Sebastien is empty, his presence is only reported, without even his first name. On the other hand, Laurence’s fiche is well filled out and Tiphaine’s fiche is of a rare overabundance. In these last two cases, the precision on the birth goes as far as quoting the act, its number and its marginal mentions:

    
    This is enough to put a stop to all those who would contest these acts! But why protect yourself against such an improbable challenge? As mentioned before, one can put what one wants on one’s Geneanet database, invent acts, their number, their content… Finally, the contribution of such details feeds the doubt rather than removing it.

    However, for Tiphaine, the manipulation is less suspect (or rather less well done ?) since it is written: “Certificate of French nationality issued by the Chief Clerk of the Tribunal d’Instance of Lille (Nord) on October 28, 2009 under the n°CNF 930/2009. Mentioned on November 19, 2009 by I. Lecoeur, Civil Status Officer by delegation“. So why give a French nationality certificate to someone born in Amiens of French parents? When, as Natacha Rey says, his parents were supposed to live near Strasbourg ? And why indicate it on Généanet? There, one loses his Latin… And this is probably intentional.

    Preceding these questions, Natacha Rey’s hypothesis appeared, in mid-February, to be consistent. It was believed, based on the chapter 10, that Catherine Audoy was probably the biological mother of the three Auzière children. Air hostess, often in New York, she had been able to give birth in this megalopolis or in Amiens, perhaps not in the same place for the three children.

    This makes us realize that the three Auzière children have also suffered a twisted life, with opaque areas. They therefore maintain, willy-nilly, the false legend that surrounds the president of the Republic. They could rebel, as Canadian President Justin Trudeau’s half-brother did recently (see Appendix D 5), but have preferred, so far, to sink into denial.

    April 12. The probable mother is no longer Catherine Audoy but Proba / Brigitte Auzière, double of André-Louis Auzière, as Brigitte Trogneux is double of Jean-Michel Trogneux. The mother’s trips to the USA appear much less likely.

    May 14. Even Tiphaine, finally, seems to have been born in Amiens. The question about the births is now focused elsewhere  was the mother Brigitte Auzière, was the father declared ?
    
    

42. (A) Honfleur, meeting place of the Auzière and Macron couples?Article from Le Parisien dated November 1, 2018:
    

    The presidential couple is in Honfleur (Calvados) where the head of state has offered a small bath of crowd after having lunch at the Bistro des Artistes in the old town. Questioned by reporters to know if he was tired as implied by several of his relatives, Emmanuel Macron brushed aside any decline in form. “I’m not letting go of anything, I’m just like all our fellow citizens I’m attached to the balance of my family and the habits we have, he explained at the microphone of BFMTV. It’s been more than 20 years that I come to this same café and I will continue to do so. I was there when I was campaigning, I was there last year, I will continue to be“.

    
    [photos from October 31, 2019, above left and below: Laurent Salmon, KCS Presse, link]
    So it would be since at least 1997 that Emmanuel and Brigitte meet in Honfleur. For what reason? What is going on in Honfleur? Why are they so attached to it? In 1997, Emmanuel was 20 years old, it was Brigitte who brought him there. She must have had an old attachment there? Which one? If we can’t find out about Brigitte, let’s ask the question differently  who comes to see Jean-Michel Trogneux every year at All Saints’ Day ? The person, outside his family, who is the most important to him… Here you are, you’re on fire  it’s his great friend Jean-Louis Auzière !

    Jean-Louis Auzière runs the company TOSCA, which is headquartered in Honfleur (links : 1 2 3). His wife Catherine Audoy is a member of the “Contre-Courant” association of artist-plasticians in Honfleur (link). They live in Touques, 15 km from Honfleur.

    
    
    We have no evidence of these meetings, but do you believe that there is, there, a coincidence ? If you don’t believe it, you will agree that this new clue adds to those showing the veracity of what this file tells.
    
    To the left, the Auzière couple at their home in Touques on the Honfleur Coast (end of Appendix D 18).
43. (A) Fictions and Realities of the 1974 Marriage, Part 1 of 2Since January 2022, we have wondered about the marriage of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux on June 22, 1974 in Le Touquet. Did it take place? If yes, under what circumstances? What about the retouched photo published in the press? For we have acquired the certainty, in Appendix A 9, that a montage was made on this photo. Our reflection continued, new clues appeared and our opinion evolved. First at the end of July, with part 1 presented here, then at the end of August with part 2 presented below. On July 29, 2022, we learned of the existence of copies of the “Echos du Touquet” dealing with the marriage, on June 22, 1974, of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux, distinct from those in the BNF (page of June 28 and page of July 12, with a photo of another wedding, which allows for comparison). Even if the hypothesis of a falsification of the library copies was not yet ruled out, we have since questioned the falsity of this marriage, which we had advanced until then.We did indeed have a 1974 marriage record and its entry in the decennial tables (Appendix A 30). If this marriage had indeed taken place, the photo trickery could only date from it. So the wedding had by no means been imagined retrospectively in 1984. It would have been imagined as early as 1974 and could even have been really celebrated and registered in the civil status. Was such a scenario, the contours of which would still have to be defined, possible? It seemed to us that it was, and I presented it here to the readers of this file, submitting it to their sagacity (no objection was raised). I continued thus :
    

    Opposite, a reminder of the wedding photo, with in red the anomalies presented by Natacha Rey in one of her videos. Let’s call BT53 Brigitte Trogneux born in 1953, JMT her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, JLA Jean-Louis Auzière, JMT’s great friend, BA Brigitte Auzière, JLA’s niece, ALA André Louis Auzière, the groom of 1974, supposedly nephew of JLA (cf. genealogical tree seen previously).BT53 died in early 1961 as understood in Chapter 28. Her parents and siblings did not accept her death and did not declare it. For the relatives, they invented a tale according to which she would be alive, gone to study abroad (Algeria, USA ? BT53 would she be supposed to accompany JMT?). As time passed, they needed to show strong evidence of her existence.That’s where JLA comes in. He has his niece BA who has, for some time, been in a relationship with JMT and would like to marry him and have children. With his knowledge of the secret service (Appendix A 31), he devises a rocky marriage that would satisfy both his niece and the Trogneux parents. BA will be the bride, serving as BT53’s clone for this wedding ostentatiously shown to the small world of Touquet, which has had the opportunity to know neither BA nor BT53 and cannot notice the substitution. And JLA will play the role of the groom, holding the role of the groom ALA and, by delegation, that of the real partner of BA, that is to say JMT. The latter is present at the ceremony as the declared brother of the bride and her witness. The Trogneux parents are satisfied: their youngest daughter is “resurrected” and the future children of the fictional couple ALA-BT53, in reality those of JMT-BA, will be their grandchildren. They can continue to make believe in the existence of their daughter BT53, nobody will go and check, since she lives far away, in Croix in the suburbs of Lille. But, from time to time, the grandchildren will be shown. BA is also happy: she will not be a single mother, she has, socially, a husband, her children will have, socially, a father, nobody will go to check her maiden name, nor will they suspect that JMT, who shares her bed from time to time, is not ALA.This solution, twisted and hardly imaginable, but finally, in its own way, brilliant, is accepted. The mayor of Le Touquet, Léonce Deprez, does everything to satisfy his great tennis buddy Jean Trogneux (Appendix A 28). The photo is retouched with the means of the time. And the arrival, from the following year, of the first of the couple’s grandchildren consolidates the subterfuge. Friends and acquaintances, even brothers and sons-in-law of the Trogneux parents, believe it…Did the marriage really take place? Probably, with registration in the civil status, the mayor not being looking… The extract of the marriage certificate would therefore be authentic. The late divorce ending this union also fits into the scenario. Léonce Deprez was mayor of Le Touquet from 1969 to 1995, then again from 2001 to 2008. Between 1995 and 2001, he could not pronounce the divorce. Before he finished his last mandate, he was the (best) accomplice, indispensable, to act the divorce of the union of 1974 before declaring, in 2007, the marriage of Emmanuel and Brigitte. As for the death of ALA in 2019, the means of the State allowed to invent it and to register it in the civil status to complete the manipulations of the parents and the mayor. Finally, it was not JMT who first wanted to reincarnate BT53, it was his parents, with the undeclared death and marriage of 1974. JMT only supported them from 1961 to 1984. In 1984/1985, with the disappearance of BA, he succeeded in conferring, in addition to his administrative existence, a real body to his sister, fulfilling at the same time the will of his parents and his own desire to change sex… In this new scenario, the role of the Trogneux parents becomes the driving force. The complicity of the mayor of Le Touquet is essential: he covers the marriage, the divorce and the remarriage, allowing the falsifications, or more precisely the non verification of identity. One question remains. Who is the bride in the 1974 photo? BA or Susan Spray (JLA’s first wife)? The latter probably would not have agreed and, reviewing the Appendix A 9 (especially, at the end, the drop shadow analysis), the bride’s image would not be from the same photo as the groom. Would it then be BA, of whom we would finally have a photo? Or would it be a photo of a third person, probably Monique Trogneux, sister of Jean Michel (strong Betaface resemblance of 82%, opposite), coming from his wedding in 1963. She would have accepted. This photo is intended to bluff, its legend too. Is the mention of the religious marriage also a bluff? Or is the priest also an accomplice? And did the wedding take place with as much pomp as the article suggests? The late publication, 6 days after the ceremony, erased the reference points, the absence of the first names also. Bluffing yes, but to what extent? As for the strange absence of the first names in the title of the photo, it could be explained as follows: it is above all a Trogneux-Auzière marriage, because it is both that of ALA with BT53 and that of JMT with BA. It is enough, by a game of photocopies, to reverse “Auzière” and “Trogneux“… Another meaning: it would be JLA and Monique Trogneux on the photo. And again: it would be a coded message for future brigittologists !

    Overall, it remains fair and it was a notable advance in the understanding of the case : we had discovered the primary role of Jean and Simone Trogneux in wanting to reincarnate their youngest daughter. As for the questions asked, they have, for the most part, lost their relevance, cat we have brought answers to them in the Appendix A 48, the second part of this one, with the adoption of a new hypothesis for the person playing the role of the bride in the photo.

44. (A) The logic of this scenario Jean-Michel – BrigitteThe scenario presented in this file, especially in its Conclusion, is a sight to behold. By skimming over it, a contrarian may consider it to be ranting without real evidence.No proof of the death of the child Brigitte Trogneux in 1961, no proof of the disappearance of Brigitte Auzière around 1984, or even of her existence, until we find one in Chapter 30. This is true, but that is precisely the crux of this case : everything was done to make this evidence impossible to unearth. This camouflage, for several decades, remains effective. The few people who know about it remain walled up in the silence of their complicity. However, unless one is indignant about not believing in the official mushy version, as former minister Roselyne Bachelot did (“It’s infecting“, opposite photo by Stéphane Lemouton, article), there are very real facts to prove the existence of deep flaws in the biographies of Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux and that of André Louis Auzière. Let’s recall them :
    • We know almost nothing about Brigitte Macron’s youth. The three photos we were shown are of three other children (Chapter 7). We only have definite records of her life from 1984 onwards.
    • We know almost nothing about Jean-Michel Trogneux since 1984. We know little more than the presence of his signature on a few documents or his name on directories. This disappearance of Jean-Michel in 1984-1985 when Brigitte appears has no official explanation.
    • Almost nothing is known about Brigitte’s first husband, André Louis Auzière. The three photos officially attributed to him are of three other people who have been identified (Chapter 9).

    Roselyne Bachelot brushes all this aside, but there are many who refute the official farbia to rely on a scenario that explains the reality of the facts, even if it means not being entirely sure. And the Hypothesis Table retained shows that we are not. Our judgment is nuanced and is likely to evolve, as it has evolved over the months of making this case in 2022.

    (Ignace)

    With these initial observations, Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard deduced, in 2021, that Jean-Michel had turned into Brigitte. And all those who had doubts and questions followed them. And this started to make some noise. The lack of official reaction, if not an obtuse denial in mid-January 2022, confirmed the deductions. There also came, in mid-January, a confirmation proved by a technical analysis of comparison of vocal spectra : Brigitte Macron and the transsexual Veronique, interviewed in 1977, are the same person (red box).

    We had therefore, from the beginning of this file, in January 2022, a solid foundation of facts considered as sure : Jean-Michel became Brigitte, André-Louis did not exist, the youth of Brigitte is fabricated. But around this base, we had other hypotheses to confirm : the identity of the people in the family photo of the 1950s (Chapter 6, Appendix 11), that of the mother of the three Auzière children (Chapter 10), the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon (Appendix A 20), Brigitte’s presence in a Strasbourg high school (Appendix A 5)…

    In this same month of January 2021, the Elysee indirectly showed some new pieces, civil status certificates (Appendix A 7, Appendix A 30). At first, guessing where they came from, we thought they were fakes. As time passed, we realized that we were wrong to dispute some of them. Xavier Poussard was right when he said that the difficulty was to distinguish the real from the fake. From May to July 2022, our perception evolved by attributing more reality to Elysee documents. Here are the main ones:

    • The family photo from the 1950s is true, showing the parents and their six children. This means that Brigitte Trogneux as a child did exist as a daughter, that Brigitte Macron, born Jean-Michel Trogneux, usurped her identity. And that this little girl probably died young in a dramatic way, Brigitte Macron seems to allude to this, but referring to the death of a niece (Chapter 28).
    • The marriage certificate in 1974 is true. It was indeed recorded in the civil registry at the time. And, strange as it may seem, it is consistent, for the couple who fathered the children from that marriage, with the non-existence of the father and the masculinity of the mother (Appendix A 43). This means that the Trogneux parents were consenting and therefore made it appear that their daughter Brigitte was still alive.
    • Brigitte Macron, née Jean-Michel, married to André Louis, was indeed a teacher in Strasbourg (Appendix A 36).

    In doing so, our investigation took two decisive turns. First on April 11, with version 21.0 (Chapter 27), the discovery of the existence of Brigitte born Auzière as the mother of the three children. Then on May 27, with version 24.0 (Chapter 28), the revelation that Jean-Michel had assumed the identity of his deceased sister. Since then, each new element has come to be easily integrated into the plot that we had then imagined in broad outline, allowing us to be more and more precise. This easy integration of the new documentary contributions is an encouraging symptom.

    The most sensitive point, in September 2022, remains the mother of the three Auzière children. In several steps, in the Chapter 27 and in the Chapter 30 we understood that her name is Brigitte Auzière and that she is a niece of Jean-Louis Auzière, the friend Jean-Michel Trogneux. Other reasons, not yet mentioned, go in the same direction :

    Other clues that Brigitte born Auzière, the 1980 bride, is a niece of Jean-Louis Auzière

    As a witness, Brigitte born Auzière showed an identity paper designating her as such. What if it was a fake ID ? If so, the strong involvement of the Auzière family in the 1974 marriage would be incomprehensible. We have seen that the fictional character of André Louis Auzière can only be made from her : the same parents, the same birth in Eséka… Conversely, an ex nihilo creation of André Louis Auzière would have meant, for his fictitious parents Louis and Renée Costes, to have agreed to appear in the marriage and to claim to have one more child. Six and not five. All this to please a friend of the grand-brother Jean-Louis? They did it on the insistent request of their daughter Brigitte. To consider her as a boy, in a fictitious way, was much more in their ropes: by replacing a girl by a son, they remained at five children. Louis’ and his father Marius’ knowledge of the secret service made it possible to measure the risks taken and to consider them manageable. In addition, for Brigitte Auzière, herself, it allowed her to be called, once married, the same way she was called before, making her life easier. We therefore retain the very strong belief that the mother’s maiden identity is Brigitte Auzière, daughter of Louis and Renee Costes. It would be very surprising if new clues could come later to contradict it.

    Like a police investigation, we have incorporated all the known facts into our concluding scenario. It is certainly complicated, but it is consistent. We don’t know of any other as complete, and we doubt that there could be another one very different. Unless Roselyne Bachelot can show better logic…

45. (A) The Elysee’s fluctuating defense in the face of stubborn realitiesThe accusations made against Brigitte Macron since 2021, particularly that of identity theft, are very serious and implicate the complicity of the president of the Republic himself, as well as that of the Trogneux parents, siblings still living, and that of the three Auzière children. Faced with such accusations, if they were unfounded, anyone would file a complaint for defamation. No: neither Brigitte Macron nor anyone from her very close family has done so so far. Only the Auzière couple has gone, as far as they are concerned directly (Appendix D 18). The only complaint filed by Brigitte, her children and her brother Jean-Michel, was for invasion of privacy (Appendix D 7). It is a blustery, by the fragility of the motive (a private life so public) and by the double involvement of Jean-Michel and Brigitte.The only official reactions are two television interviews of Brigitte Macron, dating back to mid-January 2022 (Chapter 14). In front of complacent interviewers, she played the card of victimization and outraged innocence, going so far as to compare herself to a teenager being bullied at school. She mocked what she suggests are sultry and conspiratorial comments. As for Covid, one should not inform oneself, go on the Internet and look for the truth… We have just seen, in the previous Appendix, that the friend Roselyne Bachelot plays on the same register (“It’s vile“), like all the celebrity press and well beyond (Libération in Introduction or Le Monde in Appendix D 19). By naming two horrible shrews, Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy, as the only ones responsible for this nauseating rumor, Brigitte Macron has deceived her audience into believing that there’s nothing serious going on and that it’s only about the die-hards of social networks. The major media also minimize the impact of the revelations (14,000 tweets for Le Monde, that’s all), although some go a little further, citing Faits & Documents. Mentioning a paid magazine that wants to be confidential, by classifying it as extreme droute, is less embarrassing than, for example, giving the web address, accessible to all, of a genealogist’s site.As surprising as it may seem, such a primary denial has, until now, pretty much worked. The echo of these revelations, even if it is very important and if it has touched a good part of the French population, and a part of the world’s population as well, remains in the unwritten and unspoken media, as far as the substance of the case is concerned. Even highly critical sites, such as France-Soir or Le Courrier des Stratèges (hesitantly, Appendix D 26) do not dare to engage in a resolute challenge to the doxa, as if the apocalypse would be unleashed against them if they broke the omerta. More than the Elysian denial, it is the media silence that hides the truths. The troubles encountered by Natacha Rey (the two complaints) and Xavier Poussard (Chapter 5), then Eric Verhaeghe (end Appendix D 26), are frightening…
    February 18, 2022, a regional newspaper, Le Midi Libre (link). The assignment mentions neither transsexuality (transidentity for Wikipedia),
    nor does it refer to transphobia, which for Wikipedia is an “aversion toward transgender people.” It’s okay to have an aversion to lying…
    As we saw in Appendix A 7 (Moadab and Blanrue) and at the end of Appendix A 20 (Gallice jewelry store), the Elysée activated another, more indirect level of defense. Its aim, especially with brigittologists, is to muddy the waters, to imagine falsified documents or troubling similarities, so that contradictory versions are created… In short, to sow doubt, to complicate and weaken the file.
    As we enter August 2022, we realize that changes have been made to the fraternal.org base of Geneanet. As explained in its Wikipedia entry and, less clearly, in its site named “The People’s House,” The Fraternal is an association of Freemasons. As already pointed out, this base seems to us to be more or less teleguided by the Elysée, the fiche of Brigitte Macron being particularly dithyrambic. We read that “In France, her appearances trigger enthusiastic ” Brigiiiiiiiitte ““… Not a word about her potential masculinity, it is even written twice that she is “of female gender“. So the Fraternity is “brigittolous” and it is curious to follow the evolution of this base. Precisely, the fiche of Jean-Michel Trogneux, already presented in Appendix A 20, has just been modified in June or July 2022. It is much more fleshed out…

    Below is the sheet before modification and, opposite, after.

    Strangely, everything revolves around the question “Is Jean Michel Trogneux really untraceable?” and the text even takes information from Facts & Documents by managing to evade that Jean-Michel would have turned into Brigitte ! With for conclusion : “Jean Michel Trogneux was therefore alive in 2007. … “, forgetting that in 2022 he has, as a matter of public record, filed a complaint against Natacha Rey (mentioning it, it would be necessary to explain the reason …). In addition to the Gallice jewelry store, still associated with Jean-Michel, blatant untruths are asserted : Généanet would be “alimenté par un quel utilisateur qui aurait souscrit à une offre premium” (premium or not, anyone can open and manage a base, but without being able to touch those of others) and “any premium user can modify a page“, leading one to believe that Natacha Rey would have hacked the site of La Fraternelle !! Moreover, it is embarrassing for a genealogical page, Jean-Michel would not have been married and would not have had children…

    So we have here a new strategy, which consists in answering the only question “Where is Jean-Michel Trogneux ?“, erasing that this one has become Brigitte (but sparing us anyway the “little fatty” of Moadab, Appendix A 7…). This shows, to say the least, that the affair continues to spread and that the Elysée is forced to back off a bit… until, under popular or foreign pressure, the media dam finally breaks…

46. (A) 1974-1984 Interrogations on the Auzière-Trogneux FamilyWe saw in Appendix A 44 that the 1974 marriage actually involved two couples: the fictitious one registered at the civil registry office and that of a real family, which lived briefly in Issy-les-Moulineaux and then, for a longer period, in Croix in the suburbs of Lille, until 1984. The three children were born in Amiens: Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, the first one when the mother lived in Issy-les-Moulineaux, in 1975, the two others when she lived in Croix in 1979 and 1984. Two families, then, coexist :
    1. The official family A – T (in the sense of the civil status of the rigged marriage of 1974), with for father the fictitious person André Louis Auzière, represented either by Jean-Louis Auzière (case of the marriage), or by Jean-Michel Trogneux (case of the neighborhood), and with for mother the deceased Brigitte born Trogneux, represented (in what measure ?) by Brigitte born Auzière.
    2. The biological family T – A, consisting of the biological parents: Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte born Auzière.

    These two families lived at the same time, one fading behind the other according to the context. In particular, we wondered about the birth of the three children. They were born and raised in the biological family. But officially, they could have been born in each of the two :

    1. in the family A – T official marriage, if the declared mother is the deceased Brigitte born Trogneux and if the declared father is the fictitious André Louis Auzière. The children have then the name Auzière of the father. The presentation of the marriage certificate of 1974 would have allowed this subterfuge. We gradually opted for this option.
    2. In the T family – Half-biological, if the declared mother is Brigitte born Auzière and if the father is not declared. The children then have the Auzière name of the mother. Another possibility: the mother and the father are declared and the child has the name of his mother, but this was only possible from 2002 (link). And an in-between: the father does not recognize the child at birth, but later, the child then keeping the name of the mother. We no longer believe in this option, since the discovery of the signature “B. Auzière née Trogneux” (Chapter 29). After her marriage, Brigitte born Auzière continued to lie by presenting herself as Brigitte born Trogneux.

    Everything shows, the place, the announcement, the photo shows that the parents Trogneux are present at the wedding in 1974. It is under their pressure, under that also of his uncle Jean-Louis, guided by his friend Jean-Michel, that the bride then assumes the identity of their late daughter Brigitte.

    In 1984, after the birth of Tiphaine, Jean-Michel, the father, turns into the mother, who fades away. A new family appears, the third, succeeding the other two, with the same three Auzière children. Jean-Michel Trogneux, under his new feminine appearance, has this time taken the official identity of his late sister Brigitte Trogneux. He thus replaces, in this role, Brigitte (married) Auzière, the mother of his three children, taking her name of Mrs. (married) -Auzière. The role of the fictional father André Louis Auzière is, by short intermittence (to ostensibly mow the lawn, to the point of injuring himself, link…), held by Jean-Louis Auzière. The living environment has completely changed, we are in Alsace, in Truchtersheim, where no one knows the antecedents of this family, seemingly banal and friendly.
    This metamorphosis from father to mother in 1984, after the birth of Tiphaine, was accomplished at the same time as the erasure of the biological mother of the three Auzière children. This disappearance is all the more difficult to perceive because it finally began, in part, as early as 1974, when the future mother accepted to be the bride Brigitte born Trogneux. She began, from that moment, to fade away. It was almost 50 years ago, it is not surprising, with the family omerta, that it is so difficult to prove and even imagine its existence.

    It is possible that the Trogneux family had other family secrets that may have, in some way, prepared this one. We can guess at least one : Marc Trogneux, born in 1852, the great-grandfather of Jean-Michel and Brigitte, was born of unknown father (tree). Who knew his father? Was this passed down from generation to generation ?

47. (A) In 1983, Jean-Michel Trogneux lived in La Neuville-sur-OudeuilWe saw in Appendix A 38 that in 1982, the Trogneux couple, Jean-Michel and Véronique née Dreux, lived in Beauvais, at 17 rue St Pierre, and ran a confectionery and haberdashery store there, “Tentations“.
    

    Rue Saint-Pierre in Beauvais. In the 1980s the “Tentations” store was on the opposite sidewalk [postcard]. Now it would stand at the red-hung restaurant [Google Street].

    The second surprise of the notarized document of March 27, 1985, presented in Chapter 29, is the home address of Jean-Michel Trogneux : he no longer lives in Beauvais, but next door, 16 km to the north, in La Neuville-sur-Oudeuil, at No. 10 rue Boulanger. And it’s a beautiful property, or rental :

    
    Such a home suggests a certain financial affluence. This brings us back to the remark expressed at the end of Chapter 11, indicating that Brigitte Macron had a comfortable retirement, well above what one might expect from a teacher. In his younger years, Jean-Michel, before becoming Brigitte, earned a good living. The store “Tentations”, well placed in the downtown area, was able to be successful, especially with businesses.

     

    Left, ad in the “Confiserie” section of the yellow pages of the Somme directories in 1984 and 1985. Before 1984, it was not there. From 1986, the store is absent from the directories. In the center, mention in the white pages of 1984, also from 1981 to 1983. On the right, Véronique Dreux, who was Madame Trogneux from 1980 to 1987, in Beauvais and La Neuville-sur-Oudeuil

    As we did in Appendix A 30 for André Auzière, here is a table that shows our knowledge of Jean-Michel Trogneux’s listings in telephone directories :
    
    

    Jean-Michel Trogneux in the phone books

    Years	Person – City – Street
    1970 1971	Trogneux J. confis – Blangy-Tronville – Av Mail (this is Jean, Jean-Michel’s father)
    1972-1978 1979	Trogneux J-M. confis – Blangy-Tronville – Av Mail
    1981 1982 1983	Trogneux Jean-Michel – Beauvais – 4 r Saint Pierre
    1982 1983-1988 1989	Trogneux Jean-Michel – La Neuville-sur-Oudeuil – r Boulanger
    2002 2003-2005…	Trogneux Jean-Michel – Amiens – 14 rue des Vergeaux

    The presence of Jean-Michel Trogneux in La Neuville on the directory does not mean that he lived there from 1983 to 1988. We can try to reconstruct the chronological sequence of events :

    • In 1982, all is well in the couple. Jean-Jacques has just been born, another child is envisaged, it is necessary to expand, the couple settles in La Neuville and this appears in the directory of the following year, 1983.
    • In 1984, after the birth of Valerie, the second child, everything spoils. Jean-Michel leaves his wife and children and goes to live in Truchtersheim with the children he had from another woman. A divorce procedure is then initiated, which will be completed in 1987. In the meantime Mrs. Trogneux and the Trogneux children keep the Trogneux entry in the directory.
    • Jean-Michel’s wife is found in the telephone directory of the Somme, in Amiens, in 1986 and 1987, under the name of Véronique Trogneux, at 14 rue André Chénier (extract 1987), neither before nor after (or then under her name of Véronique Dreux ?). So it was in 1985, as her divorce approached, that she would have moved to Amiens, perhaps alternatively, as she would also live in La Neuville.
    • In 1987, after the June 17 divorce, Mrs. Trogneux, probably back to being Mrs. Dreux, moved (perhaps even earlier), but was slow to change the directory, which in 1988 still kept the Trogneux entry on La Neuville.
    • As of 2008, she is manager of a real estate company in Propriano (Corsica) (link).
    
    André Chénier Street is an extension of Delpech Street, not far from La Providence and next to the nursery school
    André Chénier. On the right, in front of the building of n°14, is a van “Jean Trogneux”… [Google Street photos]
48. (A) Fictions and Realities of the 1974 Marriage, Part 2 of 2August 26. The mystery of the strange 1974 wedding continues to unravel. We had come to the point in Appendix A 43 of untangling the real from the fake, the real rubbing shoulders with the fake. Two new elements have since emerged that allow for a more precise approach. The first is presented in Chapter 29, it is the notarized deed of March 1985 where both Jean-Michel Trogneux and his sister Brigitte, for the last time reincarnated by Brigitte born Auzière, are present before her disappearance. The notary, who had already acted the marriage of 1974, Maître Hervé Laudren, recognizes it well.Next, we discover that the wedding of André Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux was also posted in the newspaper “La Voix du Nord” of June 30 – July 1, 1974, at least in two editions : that of Boulogne sur Mer (page) and that of Montreuil sur Mer (page), with the same photo, but a slightly different presentation from that of the “Echos du Touquet” (Appendix A 9) :
    This expanded publication is not surprising, we saw in Appendix A 43 the ostentation of this show-off wedding. This time, the first names of the bride and groom are given in the title and we learn, a very significant detail, that the religious union was pronounced by Abbé Herreman who came from Amiens, no doubt the one from the Trogneux family, very sympathetic, to the point of probably becoming an accomplice to this fabricated marriage. The witnesses of the groom, Jacques Naudy and Georges Costes, are from the family-in-law of Jean-Louis Auzière, his wife Renée Costes being the daughter of Louis Costes and Joséphine Naudy. They do not know Brigitte born Auzière, niece of Jean-Louis, and are probably not aware of the deception that transformed her into Brigitte born Trogneux.The publication of the 1974 wedding photo was thus much wider than first thought. This does not call into question that the photo was altered (Appendix A 9), but there is now reason to wonder whether this fakery could be only anecdotal, caused by a contextual difficulty, for example of not having been able to get the people in the photo together, or because one of them had a disturbing pose… Because the wide diffusion increases the risks of recognition. For example, the notary might not recognize the bride who came to see him for the marriage contract. And if Monique was the bride of the photo, she would also risk to be recognized. It now seems likely that the bride in the photo is Brigitte born Auzière herself.

     

    The probable mother of the three Auzière children.

    Now we know why the 2007 wedding could only be celebrated in Le Touquet, with that mayor ! [reprise of a article from Gala 2020] For her second wedding, she chose the same venue as for her first wedding, Le Touquet, the same wedding hall. […] And it is the same mayor who officiates. “This choice troubles me,” writes Sylvie Bommel. “Why expose yourself in this way to perilous rapprochements ?” For her part, Marie Huret, author, with Renaud Dély, of another book on the couple, “Les Macron du Touquet, Elysée-Plage” returns to this “nuptial recurrence”, once again told in the columns of Gala magazine, on newsstands Wednesday, June 3. “Transgression or nose-thumbing to the past ?“

    

    Betaface comparison: from 74% to 61%. In Appendix B 3, the comparison of Brigitte Macron with her children ranges from 77 to 66 percent. On the right is Pierre Herreman, Jesuit, chaplain at the Lycée “La Providence” and a member of the leadership team.

    Other reasons can be given to explain the trickery of the photo. For example the absence of the parents of the fictitious groom André Louis, who are the brother, Louis, and the sister-in-law, Renée Costes, of the groom in the photo, Jean-Louis. But the simplest explanation is probably the best: the photographer was a demanding professional who wanted to have an ideal photo, composed from photos he did not like completely… Nothing indicates that the various elements of the image were not photographed on the same day. The general luminosity seems to be the same. We have given too much importance to the trickery of this photo. In the end, it would only be a photo arranged, as professionals of the time knew how to do. And then, to modify the characters would mean taking the risk that people, present at one of the ceremonies, would take offence. The affair was too well prepared, such a risk would not have been taken.

    As with the late 1954 family photo, which may have been retouched as well, one comes to the conclusion that, aside from anecdotal ciconstant retouching, the photo is truthful. The photographer took three or four pictures of the group. He wants everyone to be well positioned with a pleasant face, he takes a character from one pose to add it to another…

     

    Touching up photographic prints in the silver era was commonplace among professional photographers. Links : 1 2 3. So for the family photo from late 1954, Jean-Michel could have been absent at the time of the shot and could have been added thanks to a photo of him from the same time. And the little girl Brigitte could have had a bad pose and been replaced by an extract from another photo of the group. This remains, for our investigation, anecdotal, incidental …

    Complement. On January 26, 1974, at the age of 90, Marie-Louise Bertin, married Pujol, Jean-Michel Trogneux’s maternal grandmother, passed away. André Auzière is mentioned on the announcement, as the fiancé of Brigitte Trogneux. The engagement took place in 1973 or January 1974. One recognizes, already there, the side “m’as-tu-vu” of the marriage…

49. (A) The five Brigitte Trogneux and Auzière: one then fourThis Appendix was originally in position A 41 under the title “The five Brigitte Trogneux and Auzière, one then four“, created in late May 2022. It was rewritten in early September 2022, taking into account new developments in the investigation.According to our scenario, there would have been, involved in the brigittegate, in the sense of civil status and spoken language, five Brigitte Trogneux or Auzière, which were embodied by four people. As it is easy to mix the Brigitte, the following reminder can be welcome. It also allows us to detect links between them that have not been made explicit. Beware, however, that the reader may get dizzy.At the very beginning, it is simple, there are only two Brigitte, both born in 1953, for sure for the first, probably for the second :
    1. 1953-1961, Brigitte born Trogneux born in Amiens, younger sister of Jean-Michel Trogneux, died early 1961. She is Brigitte No. 1.
    2. 1953-2019, Brigitte born Auzière, probably born in Eséka in Cameroon, niece of Jean-Louis Auzière, had three children with Jean-Michel Trogneux from 1975 to 1984, then slipped away, as if disappeared. Her date of death could be that, in 2019, of her fictional twin André Louis Auzière. She is Brigitte No. 2.

    We can consider that the Brigitte n°2 appears in this story because of the death of the n°1. Around 1973, Jean-Michel Trogneux remains indeed affected by the death of his younger sister, to the point of being very attracted by the Brigitte. This first name is a criterion of choice, among others, since he will later marry a Véronique. He did not want to marry this Brigitte n° 2, Auzière, who thus did not become Mrs. Brigitte Trogneux.

    As soon as Brigitte No. 1 died, things got complicated: her family kept her alive artificially. As long as it is by word of mouth, or even by written documents, it can still go. But it becomes difficult in 1974, when a Brigitte n°3 appears. Attention! We attack the hardest:

    3. 1974-1985, Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux. A subterfuge allows Brigitte n°1 to be officially married to an imaginary husband, André Louis Auzière (Appendix A 43). Brigitte n°2 is the centerpiece of this artifice : she agrees to fully renounce her true identity and to assume, as far as possible, that of Brigitte n°1, daughter of Jean and Simone Trogneux. In exchange, of course, for some gratuities… She becomes Brigitte n°3, equal to Brigitte n°1 + Brigitte n°2 = Bri-Bri. Appearing in 1974, this Brigitte n°3 will make a last appearance in March 1985 for a notary act (Chapter 29). Then, she becomes… We don’t know… Maybe a Brigitte Mystery…
    4. 1984-now, Brigitte Auzière, then Trogneux, then Macron, née Trogneux. In 1984, Jean-Michel (J-M), becomes a woman under the identity of his sister. At the same time, of father of his three children Auzière, he becomes their mother, Brigitte n°2. Thus Brigitte n°4 is J-M + Brigitte n°1 + Brigitte n°2 = Jean-Bri-Bri. For the Trogneux grandparents, Jean and Simone, it does not matter that the children of Brigitte n°3 became those of Brigitte n°4, since they always considered them as the children of Brigitte n°1. Do you follow ?

    So we have a Brigitte No. 4 who did not get married in 1974, since she did not exist yet, but who, in 1984, found herself administratively transformed into this bride, Brigitte No. 1 ! Raymond Devos would relish such a situation… Until the 2006 divorce, Brigitte #4’s commonly used name was her married name, Brigitte Auzière. In 2006, divorced, she became Brigitte Trogneux, by her civil status name (of “young boy”, in this case) n°1. Then, in 2007, because of the primacy of the name of “married woman”, she becomes Brigitte Macron. Hiding her identities J-M and Brigitte n°2, she makes believe that she is only Brigitte n°1.

    We are then in full excitement: it is the same person, Brigitte n°1, deceased, that we have revived through two successive identity usurpations, Brigitte n°3 then n°4. And this last one is a man! Worse: this man is neither the groom of the marriage act of 1974, nor the bride! He is, administratively, neither the father nor the mother of her three children. He embodies at the same time his deceased sister and the disappeared mother of his children: the Brigitte n°4 is the continuation of the Brigitte n°1 and n°2. Only the close members of the Trogneux family who have known these antecedents know it. And they keep it quiet.

    Let’s finish, resting our brains, with the case of Brigitte n°5, which is, him, simple and banal :

    5. Now, Brigitte Trogneux née Poillion. She is the wife Jean-Claude Trogneux, the brother of Jean-Michel.

    As for Brigitte n°2, we can say that n°5 is, also, somewhat related to n°1. Jean-Claude could, him also, be very marked by the death of his little sister Brigitte n°1. He too may have been attracted to women with this name. There also with measure, since his first wife was named Danièle.

    We thus realize that the first of these five Brigitte could have brought in this story the four others. This whole story comes from the refusal of the Trogneux parents to accept the death of their youngest daughter. A butterfly effect…

    
    Two signatures from Brigitte #3 Bri-Bri (1980 and 1985), then two more from Brigitte #4 Jean-Bri-Bri (2007 and 2017)
    and one from Brigitte #5. Of the first two Brigitte’s, we have no handwritten record.
    Since we’re in handwriting, let’s compare, on the left, the handwriting of Jean-Michel Trogneux, in the March 27, 1985 deed, seen in Chapter 30, with the handwriting, on the right, of Brigitte Macron in 2017, shown in Appendix A 39. The resemblance is not striking, nor is the dissimilarity. Some letters appear quite close, others different. 32 years separate these two samples, very small, with distant contexts. Jean-Bri-Bri could have worked on a distinct handwriting, and indeed he did, as most of us know how to do : the left handwriting is scribal, the right one is cursive, or semi-cursive. Could a graphologist give an opinion ?
50. (A) Politics: from Deprez to Macron via the TrogneuxWe’ve talked a lot about Jean-Louis Auzière and the help he gave to his friend Jean-Michel Trogneux. Another support was essential, that of a great friend of his father Jean Trogneux: Léonce Deprez. We are going to see that the influence of this last one was much more extended than the two essential “boosts” of his part which legitimized the marriages of 1974 and 2007. The first one allowed the Trogneux parents to have, from 1975 to 1984, three grandchildren of their daughter who died in 1961 (yes, we can see it from this angle) and the second one allowed them to have, in 2017, a son-in-law who is President of the Republic. Not bad, as “coups de pouce”… This could only be done by cheating: the bride of 1974 noted on the civil status was deceased and the official bride of 2007 was the same, still deceased, and, this time, physically represented by a man? Which, at the time was illegal.
    Leonce Deprez in 1978, four years after the 1974 wedding, and in 2005, two years before the 2007 wedding.
    Photos MaxPPP (link) and WikiPasdeCalais (link).
    Léonce Deprez, born in 1927, who died in 2017, signed there two sacred feats, he who, in his youth, had signed others, of a sporting nature. Goalkeeper of the soccer team at the Helsinki Olympics in 1952, he was previously, pre-war, a renowned tennis player, alongside Jean Trogneux (Appendix A 28). This is where their complicity begins. They meet regularly in Le Touquet. While Jean will remain, at the chocolate factory in Amiens, in the family tradition, Léonce, director of a printing company, will take a broad political scope. That his page Wikipedia presents it thus : “Elected first deputy mayor of Le Touquet-Paris-Plage in 1965, he was elected mayor in 1969 and remained so until 1995. Elected deputy of Pas-de-Calais in 1986 and re-elected until 2007, he is secretary of the National Assembly and secretary of the economic affairs committee. President of the tourism study group, he was appointed in 1994 to the Minister Bernard Bosson for the development of the 4-season tourist economy. He was a member of the Nord-Pas-de-Calais regional council from 1986 to 2002, vice-president between 1992 and 1998 and president of the planning and regional development commission from 1994 to 2001. Finally, he was again mayor of Le Touquet-Paris-Plage between 2001 and 2008.”

    Le Touquet-Paris-Plage, a seaside resort with 4,300 inhabitants, welcomes up to 250,000 people in the summer. On the left, the Westminster Hotel, where the guests of the 1974 wedding (link) and those of the 2007 wedding (“champagne à flots,” link) met (photo from the page Wikipedia of Le Touquet). In the center, the villa Brigitte Macron inherited is called Monejan (link), after the first names of her parents Simone and Jean… … and after Jean Monnet, who gave his name to the main avenue of Le Touquet (it is colored in yellow, the villa Monejan is at the top left, the beach is below, Google Map)

    The policy advocated by Léonce Deprez was Europeanist and globalist, in the wake of Jean Monnet (1888-1979), under American influence (link). In 2014 on a article (link) on his blog, Léonce Deprez called for “European governance and, beyond that, “global governance,” in short, for a kind of Great Reset… With an unintentional dash of humor  for him, the goal was to stop elected officials who “continue to pursue their political careers, that is to say, to think obsessively about themselves, rather than about the French,” a cross into which Léonce himself as well as Emmanuel have fallen, that of politicians clinging to power. The last article on his blog, from February 18, 2015, is entitled “Courage Emmanuel !“, as a sort of passing of the baton to the then new Minister of Economy…

    This continuity in the policies defended by Jean Monnet, from Léonce Deprez to Emmanuel Macron, passed through the Trogneux. We have already seen Brigitte Macron’s influence on her husband’s “and at the same time” policy (Chapter 27 and Appendix D 22) and on his propensity to use, as he did, accusatory inversions. She is the one who shaped Emmanuel’s political identity, starting when he was 15. She is the first one who pulls the strings, which is confirmed by numerous testimonies and multiple magazine covers, as the illustration in this file shows. She may have been the one who blew her husband’s mind on the new name of his political party, “Renaissance,” taking the call from a article (link) by Léonce Deprez on his blog.

    Other than these strong influences, other more discreet supports have facilitated Macron’s political career, again through Brigitte and the Trogneux. We have seen his ties to the Jesuits at the college-lycee of Providence, notably Abbé Herreman who was present at the 1974 wedding (Appendix A 48), and his ties to parents from “the upper” at the Lycée Franklin in Paris (Chapter 16). Many clues also lead to the Freemasons, perhaps through Léonce Deprez. Their mania for secrecy is such that it is tricky to move in this direction without being considered conspiracists (like this article from La Dépêche). In addition to the symbol of the Louvre pyramid, the official portrait of President Macron is full of symbols that leave no doubt : posture of verticality with the two pillars formed by the arms and, above all, two Masonic symbols arranged on each side and, each time, doubled : the rooster and its reflection and the clock with a double dial. “In the reflection cabinet, when the layman looks up, he sees this rooster, a solar symbol, which will announce the end of his eternal night and the triumph of light over darkness” (link). Also notable is the presence on the desk of Emmanuel Macron of a rough stone and a cube topped by a pyramid or “cubic stone with a point” which are Masonic symbols (“It is customary in some lodges to place two stones near the lodge board, one of them roughly squared, the other cut into the shape of a cube“) (link). We’ve also talked several times in this file, including in Appendix A 45, about the Geneanet base of the Freemason association La Fraternelle, a strong supporter of the “legend” Brigitte Macron. If Young Global Leader Macron (Appendix D 5), in his rise, had strong supporters across the Atlantic, he had strong ones in France, too.

    
    Emmanuel Macron and Freemason symbolism. It’s not exactly discreet…
51. (A) When Brigitte buys with Jean-Michel’s money…November 13, 2022. We learned at the end of last August, in Appendix A 47, that Jean-Michel Trogneux and Véronique Dreux lived in 1983 in a villa at 10 rue Boulanger in La Neuville-sur-Oudeuil. We now learn that the two spouses were the owners, the deed of sale being dated July 27, 1982. Their divorce was taken into account on July 6, 1988, with a division attributing to the husband a much larger share than to the wife. On December 19, 1990, the sale was recorded. This is how Jean-Michel Trogneux recovered a large sum of money.In the Appendix A 30, we saw that on the phone books, André Auzière and his wife Brigitte Trogneux lived in Amiens at 17 rue Saint Simon from 1991. Brigitte Trogneux, with her husband André Louis Auzière and with the guarantee of the Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur, which is dear to the Auzières, bought this house on June 29, 1991. The house was resold in 2002, Brigitte then lived in 2003 and 2004 at 66 bis rue Boucher de Perthes in Amiens (according to telephone directories), before joining Emmanuel Macron in Paris. Where did the large sum of money for the purchase of 1991 come from?
    The header of a statement from the sale of Jean-Michel’s house…
    …and the header of a statement of the purchase of Brigitte’s house, eight months later.
    

    In 1984/1985, Jean-Bri-Bri had changed his residence, leaving his house in Neuville-sur Oudeuil (left), also leaving his wife of 1980 and their two children, to live in Truchtersheim with the three Auzière children from the arranged marriage of 1974. After the divorce in 1987, he sold the house in Neuville in 1990 to buy in 1991 a house in Amiens (right) that he came to live with his three children Auzière.

    There is little doubt that it is the money obtained by Jean-Michel in the sale of his house in Neuville-sur-Oudeuil that was used for the purchase by Brigitte of the house in Amiens, six months later. This is “normal” when we know that Jean-Michel and Brigitte are the same person. It is “abnormal” and probably even “criminal” when one considers that Jean-Michel and Brigitte are two administratively distinct persons. How did the money go from one to the other?

    There is, there, a new proof, or at least a very convincing clue, that Jean-Michel and Brigitte are the same person. But the deaf, blind and dumb will remain so…