Eric Zuesse – Proof that America’s “Deep State” Exists and Controls the Government

22 december 2019Businessplan, Home, Interview, Locatie, Media, Video, Zuesse0

The readers at the international-news site South Front tend to be technologically far more knowledgeable about the internet than most people (including myself) are, and so their responses to a news-report that I did on December 17th, titled “Former NSA Tech Chief Says Mueller Report Was Based on CIA-Fabricated ‘Evidence’” (https://southfront.org/former-nsa-tech-chief-says-mueller-report-was-based-on-cia-fabricated-evidence/), not only corrected a misspelling of a particular spoken acronym (my “PHAT” there should have been spelled “FAT”) but they also explained some technological details which enable a deeper understanding of how the CIA had perpetrated the ‘Russiagate’ hoax that Robert Mueller in his report as the U.S. Special Counsel had asserted to be a “Russiagate” fact (i.e., Mueller’s allegations that the Russian Government had hacked computers of the Democratic National Committee). Especially informative there was this reader-comment, which comes from one of the world’s leading experts on cyber technology, Luke Herbert-Hansen (https://www.linkedin.com/in/lukeherbert/?originalSubdomain=dk):

Luke Herbert-Hansen (https://disqus.com/by/lukeherberthansen/) Peter Jennings
Well FAT may not [be] a common OS file system anymore, but it is still widely used on various removable media such as a USB sticks.

As everyone knows who has been closely following the most-reliable evidence regarding the question of how DNC emails had been copied and supplied to WikiLeaks, there has been much credible, soundly-sourced, speculation that the DNC employee Seth Rich had physically copied the data from a computer there onto a thumb drive (or “USB stick”), which then was picked up in the U.S. by a WikiLeaks agent, who physically delivered it to Julian Assange at London’s Ecuadorean Embassy. The great independent investigative journalist (virtually barred since 2007 from being published in the U.S. anymore), Seymour Hersh, personally investigated the records of the murder of Seth Rich, both at the Washington DC police and at the FBI, and this is from the transcript I had made (https://off-guardian.org/2017/08/07/seymour-hersh-cracks-russiagate-as-cia-planted-lie-revenge-against-trump/) of his statement in a Web-posted phone-call [my boldfaces for emphasis]:

(2:50-) At some time in late spring, which we’re talking about in June 21st, I don’t know, just late spring early summer, he makes contact with Wikileaks, that’s in his computer, and he makes contact. Now, I have to be careful because I met Julian [Assange] in Europe ten twelve years [ago], I stay the fuck away from people like that. He has invited me and when I am in London, I always get a message, ‘come see me at the Ecuadorean’ [Embassy], and I am fucking not going there. I have enough trouble without getting photographed. He’s under total surveillance by everybody.
They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC – and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ – whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later WikiLeaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER]. He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do. I mean you don’t have to be a whiz at IT [information technology], he was not a dumb kid. They got access to the drop-box. This is all from the FBI report. He also let people know with whom he was dealing, I don’t know how he dealt, I’ll tell you all about WikiLeaks in a second, with WikiLeaks the mechanism, but according to the FBI report, he shared his box with a couple of friends, so ‘If anything happens to me, it’s not going to solve your problem’, okay? I don’t know what that means. But, anyway, Wikileaks got access. And, before he was killed, I can tell you right now, [Obama’s CIA Director John] Brennan’s an asshole. I’ve known all these people for years, [John] Clapper is sort of a better guy but no rocket-scientist, the NSA guys are fuckin’ morons, and the trouble with all those guys is, the only way they’ll get hired by SAIC, is if they’ll deliver some [government] contracts, it’s the only reason they stayed in. With Trump, they’re gone, they’re going to live on their pension, they’re not going to make it [to great wealth]. I’ve gotta to tell you, guys in that job, they don’t want to live on their pension. They want to be on [corporate] boards like their [mumble] thousand bucks [cut].
I have somebody on the inside, you know I’ve been around a long time, somebody who will go and read a file for me, who, this person is unbelievably accurate and careful, he’s a very high-level guy, he’ll do a favor, you’re just going to have to trust me, I have what they call in my business, long-form journalism, I have a narrative, of how that whole fucking thing began.
(5:50-) It’s a Brennan operation. It was an American disinformation, and the fucking President, at one point when they even started telling the press – they were back[ground]-briefing the press, the head of the NSA was going and telling the press, the fucking cocksucker Rogers, telling the press that we [they] even know who in the Russian military intelligence service leaked it. All bullshit.

In other words, besides the information from Bill Binney, who was an NSA whistleblower who took early retirement so he wouldn’t have to continue doing what people such as John Brennan demanded, Seymour Hersh there provided yet additional confirmation to this account from the also-early-retired whistleblowing UK Ambassador Craig Murray – a close friend of Assange – who claimed that he had “met” the person in DC who supplied the thumb drive (USB stick), which then was delivered (he didn’t say how) to Assange (http://archive.is/H5QtI#selection-885.5-905.187):

Here is from my news-report on 6 January 2017 (https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-russian-hacking-how-the-leaks-from-clinton-and-the-dnc-happened/5566625) which confirms and documents that:

Murray received the Hillary-campaign information on September 24th. Little over a week later, on October 7th, WikiLeaks published documents from the computer of Hillary’s Campaign Chairman John Podesta, and politico announced it headlining “The most revealing Clinton campaign emails in WikiLeaks release” (https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/john-podesta-wikileaks-hacked-emails-229304). That same day, Politico also bannered “Podesta: ‘I’m not happy about being hacked by the Russians’” (https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/john-podesta-russian-hacking-229319) and the legend that ‘Russia hacked the Clinton campaign’ started immediately to compete in the day’s ‘news’ stories, and diminish focus on, the contents of that information which had been ‘hacked’.

However, the information from the DNC itself had been published much earlier, on July 22nd (https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/), and so this could not have come from the September 24th leak. Whether it came from the same person, or through the same courier (i.e., Murray), isn’t yet known [but it is now, from what Binney has just said (https://theduran.com/former-nsa-tech-chief-says-mueller-report-was-based-on-cia-fabricated-evidence/), and the answer is “yes”]. The Obama Administration has made no distinctions between those two data-dumps, but charges that all of the leaks from the Obama-Clinton-DNC conspiracy – both the anti-Sanders campaign during the primaries, and the anti-Trump campaign during the general-election contest – came from ‘Russian hacking’. The reason why the emphasis is upon the anti-Trump portion is that the conspirators now are trying to smear Trump, not Sanders, and so to make this a national issue, instead of only an internal Democratic-Party issue. They are trying to de-legitimize Trump’s Presidency – and, at the same time, to advance Obama’s aim for the U.S. ultimately to conquer Russia (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/12/americas-secret-planned-conquest-russia.html). The mutual hostility between Obama and Trump is intense, but Obama’s hatred of Russia gives added impetus to his post-Presidential campaign here. This Nobel Peace Prize winner had Russia in his gunsights well before he, as a cunning politician, made political hay out of Mitt Romney’s statement that “Russia, this is, without question America’s number one geopolitical foe” (http://rinf.com/alt-news/breaking-news/vicious-liar-trump-obama/).

Only a fool trusts the U.S. government (and the U.S. ‘news’media) after ‘Saddam’s WMD’ (http://rinf.com/alt-news/breaking-news/americas-news-is-heavily-censored/, which despite all the lies to the contrary, didn’t exist). Like Craig Murray said (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QG3V5MQzio), “I used to be the head of the FCO unit that monitored Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, and I know for certain, I can tell you, they knew there weren’t any.”

In my records, the politically progressive Craig Murray was the first individual to post to the Web a clear case that Russiagate was a U.S. Deep-State hoax: He headlined, on 31 December 2016, “Exit Obama in a Cloud of Disillusion, Delusion and Deceit” (https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/exit-obama-cloud-disillusion-delusion-deceit/), and discussed the case which now is commonly called “Russiagate.” In fact, I had never found any evidence that anything he has said was false, and – especially considering the sheer number of his postings at his blog (https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/) – this was a remarkable record of truthfulness (100%), which is attained by very few journalists, none of whom are publishable in the United States. These reporters are too honest, and too careful about the quality of the documentation they cite, to be publishable in the United States. They refuse to intentionally deceive their readers; and, to the exact contrary, they take great care never to deceive them (however, I unfortunately did finally see a posting (https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2019/12/indigenous-eurasian-islamic-populations/comment-page-1/#comment-913728) from him that included some false allegations).

Incidentally, my December 15th news-report, “Two Huge Suppressed News-Reports in a 3-Day Period Display Corrupt U.S.-&-Allied Mainstream Press” (https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Two+Huge+Suppressed+News-Reports+in+a+3-Day+Period+Display+Corrupt+U.S.-&client=opera&hs=7ZK&filter=0&biw=1355&bih=880), shows how pervasive and deeply systemic this outright lying by the U.S.-and-allied press is.

As to whom the individuals are who are America’s Deep State, that’s discussed here: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/understanding-deep-states-propaganda. In other words: the operatives (such as mainstream American journalists) are only agents for those individuals – they are not the Deep State itself. They can easily be replaced, but the Deep State is a far more deep-seated infection, in the American body-politic, and maybe cannot be removed, at all, without replacing the entire system. More-drastic measures than “reform” (https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/zuesse-why-second-american-revolution-necessary-entire-world) would therefore be needed, in order to eradicate the Deep State and restore whatever degree of democracy the United States formerly did have (it’s now a dictatorship, https://off-guardian.org/2019/02/18/how-americas-dictatorship-works/, in fact, that’s even been scientifically proven, http://archive.li/Kuuux). My research indicates that the Deep State took control of America starting on 26 July 1945 (http://archive.is/sKLQr).

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Dit delen:

Plaats een reactie Reactie annuleren