Eric Zuesse – Obama’s Guilt for Ukraine’s War

10 juni 2024Rob ScholteHome, Interview, Locatie, Media, Portretten, Ridderboek, Video, Zuesse0

Obama’s Guilt for Ukraine’s War

It was Well Encapsulated in This 10 Minute Compilation Video from 12 March 2014,

Storm Clouds Gathering – Ukraine Crisis, What You’re Not Being Told

Published 12 mrt 2014

StormCloudsGathering

The European and American Public are Being Systematically Lied To about the Ukraine Crisis.

Sources and Full Transcript https://stormcloudsgathering.com/posts/the-ukraine-crisis-what-youre-not-being-told/

Follow Us on Our New Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/scgnewsmedia/

Reacties
https://youtu.be/fWkfpGCAAuw?si=XXXbrfOK5ogdCZYE

Which Video is Also Archived Here and Here. That 10 Minute Documentary’s Only Error is at 22 Seconds in, Where Its Narrator said the Year “Two Thousand Thirteen” When he Obviously Meant to Say “Two Thousand Fourteen”, but, Otherwise than that, I have Verified the Authenticity and Correctness of Each One of its Many Sources and Allegations, and Find that It is the Best, Most Comprehensive, Brief, and Accurate, Single History of the 20 – 26 February 2014 Coup in Ukraine, Which has Yet Been Done.

It Shows Victoria Nuland, Whom Obama had Selected to Plan, Organize, Oversee, and Direct, the Coup in Ukraine, Instructing America’s Ambassador in Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, Whom to Get to Become Appointed to Take Over Control of Ukraine’s Government after the Democratically Elected President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, will Be Overthrown. That Phone Call from Nuland Occurred on 27 January 2014, A Month before Obama’s Coup There was Completed, and the Person Whom She Selected to Run Obama’s Government of Ukraine was the Rabidly Anti Russian Arseniy Yatsenyuk, or “Yats” as she Sometimes Referred to him in this Video, and he did Get the Appointment A Month Later.

Here is that Complete Phone Conversation, Which is Merely Excerpted in the 10 Minute Documentary,

Victoria Nuland & Geoffrey Pyatt – Leaked Phone Conversation (COMPLETE with SUBTITLES)

Published 30 apr 2014

Diddley Squat

WARNING

Profanity Victoria Nuland, Assistent Secretary of State for Europe, Phone Call to US Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, in A Phone Call Leaked to the News Media on 4 February 2014. Fuck the EU! What’s Really Important, Here is the Level of Planning for the Coup that Overthrew the Elected President Viktor Yanukovych, Which Brought to Power, as Heard on the Recording, A Group of Select Individuals Described as “Moderate Democrats.” In Fact, Most of Them, Including Oleh Tyahnybok, Whom Nuland Insists the New Head of State Consult Four Times Weekly, are A Far Right Nationalist Faction with Overt and Long Standing Ties to the Neo Nazi Movement. Meet the Characters in the Story that Led to What’s Called “The Worst Crisis since the Cold Cold War” and Which Russia Experts at American Universities Describe as A New Cold War More Dangerous than the First.

Reacties
https://youtu.be/WV9J6sxCs5k?si=LyTYnBYdR5Gxvnee

Archived at Here and Here,

And Here is My Transcript of It, Along with My Explanations of What She was Referring To and Why.

This Recorded Phone Conversation is the Most “Smoking Gun” Evidence that I Know of for Any Coup that has Ever Taken Place, and for This Reason and Also on the Basis of All of the Other Evidences on this Coup, I Agree with What the Founder and Head of the Stratfor ‘Private CIA’ Corporate Advisory Firm Said about the Matter, that It was “The Most Blatant Coup in History”. But Then, A Year Later, at the Website of A Former Convicted Wall Street Trader, he posted an Opinion Article to Which he Slipped In, As If It were an Aside, Mention that Though on “The Internet and Twitter (…), You will Find Me Saying the United States Staged the Most Blatant Coup in History,” and he Went on To Mis Represent What he had Actually Said, and he Then Alleged That he hadn’t Said That, and Then he Said that “It was No Coup,” It was Nothing More than “A Systematic Campaign to Saturate the Internet, the Russians Fed the Quote Back into Some Major Russian Print Publications, then Back onto the Internet, until It Resonated and Fed Back on Itself,” and, So, he Alleged that It was Just A Nothingburger, Which “The Russians” had Cooked Up. He Needed to Retain his Mega Corporate Customers.

On 4 November 2019, I headlined “The Obama Regime’s Plan to Seize the Russian Naval Base in Crimea”, and Provided my Latest Summary of, and Links to, the Evidences Regarding the Planning of Obama’s Coup in Ukraine, and of the Obama Regime’s Extensive Pollings of Ukrainians, and Especially of Crimeans, Both Before the Coup and After the Coup, and Noted the Polls’ Findings, Which Confirmed and Made Clear that the US Government couldn’t Go Public with their Poll Findings, because Those Findings were Entirely Consistent with the 16 March 2014 Russian Managed Pebiscite in Crimea, Which had Found that 95.6% of Crimea’s Voters had Marked the Option of “Join the Russia Federation as Federal Subject of Russia.” Although that Percentage was Slightly Higher than the Pollings that the US Regime had Commissioned, Which were Closer to 90%, Any Public Challenging of that Plebiscite on the Basis of these Poll Findings would Have Required the US Regime to Acknowledge that Both the US Polls and the Russian Plebiscite could Simultaneously Be Right, and, So, There was No US and Allied Publicity Given to Those Polls.

Furthermore, Any Such allegation, Challenging the Crimean Plebiscits’s 95.6% Figure, by the US Regime might Also Cause to Become Dredged Up Obama’s Plan, as Part of the Coup, for Russia’s Main Naval Base, Which since 1783 has Been in Crimea, to Become Replaced by Yet Another US Naval Base, the Only Part of Obama’s Plan That had Failed, Perhaps because Crimeans Overwhelmingly Despised the US Government, by A Margin of 76.2% “Negative” to 2.8% “Positive,” which is 96.3% Negative to 3.7% Positive, in the US Regime’s April 2014 Poll of Crimeans, So, It would Have Been A Hopeless Cause for Obama to Continue with that Part of his Plan, and to Challenge that 95.6% Plebiscite.

My 4 November 2019 Article Also Documented Obama’s, Nuland’s, Yatsenyuk’s, Plan to Kill Enough Residents in the Far Eastern Region of Ukraine, Which had Voted over 90% for Yanukovych, for the Population There to Become Either Exterminated or Else Terrorized by the US Imposed Regime, So that Enough of Yanukovych’s Supporters would Be Culled from Ukraine’s Electorate, around A Million of Them Fled to Russia, So as to Virtually Assure that Subsequently Elected National Leaders of Ukraine would Likewise Be Rabidly Anti Russian, Pro US Regime. This Ethnic Cleansing by the US Imposed Ukrainian Regime, was Likewise Documented in that Article.

So, This is How the War in Ukraine Actually Started. It Started in 2014, by Obama, Not by Putin, Such as the US Regime and Its Colonies Allege.

Even NATO’s Leader Jens Stoltenberg and Ukraine’s Leader Volodymyr Zelensky Deny the US Government’s Lie that the War in Ukraine Started on 24 February 2022 When Russia Invaded Ukraine, and Acknowledge that It Started Eight Years before That, in 2014, Stoltenberg Said, about This, “The War didn’t Start in 2022. The War Started in 2014.” Zelensky Said about It, “I Made A Point that the War in Ukraine has Been Lasting for Eight Years. It’s Not Just Some Special Military Operation.” So, the US Government’s Lie, such as US ‘Defense’, Offense, Secretary Lloyd Austin Expressed It, on 1 June 2024, is Rabidly False, that,

“In February of 2022, Russia’s Unprovoked Invasion of Ukraine Shocked the World, and This Region [Singapore]. And Since Then, Putin’s War of Aggression has Provided Us All with A Preview of A World that None of Us would Want. It’s A Glimpse of A World Where Tyrants Trample Sovereign Borders, A World Where Peaceful States Live in Fear of Their Neighbors, and A World Where Chaos and Conquest Replace Rules and Rights.

But Russia’s Lawless Invasion Also Reminds Us that Free Countries can Rally Together to Help the Victims of Aggression.”

That’s A Baldfaced Lie, Which Blames Putin, Not Obama, for the War in Ukraine.

Similar Lies are Common in US and Allied ‘News’ Media, Such as,

“When Russian President Vladimir Putin Started the War in Ukraine, he Tried to Shift the Blame to NATO, Calling It the Instigator. He Argued that Russia had No Choice but to Defensively Launch the Invasion to Prevent NATO from Surrounding Russia from All Sides. Reality, of Course, was Different. NATO was A Defense Alliance in Retirement, Collecting its “Peace Dividend” from the Breakup of the Soviet Union. Most of its Members Maintained their Defense Spending Below their Shared Commitment.” Note that that Commentator calls this “NATO (…) Collecting Its ‘Peace Dividend’ from the Breakup of the Soviet Union”, as If All that Matters is Peace for the US Regime, and that Russia’s Authentic National Security Concerns to Protect Russia’s Citizens against A Possible US NATO Invasion, should Just Be Ignored, and that It says “NATO was A Defense Alliance in Retirement (…) from the Breakup of the Soviet Union,” though, in Fact, that Military Alliance Secretly Continued on the American Side after the USSR’s Warsaw Pact Military Alliance Ended in 1991, didn’t Ever Go into Any ‘Retirement’ when the Cold War on Russia’s Side DID End. So, That’s Not Actually A “Defense Alliance”, It is Very Clearly an Aggression Alliance, against Russia Itself.

And,

“Putin Started the War in Ukraine.”

And,

“In 2014, Putin Started the War in Ukraine by Annexing the Crimea.”

And,

“Putin Started the War in Ukraine and has Said Negotiations have Reached an Impasse, Without Slamming the Door on Them, but Before the War Started, Putin Presented The West with A List of Demands Including, Most Notably, A Halt to NATO Enlargement.”

Though the Second of the Two Sentences in that Last One is True, Nothing was Wrong with Putin’s Having Presented Those Demands at That Time, on 17 December 2021, as his Requirements for A Peaceful Settlement of the Ukraine Issue. Ukraine is the Only Country Whose Border is A Mere 317 Miles, Five Minutes of A Nuclear Missile’s Flying Time Away from Hitting The Kremlin and So Decapitating Russia’s Central Command. That is the Reason hy the US Regime has Wanted Ukraine So Much as to Risk WWIII over Winning It, as They Did, and Keeping It, as They Won’t, because the US Regime Demands to ‘Win’ WWIII, Not to Merely Avoid It. If They can’t Be N° 1 over the Whole World, They don’t Want Anything, They don’t Have Any “Plan B,” Yet, Unless It’s WWIII Itself. On 29 December 2016, I Headlined about “America’s Secret Planned Conquest of Russia”, Tracking that Plan, Now Called “Nuclear Primacy”, Back to At Least 2006 as Constituting the New MainStream View in the US Government, and, on 19 April 2023, I Headlined “US Nuclear War Strategy”, Tracking Even Farther Back, to 1981, When Nuclear Primacy, the Goal of Winning WWIII, First was Proposed to Replace the Pre Existing, but Still Dominant in Russia and China, “Mutually Assured Destruction” or “MAD,” View, that Nuclear Weapons Exist Only in Order to Prevent A WWIII, Not in Order to Win A WWIII, via Attaining and Using “Nuclear Primacy”.

If Obama had Not Wanted the War in Ukraine, then he wouldn’t Have Started It. He wouldn’t Have Hired People Such as Victoria Nuland to Get It Done. Maybe he had Gotten A Good Laugh Privately When he had Received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 before he had Achieved Anything in his Presidency. He, and Not Putin, Started the War in Ukraine. Under International Law, “The Aggressor” is Supposed to Be the Side that STARTED the War, Not the Side Which was Mortally Endangered by that Aggressor and Needed to Respond in the Way It Considered Existentially Necessary in Order to Respond Effectively To and Divert that Threat, That Danger, to One’s Nation’s Very Existence.

In this Case, it is Clear that the US Regime’s N° 1 Objective is to Control the Entire World, All Countries, Including Russia and China, and Iran, and Venezuela, and North Korea, and Any Other Hold Outs. In Russia’s Case, this Demand by the US Regime is So Extreme that It Placed A Requirement upon Finland for Finland to Allow the US to Position Its Nuclear Weapons in Finland in Order for Finland to Be Allowed to Become A NATO Member. Finland isn’t As Close to Moscow as Ukraine is, It’s 507 Miles Instead of Ukraine’s 317 Miles Away from The Kremlin, and, So, It Demanded Finland to Allow Its Nuclear Missiles and Finland said Yes. That Proves How Psychopathic the US Regime Actually is.

And One should Not Forget the Longstanding Post 1991 Lies by NATO about What It is,

“NATO is Not A Threat to Russia.”

“NATO has Tried to Build A Partnership with Russia, Developing Dialogue and Practical Cooperation in Areas of Common Interest. Practical Cooperation has Been Suspended since 2014 in Response to Russia’s Illegal and Illegitimate Annexation of Crimea, Ukraine, Which NATO will Never Recognise.”

“NATO is Not at War with Russia.”

But the Actual Fact is, and has Been since NATO’s Very Start in 1949, NATO has Always Been the Post WWII US Regime’s Main Military Alliance to Conquer Russia. For It to Have Continued after the Soviet Union Ended in 1991, is, and should Be Punished as, an Immense International War Crime. It is Simply WWIII Pushing to Happen. Why, Then, are Not the World’s Other Nations Demanding that NATO End,

Demanding, End NATO Now!

NATO has Terrorized All Decent Countries. They are Too Afraid to Condemn It Publicly. Similarly, for A Different Example, “Israel can Get Away with Mass Murder because the World’s Super Power, USA, Defends and Excuses Them of Accountability.”

The 14 November 2014 ARD German Government TV Network Broadcast Interview of Putin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdlXqyZHB9k became Removed by ARD when Germany’s Government Decided that It Wants to Go to War against Russia, Again, Reprising Hitler’s Operation Barbarossa, and So Broadcasting this Interview had been A Mistake. Therefore, Ever since At Least 12 March 2016, “This Video is Private.” has Resulted from that URL. However, Up until At Least 14 September 2015, It had Been Public, and was Therefore Fortunately Being Archived by Some of Its Viewers Online, So, Here It is, from an Archived Copy, of this Hostile, Pro US Regime, Anti Russia Government, Interview of Putin, about these Matters,

ARD | Günther Jauch – English, Exclusive ARD Interview with Russian President Putin, 17. November 2014

Published on Nov 17, 2014

In an Interview with ARD‘s Gunther Jauch, Russian President Vladimir Putin Presents his Views on the Ukraine Crisis and Defends Russia’s Actions.
http://www.daserste.de

10:55

JAUCH
For The West, this [Russia’s Annexation of Crimea] was A Clear Breach of International Law.

PUTIN
What’s the Question?

JAUCH
The Question is, Did You Underestimate the Reaction of The West? (…)

PUTIN
We Find this Reaction Absolutely Disproportionate. (…) When We’re Confronted with the Accusations that Russia has Violated International Law, I can Hardly Feel Anything but Astonishment. What is International Law? First and Foremost, It’s the Charter of the United Nations. (…) A Vivid and Fresh Precedent was Set in Kosovo.

JAUCH
You Mean the Judgment of the International Criminal Court, with Respect to Kosovo, Which said that Kosovo had the Right to Self Determination, and that the People of Kosovo could Vote on Whether They Wanted to Have Their Own State or Not?

PUTIN
Exactly So, but There’s More to It than That. The Most Important Thing Mentioned There was That In Terms of Self Determination, People Populating A Certain Area are Not Obliged to Ask the Opinion of the Central Authorities of the State Where They are Resident. There’s No Need to Have Permission from the Central Governmental Authorities, in Order to Take the Necessary Steps to Self Determination. This is the Most Crucial Point, and Nothing that Transpired in Crimea was Any Different from that Which Happened in Kosovo. I am Deeply Convinced that Russia has Not Violated Any International Laws. I am Very Open about This. It’s A Fact, and We’ve Never Concealed It. (…) Besides, What is Democracy? You and I Know Very Well, What does Demos Mean, It means People. Democracy means the Rule by the People. In Our Case, it’s the People’s Right to Be Independent.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150914075634/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdlXqyZHB9k

Earlier in It was,

8:32

JAUCH
There was an Agreement [between the National Government and the Maidan Demonstrators, on 20 February 2014] Which Called for National Conciliation and A National Government. This Agreement Lasted About 24 Hours and Then was Dead. You Followed the Events of the 21st of February Very Closely. Did You Talk with President Obama or Chancellor Merkel at the Time?

PUTIN
Yes. Indeed, on the 21st of February, It was Not Only the German Minister of Foreign Affairs Who Came to the Ukraine, to Kiev, but Also the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Poland and France. They Acted as Guarantors [Along with the EU’s Representative] for the Agreement between the Then President Yanukovych and the Opposition. They were Agreed that the Process should Be Carried Out Peacefully. They Signed This Document, this Agreement between the Authorities and the Opposition as Guarantors, and the Authorities Actually Thought that It would Be Executed Accordingly. And Indeed, I had A Phone Conversation with the President of the United States on the Same Evening [February 21st], and We Discussed this Problem in Exactly this Manner. However, the Next Day, A Coup took Place, Despite the Guarantees Given by the Western Powers [Obama’s Polish and French, and EU Minister of Foreign Affairs, Stooges], the Buildings of the Presidential Administration and the Government were Taken Over. In this Context, I would Like to Stress the Following, [10:00] Either the European Minister of Foreign Affairs [Baroness Catherine Ashton, Recorded Here in A Private 26 February 2014 Phone Call about this Matter] shouldn’t Have Signed the Paper and Guaranteed the Execution of the Agreement, or, Having Done So They should Have Insisted on Its Execution. Instead, They Distanced Themselves from It. Moreover, They Seem to Prefer Not to Remember the Agreement, As If It had Never Existed. I Think It’s Completely Wrong, and Even More So, It’s Counter Productive. [10:38]

https://web.archive.org/web/20150914075634/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdlXqyZHB9k

The US and Allied Line on Why Yanukovych was Overthrown was that he had Turned Down the EU’s Offer on 20 November 2013. But Actually, That was A Set Up Deal, Set Up to Be Rejected in Order for Nuland’s Plan Then to Go Directly into Action. As I Headlined on 27 March 2015, “The $ 160 Billion Cost, Why Ukraine’s Viktor Yanukovych Spurned EU’s Offer, on 20 November 2013”. Even Earlier than That, Putin had Explained This to the Russian People, though Without Mentioning the $ 160 Billion Bottom Line Price Tag for Ukraine to Enter the EU,

On 5 June 2014, Less than A Half Year after Obama had Grabbled Ukraine and Started the War there, Putin did an Interview about the Ukraine War, on Russia’s Voice of Russia Channel. It was Broadcast the Next Day, Headlining “Russia Never Annexed Crimea, No Plans to Intervene in Ukraine, It’s A Western Delusion, Putin”.

Here are Highlights,

On What Happened in Ukraine

Vladimir Putin
There was A Conflict and that Conflict Arose because the Former Ukrainian President Refused to Sign an Association Agreement with the EU. Russia had A Certain Stance on this Issue. We Believed It was Indeed Unreasonable to Sign that Agreement because It would Have A Grave Impact on the Economy, Including the Russian Economy. We have 390 Economic Agreements with Ukraine and Ukraine is A Member of the Free Trade Zone within the CIS. And We wouldn’t Be Able to Continue this Economic Relationship with Ukraine as A Member of the Free Trade Zone. We Discussed This with Our European Partners. Instead of Continuing the Debates by Legitimate and Diplomatic Means, our European Friends and Our Friends from the United States Supported the Anti Constitutional Armed Coup. This is What Happened. We did Not Cause this Crisis to Happen. We were Against this Course ofEevents.

The Pint is No One should Be Brought to Power through an Armed Anti Constitutional Coup, and this is Especially True in Post Soviet Space where Government Institutions are Not Fully Mature. When It Happened, Some People Accepted the Regime and were Happy about It, while Other People, Say, in Eastern and Southern Ukraine, Just won’t Accept It. And It is Vital to Talk with the People Who didn’t Accept this Change of Power Instead of Sending Tanks, as You said Yourself, Instead of Firing Missiles at Civilians from the Air and Bombing Non Military Targets.

On Russian Troops in Ukraine

The Interviewer Told the Russian President that the United States Claimed They had Evidence that Russia had Intervened in the Conflict by Sending Troops and Weapons.

Vladimir Putin
Proof? Why don’t They Show It? The Entire World Remembers the US Secretary of State Demonstrating the Evidence of Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction, Waving around Some Test Tube with Washing Powder in the UN Security Council. Eventually, the US Troops Invaded Iraq, Saddam Hussein was Hanged and Later It Turned Out There had Never Been Any Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq [Ever since 1998]. You know, It’s One Thing to Say Things and Another to Actually have Evidence. I will Tell You Again, No Russian Troops (…)

There are No Armed Forces, no Russian ‘Instructors‘ in South Eastern Ukraine, and There Never were Any.

On Whether Russia Wanted to Annex Ukraine and Tried to Destabilize the Situation There,

Vladimir Putin
We Never did That. The Ukrainian Government must Now Sit Down and Talk with Their Own People instead of Using Weapons, Tanks, Planes and Helicopters. (…)

On Crimea

Vladimir Putin
It’s A Delusion that Russian Troops Annexed Crimea. Russian Troops did Nothing of the Kind.

Russian Troops were in Crimea under an International Treaty on the Deployment of the Russian Military Base. It’s True that Russian Troops Helped Crimeans Hold A Referendum on Their (a) Independence and (b) Desire to Join the Russian Federation. No One can Prevent these People from Exercising A Right that is Stipulated in Article 1 of the UN Charter, the Right of Nations to Self Determination.

In Accordance with the Expression of the Will of People Who Live There, Crimea is Part of the Russian Federation and Its Constituent Entity.

I want Everyone to Understand This Clearly. We Conducted an Exclusively Diplomatic and Peaceful Dialogue, I Want to Stress This, with Our Partners in Europe and the United States. In Response to our Attempts to Hold Such A Dialogue and to Negotiate an Acceptable Solution, They Supported the Anti Constitutional State Coup in Ukraine, and Following that We could Not Be Sure that Ukraine would Not Become Part of the North Atlantic Military Bloc. In that Situation, We could Not Allow AHistorical Part of the Russian Territory with APre Dominantly Ethnic Russian Population to Be Incorporated into an International Military Alliance, Especially because Crimeans Wanted to Be Part of Russia. I am Sorry, but We couldn’t Act Differently. (…)

There are Basically No Russian Troops Abroad while US Troops are Everywhere. There are US military bases everywhere around the world and they are always involved in the fates of other countries even though they are thousands of kilometers away from US borders. …

On the Collapse of the Soviet Union

Vladimir Putin
We will Not Promote Russian Nationalism [Patriotism Yes, Nationalism No], and We do Not Itend to Rvive the Russian Empire. What did I mean when I said that the Soviet Union’s Collapse was One of the Largest Humanitarian, Above All Humanitarian, Disasters of the 20th Century? I Meant that All the Citizens of the Soviet Union Lived in A Union State Irrespective of Their Ethnicity, and After Its Collapse 25 Million Russians Suddenly became Foreign Citizens. It was A Huge Humanitarian Disaster. Not A Political or Ideological Disaster, but A Purely Humanitarian Upheaval. Families were Divided, People Lost their Jobs and Means of Subsistence, and had No Means to Communicate with Each Other Normally. This was the Problem.

Practically Everything that The West Alleges about the War in Ukraine is False. It’s Intentionally that Way, Not Due to Any Mere Negligence.

The Nobel Peace Prize Winner Barack Obama Deserves to Be Tried at the International Criminal Court for the International War Crime of Aggression. The Biggest Problem in this Regard is that No Sensible Definition of “Aggression” Yet Exists in International Law. At the End of that Article Linked To There, I Proposed A New Definition of the Term. One of My Longer Articles Explained the History behind that Immense Collective Failure. For Another Example of that Failure, How is Perpetrating an International Coup, Which in Reality is an International War Crime, and It was That against Iran in 1953, Chile in 1973, Ukraine in 2014, and So Many Others, Being Addressed in Current International Law? It’s Not, it is Instead Ignored. The International Criminal Court was Designed by Victor Countries against Victim Countries. It wasn’t Designed to Sustain Peace and Prevent War. It’s A Bad Joke. However, Historians Nonetheless have an Obligation to 100% Truth, Never to Falsify. In the US and its Colonies ‘Allies’, They Shirk that Obligation, because 100% Truth can Cripple their Careers. This is the Reality, No Matter How Much Historians in Some Countries, the Countries that Have Dominated the World for Far Too Long, might Publicly Deny It. Academic Scholarship is Profoundly Corrupted by this Reality.

The Latest Version of YouGov’s “World’s Most Admired” Pollings around the World is the “World’s Most Admired 2021” Version, and It is Headlined, “The Obamas Remain the World’s Most Admired Man and Woman”.

¶

Investigative Historian Eric Zuesse’s Latest Book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVI, Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about How America Took Over the World after World War II in Order to Enslave It to US and Allied Billionaires. Their Cartels extract the World’s Wealth by Control of Not Only their ‘News’ Media but the Social ‘Sciences’, Duping the Public.
Eric Zuesse blogs at https://theduran.com/author/eric-zuesse/.

https://ericzuesse.substack.com/p/obamas-guilt-for-ukraines-war

https://theduran.com/obamas-guilt-for-ukraines-war/

PDF
Catherine Ashton, Vice President European Commission, High Representative of the European Union, EU High Representative – Speech,Message to Maidan Protesters, 11 december 2013

Obama’s Guilt for Ukraine’s War

Storm Clouds Gathering – Ukraine Crisis, What You’re Not Being Told

Victoria Nuland & Geoffrey Pyatt – Leaked Phone Conversation (COMPLETE with SUBTITLES)

ARD | Günther Jauch – English, Exclusive ARD Interview with Russian President Putin, 17. November 2014

10:55

8:32

On What Happened in Ukraine

On Russian Troops in Ukraine

On Crimea

On the Collapse of the Soviet Union

¶

Dit delen:

Plaats een reactie Reactie annuleren