Prosecutorial Misconduct + Violation of Oath of Office + Treason in the Case Against Trump

As previously reported in Restored Republic, “A new Bombshell Document has destroyed the Manhattan DA’s Case against Trump. On Wed. 22 March Trump was set to be indicted, charged with a felony and set for arrest. Instead, the New York Grand Jury investigating Trump was dismissed after a 2018 letter surfaced from Michael Cohen’s lawyer. The letter was addressed to the FEC and declared that Cohen used his own personal funds to pay Stormy Daniels. The Trump Camp was not a party to the transaction and did not reimburse Cohen for the payment. The document was among close to 600 pages of evidence in favor of Trump that the DA had intentionally withheld from the Grand Jury investigating Trump. – It’s OVER.”

PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT

In jurisprudence, prosecutorial misconduct is “an illegal act or failing to act, on the part of a prosecutor, especially an attempt to sway the jury to wrongly convict a defendant or to impose a harsher than appropriate punishment.”

BRADY VIOLATIONS

Brady Violations result when exculpatory or impeaching information and evidence that is material to the guilt or innocence or to the punishment of a defendant is suppressed. The term comes from the 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, in which the Supreme Court ruled that suppression of evidence favorable to a defendant, who has requested it, violates due process

VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE

Michael Cohen’s lawyer confirmed that Cohen personally paid Stormy Daniels $ 130,000 out of his own personal funds. We are not talking about an insignificant amount of money here! Cohen who claimed that he was paying off Stormy Daniels on behalf of (his Client) Donald Trump, with Cohen’s own funds and without reimbursement arrangement from Trump or his campaign has the appearance of collusion. So, simply following the logic, we cannot help but wonder just exactly who was actually involved in the pay-off scheme? Was Michael Cohen actually trying to set Donald Trump up in an act of collusion with those who have already shown themselves to be enemies of Trump and intentionally collaborating with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg?

Michael Cohen was Donald Trump’s lawyer and had legal requirements as a fiduciary to Donald Trump, under his Oath of Office as an Attorney. Both Michael Cohen and Alvin Bragg, as attorneys, gave an Oath of Office to support and Defend the Constitution in all situations.

“A prerequisite of an attorney’s license is an inviolable promise that they will always support and defend the Constitution in all situations.”

“Every lawyer in the country must be sworn in and take their state’s oath of attorney. This ceremony may seem traditional and mundane, but it has never been more important. This oath binds each attorney to certain professional obligations and requires us, as lawyers, to faithfully uphold and support the laws of our state and our country.”

“The words in that oath are a mandate to all attorneys that they practice with professionalism, integrity, and respect. Each state’s oath varies in its wording, but they all require of us the same three duties:

(1)        To support the Constitution of the United States,
(2)        To faithfully discharge the duties of an attorney, and
(3)        To conduct oneself with integrity and civility.”

“As officers of the courts, lawyers are sworn to support the Constitution not just of the state in which they seek to practice, but above all, to support the Constitution of the United States. This promise is included first in every state’s attorney oath, and it is the most important promise that a new attorney will make. It commands an attorney to take action to ensure the supreme law of the land is followed and upheld. This promise is a burden on all lawyers—every lawyer must defend the US Constitution, in all ways, at all times.”
American Bar Association

“Any judge [or magistrate] who does not comply with his/her oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.”
Cooper versus Aaron, 358 US 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401, 1958

The public corruption (treasonous violations of the oath of office) discussed herein may well fall under The RICO Act, which focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes, which order others to do or assisted them in doing, closing a perceived loophole that allowed a person who instructed someone else to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because they did not actually commit the crime personally.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon the officers of the Court and Servants of We the People, to bring this out into the light of day and expeditiously restore law and order to the nation.

Treason in the Case Against Trump

18 US CODE § 2381  TREASON

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $ 10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

MISPRISION OF TREASON

Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary – accepted by four Acts of Congress – serving as commentary on Constitutional law, under the definition of “misprision” states a purpose of this Affidavit: “4. It is the duty of every good citizen, knowing of a treason or felony having been committed; to inform a magistrate. Silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavors to apprehend the offender, is a misprision.”  1 Russ.on Cr. 43; Hawk. P. C. c. 59, s. 6; Id. Book 1, c. s. 1; 4 Bl. Com. 119. You are hereby noticed of potential treason by this undersigned “good citizen”.

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. – 18 U.S. Code § 2382

There is ample evidence presented to show that these claims have plausible merit. The prosecution in concert with others have conspired to cause harm and have willfully sought the destruction of President Donald J. Trump’s God Given Rights of due process of law, which lies at the heart of this matter.

The Department of Homeland Security has a national campaign to raise public awareness of the signs of terrorism and terrorism-related crimes called, “If you see something, say something.”  Fairbanks’ appeals and actions leave a most important question before this court, “What good does it do, if no one responds?”

The violation of one’s oath of office is an act of treason and anyone having knowledge of the commission of treason, who conceals or does not, as soon as possible, disclose and make known the same is guilty of misprision of treason.

Source Unknown, Date Unknown, Original Link Unknown

Meer informatie
https://robscholtemuseum.nl/?s=Tom+Fairbanks
https://robscholtemuseum.nl/?s=Community+Support+Foundation
https://robscholtemuseum.nl/?s=Prosecutorial+Misconduct
https://robscholtemuseum.nl/?s=Violation+of+Oath+of+Office
https://robscholtemuseum.nl/?s=Treason+in+the+Case+Against+Trump
https://robscholtemuseum.nl/?s=Treason